Harta sepencarian

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Haji Ramah v Alpha & Ors (1924)4 FMSLR 179 The W claimed her share-faraid- a further halfshare in the 2 pieces of land bcoz she helped herH in opening and cultivating them. The Ct: Should apply Islamic law. Qadhi: expert evidence. The widow was entitledto one-quarter of the value of land which shehad helped to cultivate as upah or compensationfor work done in addition to her quarter share inthe estate.
Wan Junaidah v Latiff (1988) 8 JH 122 Divorce-The W claimed inter alia for a share ofHS being half of the proceeds of the sale ofland- RM57310. Held: the pt was entitled to share the HS.
Page 1 and 2: Islamic Law ofPropertyLAB2033DR. ZU
Page 3 and 4: Introduction Harta sepencarian-urfo
Page 5 and 6: Conceptual Basis Fuqaha views Syari
Page 7 and 8: The Bughyah at-Mustarsyidin“When
Page 9 and 10: Al-A’adahA’adah Muhakkamah Isla
Page 11 and 12: Sh ct’s Decision Semek v Siti Zub
Page 13 and 14: Boto v JaafarJaafar (1985) 2 MLJ 98
Page 15 and 16: Semek v Siti Zubaidah (1995) 11 JH
Page 17 and 18: When? 1) Divorce 2) Death 3) Polyga
Page 19 and 20: Tijah v Mat Ali [1884] 4 KY 124 The
Page 21 and 22: Death No specific provision under t
Page 23: Bunga Ibrahim v Ila Abdullah(1990)
Page 27 and 28: HS and EPF 1) EPF as HS 2) EPF as a
Page 29 and 30: Che Mas Abdullah v Mat Sharie Yaaku
Page 31 and 32: 1. One-third 2. one halfApproaches
Page 33: One half If the W has directly cont

Harta sepencarian

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?