the mean and variance of total stand volume estimates correspond closely tothe mean and variance obtained by the NFI after the calibration, althoughthe original kNN estimates had considerably less variance (Gilichinsky etal. 2009). It has also been found that the accuracy for total stand volumeincreased after the matching as compared to the accuracy of the originalkNN estimates.<strong>The</strong> possibility to improve the accuracy of kNN estimates of forest parametersby using TWI, mapped clear cuttings, and other types of ancillary datain combination with satellite data in the estimation was tested. <strong>The</strong> resultsshow that the estimation accuracy for variables such as stand volume wasslightly improved when adding information on cuttings and tree species inthe kNN estimation, as compared to only using satellite data. However, theestimation accuracy was not improved by including TWI.Fulfillment of objectives<strong>The</strong> research and development regarding the kNN method, including calibrationof the estimates, and the use of post-stratification based on remotelysensed data has been successful. However, the development of the methodshas taken much longer than initially anticipated. It was also intended that asegmentation algorithm should be developed and implemented. Unfortunately,it was not possible to finalize this part within the <strong>Heureka</strong> program.<strong>The</strong> implementation of a segmentation algorithm will therefore be finalizedwithin SLU’s environmental monitoring and assessment program.ReferencesScientific articlesSeibert, J. Stendahl, J. & Sörensen R. 2007. Topographical influence on soil properties inboreal forest soils. Geoderma 141; 139–148.Tomppo, E., Olsson, H., Ståhl, G., Nilsson, M., & Katila, M. 2007. Creation of forest databases by combining National Forest Inventory Field Plots and Remote Sensing Data.Remote Sens. of Environ. 112:1982-1999.Gilichinsky, M., Heiskanen, J., Wallerman, J., Egberth, M., & Nilsson, M. 2009. Histogrammatching for post-processing of stem volume estimates imputed from forest inventoryand satellite data. Submitted to Remote Sensing of Environment.Lyon, S.W. Sörensen, R. Stendahl, & J. Seibert, J. 2009. Using landscape characteristics todefine an adjusted distance metric for improving kriging interpolations. Manuscript inpress.Nilsson, M., Holm, S., Wallerman, J., Reese, H. & Olsson, H. 2009. Estimating annualcuttings using multi-temporal satellite data and field data from the Swedish NFI. InternationalJournal of Remote Sensing, 30: 5109–5116.Reese, H., Nilsson, M., & Olsson, H. 2009. Comparison of Resourcesat-1 AWiFS andSPOT-5 data over managed boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30:4957–4978.70
Conference proceedingsNilsson, M., Holm, S., Reese, H., Wallerman, J., & Engberg, J. 2005. Improved forest statisticsfrom the Swedish National Forest Inventory by combining field data and opticalsatellite data using post-stratification. In: Proceedings of ForestSAT 2005 in Borås, May31 – June 3, Report 8a, pp. 22-26.Reese, H., Granqvist-Pahlén, T., Egberth, M., Nilsson, M., & Olsson, H. 2005. Automatedestimation of forest parameters for Sweden using Landsat data and the kNN algorithm.In: Proceedings for the 31st International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment,June 20-24, 2005, St. Petersburg, Russia.Stendahl, J. Seibert, & J. Sörensen, R. 2005. Spatial variability in soil carbon stocks andrelations to topography at the landscape level. Poster: Focus on Soils symposium, Uppsala14-16 September, 2005.Olsson, H., Sallnäs, O., Nilsson, M., Egberth, M., Sandström, P. & Bohlin, J. 2008. Satellitedata time series for forecasting, habitat modeling and visualization of the managed borealforest landscape. In: proceedings from the XXI ISPRS Congress, Bejing, July 3-11, 2008,International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial InformationSciences vol XXXVII Part b8, pp.1007-1012. (www.isprs.org).Popular science publicationsChaminade, G. 2005. Topography, vegetation and soil carbon-nitrogen ratio in borealforests at the landscape level. MSc thesis at the Dep. of Forest Soils, SLU, 12.External referencesMcRoberts, R.E., Nelson, M.D., & Wendt, D.G. (2002a). Stratified estimation of forestarea using satellite imagery, inventory data, and the k-Nearest Neighbors technique.Remote Sensing of Environment, 82:457-468.Reese, H., Nilsson, M., Granqvist Pahlén, T., Hagner, O., Joyce, S., Tingelöf, U., Egberth,M., & Olsson, H. 2003. Countrywide estimates of forest variables using satellite data andfield data from the National Forest Inventory. Ambio 32, pp. 542-548.Tomppo, E. 1993. Multi-Source National Forest Inventory of Finland. In: Proceedings ofIlvessalo Symposium on National Forest Inventories, August 17-21, Finland. pp. 52-59.71
- Page 3:
ContentsResearch Programme 5Applica
- Page 7 and 8:
Growth and yieldmodelsSP1 Forest Ec
- Page 9 and 10:
forest production, and social value
- Page 11 and 12:
Applications of the Heureka systemT
- Page 13 and 14:
data, improving opportunities to in
- Page 15 and 16:
User valueA complete decision suppo
- Page 17 and 18:
opment scenarios for a stand that w
- Page 19 and 20: Programme meeting including an excu
- Page 21 and 22: forest roads, 10 time periods, four
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 6. Examples of screen layout
- Page 25 and 26: Implementations in practical forest
- Page 27 and 28: Thematic research projectsGrowth an
- Page 29 and 30: 600PineSpruceBirch500400Max-age, yr
- Page 31 and 32: Specification of silviculturaland n
- Page 33 and 34: zones and other tree groups. Border
- Page 35 and 36: expresses the expected potential in
- Page 37 and 38: tions, mainly using current forest
- Page 39 and 40: ReferencesPopular science publicati
- Page 41 and 42: identified relationships were used
- Page 43 and 44: Fulfilment of objectivesThe goal of
- Page 45 and 46: Soil biogeochemical modellingProjec
- Page 47 and 48: Scientific resultsSoil carbon model
- Page 49 and 50: model (Fig. 18). In addition, the w
- Page 51 and 52: Hodson, M.E., Langan, S.J. & Wilson
- Page 53 and 54: phytes, fungi, lichens, invertebrat
- Page 55 and 56: forest net value revenues and the p
- Page 57 and 58: Wood propertiesProject leader: Lars
- Page 59 and 60: pulpwood energy wood sections) are
- Page 61 and 62: Table 1. Properties that can be pre
- Page 63 and 64: Hannrup, B. et al. (manuscript). Mo
- Page 65 and 66: value model, based on both stand at
- Page 67 and 68: uscript in prep.Working papersLindh
- Page 69: een tested.Estimates of forest para
- Page 73 and 74: Selection of plot data to represent
- Page 75 and 76: set, in the BIOMASS and IRIS projec
- Page 77 and 78: the end of the project period. The
- Page 79 and 80: y a study of the consequences for H
- Page 81 and 82: Field trials in the project Data ac
- Page 83 and 84: Fulfillment of objectivesThe main e
- Page 85 and 86: vests? As a result, for the identif
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 26. The spatial layout of ha
- Page 89 and 90: Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisPro
- Page 91 and 92: !"#$%&'N)';%&4&32-2",3',6'5-2-'6,%'
- Page 93 and 94: problems. Spatial problems pose par
- Page 95 and 96: Forest owner behaviour and dynamics
- Page 97 and 98: area between these size groups has
- Page 99 and 100: Programme managementWhen the second
- Page 101 and 102: Funding and expenditureFundingThe s
- Page 103 and 104: Publications in phase I and phase I
- Page 105 and 106: Freeman, M., Severinsson, T., Moré
- Page 107 and 108: Pettersson, H. & Ståhl, G. 2006. F
- Page 109 and 110: forests at the landscape level. MSc
- Page 111 and 112: Lanvin, J-D. Bajric, F. Wilhelmsson
- Page 113 and 114: ceedings from the 24th EARSeL Sympo
- Page 115 and 116: ceedings 3rd Forest Engineering Con
- Page 117 and 118: Lämås, T., Ståhl, G. och Dahlin,
- Page 119: Anon., 2005. The Heureka Research P