09.07.2015 Views

Principles of Nonprofit Investment Management - Commonfund

Principles of Nonprofit Investment Management - Commonfund

Principles of Nonprofit Investment Management - Commonfund

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ObjectivesAll involved in nonpr<strong>of</strong>it governanceand management certainly know theirorganization’s mission and – at least ingeneral terms – the kinds <strong>of</strong> programsmost likely to realize its goals. Butwhen it comes to assuring the financialresources to support those programs,different perspectives and expertiseare required.Members <strong>of</strong> the governing board whocame <strong>of</strong> age in the private sector maytend to think <strong>of</strong> ultimate objectives interms <strong>of</strong> net pr<strong>of</strong>it, return on investment,and shareowner value, all <strong>of</strong>which are measurable. In their nonpr<strong>of</strong>itroles, however, they have tocope with more subjective goals.These goals must be understood firstin terms <strong>of</strong> the social and intellectualutility <strong>of</strong> the institution, howeverintangible that may seem. Ultimately,the board must view the pools <strong>of</strong> assetsthat support the mission within thecontext <strong>of</strong> the entire organization andthe optimization <strong>of</strong> its mission. Whatcan create confusion is that the termsemployed resemble those used inbusiness; pr<strong>of</strong>it and growth certainlyhave relevance to the management <strong>of</strong>a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it’s investment fund. But ina nonpr<strong>of</strong>it environment, success hasvery different implications.The board, usually through its investmentcommittee, exercises that responsibilityby defining the objectives thatwill guide its assigned investmentexperts. While the statement <strong>of</strong> theobjectives should be clear and simple,the process <strong>of</strong> formulating – as wellas maintaining – those objectives isnever simple.The committee has to weigh severalpotentially vexing issues that can affecthow the mission will be translated intoinvestment policy. The issues mayinclude:◆ The role <strong>of</strong> the fund in supportingthe institution’s mission, as well as inmaintaining a healthy balance sheet◆ The total real return goal neededfrom investment activities◆ The additional bequests and/ordonations that can be expected◆ The legal requirements affectingthe fund◆ How much <strong>of</strong> the endowment’sreturn should be spent, and howmuch reinvested, and how thisshould be calculated◆ The liquidity required to coverdistributions and expenses over areasonable time frame◆ The level <strong>of</strong> risk the board membersbelieve they can tolerate, includingdefinition <strong>of</strong> acceptable (and unacceptable)types <strong>of</strong> investments◆ Formal documentation <strong>of</strong> thedecision-making process, andresponsibility, accountability andauthority, including which investmentdecisions, if any, should bedelegated to outside consultants,advisors, or investment managers◆ Special characteristics <strong>of</strong> the nonpr<strong>of</strong>it’sprograms, distributions, andother financial decisions that canaffect spending or tax exposure◆ Special limitations on investmentimposed on portions <strong>of</strong> the fund bydonors or by particular constituencies,such as a community nonpr<strong>of</strong>it’sgovernance requirements◆ The impact <strong>of</strong> policy decisions onfuture giving◆ The strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong>the institutions, the investmentcommittees, staff and any outsideconsultants.- 5 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!