18.11.2012 Views

Contents - IARC

Contents - IARC

Contents - IARC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vitamin D and Cancer<br />

young age at onset, and the occurrence of naevi (Whiteman et al.,1998) and many have a mutation in<br />

the BRAF proto-oncogene (Maldonado et al.,2003). In contrast, melanomas occurring on usually sun<br />

exposed sites tend to occur in older age, have a weaker association with the presence of naevi and<br />

are less likely to have BRAF mutations.<br />

Notwithstanding these limitations, the fraction of disease in the population (PAF) attributable to<br />

sun exposure has been estimated at 96% in males and 92% in females in the USA, by comparison of<br />

white and black populations (Armstrong and Kricker, 1993). Comparison of white populations in New<br />

South Wales, Australia, with ethnically similar populations in England and Wales gives a PAF of 89%<br />

(males) and 79% (females) (Armstrong and Kricker, 1993).<br />

3.5 Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)<br />

The evidence that sun exposure causes SCC is strong. In Australia and the USA, the incidence<br />

of SCC increases with proximity to the equator (Scotto and Fears, 1983, Giles et al.,1988). In the<br />

USA, the relationship with ambient UV measurements is strongest for SCC and weakest for<br />

melanoma (Armstrong and Kricker, 2001). SCCs occur almost exclusively on parts of the body that<br />

are the most heavily exposed to sunlight (Armstrong et al.,1997). Migrants from the United Kingdom to<br />

Australia have a substantially lower risk than native-born Australians and the risk decreases with<br />

increasing age at migration (English et al.,1998). People whose skin is sensitive to sunlight are at<br />

increased risk (<strong>IARC</strong>, 1992).<br />

Evidence from case-control studies of personal exposure generally shows that the risk increases<br />

directly with total exposure. Armstrong and Kricker (2001) performed a meta-analysis of existing casecontrol<br />

studies; the pooled relative risks comparing the highest versus lowest category of exposure<br />

were 1.53 (1.02–2.27) for total exposure, 1.64 (1.26–2.13) for occupational exposure, 0.91 (0.68–1.22)<br />

for intermittent exposure and 1.23 (0.90–1.69) for a history of sunburn. There is a paucity of wellconducted<br />

epidemiological studies from which a dose-response curve can be estimated with<br />

confidence.<br />

A randomised controlled trial of sunscreen use in Queensland showed a reduced risk for SCC in<br />

the sunscreen group (relative risk = 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.81)) (Green et al.,1999). Other randomised<br />

trials have shown that their use can prevent the appearance of new solar keratoses (likely precursors<br />

to SCC) and cause regression in existing solar keratoses (Boyd et al.,1995, Thompson et al.,1993).<br />

Most SCCs show mutations in the tumour suppressor gene tp53 that are consistent with the<br />

effects of sunlight in producing pyrimidine dimers in DNA (Wikonkal and Brash, 1999), and rats and<br />

mice exposed to sunlight or to artificial sources of UV light develop high numbers of SCCs (<strong>IARC</strong>,<br />

1992).<br />

3.6 Basal cell carcinoma (BCC)<br />

As for SCC, the incidence of BCC increases with proximity to the equator in Australia and the<br />

USA (Scotto and Fears, 1983, Giles et al.,1988). It is most common on anatomic sites usually<br />

exposed to sunlight, but is relatively more common than SCC on occasionally exposed sites<br />

(Armstrong et al.,1997). Migrants from the United Kingdom to Australia have substantially lower risk<br />

than native-born Australians and the risk decreases with increasing age at migration (Kricker et<br />

al.,1991). People whose skin is sensitive to sunlight are at increased risk (<strong>IARC</strong>, 1992).<br />

Evidence from case-control studies of personal exposure suggests that intermittent exposure is<br />

more important than chronic exposure. Armstrong and Kricker (2001) reported pooled relative risks<br />

comparing the highest versus lowest category of exposure of 0.98 (0.68-1.41) for total exposure, 1.19<br />

(1.07-1.32) for occupational exposure, 1.38 (1.24-1.54) for intermittent exposure and 1.40 (1.29-1.51)<br />

for a history of sunburn. The Queensland randomised trial of sunscreen showed no benefit for BCC<br />

(Green et al.,1999).<br />

Similar mutations in the tumour suppressor gene tp53 to those seen in SCC have been found in<br />

BCC (Ponten et al.,1997).<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!