Productivity of the verbal inflectional classes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

162 Natalia Gagarinarule-governed mechanisms to derive (denominal) verbs. Thematic affixation is the nextbarrier in new verb creation. As we showed, thematic –i has the highest potentiality for verbderivation, and, thus, MC 3 has the highest possibility for realisation. There are only fewrestrictions on the applicability of the –i verb formation rule. Why, then, is the absolutemajority of loan and indigenous verbs are found in MC 2? There is one restriction in theapplicability of –i which plays an important role. Suffix –i cannot be attached to nouns endingin –cija. The overwhelming majority of loan nouns belong exactly to this group which, inturn, serves as the base for –(izir)ova suffixation.It seems that the two highest criteria of productivity have their own ‘priority’ for agiven verbal MC, e.g. the highest criterion a) for MC 3 (integration of the loan verbs), and,partially for MC 2. The next criterion b) may be applied only very specifically (MC 2). Andthe lowest criterion e), productive derivation from indigenous bases, participates in assigningverbs to all productive classes.ReferencesAlekseev, Dmitrij I. 1966. Abbreviatury kak novyj tip slov. In: Razvitije slovoobrazovanijasovremennogo russkogo jazyka, (eds.) Elena A. Zemskaja and Dmitrij N. Šmeljov, 13-37.Moskva: Nauka, AN SSSR.Aronoff, Mark 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Baayen, Harald 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook ofMorphology 1991, 109-149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Bahturina, R. V. 1966. Znachenije i obrazovanije otymennyh glagolov s suffiksom -0-/-i-(t'). In:Razvitije slovoobrazovanija sovremennogo russkogo jazyka, (eds.) Elena A. Zemskajaand Dmitrij N. Šmeljov, 74-112. Moskva: Nauka, AN SSSR.Belošapkova, Vera A. 1997. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Moskva: AzbukovnikBojarkina, V. D. 1993. Novaja glagol´naja leksika v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Avtoref.kand. dissert.Bricyn, Mikhail A. & Kononenko, Viktor I. 1983. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Kiev: Visca Škola.Ceytlin, Stella N. 1989. Detskaja rech': innovacii formoobrazovanija i slovoobrazovanija (namateriale sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. Habilitation. Leningrad.Ceytlin, Stella N. & Marina B. Eliseeva 1996. Govorjat deti. Slovar’-spravočnik. St.Petersburg:Niva .Čertkova, Marina Ju. 1996. Grammaticheskaja kategorija vida v sovremennom russkom jazyke.Moskva: MGU.Čertkova, Marina Ju. 2001. Dvuvidovyje glagoly kak zerkalo razvitija kategorii russkogo vida.Paper presented at the conference ‘Slavic aspect and lexicography’, Hamburg, 27.06-01.07.2001.Dressler, Wolfgang U., Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl, & Wolfgang U. Wurzel 1987.Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Dressler, U. Wolfgang & Katarzyna Dzuibalska-Kołaczyk 1997a. Polish inflectional classeswithin Natural Morphology. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 53: 95-119.Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1997b. On productivity and potentiality in inflectional morphology. vol.7: CLASNET Working Papers.Dressler, U. Wolfgang & Natalia Gagarina 1999. Basic questions in establishing the verb classesof contemporary Russian. In: Essays in poetics, Literary History and Linguistics.Festschrift V.V. Ivanov. (eds.) L.Fleishman et al. 754-760. Moscow: OGI..
Productivity of the verbal inflectional classes 163Dressler, U. Wolfgang & Mária Ladányi 2000. Productivity in word formation (WF): amorphological approach. Acta Linquistica Hungarica 47:103-144.Green, Jonathon 1992. New Words. A Dictionary of Neologisms since 1960-s. London:Bloomsbury.Isačenko, Aleksandr V. 1960. Grammaticeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii soslovackim. Bratislava: Slovackaja AN.Jakobson, Roman 1984. Russian and Slavic Grammar. Berlin, New York: de Cruyter.Karcevskij, Serge 1927. Système du verbe russe. Essai de linguistique synchronique. Prague.Kilani-Schoch, Marianne 1988. Introduction à la morphologie naturelle. Bern: Lang.Kotelova, Nadezda Z. 1971. Novoje v russkoj leksike: slovarnyje materialy. Moskva: AN SSSR.Kotelova, Nadezda Z. 1983. Novoje v russkoj leksike: slovarnyje materialy. Moskva: AN SSSR.Kotelova, Nadezda Z. 1989. Novoje v russkoj leksike: slovarnyje materialy. Moskva: AN SSSR.Kuznecov, P. S. 1952. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Morfologija. Moskva: MGU.Lekant, Pawel A. 1982. Sovremennyj russkij literaturnyj jazyk. Moskva: Vysšaja škola. [Levashov, Evgenij A. (ed.) 1984. Novyje slova i znachenija: Slovar'-spravochnik po materialampressy i literatury 70-h godov. Moskva: Russkij Jazyk.Marle, Jaap van 1992. The relationship between morphological productivity and frequency: acomment on Baayen's performance-oriented conception of morphological productivity.Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 151-163. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Matthews, W. K. 1960. Russian historical grammar. University of London: The Athlone Press.Miloslavskij, Igor' 1981. Morfologicheskije kategeorii sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. Moskva:Prosvešchenije.Morimoto, Yukiko 1999. Loan words and their implications for the categorical status of verbalnouns. Paper presented at the Twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Berkeley LinguisticSociety, Berkeley.Ožegov, Sergej I. 1989. Tolkovyj slovar' sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.Russakova, Marina V. & Sergej Sai 2001. Analogical levelling in the Russian aspectual ‘hyperparadigms’.Paper presented at the conference ‘Uniformity of Paradigm’, ZAS, Berlin, 9-10.03.2001.Sobin, Nicholas 1982. Texas Spanish and lexical borrowing. In: Spanish in the United States:Sociolinguistic aspects, (eds.) J. Amastae & L. Elias-Olivares, 166-181. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Švedova, Natalja Ju. 1980. Russkaja grammatika V 2-x tt. Moskva: Nauka, AN SSSR.Vinogradov, Viktor V. 1938/1972. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk (grammaticheskoe uchenie oslove). Moskva: Vysšaja škola.Walter, Harry 2001. Tendencii razvitija rechi russkoj molodjozhi. In: Sprachwandel desRussischen im Transformationsprozess am Ende des 20. und zu Beginn des 21.Jahrhunderts, (ed.) Ursula Kantorczyk, 215-227. Rostock: Universitaet Rostock.Wurzel, U. Wolfgang 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natuerlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Zemskaja, Elena A. 1997. Russkij jazyk konca XX stoletija (1985-1995). Moskva: Nauka, InstitutRusskogo Jazyka RAN.The American Heritage Dictionary (1982). Boston: Houghton Muffin Company.
Page 1 and 2: Published: (2002) in: Future Challe
Page 4 and 5: 156 Natalia GagarinaIn case of loan
Page 6 and 7: 158 Natalia Gagarina5 The three low
Page 9: Productivity of the verbal inflecti

Productivity of the verbal inflectional classes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?