7UYjG9RVg

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation • Assesses the options against the project goals, examining the direct and broader impacts • Transportation • Financial • Environment • Economic Development • Community • Focus on the metrics in those areas that aid decision making to compare options 36
Findings 1 RER Plus Option: • Attracts very little demand from Yonge Line and was not taken forward for full evaluation 2A Relief Line Short: • Delivers significant benefits to relieving the Yonge Subway and Danforth Subway • May eliminate or defer the need for major change to Bloor/Yonge Station 2B Relief Line Long: • Increases the benefits by attracting more demand from the Yonge Subway • High cost due to underground alignment and number of stations • Further study of the Relief Line Long is required to identify a preferred project concept considering reduced underground construction and fewer stations 2C Relief Line U: • Delivers about the same benefits to Yonge Subway as the Relief Line (Short) at a much higher cost 3 Surface LRT: • Attracts the least demand from the Yonge Subway • Adds demand to Danforth Subway 37
Page 1 and 2: Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS) R
Page 3 and 4: Recommendations It is recommended t
Page 5 and 6: Outline 1. Background 2. Understand
Page 7 and 8: A Regional Network YRNS • Relief
Page 9 and 10: Timeline Sept. 2013 Winter/ Spring
Page 11 and 12: City of Toronto Relief Line Project
Page 13 and 14: Understanding the Problem - Key Fac
Page 15 and 16: Capacity and Committed TTC Improvem
Page 17 and 18: Solutions Committed - TYSSE 2021 Ca
Page 19 and 20: The YRNS Base Case 2021 Capacity v/
Page 21 and 22: YRNS Future Scenarios • Scenarios
Page 23 and 24: Longer Term Longer term projects we
Page 25 and 26: Option 1: RER Plus Network • Enha
Page 27 and 28: Relief Line Options Option 2A: Reli
Page 29 and 30: Relief Line Options Option 2C: Reli
Page 31 and 32: Emerging Results Volumes AM peak ho
Page 33 and 34: Option Impact on Bloor-Danforth Sub
Page 35: Evaluation Strategic Case • An as
Page 39 and 40: Conclusions (cnt’d) • The City
Page 41: Recommendations Cont’d 2. Direct

7UYjG9RVg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?