10.07.2015 Views

ENRICHED INDEXED CATEGORIES Contents 1. Introduction

ENRICHED INDEXED CATEGORIES Contents 1. Introduction

ENRICHED INDEXED CATEGORIES Contents 1. Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ENRICHED</strong> <strong>INDEXED</strong> <strong>CATEGORIES</strong> 6495.19. Example. Recall from Example 2.42 that when V = Psh(S, V), with S a locallysmall category with pullbacks and V a classical cosmos, we do not have all indexedcoproducts and homs, but only those satisfying some smallness conditions. Let us saythat a Psh(S, V)-category A is locally small if each hom-object A (a, a ′ ) is small in thesense of Example 2.42, and likewise that a Psh(S, V)-profunctor H : A −→ −↦ B is locallysmall if each H(b, a) is small. Then the proof of Lemma 5.15 goes through as long as weassume additionally that B, H, and K are locally small. Likewise, Lemma 5.16(i) holdswhen C and K are locally small, and (ii) holds when A and H are locally small.The Psh(S, V)-categories that arise “in nature” are generally not locally small. However,we will see in §9 that locally small Psh(S, V)-categories and profunctors are usefulfor describing weighted limits and colimits.These representing objects actually have a stronger universal property, which is necessary(for instance) to show that they are associative. To express this property, we firstobserve that for V -profunctors H i : A i −→ −↦ A i+1 and K : A 0 −→ −↦ A n , there is a more generalnotion of a multimorphism φ : H 1 , . . . , H n → K. This has componentsH 1 (a 1 , a 0 ) ⊗ ɛa1 · · · ⊗ ɛan H n (a n , a n−1 )❴ɛa 0 × · · · × ɛa nφ a0 ,...,anK(a n , a 0 )❴ ɛa 0 × ɛa nsatisfying axioms similar to (5.12) and (5.13) for the actions of A 0 and A n , and axiomssimilar to (5.14) for the actions of A 1 through A n−1 . In the case n = 0, the componentsof a multimorphism φ : () → K areI ɛaφ a❴ɛa∆K(a, a)❴ ɛa × ɛaand its only axioms are of the form (5.12) and (5.13). Write V -Multimor(H 1 , . . . , H n ; K)for the set of multimorphisms H 1 , . . . , H n → K. Multimorphisms can obviously also becomposed with ordinary morphisms, and also with each other in a multicategory-like way,e.g. given φ : H 1 , H 2 → K 1 and ψ : K 1 , K 2 → L we have ψ(φ, 1) : H 1 , H 2 , K 2 → L.Formally, multimorphisms are the 2-cells of another virtual equipment, which we denoteV -PROF. The following is [CS10, Def. 5.1].5.20. Definition. A composite of V -profunctors H : A −→ −↦ B and K : B −→ −↦ C is aV -profunctor H ⊙K : A −↦−→ C and a bimorphism φ : H, K → H ⊙K such that composingwith φ induces bijectionsV -Multimor(L 1 , . . . , L n , H ⊙ K, M 1 , . . . , M m ) ∼ −→V -Multimor(L 1 , . . . , L n , H, K, M 1 , . . . , M m )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!