09.07.2015 Views

the civil procedure act - Kenya Law Reports

the civil procedure act - Kenya Law Reports

the civil procedure act - Kenya Law Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rev. 2010] Civil Procedure CAP. 21 169(2) Where <strong>the</strong> court makes an order under subrule (1), Order 11 shallapply.[Subsidiary](3) This rule applies notwithstanding that <strong>the</strong> cause could not have been(4) Any reference in <strong>the</strong>se Rules to proceedings begun by a plaint shall,unless <strong>the</strong> context o<strong>the</strong>rwise requires, be construed as including a reference toa cause proceeding under an order made under subrule (1).20. If an originating summons is adjourned into court, <strong>the</strong> judge may, if<strong>the</strong> costs be taxed on <strong>the</strong> scale applicable to suits. In all o<strong>the</strong>r cases <strong>the</strong> judgemay make such orders as to <strong>the</strong> costs of <strong>the</strong> parties as he considers just.[Order 37, rule 20.]Court may makeorders as to costsincurred by any party.ORDER 38SELECTION OF TEST SUIT1. Where two or more persons have instituted suits against <strong>the</strong> samedefendant and such persons under rule 1 of Order I could have been joined asco-plaintiffs in one suit, upon <strong>the</strong> application of any of <strong>the</strong> parties with noticeeach suit are precisely similar, make an order directing that one of <strong>the</strong> suits betried as a test case, and staying all steps in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r suits until <strong>the</strong> selected suitshall have been determined, or shall have failed to be a real trial of <strong>the</strong> issues.2. Where a plaintiff has instituted two or more suits, and under rule 3 ofOrder 1 <strong>the</strong> several dependants could properly have been joined as co-defendantsissues to be tried in <strong>the</strong> suit to which he is a party are precisely similar to <strong>the</strong>issues to be determined in ano<strong>the</strong>r of such suits, may order that <strong>the</strong> suit towhich such defendant is a party be stayed until such o<strong>the</strong>r suit shall have beendetermined or shall have failed to be a real trial of <strong>the</strong> issues.[Order 38, rule 1.]Staying several suitsagainst <strong>the</strong> samedefendant.[Order 38, rule 2.]Staying similar suitsupon application bydefendant.ORDER 39ARREST AND ATTACHMENT BEFORE JUDGMENT1. Where at any stage of a suit, o<strong>the</strong>r than a suit of <strong>the</strong> nature referredto in paragraphs (a) to (d(a) that <strong>the</strong> defendant with intent to delay <strong>the</strong> plaintiff, or to avoid anyprocess of <strong>the</strong> court, or to obstruct or delay <strong>the</strong> execution of anydecree that may be passed against him—(i) has absconded or left <strong>the</strong> local limits of <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction of <strong>the</strong>court; or[Order 39, rule 1.]Where defendantmay be called uponto furnish security forappearance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!