10.07.2015 Views

Intertemporal Substitution and Recursive Smooth Ambiguity ...

Intertemporal Substitution and Recursive Smooth Ambiguity ...

Intertemporal Substitution and Recursive Smooth Ambiguity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For any c ∈ C, we use δ[c] to denote the degenerate lottery over c. When no confusionarises, we tend to omit the symbol of degenerate lottery <strong>and</strong> write down the deterministiccomponent as it is. For example, a deterministic sequence y = (c 0 , c 1 , c 2 , · · · ) is used as it is,instead of being denoted like (c 0 , δ[(c 1 , δ[(c 2 , δ[· · · ])])]).3.2. PreferencesWe consider two preference relations over two domains. Of primary interest are the decisionmaker’s preferences ≽ s t at each history s t over pairs of current consumption <strong>and</strong> continuationcompound lottery acts, C ×G. Each pair is called a consumption plan. In order to recover thedecision maker’s second-order beliefs, we introduce another preference ordering over secondorderacts. Take a set of one-step-ahead probability measures P s t ⊂ ∆(S) as a primitive foreach history s t . A second-order act on P s t is a mapping f : P s t → M. Let I (P s t) denotethe set of all the second-order acts on P s t. Let ≽ 2 sdenote the conditional second-ordertpreference defined over I (P s t) at each history s t .3.3. AxiomsWe start by introducing five st<strong>and</strong>ard axioms for the preference process {≽ s t}. First, weassume weak order (complete <strong>and</strong> transitive), continuity, <strong>and</strong> sensitivity. This ensures theexistence of a continuous functional representation of preference (see Debreu (1954)).Axiom A1 (Order) For all t <strong>and</strong> s t , ≽ s texist y, y ′ ∈ C ∞ such that y ≻ s t y ′ .is a continuous weak order over C × G, <strong>and</strong> thereSecond, we assume that preference over acts for the future is independent of currentconsumption. This axiom is adapted from Koopmans (1960) <strong>and</strong> is essential for the representationto have a form in which current consumption <strong>and</strong> continuation value are separable.Axiom A2 (Current Consumption Separability) For all t <strong>and</strong> s t , for all c, c ′g, g ′ ∈ G,(c, g) ≽ s t (c, g ′ ) ⇐⇒ (c ′ , g) ≽ s t (c ′ , g ′ ).∈ C <strong>and</strong>Third, we assume that preference over risky consumption is independent of history. Thisaxiom ensures that utility is stationary (or time invariant) in the pure risk domain C × M.It also implies that preference over deterministic consumption streams is independent ofhistory.11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!