22.11.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Marla had talked to her friend Langford, the biomancer, enough to know that such<br />

things were maybe theoretically possible, though the technology was a long way off, so<br />

she nodded. “All right.”<br />

“Then ask yourself whether humans are likely to ever achieve that technology. I think<br />

it’s obvious that we will, unless we cause ourselves to become extinct first, which<br />

seems doubtful, frankly. The tenacity of cockroaches is nothing compared to that of<br />

humans.”<br />

Marla twirled her finger in a hurry-up motion.<br />

“The final question is this: do you believe that such advanced people would never, ever<br />

run sophisticated computer simulations of their own ancestors?”<br />

“I wouldn’t say never,” she said. “People dress up in Civil War uniforms and pretend to<br />

shoot one another in fields, so I guess running a computer simulation of our ancestors<br />

isn’t so different.”<br />

“Then you must agree that, in all likelihood, we are actually simulations living inside a<br />

computer. We’re completely unaware that we’re simulations, truly sentient and<br />

conscious, but actually running on some unimaginably complex computer system<br />

sometime in our own subjective far future. It’s simple probability. If our descendants<br />

can create such simulations, then there’s no reason to assume they would do so on a<br />

small scale, or for only one era. There might even be multiple versions of the same<br />

‘world’ being simulated in dozens or scores or hundreds of computers, with slight<br />

variations. The odds are good that there are far more simulated minds running on<br />

computers than there are organic consciousnesses running on their original brains—and,<br />

so, probability tells us that, in all likelihood, we are simulations. It’s not a new idea—<br />

science fiction writers have played with it for decades—but Bostrom’s paper was one of<br />

the first attempts to treat it rigorously and take it seriously. You’ll have to give me your<br />

e-mail address, Marla, I’ll send you a link to the preprint.”<br />

“I think Rondeau might have e-mail,” she said.<br />

“I’ve got an AOL account,” Rondeau said, in a helpful tone, without looking up from<br />

his arcade game.<br />

Dalton looked at them as if they were exotic insects.<br />

“So we’re all living in a computer,” Marla said. “Who cares? If we’ll never know, and<br />

we can’t tell the difference, why does it matter? It’s like the free-will debate—for<br />

practical purposes, it doesn’t matter. You have to live as if you have free will anyway,<br />

or else you just sit around until you die of starvation.”<br />

“But it does matter,” Dalton said. “Bostrom thinks it matters because of the<br />

philosophical and theological implications, but it matters to us, to people like you and<br />

me, Marla. Because we’re sorcerers. We do things that violate the known laws of the<br />

universe all the time. And do you know why? Because we’re not in nature. We’re in a<br />

computer program, and the rules of the physical universe don’t apply. That’s why I can

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!