10.07.2015 Views

Earnings - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Earnings - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Earnings - Comptroller and Auditor General of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report No.6 <strong>of</strong> 2006 (Railways)when wagons were ready to be taken out, indicates improper planning <strong>and</strong>lack <strong>of</strong> coordination amongst Workshop authorities <strong>and</strong> operating staff. Theloss <strong>of</strong> earning capacity due to non-withdrawal <strong>of</strong> wagons after POH within areasonable period <strong>of</strong> two days works out to Rs.2.60 crore.When the matter was brought to the notice <strong>of</strong> Railway Administration (March2005) they stated in June 2005 that the loss <strong>of</strong> earning capacity worked out byAudit is not correct. As per Railway Administration’s calculation the lossworks out to Rs.2.29 crore. If the wagons are brought in piece meal the cost<strong>of</strong> deployment <strong>of</strong> engine would have been Rs.2.49 crore. They also stated thatif more than two to three trips in a month are made to the workshop it willchoke up the main line resulting in detention to passenger trains.The contention <strong>of</strong> the Railway Administration <strong>and</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> Rs.2.29 croreworked out by them are based on the figures <strong>of</strong> net earning after providing thecost <strong>of</strong> all operations including the engine hire charges. The loss <strong>of</strong> earningcapacity worked out by Audit, however, is based on the earning capacity <strong>of</strong> awagon as published in the Annual Statistical Statements <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>n Railways.Moreover, the Railway Administration’s apprehension <strong>of</strong> choking up <strong>of</strong> mainlines is not based on a correct appreciation <strong>of</strong> audit contention. It wasobserved by audit that in fact the locomotives visited PRTN Workshop at anaverage <strong>of</strong> 14 days in a month. Out <strong>of</strong> 910 occasions on which the locomotivesvisited the workshop, on 159 days it was returned empty despite the fact thatoverhauled wagons were waiting for withdrawal from the workshop. Withbetter management <strong>of</strong> the same number <strong>of</strong> trips, detention could have beenavoided.The matter was taken up with the Railway Board in October 2005. Their replyhas not been received so far (December 2005).2.4.3 South Central Railway: Loss due to detention <strong>of</strong> loaded rakesUnnecessary detention <strong>of</strong> rakes led to loss <strong>of</strong> earning capacity amounting toRs.7.16 croreThe performance <strong>of</strong> a Railway depends, among other things, on optimumutilization <strong>of</strong> its rolling stock with minimum detention <strong>and</strong> improved turnaround.Maharastra State Electricity Board (MSEB) siding is 5 kms. away from itsserving station viz. Parli Vaijnath (PRLI). The siding is notified as anindependent booking point for charging freight on through distance basis sincethe siding has all the facilities to receive <strong>and</strong> dispatch rakes without beingdealt at serving station.Review <strong>of</strong> the records <strong>of</strong> siding/ station revealed that coal rakes received atPRLI station for MSEB siding were detained in the station yards for about 2hours 12 minutes on an average, even after allowing 30 minutes for change <strong>of</strong>crew <strong>and</strong> fuelling <strong>of</strong> engines. As the rake was not to be h<strong>and</strong>led at the servingstation (PRLI) before its despatch into the siding, Audit is <strong>of</strong> the view thatthere was no necessity for this detention. Total detention on this account wasworked out to 34,411 wagon days with consequential loss <strong>of</strong> earning capacity<strong>of</strong> Rs.5.66 crore in respect <strong>of</strong> 2,153 rakes detained during the period April2002 to September 2004. Even after the rakes were physically placed in the58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!