Changing Framework of Local Governance and - Create

Changing Framework of Local Governance and Community Participation in Elementary Education9. ConclusionEducation of all children should be considered a shared social goal for all members of thecommunity and it is important to set up structures and interventions to get stakeholdersinvolved. These might include initiatives to improve physical infrastructure, developefficiency in educational services and improve educational quality, and should includecommunity members, as well as educational professionals. Indeed, both public response andpublic action are essential ingredients for the sustainable and continuous development ofeducation.... the virtuous circle of state intervention and public response is likely to beconsolidated as education levels among parents continue to increase rapidly in the nearfuture (PROBE, 1999:127).India has witnessed a wide range of reforms of educational governance over the last couple ofdecades. Most states have attempted to establish multilevel governance systems moving closerto the schools and redefining the roles and responsibilities for elementary education. Thispaper has described the process of these changes which differ in various states. In some statesthe local authority including the Panchayati Raj Institute is managing school education, whileother states are considering involving parents and the community in the management ofschools through school level committees. Various policy measures have made these moves toa more decentralised system more possible.However, the situation is politically complicated and reform uneven across the country. Thiscomplication, as well as variation, is likely to increase in the years to come and so it isessential that planners and policy makers have a good understanding of the processes andoutcomes of effective decentralisation. Educational reforms at the local level require realisticunderstandings of community characteristics and greater flexibility in order to address localneeds. Effective decentralisation is one way to help enable this.This paper has shown how through the effective involvement of parents and communityorganisations, different states are attempting to bring schools and the community closer in orderto meet educational needs in a contextualised manner. This has no doubt introduced a sense ofownership and democratic participation among parents and other stakeholders in schoolmanagement. An ongoing study undertaken by NUEPA has examined the involvement ofVECs and found that regular interaction with communities can improve democraticparticipation.However, the major emphasis in these states has been on improving the efficiency of the systemrather than empowering the local community to decide and take action on their children’seducation. Moreover, these school-related bodies have been established essentially through topdownadministrative processes without serious efforts towards grassroots mobilization and theorganization of local citizenry in participative processes. Devolution of power and functions atthe local level in most cases are far from complete resulting in weak community participation. Itis generally the case that states that have adopted more community and local representation alsohave better access and retention rates for children; those states with weaker access and retentionrates also have less community involvement.38