2004 Issue 3 - Raytheon
2004 Issue 3 - Raytheon
2004 Issue 3 - Raytheon
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NCS Organizations Achieve<br />
CMMI ® L5 SW/CMMI L3 SE<br />
In the journey to drive full CMMI integration<br />
across the <strong>Raytheon</strong> enterprise, two<br />
NCS organizations in Marlborough, Mass.<br />
have done their part to achieve this goal by<br />
reaching CMMI Maturity Level 3 and Level<br />
5 in one year’s time. The Software<br />
Engineering Center (SWEC) achieved Level<br />
5 — the highest CMMI level — while the<br />
Systems Engineering Center leveraged the<br />
SWEC experience, and brought their entire<br />
organization to CMMI Level 3, all in 2003.<br />
Neither organization started from ground<br />
zero at the beginning of the year. SWEC<br />
had a long history in process improvement<br />
and success, while SEC had a shorter history<br />
in their formal process improvement.<br />
Some of the more effective cultural<br />
changes, enablers and tools that helped<br />
in bringing both organizations CMMI<br />
success were:<br />
• KPA/PA process blitz meetings<br />
• Web-based Process Asset Library (PAL)<br />
• Training enablers including the Core<br />
Competency Model (CCM) and a rolebased<br />
Organizational Training Matrix<br />
(OTM) with sophisticated reporting<br />
enabling center-wide Organizational<br />
Training Reports (OTR)<br />
In 2003, <strong>Raytheon</strong> Systems<br />
Limited (RSL), the UK-based<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong> Global Company, became<br />
the first in the UK to achieve CMMI<br />
Level 2 for Software Engineering. On the<br />
back of this success, they are now driving<br />
forward to achieve CMMI Level 3 for<br />
Software Engineering and Level 2 for<br />
Systems Engineering. The SCAMPIs<br />
(SCAMPI is the Standard CMMI Appraisal<br />
Method for Process Improvement) were<br />
held in December 2003 at the Harlowbased<br />
facility and the Software Center in<br />
Northern Ireland which had achieved CMM<br />
Level 3 the previous year.<br />
CMMI is a new concept in the UK and<br />
RSL’s customers are becoming very interested<br />
in it as a process improvement model.<br />
Both civil and defense customers are looking<br />
to use CMMI within their own organizations<br />
to improve their program management<br />
capabilities and processes. CMMI<br />
does not yet appear as a requirement for<br />
• Process Support Team (PST)<br />
• Robust metrics gathering, arranging<br />
and presentation capability<br />
• Integration of the <strong>Raytheon</strong> Six<br />
SigmaTM process with the Level 4 and<br />
5 process change management<br />
requirements of the CMM and CMMI.<br />
The cultural change to embracing the<br />
process has been wide spread across all<br />
SWEC and SEC projects. The use of the PAL<br />
has been substantial. Tracking books for<br />
managing the programs have become<br />
more automated, useful and consistent<br />
across all projects. The integration of<br />
process improvement activities with R6σ<br />
principles has become an undertone in<br />
everything they do. But how does the<br />
achievement of CMM/CMMI high maturity<br />
bids in the UK, although it is believed this<br />
will not be so for much longer. RSL has<br />
recently briefed the UK Ministry of Defense<br />
(MoD) and the UK National Air Traffic<br />
Services on their CMMI and process<br />
improvement activities.<br />
With RSL gaining the first CMMI ratings in<br />
the UK, <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s considerable wealth of<br />
experience in CMMI and process improvement<br />
has enabled the company to move a<br />
notch ahead of its competitors and get<br />
ahead of the game.<br />
RSL did not have a strong history of<br />
process improvement, so <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s pool<br />
of knowledge and process material has<br />
been invaluable. Like all of the <strong>Raytheon</strong><br />
businesses, RSL’s process architecture is<br />
built upon the implementation of IPDS. The<br />
challenge has been selecting and translating<br />
the best practice into a model appropriate<br />
to RSL’s cultural and business needs.<br />
RSL has many small projects, as well as a<br />
few larger prime contract programs. requir-<br />
help their bottom line? By improving accuracy<br />
in their bidding process because they<br />
know exactly how much a project is going<br />
to cost to implement. They plan and monitor<br />
their programs in much more detail.<br />
They anticipate potential problems and can<br />
avoid major impacts to programs. They<br />
identify risks and opportunities and develop<br />
plans to mitigate or capture them as part<br />
of the program. The impact of CMM/CMMI<br />
is demonstrated in the processes that are<br />
applied to provide the engineering team<br />
control over so many variables involved in<br />
major programs and the organizational lessons<br />
learned that are fed back into the<br />
process to constantly improve program execution.<br />
These are the benefits of an organization<br />
achieving high maturity. •<br />
Alan C. Jost<br />
Alan_C_Jost@raytheon.com<br />
ing a flexible and light weight process<br />
architecture. The company recognized the<br />
importance of building on existing best<br />
practices rather than starting from scratch.<br />
Dr. Brooke Hoskins, director of Enterprise<br />
Process Improvement in RSL, says that<br />
“everyone worked really hard last year<br />
to make the Level 2 SCAMPIs a success<br />
and we’re asking them to do the same<br />
again this year. We have really strong<br />
backing from the RSL Leadership Team —<br />
that helps.”<br />
R6σ has been an integral part of the CMMI<br />
program in RSL, with two dedicated<br />
experts on the team and Process Action<br />
Teams being run as R6σ specialist projects.<br />
RSL has an integrated process and infrastructure<br />
improvement program that brings<br />
together CMMI, IPDS and R6σ. Bringing all<br />
of these improvement activities together<br />
provides opportunities to exploit synergies<br />
and makes it easier to manage the impact<br />
on the business. •<br />
<strong>2004</strong> ISSUE 3 29