10.07.2015 Views

AGRICOLA -- Guide to Subject Indexing

AGRICOLA -- Guide to Subject Indexing

AGRICOLA -- Guide to Subject Indexing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

addition <strong>to</strong> the thesaurus?8.2. Does this descrip<strong>to</strong>r represent a concept which can beconsistently and reliably differentiated from any otherconcept?Do not propose the descrip<strong>to</strong>r unless you can answer "yes" <strong>to</strong> bothof these questions."Justification for change" section of form:9. Authorities and references cited in support of proposed changesneed not comply with any standard format, but the citationshould be complete enough bibliographically that there will beno difficulty identifying the source, e.g., name of book, authoror edi<strong>to</strong>r, place of publication, publisher, date, pagenumber(s).10. The first source <strong>to</strong> consult when justifying a proposal isAGROVOC, FAO's multilingual thesaurus of agriculturalterminology. CABI, NAL, and FAO are all interested incompatibility between the CAB Thesaurus and AGROVOC; CABI willthus prefer an AGROVOC term in most cases over those from othersources. Always indicate on your form any related terms youfind in AGROVOC.11. For justification, consider other thesauri; specializeddictionaries, handbooks, monographs, and textbooks; and numbersof postings for the proposed concept in relevant databases.Generally, do not use all-purpose dictionaries."Hierarchy and rt" section of form:12. You must supply at least one BT1 (Broader Term) for eachproposed descrip<strong>to</strong>r (except in the rare instances when you maybe proposing a new <strong>to</strong>p term). This suggested BT1 must be avalid descrip<strong>to</strong>r in the CAB Thesaurus or a term you areproposing concurrently.13. The relationship between a term and its BT should, in mostcases, be a generic one, i.e., the broader term should denote aclass of concepts of which the narrower term is always a member.The part-whole relationship is also acceptable in some cases,e.g., for descrip<strong>to</strong>rs representing geographic locations, thoserepresenting ana<strong>to</strong>mical parts of an organism, those representingdisciplines. The thesaurus presently contains hierarchies basedon relationships other than these two types, but we wish <strong>to</strong>avoid adding any more.14. Provision of NT's (Narrower Terms) and rt's (related terms) isoptional. If you choose <strong>to</strong> do so, these should also be eithervalid descrip<strong>to</strong>rs in the thesaurus or terms you are proposingconcurrently."Additional comments" section of form:15. A term is assumed <strong>to</strong> include any of its common definitions. Ifcertain definitions are <strong>to</strong> be excluded from the scope of thedescrip<strong>to</strong>r or if uncommon definitions are <strong>to</strong> apply, this shouldbe made clear. The two primary methods of clarification wouldbe hierarchical placement or a scope note. Please supply thescope note if one is needed.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!