08.07.2015 Views

Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of ... - PsychWiki

Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of ... - PsychWiki

Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of ... - PsychWiki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 P. Gaudreau, J.-P. Blondin / Psychology <strong>of</strong> Sport and Exercise 3 (2002) 1–34Table 6Means, standard deviations, and Cronbach’s index <strong>of</strong> internal consistency <strong>for</strong> appraisal, affective, coping, and socialdesirability variablesVariables M SD aAppraisal variablesPerceived relevance <strong>of</strong> competition a 17.09 4.75 0.797Sense <strong>of</strong> control a 14.39 3.14 0.826Perceived goal attainment b 11.66 3.62 0.893Affective variablesPositive affect c 37.09 6.69 0.867Negative affect c 19.76 6.07 0.799Cognitive anxiety-state d 16.48 4.83 0.817Somatic anxiety-state d 16.76 4.85 0.811Confidence-state d 24.05 5.56 0.848MCOPE subscales eInstrumental social support 2.26 0.94 0.786Behavioral disengagement 1.48 0.60 0.621Planning 2.83 0.92 0.815Suppression <strong>of</strong> competing activities 2.81 0.85 0.683Venting <strong>of</strong> emotions 1.76 0.86 0.896Increased ef<strong>for</strong>t 3.63 0.83 0.866Positive reappraisal 3.28 0.88 0.875Mental disengagement 2.12 0.84 0.807WOCQ subscales fDistancing/avoidance 1.73 0.51 0.607Confrontation/seeking social support 2.53 0.54 0.743Problem-focused 1.72 0.47 0.735Denial 1.90 0.48 0.331Social desirability g 13.36 3.67 0.669Note: means and standard deviations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MCOPE and WOCQ subscales are presented as per item scores t<strong>of</strong>acilitate comparison across variables. a N=306, b N=301, c N=147, d N=157, e N=108, f N=97, g N=96.tive state-anxiety, and somatic state-anxiety. These results are presented in Table 8. A final set<strong>of</strong> analyses concerned <strong>the</strong> relationship between ISCCS subscales and social desirability. Copingstrategies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ISCCS did not correlate significantly with social desirability.Differential validityThe purpose <strong>of</strong> this analysis was to examine <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> athletes’ level <strong>of</strong> expertise (i.e.international, national, provincial, or regional) and gender on <strong>the</strong>ir use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ISCCS coping strategies.A factorial multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (MANOVA), using <strong>the</strong> 10 coping subscalesas dependent variables and both <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> expertise and gender as independent variables, wasper<strong>for</strong>med. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> small number <strong>of</strong> males in <strong>the</strong> international athletes subgroup, nationaland international athletes were combined in a subgroup labeled ‘elite athletes’. There<strong>for</strong>e, anExpertise (3)×Gender (2) analysis was conducted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!