Quality of Life in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - CNIB
Quality of Life in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - CNIB
Quality of Life in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - CNIB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a cl<strong>in</strong>ically significant change 41 . A measure may not be responsive <strong>in</strong> smaller<br />
samples over a shorter period <strong>of</strong> time, when less change might be expected<br />
to take place, if it cannot detect a change <strong>of</strong> only two l<strong>in</strong>es. It rema<strong>in</strong>s to be<br />
seen if the NEIVFQ is sufficiently responsive to detect twol<strong>in</strong>e vision loss.<br />
2.1.5 Visionspecific <strong>in</strong>dividualised quality <strong>of</strong> life measures: these<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigate the impact <strong>of</strong> vision impairment on QoL, exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g both impact<br />
and importance <strong>of</strong> each doma<strong>in</strong> on QoL and allow<strong>in</strong>g for variability <strong>in</strong> the<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> specific doma<strong>in</strong>s to <strong>in</strong>dividual respondents 42 43 . Impact and<br />
importance scores are multiplied to give weighted impact scores. The<br />
MacDQoL 42 44 measure <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> MD on QoL has two overview items<br />
(present QoL and MDspecific QoL) and 23 doma<strong>in</strong>specific items. It has been<br />
shown to differentiate between mild and moderate and mild and severe MD<br />
(measured by UK registration status: bl<strong>in</strong>d, partiallysighted or not registered)<br />
but, <strong>in</strong> common with visual function measures, not between moderate and<br />
severe. The overview items are also sensitive to severity <strong>of</strong> MD, the present<br />
QoL (generic) item less so than the MDspecific item, as would be expected.<br />
There are promis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dications <strong>of</strong> the MacDQoL’s responsiveness to change<br />
<strong>in</strong> a small sample (Mitchell, Wolffsohn, Woodcock et al, manuscript <strong>in</strong><br />
preparation), and this warrants <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong> a larger study. Measur<strong>in</strong>g both<br />
the impact and the importance <strong>of</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> life to QoL leads to<br />
considerable variability <strong>in</strong> scores and so correlations between the MacDQoL<br />
and measures <strong>of</strong> vision such as VA or contrast sensitivity may not be as large<br />
as those between VA and visual function e.g. MacDQoL average weighted<br />
impact score correlates 0.45 with better eye distance VA 42 , NEIVFQ distance<br />
vision score correlates 0.65 with better eye distance VA 38 This latter<br />
correlation is perhaps not surpris<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce, for the NEIVFQ score and the<br />
12