10.07.2015 Views

ENRICHED INDEXED CATEGORIES Contents 1. Introduction

ENRICHED INDEXED CATEGORIES Contents 1. Introduction

ENRICHED INDEXED CATEGORIES Contents 1. Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ENRICHED</strong> <strong>INDEXED</strong> <strong>CATEGORIES</strong> 651Proof. We prove only (5.25); the others are similar. For any appropriately typed M, wehaveV -PROF ((H ⊙ K) ⊙ L, M) ∼ = V -Bimor((H ⊙ K), L; M)∼ = V -Multimor(H, K, L; M)∼ = V -Bimor(H, K ⊙ L; M)∼ = V -PROF (H ⊙ (K ⊙ L), M).Thus, the Yoneda lemma gives (5.25).5.26. Lemma. For H : A −↦−→ B, the composites H ⊙B and A ⊙H, and the homs B ⊲Hand H ⊳ A , all exist and are canonically isomorphic to H.Proof. Just like the previous lemma.5.27. Remark. We will henceforth abuse language by writing “H ⊙ K ∼ = L” to meanthat the composite H ⊙ K exists and is canonically isomorphic to L, and similarly for leftand right homs.5.28. Lemma. For a V -profunctor H : A −→ −↦ B and a V -functor f : A ′ → A , we haveA (1, f) ⊙ H ∼ = H(1, f). Similarly, for g : B ′ → B, we have H ⊙ B(g, 1) ∼ = H(g, 1).Proof. By [CS10, Theorem 7.16].In particular, for A f −→ B g −→ C , we have B(1, f) ⊙ C (1, g) ∼ = C (1, gf), so thatrepresentable profunctors are “pseudofunctorial”, even though in general, V -profunctorsbetween large V -categories do not form a bicategory. The same proof as in Lemma 3.26shows that this functor is fully faithful, i.e. we have natural bijectionsV -CAT (A , B)(f, g) ∼ = V -PROF (A , B)(B(1, f), B(1, g))∼ = V -PROF (B, A )(B(g, 1), B(f, 1)).The dual statement for homs is the second Yoneda Lemma, as in 3.29.5.29. Lemma. For a V -profunctor H : A −→ −↦ B and a V -functor f : A ′ → A , we haveH ⊳ A (f, 1) ∼ = H(1, f). Similarly, for g : B ′ → B, we have B(1, g) ⊲ H ∼ = H(g, 1).Proof. This follows immediately from [CS10, Theorem 7.20].In particular, although in the statement of Lemma 3.29 we assumed V to be an indexedcosmos so that the homs ⊳ and ⊲ would exist a priori, this version of it shows that thatassumption is unnecessary; the particular homs in question automatically exist.The first Yoneda Lemma 3.28 follows immediately.5.30. Lemma. For any V -functor f : A → B and V -profunctors H : A −→ −↦ B andK : B −→ −↦ A , there are natural bijectionsV -PROF (A , B)(B(1, f), H) ∼ = V -PROF (A , A )(A , H(f, 1))V -PROF (B, A )(B(f, 1), K) ∼ = V -PROF (A , A )(A , K(1, f)).and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!