06.07.2015 Views

Quality of Life in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - CNIB

Quality of Life in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - CNIB

Quality of Life in Age-Related Macular Degeneration - CNIB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a cl<strong>in</strong>ically significant change 41 . A measure may not be responsive <strong>in</strong> smaller<br />

samples over a shorter period <strong>of</strong> time, when less change might be expected<br />

to take place, if it cannot detect a change <strong>of</strong> only two l<strong>in</strong>es. It rema<strong>in</strong>s to be<br />

seen if the NEI­VFQ is sufficiently responsive to detect two­l<strong>in</strong>e vision loss.<br />

2.1.5 Vision­specific <strong>in</strong>dividualised quality <strong>of</strong> life measures: these<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigate the impact <strong>of</strong> vision impairment on QoL, exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g both impact<br />

and importance <strong>of</strong> each doma<strong>in</strong> on QoL and allow<strong>in</strong>g for variability <strong>in</strong> the<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> specific doma<strong>in</strong>s to <strong>in</strong>dividual respondents 42 43 . Impact and<br />

importance scores are multiplied to give weighted impact scores. The<br />

MacDQoL 42 44 measure <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> MD on QoL has two overview items<br />

(present QoL and MD­specific QoL) and 23 doma<strong>in</strong>­specific items. It has been<br />

shown to differentiate between mild and moderate and mild and severe MD<br />

(measured by UK registration status: bl<strong>in</strong>d, partially­sighted or not registered)<br />

but, <strong>in</strong> common with visual function measures, not between moderate and<br />

severe. The overview items are also sensitive to severity <strong>of</strong> MD, the present<br />

QoL (generic) item less so than the MD­specific item, as would be expected.<br />

There are promis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dications <strong>of</strong> the MacDQoL’s responsiveness to change<br />

<strong>in</strong> a small sample (Mitchell, Wolffsohn, Woodcock et al, manuscript <strong>in</strong><br />

preparation), and this warrants <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong> a larger study. Measur<strong>in</strong>g both<br />

the impact and the importance <strong>of</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> life to QoL leads to<br />

considerable variability <strong>in</strong> scores and so correlations between the MacDQoL<br />

and measures <strong>of</strong> vision such as VA or contrast sensitivity may not be as large<br />

as those between VA and visual function e.g. MacDQoL average weighted<br />

impact score correlates 0.45 with better eye distance VA 42 , NEI­VFQ distance<br />

vision score correlates 0.65 with better eye distance VA 38 This latter<br />

correlation is perhaps not surpris<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce, for the NEI­VFQ score and the<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!