Restoring the Soil - Canadian Foodgrains Bank
Restoring the Soil - Canadian Foodgrains Bank
Restoring the Soil - Canadian Foodgrains Bank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Choosing The Right GM/CC Cropping System For A Specific Area195. Choosing <strong>the</strong> Right Green Manure/Cover CropSystem for a Specific AreaWhat about Farmer Participation?Many people working in agricultural development strongly believe that farmers shouldparticipate in <strong>the</strong>ir own agricultural development. I would go one step fur<strong>the</strong>r thanthat. I believe that farmers should become <strong>the</strong> protagonists, <strong>the</strong> architects or, as PauloFreire wrote, <strong>the</strong> authors of <strong>the</strong>ir own development. In fact, if <strong>the</strong> smallholder farmersare not in charge of <strong>the</strong> process, at least after <strong>the</strong> first few years, I would questionwhe<strong>the</strong>r what is happening is really development.The achievement of broad-based au<strong>the</strong>ntic farmer participation is not easy. Seriousquestions need to be answered about participation. Are we talking about participationof <strong>the</strong> powerful, or of everyone? And if a few of <strong>the</strong> powerful can manipulate agroup, does participation exist, even if everyone is giving his or her “opinion”? Is trueparticipation occurring if people are giving us <strong>the</strong> answers <strong>the</strong>y think we want to hear,or <strong>the</strong> answers o<strong>the</strong>r development people have told <strong>the</strong>m are <strong>the</strong> “right” answers? Is itparticipation if <strong>the</strong> men do all <strong>the</strong> talking, or women also talk but are afraid tocontradict what <strong>the</strong> men have said? Can we assume that <strong>the</strong> farmers know all <strong>the</strong>technological possibilities in a given situation? If not, of how much value is <strong>the</strong>ir“participation”?For 40 years, development organizations have been told <strong>the</strong>y are not using farmerparticipation as much as <strong>the</strong>y should, yet seldom have <strong>the</strong> above questions been asked.When <strong>the</strong>y are asked seriously, <strong>the</strong>y can have a tremendous impact on what we callparticipation.These questions about participation should be in <strong>the</strong> back of people’s minds as <strong>the</strong>ywork with <strong>the</strong> decision tree in this book. Most questions in <strong>the</strong> decision tree shouldbe discussed with <strong>the</strong> farmers, and most of <strong>the</strong> answers should be provided by <strong>the</strong>farmers, in an atmosphere of complete freedom, trust and confidence.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> gm/cc systems recommended by <strong>the</strong> decision tree are ones that havebeen tried and, at least for some farmers, have been successful over a period of severalyears. Still, <strong>the</strong>y should not be considered <strong>the</strong> only possibilities that might be used ineach situation. It is quite possible, that over time, smallholder farmers will find bettergm/cc species or better ways of using <strong>the</strong>m. I am sure that dozens of good gm/cc speciesare yet to be discovered, and perhaps hundreds of as-yet untried systems will alsobe discovered. The world is in serious need of more, and better, gm/cc systems. Farmersand programs should always be looking for more gm/cc species and more ways touse <strong>the</strong>m, just as farmers are always looking for more crops to grow or better ways ofgrowing <strong>the</strong>m. This decision tree should not be allowed to reduce people’s creativity.We must allow creativity to blossom.