09.07.2015 Views

SHLAA Main Document (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...

SHLAA Main Document (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...

SHLAA Main Document (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evidence BaseA l l e rd aleLocal Plan• Market value: high, medium or low (basedon average house prices at parish level)Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the location (<strong>in</strong> terms ofland value/market attractiveness), area (<strong>in</strong>terms of the number of dwell<strong>in</strong>gs that could bedelivered) and the need for remediation (<strong>in</strong>terms of brownfield land) sites were then givena rat<strong>in</strong>g of viable, marg<strong>in</strong>al or unviable.The difficult hous<strong>in</strong>g market conditions causedby the economic downturn has been factored<strong>in</strong>to the assessment <strong>in</strong> order to avoid an overlyconservative approach. In some cases theviability rat<strong>in</strong>g has been adjusted tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>toaccount both historical trends and localknowledge of the hous<strong>in</strong>g market (e.g. demandand/or desirability of areas/settlements).Given the timeframe of the <strong>Allerdale</strong> Local Plan(2011-2028) it is likely that hous<strong>in</strong>g market willimprove. Therefore it was considered essentialto allow for a certa<strong>in</strong> level of flexibility with<strong>in</strong> ourviability assessments.Only the most constra<strong>in</strong>ed and unviable siteswere discounted at this stage.Assess<strong>in</strong>g site deliverabilityThose sites considered to be both available andachievable were then assessed <strong>in</strong> terms of thelikelihood of when they would be developed.The assessment was based on deductivereason<strong>in</strong>g tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the economicviability of the site, the level of demand forhous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the locality and any identifiedconstra<strong>in</strong>ts that would need to be addressedbefore the site could be brought forward.Based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these factors siteswere then classified <strong>in</strong>to two categories:• Deliverable (A realistic prospect thathous<strong>in</strong>g will be delivered on the site with<strong>in</strong>5 years)• Developable (There is a reasonableprospect that hous<strong>in</strong>g will be delivered onthe site later <strong>in</strong> the plan period with<strong>in</strong> the6-15 year timeframe)Estimat<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g capacity of <strong>SHLAA</strong> sitesPotential hous<strong>in</strong>g capacity of <strong>SHLAA</strong> sites hasbeen estimated based on assumptions <strong>in</strong>relation to:• Density<strong>SHLAA</strong>: <strong>Ma<strong>in</strong></strong> Report 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!