18.11.2012 Views

RAYTHEON BRINGS EO TECHNOLOGY To Defend Our Nation

RAYTHEON BRINGS EO TECHNOLOGY To Defend Our Nation

RAYTHEON BRINGS EO TECHNOLOGY To Defend Our Nation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Engineering for Raytheon’s Intelligence and<br />

Information Systems business. Major Nielsen<br />

particularly enjoyed this year’s conference.<br />

“As a newcomer to this community, I find<br />

the level of energy really exciting. I think<br />

this [conference] helps show the common<br />

problems across the industry base, [and]<br />

enables a company like Raytheon to understand<br />

the issues that other companies have<br />

and how they may have solved them. No<br />

one company has all the answers and good<br />

companies understand that.” Grimm spoke<br />

on the role of CMMI in Mission Assurance.<br />

“We need to get out and talk to our customers<br />

to see what the requirements are in<br />

each of the businesses and not just automatically<br />

jump over the horse. Mission<br />

Assurance is associated with CMMI in that<br />

it gives us a strong base. If we’re at maturity<br />

level 3 or 5 in CMMI, we’re getting very<br />

close to having the kind of base we need to<br />

have in Mission Assurance.” He also saw<br />

the value in seeing people talk together<br />

and discuss real issues. “The panel discussions<br />

are a catalyst to get ideas to the forefront<br />

of everybody’s minds. These kinds of<br />

gatherings make people really start to<br />

exchange ideas and solve real problems.”<br />

More than 30 Raytheon employees from<br />

across the company attended the conference,<br />

including 12 CMMI experts who presented<br />

more than 15 papers and tutorials.<br />

Raytheon was well represented by earning<br />

four “Best Paper” awards, including “Best<br />

Overall Paper” by Donna Freed on<br />

Raytheon ROI and Benefits for Achieving<br />

CMMI Level 5. Freed also won “Best Paper”<br />

for another presentation, as did fellow<br />

employees <strong>To</strong>m Lienhard, Timothy Davis<br />

and Melissa Olson. For a complete list of<br />

papers and tutorials presented at this year’s<br />

event, go to http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2004<br />

cmmi/2004cmmi.html.<br />

John Evers, Raytheon Engineering Common<br />

Program, CMMI and Integrated Product<br />

Development System project manager,<br />

summed up his thoughts about the conference<br />

and on Mission Assurance by saying,<br />

“The most valuable thing is seeing where<br />

other companies are, including our competitors,<br />

[and] seeing where we’re at as a<br />

company. We had a lot of presentations<br />

here which is great. We got the word out<br />

on what we’ve been doing, but we also<br />

know we have more to do. We’ve got a lot<br />

of sites at CMMI Level 3, but that’s just part<br />

of it. We really want to get to where this is<br />

part of what we’re doing, continuously<br />

improving our processes: how we use them<br />

and how we execute them on projects. One<br />

of the key things in Mission Assurance is<br />

that it’s strongly related to CMMI. By<br />

improving how we stand against CMMI as<br />

an appraisal model, we get better in executing<br />

our job and delivering products and<br />

services that our customers need.”<br />

The CMMI project is a cooperative effort<br />

of the DoD, industry and the Software<br />

Engineering Institute to develop an integrated<br />

Capability Maturity Model that<br />

encompasses systems engineering, software<br />

engineering, integrated product and<br />

process development and supplier sourcing.<br />

Its purpose is to provide for improvements<br />

in cost, schedule and overall quality of programs<br />

in engineering development and production<br />

by causing integration of the various<br />

engineering and related disciplines.<br />

For more information about CMMI at<br />

Raytheon, visit http://cmmi.ray.com/cmmi.•<br />

Bob Rassa is a<br />

director of system<br />

supportability for<br />

Raytheon Space and<br />

Airborne Systems in El<br />

Segundo, Calif. During<br />

the past 10 years he<br />

has focused on working<br />

with customers to make Raytheon products<br />

easier to support through systems engineering.<br />

Rassa founded and chaired the <strong>Nation</strong>al<br />

Defense Industrial Association’s (NDIA) systems<br />

engineering (SE) division, partnering with Mark<br />

Schaeffer from the Department of Defense (DoD),<br />

who had recently established a new systems<br />

engineering department within the office of the<br />

Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition<br />

Technology & Logistics.<br />

This defense-industry partnership led to the<br />

integration of significant capability maturity<br />

models — specifically SW-CMM and SECM —<br />

with IPD-CMM, which eventually became<br />

known as Capability Maturity Model<br />

Integration or CMMI, an idea borne from<br />

napkin doodlings among Schaeffer, Dr. Art<br />

Pyster (then with the Software Productivity<br />

Consortium) and Roger Bate of the Software<br />

Engineering Institute. With Rassa’s validation,<br />

NDIA became the industry sponsor of CMMI,<br />

with Schaeffer as the DoD counterpart.<br />

“What CMMI promised, it has been delivering:<br />

substantial adoption within the commercial<br />

and defense industries, and outstanding return<br />

on investment being reported in terms of<br />

improved cost performance index and schedule<br />

performance index, reduced delivered defects<br />

and quicker development time,” explains<br />

Rassa. The group also wrote the CMMI<br />

Acquisition Module (CMMI-AM) to improve<br />

government program offices’ performance<br />

and facilitate their engagement as industry<br />

adopts CMMI.<br />

Continued on page 29<br />

2005 ISSUE 1 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!