10.07.2015 Views

Restoring the Soil - Canadian Foodgrains Bank

Restoring the Soil - Canadian Foodgrains Bank

Restoring the Soil - Canadian Foodgrains Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Choosing The Right GM/CC Cropping System For A Specific Area195. Choosing <strong>the</strong> Right Green Manure/Cover CropSystem for a Specific AreaWhat about Farmer Participation?Many people working in agricultural development strongly believe that farmers shouldparticipate in <strong>the</strong>ir own agricultural development. I would go one step fur<strong>the</strong>r thanthat. I believe that farmers should become <strong>the</strong> protagonists, <strong>the</strong> architects or, as PauloFreire wrote, <strong>the</strong> authors of <strong>the</strong>ir own development. In fact, if <strong>the</strong> smallholder farmersare not in charge of <strong>the</strong> process, at least after <strong>the</strong> first few years, I would questionwhe<strong>the</strong>r what is happening is really development.The achievement of broad-based au<strong>the</strong>ntic farmer participation is not easy. Seriousquestions need to be answered about participation. Are we talking about participationof <strong>the</strong> powerful, or of everyone? And if a few of <strong>the</strong> powerful can manipulate agroup, does participation exist, even if everyone is giving his or her “opinion”? Is trueparticipation occurring if people are giving us <strong>the</strong> answers <strong>the</strong>y think we want to hear,or <strong>the</strong> answers o<strong>the</strong>r development people have told <strong>the</strong>m are <strong>the</strong> “right” answers? Is itparticipation if <strong>the</strong> men do all <strong>the</strong> talking, or women also talk but are afraid tocontradict what <strong>the</strong> men have said? Can we assume that <strong>the</strong> farmers know all <strong>the</strong>technological possibilities in a given situation? If not, of how much value is <strong>the</strong>ir“participation”?For 40 years, development organizations have been told <strong>the</strong>y are not using farmerparticipation as much as <strong>the</strong>y should, yet seldom have <strong>the</strong> above questions been asked.When <strong>the</strong>y are asked seriously, <strong>the</strong>y can have a tremendous impact on what we callparticipation.These questions about participation should be in <strong>the</strong> back of people’s minds as <strong>the</strong>ywork with <strong>the</strong> decision tree in this book. Most questions in <strong>the</strong> decision tree shouldbe discussed with <strong>the</strong> farmers, and most of <strong>the</strong> answers should be provided by <strong>the</strong>farmers, in an atmosphere of complete freedom, trust and confidence.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> gm/cc systems recommended by <strong>the</strong> decision tree are ones that havebeen tried and, at least for some farmers, have been successful over a period of severalyears. Still, <strong>the</strong>y should not be considered <strong>the</strong> only possibilities that might be used ineach situation. It is quite possible, that over time, smallholder farmers will find bettergm/cc species or better ways of using <strong>the</strong>m. I am sure that dozens of good gm/cc speciesare yet to be discovered, and perhaps hundreds of as-yet untried systems will alsobe discovered. The world is in serious need of more, and better, gm/cc systems. Farmersand programs should always be looking for more gm/cc species and more ways touse <strong>the</strong>m, just as farmers are always looking for more crops to grow or better ways ofgrowing <strong>the</strong>m. This decision tree should not be allowed to reduce people’s creativity.We must allow creativity to blossom.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!