ACHIEVING MISSION ASSURANCE - Raytheon
ACHIEVING MISSION ASSURANCE - Raytheon
ACHIEVING MISSION ASSURANCE - Raytheon
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 2. UPDM standards context<br />
Group (SE DSIG) and the OMG C4I Task<br />
Force, within the context of the MDA initiative,<br />
is in the process of defining Systems<br />
Modeling Language (SysML) for Systems<br />
Level Modeling. For more information, see<br />
the article on page 6 titled, “Systems<br />
Modeling Language and Mission Assurance,”<br />
or visit http://syseng.omg.org/ SysML.htm.<br />
For information on the UPDM frameworks,<br />
visit http://syseng.omg.org/UPDM.htm.<br />
The profile includes representations for modeling<br />
system architecture and consists of a<br />
system viewpoint (DoDAF System View)<br />
along with related technical standards<br />
(DoDAF Technical View) within the context of<br />
a business viewpoint (DoDAF Operational<br />
View). UPDM will also allow the architecture<br />
model to include representations of an enterprise<br />
capability and strategic intent (MODAF<br />
Strategic Viewpoint) and the process steps<br />
associated with the procurement of systems<br />
(MODAF Acquisition Viewpoint).<br />
The UPDM will provide for the standardized<br />
modeling of general operational capabilities,<br />
military services activities, operational nodes,<br />
system functions and services, input-output<br />
ports, communication protocols, system<br />
interfaces, system performance parameters,<br />
and physical properties and metrics. In addition,<br />
UPDM will allow for the modeling of<br />
related architecture concepts such as DoD’s<br />
doctrine, organization, training, material,<br />
leadership and education, personnel, and<br />
facilities (DOTMLPF). It will also allow for the<br />
equivalent UK Ministry of Defense Lines of<br />
Development elements.<br />
Available Tools<br />
Currently, tool vendors are challenged to<br />
support a range of DoDAF variants (e.g.,<br />
MODAF) that have been created to address<br />
the needs of several nationalities. In MODAF,<br />
for example, a UML metamodel is being<br />
defined to support XMI-based file exchange<br />
between tools and repositories. In addition,<br />
the DoDAF specification is characterized by<br />
the underlying Core Architecture Data Model<br />
(CADM) that is now being integrated into a<br />
wider range of tool suites. Without a common<br />
underlying metamodel, interoperability<br />
across DoDAF tools — and definitely with<br />
MODAF tools — will be increasingly difficult.<br />
The ever-growing complexity and scale of<br />
modern military systems characterized by<br />
emerging system-of-systems design and network-centric<br />
operations requires a collaborative<br />
system engineering and architecting<br />
effort across companies, military services and<br />
nations. The absence of an industry standard<br />
makes it difficult and costly to create, reuse,<br />
consolidate, sustain and distribute architecture<br />
models in collaboration. SysML, which<br />
will soon achieve formal approval of Version<br />
1.0, extends the proven power of UML in<br />
software engineering to the broader challenges<br />
of system engineering and is the<br />
leading candidate to fill this void and enable<br />
the necessary tool developments.<br />
UPDM and Mission Assurance<br />
Within the umbrella of OMG, <strong>Raytheon</strong>,<br />
other aerospace companies and commercial<br />
tool vendors are working together to help<br />
define the UPDM specification and reference<br />
implementations. UPDM attempts to address<br />
the current deficiencies in both models and<br />
tools for DoDAF and MODAF — and a combined,<br />
collaborative effort offers the best<br />
path forward. A key element of Mission<br />
Assurance is the ability to clearly characterize<br />
the structure, behavior, constraints and state<br />
of a system in support of well-defined missions.<br />
Integrated models that capture the<br />
system level, software and hardware<br />
architectures are a critical aspect of an endto-end,<br />
model-driven system approach to<br />
Mission Assurance. A UML Profile for DoDAF<br />
and MODAF is a significant step in<br />
that direction.<br />
Ron Williamson, Ph.D., NCS Architect<br />
ron_c_williamson@raytheon.com<br />
1. For more information regarding OOSE, see the<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong> Technology Networks Seminar, TNS976, entitled<br />
“Using Reference Architecture in <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s Corporate<br />
Architecture Practice” by Dr. Mike Borky and the System<br />
Engineering Technology Network's SEOO TIG (Technology<br />
Interest Group).<br />
PROFILE<br />
Robert C. Rassa is director of<br />
system supportability for<br />
<strong>Raytheon</strong> Space and Airborne<br />
Systems (SAS) in El Segundo,<br />
Calif. Bob is responsible for<br />
making SAS products more<br />
supportable. Because he serves<br />
as <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s primary generic<br />
(non-program) interface with our customers in<br />
the systems engineering/programs environment,<br />
Bob is able to do this by influencing systems<br />
engineering content and process at the senior<br />
levels of Office of the Secretary of Defense and<br />
the armed services.<br />
Bob founded and still chairs the National<br />
Defense Industrial Association’s Systems<br />
Engineering Division, where he leads a team of<br />
several hundred senior industry leaders. The goal<br />
is to positively influence Department of Defense<br />
(DoD) programs so that they include more systems<br />
engineering content. As such, Bob invented<br />
an integrated, satellite-facilitated electronics/<br />
avionics maintenance system that, for the most<br />
part, is used on all new DoD weapon systems.<br />
The system incorporates interactive electronic<br />
tech manuals, real-time diagnostics information<br />
and asset tracking.<br />
To provide process best practices in systems<br />
engineering, Bob helped develop the Capability<br />
Maturity Model Integration (CMMI®) product<br />
suite. He is also the industry sponsor of the<br />
CMMI Project and serves as chair of the CMMI<br />
Steering Group that manages CMMI and its<br />
steward, the Software Engineering Institute.<br />
CMMI integrates systems engineering, software<br />
engineering and hardware design engineering<br />
processes with program management and<br />
supply chain process.<br />
To further the exploration and implementation<br />
of good systems engineering practices and<br />
methodologies, Bob recently founded the new<br />
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers<br />
(IEEE) Systems Council to bring the might of<br />
that organization to bear on addressing systems<br />
engineering issues. An IEEE fellow, Bob is also<br />
the executive vice president of the IEEE<br />
Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society and<br />
past president of the Instrumentation and<br />
Measurement Society, both of which focus<br />
heavily on military and defense systems.<br />
To keep up on communications between industry<br />
and our DoD counterparts, Bob founded and<br />
chairs several major National Defense Industrial<br />
Association (NDIA) annual conferences, including<br />
the Systems Engineering Conference, the<br />
CMMI Technology Conference and User Group,<br />
and the Net-Centric Operations Conference.<br />
Finally, Bob served as principal author and coordinator<br />
of the NDIA’s formal report on the “Top 5<br />
Systems Engineering Issues” in early 2003 that led<br />
to the recent DoD policies requiring systems engineering<br />
plans and content on defense programs.<br />
CMMI is registered in the U.S. Patent and<br />
Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University.<br />
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGY TODAY 2006 ISSUE 1 19