10.07.2015 Views

Earnings - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Earnings - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Earnings - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report No.6 <strong>of</strong> 2006 (Railways)2.2.8 Western Railway: Loss due to incorrect computation <strong>of</strong>chargeable weightFailure <strong>of</strong> Railway Administration to stencil the correct carrying capacity onthe wagons during periodical overhauling, in terms <strong>of</strong> Railway Board’s order,resulted in incorrect computation <strong>of</strong> chargeable weight leading to loss <strong>of</strong>revenue <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.56 croreThe Railway Board in January 1983 noted that while the normal maximumcarrying capacity (CC) <strong>of</strong> a four wheeler LPG tank wagon, as per design, was15.4 tonnes, some <strong>of</strong> the tank wagons had a CC <strong>of</strong> less than 15.4 tonnesmarked on them due to higher tare weight. The Board, therefore, ordered thatthe four wheeler LPG tank wagons should be loaded to their designed CCsubject to their axle load not exceeding 17 tonnes. In May 1999, the RailwayBoard decided to reconfirm whether it was possible to load the wagons up to15.4 tonnes without involving any safety hazards. In response to this WesternRailway confirmed (August 1999) that CC <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the four wheeler LPGtank wagons was 15.4 tonnes <strong>and</strong> tare weight was 18.6 tonnes. Subsequently,Railway Board superseded their orders <strong>of</strong> January 1983 <strong>and</strong> decided (March2001) that CC for LPG tank wagons will be the marked/ stenciled CC, notexceeding 15.4 tonnes. However, the Board also decided that in respect <strong>of</strong> allLPG tank wagons, the CC should be determined afresh during periodicaloverhauling (POH) on priority to ensure that the axle load does not exceed 17tonnes <strong>and</strong> the revised CC should be fixed at 34 tonnes minus the actual tareweight.Audit noticed that in 485 wagons, the tare weight <strong>of</strong> these wagons wasmarked/ stenciled at 18.6 tonnes while the CC was marked/ stenciled as 14tonnes which adds up to 32.6 tonnes only, leaving a margin <strong>of</strong> 1.4 tonnes. Itwas seen in audit that though these wagons were given POH in Kota workshopduring April 2001 to December 2004, the marked tare weight <strong>and</strong> CCremained unchanged. The freight is, therefore, being charged on marked CC <strong>of</strong>14 tonnes even though Western Railway had found the CC <strong>of</strong> most LPG tankwagons to be 15.4 tonnes.Audit is <strong>of</strong> the view that non-observance <strong>of</strong> Railway Board instructions <strong>of</strong>marking the CC afresh after ascertaining the actual tare weight has resulted infreight being wrongly charged on marked CC <strong>of</strong> 14 tonnes <strong>and</strong> consequentshort realisation <strong>of</strong> freight to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.56 crore in respect <strong>of</strong> 9,607wagons loaded from Oil <strong>and</strong> Natural Gas Commission siding Kawas duringApril 2002 to March 2005.When the matter was taken up (May 2005) with Railway Administration, theyagreed (September 2005) that CC could have been computed by deducting tareweight from the axle load in respect <strong>of</strong> wagons where tare weight was alsostenciled on the wagons. They further added that directions have been given tostencil the revised CC in terms <strong>of</strong> Railway Board’s instructions.Though the Railway Administration have accepted short realisation <strong>of</strong> freightin respect <strong>of</strong> wagons whose tare weight <strong>and</strong> CC were marked/ stenciled, theyhave failed, even now, to issue clear instructions to the concerned staff toarrive at the CC by deducting tare weight from axle load in respect <strong>of</strong> such46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!