REHABILITATION ARTICLEEffectiveness of NeurobehaviouralRehabilitation for Young Peopleand Adults with Traumatic BrainInjury and Challenging BehaviourProfessor NickAldermanis Consultant ClinicalNeuropsychologist, SpecialtyLead and Associate Director atthe National Brain Injury Centre,St Andrew's Healthcare,Northampton. He specialises inneurobehavioural rehabilitation,and the assessment and managementof the dysexecutivesyndrome in people withacquired brain injury. He is VisitingProfessor at the universities ofGlamorgan, the West of Englandand Newman University College,Birmingham, and Visiting SeniorLecturer at the Institute ofPsychiatry, King's College London.Correspondence to:Prof N Alderman,Consultant ClinicalNeuropsychologist,National Brain Injury Centre,St Andrew’s Healthcare,Billing Road,Northampton,NN1 5DG, UK.Tel: +44 (0)1604 616381Email: nalderman@standrew.co.ukTraumatic brain injury (TBI) can happen toanyone at any time. Very young children, youngmen and older people are particularly at risk.TBI is often caused by road traffic accidents, falls,violence and sport. It has been described as the‘silent epidemic’: a conservative estimate is 295new cases per 100,000 in the UK which equates toapproximately 180,000 people each yearpresenting with head injury at hospital. Improvedmedical services mean more people survive butthe long term effects can be devastating. Theseinclude a wide range of physical, cognitive, sensory,functional and emotional impairments, disabilitiesand handicaps which can be long-term. Despitehigh prevalence and the proven effectiveness ofneurorehabilitation, brain injury has been regardedas a ‘Cinderella’ condition for many years withtreatment and care provided to survivors beingpatchy, under-resourced and of variable quality.Neurobehavioural disability and outcomeNeurobehavioural disability (NBD) and socialhandicap arising from this has a major impact onlong-term outcome. NBD comprises a complex,subtle, pervasive constellation of cognitive-behaviouralchanges that typify post-acute TBI. Thisundermines social independence and is associatedwith poor prognosis. Emotional difficultiesand challenging behaviour are characteristic ofNBD. Relatives frequently describe their familymember as having undergone a personalitychange. In some cases, aggression and sexuallyinappropriate behaviour are evident. Stress andburden on family members are immense. It hasbeen estimated that one new TBI case per 300,000people each year in the UK has severe, persistentbehaviour problems that exclude them from mainstreamservices. 1 As a consequence, at least 200people per year gravitate to care homes, prison andmental health units that are unable to meet theircomplex needs.Neurobehavioural rehabilitationThe National Brain Injury Centre (NBIC) was theUK’s first provider to offer rehabilitation to peoplewith TBI and other types of acquired brain injurywho also presented with challenging behaviour. Partof St Andrew’s Healthcare, the UK's largest not-forprofitmental health care charity, NBIC admitted itsfirst six patients in January 1979. Thirty years later, theservice has grown to over 100 beds with separatecare pathways for young people, men and women,units that cater for those with very challengingbehaviour, and others that offer slow-stream, longstayrehabilitation, both within a hospital setting andthe community. Patients are typically referredbecause they present with challenging behaviour ofsuch severity to preclude them from mainstreamneurorehabilitation services, and often from thecommunities in which they live.The treatment model is psychosocial and NBICwas the first service to evolve what is now termed‘neurobehavioural rehabilitation’. 2 This approachacknowledges that challenging behaviour is primarilya product of physical damage to the brain, butrecognises this is further shaped by the environment.This can help sustain challenging behaviour,which can be unwittingly maintained by thosepeople charged with the care of a person with abrain injury. This clinical population is not popularwith rehabilitation professionals because of theirirritating, threatening, and embarrassing behaviour,as well as their general lack of motivation. 3Consequently, patients with brain injuries may beavoided by staff and carers, and become sociallyisolated. Unfortunately, while challenging behaviourmay be primarily attributable to damagedneural systems, it can be reinforced by environmentsin which there are limited opportunities forappropriate social behaviour. Under conditions inwhich people are habitually ignored for longperiods, it is possible their only social contact iswhen staff intervene when managing challengingbehaviour. This can inadvertently reinforce andmaintain it.Whilst the environment can unwittingly maintainNBD and social handicap, it can also bemanipulated to benefit rehabilitation.Neurobehavioural rehabilitation services attemptto reduce NBD and social handicap by creating anenvironment in which people are re-taught skillsthey have lost through brain injury, which are thenencouraged and reinforced in the context ofeveryday behaviour. Treatment interventions workprimarily to reverse contingencies that previouslymaintained challenging behaviour, first byrequiring staff to interact with patients who maypreviously have been ignored, and second, byensuring social reinforcement is directed at desirable,rather than challenging behaviour. 4 In thisway, interventions based on operant learningtheory create enriched environments that changethe behaviour of people working with challengingbrain-injured patients and encourage developmentof a positive social climate that promotes therapeuticrelationships. Provision of these interventionswithin a highly structured environmentencourages new learning, skill acquisition, andpromotion of independence, giving patients morechoice, control, and freedom as they progress.26 > <strong>ACNR</strong> > VOLUME 11 NUMBER 4 > SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2011
REHABILITATION ARTICLEThe multidisciplinary teamIn addition to challenging behaviour, patientsadmitted to neurobehavioural services invariablyhave a range of complex needs that arepotentially amenable to rehabilitation. For thisreason, a wide range of clinical specialists isdrawn together to form a multidisciplinaryteam who work with the patients includingneurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology,nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy,speech and language therapy, education anddietetics. Following a period of assessment,individual programmes are implementedwhose goals are to reduce challenging behaviourto enable patients to benefit from the clinicalspecialties they had been unable toaccess previously. All members of the multidisciplinaryteams implement theseprogrammes: role blurring and effectivecommunication ensure they are delivered allthe time, not just in formal therapy sessions.Evidence baseBecause neurobehavioural rehabilitation wascompletely new, a great deal of researchregarding its effectiveness has been undertaken.In NBIC a diverse research programmethat underpins clinical effectiveness and seeksto find new, innovative ways of helping patientshas been a characteristic of the service since itopened, much of which is conducted in partnershipwith universities and other academiccentres of excellence. In 1985 the first studythat examined outcomes achieved by theinitial 24 service users to pass though the NBICprogramme was published. 5 Results demonstratedthat more than two thirds of this verychallenging group had benefited, and a fifthcontinued to make further gains afterdischarge.A very recent review paper has beenpublished which confirms the evidence baseand efficacy of the different types of interventionsused in neurobehavioural services tohelp patients manage challenging behaviour. 6Other studies have demonstrated functionaland fiscal benefits of neurobehavioural rehabilitation,including savings to be made inproviding care in the medium-to-long term. 7 9Assessing individual outcome: SASNOSA range of bespoke behaviour rating scalesand other outcome measures conceptualisedfor use with people with ABI havebeen designed by clinicians within NBIC.Most recently, a four year project carried outin collaboration with Swansea Universityhas resulted in publication of the ‘StAndrew’s-Swansea NeurobehaviouralOutcomes Scale. 10 (SASNOS). This newmeasure fills a gap in the market byproviding a global measure of symptoms ofNBD and social handicap that has known,robust psychometric properties. Patients arerated by clinical teams on 49 items whichmeasure five major domains of NBD, each ofwhich has 2-3 sub-domains. Standardisedscores are computed so domains can becompared. Initial ratings can be used as aFigure 1: Change in SASNOS ratings in response to participation in neurobehavioural rehabilitation.baseline to track progress in rehabilitation.They can also be compared with those ofneurologically healthy people to help clinicianswith setting goals.Figure 1 illustrates how SASNOS was used toreflect an individual patient’s (KJ) response toneurobehavioural rehabilitation. The standardisedscore plot of symptoms of NBD observedand rated by members of the clinical teamduring the first two weeks of admissionsuggested that social handicap was underpinnedby difficulties in interpersonal relationships,cognitive function and sexual inhibitionand aggression. This plot assisted clinicians todetermine KJ’s strengths-weaknesses profile,determine the priority of his rehabilitationgoals, and design neurobehavioural rehabilitationinterventions. A second set of ratingsmade at discharge show the substantialimprovement in these target areas, with symptomsfor most sub-domains being rated atlevels comparable with the neurologicallyhealthy population.ConclusionFinally, it has been independently acknowledgedin the literature that it is a mistake tobelieve that people with acquired brain injuryand challenging behaviour can be effectivelymanaged in non-specialist services. 1 Opinionand evidence indicates that admission tospecialised neurobehavioural rehabilitationunits is required in such cases, and in additionto the clinical benefits this provides the mostcost-effective solution. Use of appropriateoutcome measures will help determine individualresponse to rehabilitation, and assistcommissioners to benchmark services againstone another. SASNOS is free to download anduse from the St Andrew’s Healthcare website atwww.stah.org/services/brain-injury/sasnos.aspx.REFERENCES1. McMillan T, Oddy M. Service provision for socialdisability and handicap after acquired brain injury. In RLl Wood, T McMillan (Eds), Neurobehavioural Disabilityand Social Handicap Following Traumatic Brain Injury.Hove, Psychology Press; 2001.2. Wood, RL. Brain injury rehabilitation: A neurobehaviouralapproach. London: Croom Helm; 1987.3. Miller E, Cruzat A. A note on the effects of irrelevantinformation on task performance after mild and severehead injury. British Journal of Social and ClinicalPsychology 1981;20:69–70.4. Alderman N. Contemporary approaches to the managementof irritability and aggression following traumaticbrain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation2003;13:211–40.5. Eames P, Wood RL. Rehabilitation after severe braininjury: a follow-up study of a behaviour modificationapproach. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, andPsychiatry 1985;48:613–19.6. Wood RL, Alderman N. Applications of operant learningtheory to the management of challenging behaviour aftertraumatic brain injury. Journal of Head TraumaRehabilitation 2011;26:202-11.7. Eames P, Cotterill G, Kneale TA, Storrar AL, Yeomans P.Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe braininjury: a follow-up study. Brain Injury 1996;10:631–50.8. Wood RL, McCrea JD, Wood LM, Merriman RN. Clinicaland cost effectiveness of post-acute neurobehaviouralrehabilitation. Brain Injury 1999;13:69–88.9. Worthington AD, Matthews S, Melia Y, Oddy M. Costbenefitsassociated with social outcome from neurobehaviouralrehabilitation. Brain Injury 2006;20:947–57.10. Alderman N, Wood RL, Williams C. The development ofthe St Andrew’s-Swansea Neurobehavioural OutcomeScale: validity and reliability of a new measure ofneurobehavioural disability and social handicap. BrainInjury 2011;25:83-100.<strong>ACNR</strong> > VOLUME 11 NUMBER 4 > SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2011 > 27