10.07.2015 Views

Download Magazine - Levin College of Law - University of Florida

Download Magazine - Levin College of Law - University of Florida

Download Magazine - Levin College of Law - University of Florida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I should certify in time according to thewill <strong>of</strong> law and as the law was written.”The case, the first Gore v. Harris,eventually arrived on the docket <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Florida</strong> Supreme Court, which ruledon Nov. 21 that the recount would takeplace, that amended returns must beaccepted from the counties that wereparty to the case, and that Harris couldnot certify the election until Nov. 26.“We made a statutory constructionanalysis <strong>of</strong> the law, and we found therewere ambiguities in the statute whichrequired there to be a construction thatwould permit the intent <strong>of</strong> the statute tobe carried out,” said <strong>Florida</strong> SupremeCourt Justice Charles T. Wells (JD 64),who was chief justice at the time.The ruling was appealed to the U.S.Supreme Court in Bush v. Palm BeachCounty Canvassing Board. The SupremeCourt remanded it back to the <strong>Florida</strong>Supreme Court on Dec. 4 with a requestfor an explanation <strong>of</strong> how it reached itsruling.“The United States Supreme Courtmade a determination that it was not amatter <strong>of</strong> statutory construction understate law, but that the federal scheme forelecting presidential electors gave to theLegislature plenary power to make thedetermination as to how the selection<strong>of</strong> electors was going to be done,” saidWells. “They remanded the case to us,saying that they did not understand thebasis upon which we reached the decisionto extend the time for the certification.”Meanwhile, Harris, pursuant to the<strong>Florida</strong> Supreme Court’s order in Gorev. Harris, certified the election resultson Nov. 26 in which Bush was thevictor with a lead <strong>of</strong> 537 votes. Gore’sStephen N. Zack (JD 71) inhis downtown Miami <strong>of</strong>fice.team then filed a petition contesting theelection, the second Gore v. Harris. Thecase moved through circuit and districtcourts to the <strong>Florida</strong> Supreme Court,which ruled on Dec. 8 that a statewiderecount would proceed with a deadlinefor completion <strong>of</strong> Dec. 12. That date wasthe federal “safe-haven” deadline for“We as a people are fully committed to the constitutionalelectoral process and, at all times, were goingto turn to our lawyers and not to our generals.”NOVEMBER 24: To thesurprise <strong>of</strong> many observers,the U.S. Supreme Court agreesto hear Bush’s appeal <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Florida</strong> high court ruling inBush vs. Palm Beach CountyCanvassing Board allowinghand recounts to proceed.NOVEMBER 26: Harriscertifi es the results <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Florida</strong> vote after the <strong>Florida</strong>Supreme Court deadlineexpires, giving Bush a 537-vote lead over Gore, but thesedo not include results fromPalm Beach County, whichcompleted its manual recountabout two hours after thedeadline.NOVEMBER 27: Gore’s lawyersmove to contest the <strong>Florida</strong>result in a circuit court inTallahassee.NOVEMBER 30: <strong>Florida</strong>lawmakers vote along party linesto recommend a special sessionto name electors if the electioncontest is not resolved by Dec.12, six days before the Electoral<strong>College</strong> meets. The Republicanledlegislature is expected toname electors pledged to Bush.DECEMBER 1: In Bush vs. PalmBeach County Canvassing Board,the U.S. Supreme Court hearsoral arguments over whether the<strong>Florida</strong> Supreme Court oversteppedits authority by ordering Harris toinclude the manual recounts incertified state results.DECEMBER 4: The U.S. SupremeCourt asks the <strong>Florida</strong> SupremeCourt to explain its reasoning inextending the hand recounts,returning the case to Tallahasseeand putting <strong>of</strong>f any action in Bush’sappeal objecting to the recounts.DECEMBER 8: In a decisiondivided 4-3, the <strong>Florida</strong> SupremeCourt in Gore vs. Harris ordersmanual recounts in all countieswith significant numbers <strong>of</strong>presidential undervotes; Bushappeals the decision to theU.S. Supreme Court and seeksinjunctive relief to stop the handrecounts.DECEMBER 9: The U.S. SupremeCourt, in a 5 to 4 ruling, halts themanual recounts and sets a hearingon the matter two days later.DECEMBER 11: Arguments areheard by the U.S. Supreme Courtin Bush vs. Gore.DECEMBER 12: The U.S.Supreme Court, in a 5 to 4 rulingin Bush vs. Gore, puts an end tothe <strong>Florida</strong> recount. The rulingcoincides with the Dec. 12 “safehaven” deadline. Gore <strong>of</strong>ficiallyconcedes the election to Bushshortly thereafter.FALL 2008 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!