22.11.2012 Views

ECI Annual Review 2006/2007 - Environmental Change Institute ...

ECI Annual Review 2006/2007 - Environmental Change Institute ...

ECI Annual Review 2006/2007 - Environmental Change Institute ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

much on numerical targets appear<br />

to be justified, and more attention is<br />

now being turned to the ecological<br />

impacts of such plans.<br />

Citizen science and community<br />

participation in Protected Area<br />

Management: a new approach for<br />

European Transition Countries<br />

Through its new and acceding<br />

member states the European Union<br />

has inherited an impressive array<br />

of protected areas and traditional<br />

agricultural landscapes with a<br />

wealth of biodiversity that has long<br />

been lost in western member states.<br />

New EU policy and changes in<br />

conservation philosophy provide<br />

openings and challenges for the<br />

central and eastern countries of<br />

Europe.<br />

These include the shift from<br />

centralised, hierarchical planning<br />

to participatory approaches<br />

which recognise the value of local<br />

knowledge, local commitment<br />

to place, and traditional customs<br />

and rules for protecting resources.<br />

Current participatory approaches<br />

rely either on a strong civil society<br />

sector (as in western Europe)<br />

or on rural communities who<br />

depend on their own resources and<br />

develop their own user rules (as in<br />

developing countries). New models<br />

of participatory conservation are<br />

therefore needed in post-socialist<br />

Europe.<br />

<strong>ECI</strong> is testing a model for<br />

community participation in<br />

protected areas in the northern<br />

Carpathians of Romania (the Rodna<br />

Mountains National Park) as part of<br />

a UK Government Darwin Initiative<br />

funded project. The approach<br />

recognises that participation is<br />

a new concept for many of the<br />

stakeholders, and therefore builds<br />

on existing relationships of trust<br />

within communities and schools.<br />

Activities include school children<br />

documenting local and traditional<br />

knowledge about the national park;<br />

schools forming ‘Friends of Rodna<br />

Mountains’ clubs, focusing on the<br />

specific interests of their school (eg,<br />

art); and Friends clubs contributing<br />

to the implementation of the<br />

management plan, by selecting<br />

specific plants or animals to study,<br />

with training in GIS (Geographical<br />

Information Systems). This also<br />

allows the park administration to<br />

consolidate, analyse and map all the<br />

data.<br />

This approach provides a model<br />

which is culturally and politically<br />

appropriate. It is being evaluated<br />

and adapted at interactive multistakeholder<br />

workshops nationally<br />

(Nov <strong>2006</strong>) and internationally (late<br />

<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

Community forests and small-scale<br />

forestry in Romania<br />

In common with other former-<br />

Soviet countries in Central and<br />

Eastern Europe, Romania initiated a<br />

process of ‘restitution’ – the return<br />

of state-appropriated property to<br />

pre-communist owners soon after<br />

the restoration of democracy.<br />

Restitution of forests is notoriously<br />

problematic and controversial,<br />

and <strong>ECI</strong> research is highlighting<br />

the difficult experiences of rural<br />

households, as they have coped<br />

with losing their forests to the<br />

state, regarding the forests as state<br />

property, and then engaging with<br />

the tangled restitution process to get<br />

their forests back.<br />

The diversity of these experiences<br />

provide signposts to the future to<br />

improve the social, institutional and<br />

ecological sustainability of forests,<br />

Key Publications<br />

Leader: Dr Anna Lawrence<br />

including:<br />

1. Establishing examples of good<br />

practice;<br />

2. Education and training:<br />

practical initiatives to integrate<br />

environmental and cultural<br />

values into school curricula;<br />

communication training for<br />

foresters; and management<br />

training for forest owners;<br />

3. Support for associations of<br />

forest owners to simplify<br />

administration and governance;<br />

4. Policy: taking account of the<br />

strong diversity of ownership<br />

and forest history; engaging<br />

with the more abstract, pronature<br />

values of city-based<br />

owners and public;<br />

5.<br />

Media: addressing the negative<br />

effects of foresters’ low selfesteem;<br />

and promoting the<br />

remarkable richness of cultural<br />

attachment to the forest found<br />

in rural Romania.<br />

Lawrence A. and Hawthorne W.<br />

(<strong>2006</strong>) Plant identification: creating<br />

user-friendly field guides<br />

for biodiversity management.<br />

Earthscan, London.<br />

Lawrence, A., Paudel, K.,<br />

Barnes, R. and Y. Malla. <strong>2006</strong>.<br />

Adaptive value of participatory<br />

biodiversity monitoring<br />

in community forestry, Nepal.<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Conservation<br />

33(4):325-334.<br />

Lawrence, A. (<strong>2006</strong>) “No<br />

personal motive?” Volunteers,<br />

biodiversity and the false<br />

dichotomies of participation.<br />

Ethics, Place and Environment 9<br />

(3): 279-298.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!