SHLAA Main Document (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...
SHLAA Main Document (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...
SHLAA Main Document (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Evidence BaseA l l e rd aleLocal Plan• Market value: high, medium or low (basedon average house prices at parish level)Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the location (<strong>in</strong> terms ofland value/market attractiveness), area (<strong>in</strong>terms of the number of dwell<strong>in</strong>gs that could bedelivered) and the need for remediation (<strong>in</strong>terms of brownfield land) sites were then givena rat<strong>in</strong>g of viable, marg<strong>in</strong>al or unviable.The difficult hous<strong>in</strong>g market conditions causedby the economic downturn has been factored<strong>in</strong>to the assessment <strong>in</strong> order to avoid an overlyconservative approach. In some cases theviability rat<strong>in</strong>g has been adjusted tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>toaccount both historical trends and localknowledge of the hous<strong>in</strong>g market (e.g. demandand/or desirability of areas/settlements).Given the timeframe of the <strong>Allerdale</strong> Local Plan(2011-2028) it is likely that hous<strong>in</strong>g market willimprove. Therefore it was considered essentialto allow for a certa<strong>in</strong> level of flexibility with<strong>in</strong> ourviability assessments.Only the most constra<strong>in</strong>ed and unviable siteswere discounted at this stage.Assess<strong>in</strong>g site deliverabilityThose sites considered to be both available andachievable were then assessed <strong>in</strong> terms of thelikelihood of when they would be developed.The assessment was based on deductivereason<strong>in</strong>g tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the economicviability of the site, the level of demand forhous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the locality and any identifiedconstra<strong>in</strong>ts that would need to be addressedbefore the site could be brought forward.Based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these factors siteswere then classified <strong>in</strong>to two categories:• Deliverable (A realistic prospect thathous<strong>in</strong>g will be delivered on the site with<strong>in</strong>5 years)• Developable (There is a reasonableprospect that hous<strong>in</strong>g will be delivered onthe site later <strong>in</strong> the plan period with<strong>in</strong> the6-15 year timeframe)Estimat<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g capacity of <strong>SHLAA</strong> sitesPotential hous<strong>in</strong>g capacity of <strong>SHLAA</strong> sites hasbeen estimated based on assumptions <strong>in</strong>relation to:• Density<strong>SHLAA</strong>: <strong>Ma<strong>in</strong></strong> Report 6