Harta sepencarian

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Timah Sulaiman v Abd Rahman Ayob (2001)JH XIV 297 The pt applied for mutaah and HS arising froma divorce. HS-bungalow at PD, a car and thesaving in the Epf. Wtr the Pt had provided sufficient proof toshow that the properties were HS. SHC N.9: the car and EPF money were HS.Efforts+ managed the household withoutassistance. The pt was entitled to get one-thirdof the EPF. SCOA: The EPF was an estate and not HS.
Che Mas Abdullah v Mat Sharie YaakubNo-41-001-8-99 17.4.2003 A divorced pt brought a claim for HS in the sumof RM36k (EPF of her H). SHC Tganu: Only the aggregate deductions of the member salaryfor payment to the EPF- HS The employers contribution and dividends: estate Lack of evidence: the claim for HS thereby failed.
Page 1 and 2: Islamic Law ofPropertyLAB2033DR. ZU
Page 3 and 4: Introduction Harta sepencarian-urfo
Page 5 and 6: Conceptual Basis Fuqaha views Syari
Page 7 and 8: The Bughyah at-Mustarsyidin“When
Page 9 and 10: Al-A’adahA’adah Muhakkamah Isla
Page 11 and 12: Sh ct’s Decision Semek v Siti Zub
Page 13 and 14: Boto v JaafarJaafar (1985) 2 MLJ 98
Page 15 and 16: Semek v Siti Zubaidah (1995) 11 JH
Page 17 and 18: When? 1) Divorce 2) Death 3) Polyga
Page 19 and 20: Tijah v Mat Ali [1884] 4 KY 124 The
Page 21 and 22: Death No specific provision under t
Page 23 and 24: Bunga Ibrahim v Ila Abdullah(1990)
Page 25 and 26: Wan Junaidah v Latiff (1988) 8 JH 1
Page 27: HS and EPF 1) EPF as HS 2) EPF as a
Page 31 and 32: 1. One-third 2. one halfApproaches
Page 33: One half If the W has directly cont

Harta sepencarian

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?