+!!:6; %& ?'@ 3=@ %'@9+5+8)9)5/
Publications in phase I and phase IIof the research programme<strong>The</strong> list below covers all publications produced within the <strong>Heureka</strong> researchprogramme.<strong>The</strong> publications are divided in:• Scientific articles• Doctoral theses• Master theses• Reports• Working papers• Papers in conference proceedings• Popular scientific publications• Other publications (e.g. programme plans)<strong>The</strong> scientific articles in bold are published in a supplement to ScandinavianJournal of Forest <strong>Research</strong>, containing selected results from the first phase ofthe <strong>Heureka</strong> research <strong>Programme</strong> (Scandinavian Journal of Forest <strong>Research</strong>,Vol. 21, February 2006, Supplement No. 7.Scientific articlesAndersson M., Dahlin B., Erikers K. & Sallnäs O. 2005. Multi-objective forest landscapeprojection modelling – problems and prospects. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21:2/3175-197.Andersson M., Dahlin B. & Mossberg M. 2005. <strong>The</strong> forest time machine – a multi-purposeforestry decision support system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:114-128.Backéus, S ., Wikström, P., and. Lämås, T. 2005. A model for regional analyses of carbonsequestration and timber production. Forest Ecology and Management 216: 28-40Backéus, S ., Wikström, P., and. Lämås, T. Carbon sequestration in Swedish forest standsunder various management regimes. (manuscript) In Backéus S , 2009. Forest ManagementStrategies for CO2 mitigation. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae 2009:89(Doctoral <strong>The</strong>sis). 47s, ISBN : 978-91-576-7436-4Barth, A., Lind, T., Pettersson, H. & Ståhl, G. 2006. A framework for evaluating dataacquisition strategies for analyses of sustainable forestry at national level. ScandinavianJournal of Forest <strong>Research</strong> 21, Supplement 7:94-105Bergh, J., Freeman, M. & Räisänen, J. Modelling regional effects of global change on netprimary production in Scandinavia. Manuscript in prep. Global Change Biology.Boman, M. 2005. To pay or not to pay? - A ratio scale interpretation of polychotomousquestions with uncertain response options. Manuscript.Boman, M. & Mattsson, L. 2005. Trade-offs in forest utilization from a sustainability perspective.Accepted for publication in Journal of Sustainable Forestry.Boman, M., Berg, C., Ahlroth, S., Bostedt, G., Mattsson, L. & Gong, P. 2005a. Environmentalaccounting through adaptation of contingent valuation methodology: A proposal.Submitted.103
- Page 3:
ContentsResearch Programme 5Applica
- Page 7 and 8:
Growth and yieldmodelsSP1 Forest Ec
- Page 9 and 10:
forest production, and social value
- Page 11 and 12:
Applications of the Heureka systemT
- Page 13 and 14:
data, improving opportunities to in
- Page 15 and 16:
User valueA complete decision suppo
- Page 17 and 18:
opment scenarios for a stand that w
- Page 19 and 20:
Programme meeting including an excu
- Page 21 and 22:
forest roads, 10 time periods, four
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 6. Examples of screen layout
- Page 25 and 26:
Implementations in practical forest
- Page 27 and 28:
Thematic research projectsGrowth an
- Page 29 and 30:
600PineSpruceBirch500400Max-age, yr
- Page 31 and 32:
Specification of silviculturaland n
- Page 33 and 34:
zones and other tree groups. Border
- Page 35 and 36:
expresses the expected potential in
- Page 37 and 38:
tions, mainly using current forest
- Page 39 and 40:
ReferencesPopular science publicati
- Page 41 and 42:
identified relationships were used
- Page 43 and 44:
Fulfilment of objectivesThe goal of
- Page 45 and 46:
Soil biogeochemical modellingProjec
- Page 47 and 48:
Scientific resultsSoil carbon model
- Page 49 and 50:
model (Fig. 18). In addition, the w
- Page 51 and 52: Hodson, M.E., Langan, S.J. & Wilson
- Page 53 and 54: phytes, fungi, lichens, invertebrat
- Page 55 and 56: forest net value revenues and the p
- Page 57 and 58: Wood propertiesProject leader: Lars
- Page 59 and 60: pulpwood energy wood sections) are
- Page 61 and 62: Table 1. Properties that can be pre
- Page 63 and 64: Hannrup, B. et al. (manuscript). Mo
- Page 65 and 66: value model, based on both stand at
- Page 67 and 68: uscript in prep.Working papersLindh
- Page 69 and 70: een tested.Estimates of forest para
- Page 71 and 72: Conference proceedingsNilsson, M.,
- Page 73 and 74: Selection of plot data to represent
- Page 75 and 76: set, in the BIOMASS and IRIS projec
- Page 77 and 78: the end of the project period. The
- Page 79 and 80: y a study of the consequences for H
- Page 81 and 82: Field trials in the project Data ac
- Page 83 and 84: Fulfillment of objectivesThe main e
- Page 85 and 86: vests? As a result, for the identif
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 26. The spatial layout of ha
- Page 89 and 90: Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisPro
- Page 91 and 92: !"#$%&'N)';%&4&32-2",3',6'5-2-'6,%'
- Page 93 and 94: problems. Spatial problems pose par
- Page 95 and 96: Forest owner behaviour and dynamics
- Page 97 and 98: area between these size groups has
- Page 99 and 100: Programme managementWhen the second
- Page 101: Funding and expenditureFundingThe s
- Page 105 and 106: Freeman, M., Severinsson, T., Moré
- Page 107 and 108: Pettersson, H. & Ståhl, G. 2006. F
- Page 109 and 110: forests at the landscape level. MSc
- Page 111 and 112: Lanvin, J-D. Bajric, F. Wilhelmsson
- Page 113 and 114: ceedings from the 24th EARSeL Sympo
- Page 115 and 116: ceedings 3rd Forest Engineering Con
- Page 117 and 118: Lämås, T., Ståhl, G. och Dahlin,
- Page 119: Anon., 2005. The Heureka Research P