29.06.2015 Views

Orientation reversal of manifolds - Universität Bonn

Orientation reversal of manifolds - Universität Bonn

Orientation reversal of manifolds - Universität Bonn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 3 Examples in every dimension ≥ 3<br />

For the chirality <strong>of</strong> the even-dimensional examples, we use the cup product<br />

structure in cohomology in a way which cannot be reduced to the intersection<br />

or linking form as in the simpler examples <strong>of</strong> Chapter 2.<br />

3.1<br />

Examples in every odd dimension ≥ 3<br />

Theorem 23<br />

In every odd dimension ≥ 3, there is a closed orientable manifold that does<br />

not admit a continuous map to itself with degree −1.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> such <strong>manifolds</strong> will be provided by mapping tori <strong>of</strong> n-dimensional<br />

tori T n = S 1 × . . . × S 1 . Although the base space S 1 and the fibre T n<br />

are amphicheiral, the fibration is twisted in a way that makes orientation <strong>reversal</strong><br />

impossible. We can exclude orientation-reversing maps by studying<br />

the endomorphisms <strong>of</strong> the fundamental group. Therefore, we first work out<br />

some properties <strong>of</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> groups which we will encounter as fundamental<br />

groups.<br />

Lemma 24<br />

Abelianisation is a right exact functor.<br />

Although abelianisation as a functor is left adjoint to the inclusion <strong>of</strong> abelian<br />

groups into all groups, the simple category-theoretic argument “left adjoint<br />

functors are right exact” only applies to abelian categories. Therefore, the<br />

exactness property is checked ad hoc.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Clearly, abelianisation is functorial. Consider the following commutative<br />

diagram, where the middle row is assumed to be exact and the columns<br />

are exact by definition <strong>of</strong> the commutator subgroup and abelianisation. The<br />

surjectivity <strong>of</strong> the map [B, B] → [C, C] follows from the surjectivity <strong>of</strong> B → C.<br />

1 1<br />

[B, B] [C, C] 1<br />

A B C 1<br />

∗<br />

A ab B ab C ab 1<br />

1 1 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!