Stendahl, J. 2005. Mark (Soils) In: Ingemarson, F. (Ed.) 2005. Har skogen mer att ge?<strong>Heureka</strong> årsrapport 2004. Fakulteten för skogsvetenskap, SLU. Rapport nr 20. Umeå.75-82 (In Swedish).Ståhl, G. 2003. Hjälp att förutse miljöåtgärder. Miljötrender Nr 1, 2003. p 2. (In Swedish)Sundblad, L-G, Thor, M. Wilhelmsson, L. Linander, F. Hannerz, M. 2008. Hjälpmedel förinventering av rotröta i stående skog. Resultat 18. Skogforsk (Uppsala). 4 pp.Söderberg, U. 2005. Naturlig avgång (Mortality) In: Ingemarson, F. (Ed.) 2005. Har skogenmer att ge? <strong>Heureka</strong> årsrapport 2004. Fakulteten för skogsvetenskap, SLU. Rapportnr 20. Umeå. 72-74 (In Swedish)Thor, M., Ståhl, G. & Stenlid, J. 2004. Räkna med rotröta – nytt hjälpmedel för skogligplanering. Skogforsk Resultat nr 13. (In Swedish.)Thor, M. and Stenlid, J. 2004. Root rot. A growing problem. In: <strong>Research</strong> & DevelopmentConference 2004. Skogforsk, Redogörelse nr 1, 2004. (In Swedish with a summaryin English).Thor, M., Ståhl, G., Stenlid, J. 2004. Model for predicting root rot. A new tool for forestryplanning. Skogforsk, Results no 5, 2004Thor, M. & Stenlid, J. 2005. Rotröta (Root rot). In: Ingemarson, F. (Ed.) 2005. Har skogenmer att ge? <strong>Heureka</strong> årsrapport 2004. Fakulteten för skogsvetenskap, SLU. Rapportnr 20. Umeå. 157-162 (In Swedish)Wikström, P. 2005a. Applikationen för långsiktig planering. In: Ingemarson, F. (Ed.) 2005.Har skogen mer att ge? <strong>Heureka</strong> årsrapport 2004. Fakulteten för skogsvetenskap, SLU.Rapport nr 20. Umeå. 44-50 (In Swedish with English summary)Wikström, P., Klintebäck, F., Westling, J. BeståndVis- en simulator för analys av skogsskötsel.Fakta Skog No. 4 2008Öhman, K., Edenius, L., Eriksson, L-O,. Mikusinski, G. Habitatmodeller och flermålsanalys-en väg till effektivare planering av skogslandskapet. Fakta Skog No. 5 2008.Other publicationsAnon., 2002. Analysis systems for sustainable multi-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>.<strong>Programme</strong> plan Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2005. Revised Dec. 17, 2002.Anon., 2003. Bättre beslut i skogen. Exkursionshandledning, Ultuna 8 maj 2003. (InSwedish)Anon., 2004. Analysis systems for sustainable multi-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>.<strong>Programme</strong> plan 2004. Revised Jan. 19, 2004.Anon., 2004. Årsrapport 2003 Forskningsprogram <strong>Heureka</strong>. 30 pp. (In Swedish)Anon., 2007. Årsrapport 2006. Forskningsprogram <strong>Heureka</strong>. 28 pp.(In Swedish)Anon., 2008. Årsrapport 2007. Forskningsprogram <strong>Heureka</strong>. 26pp. (In Swedish)Anon., 2009. Årsrapport 2008. Forskningsprogram <strong>Heureka</strong>. 26pp. (In Swedish)Anon., 2004. Har skogen mer att ge? Analysverktyg för framtidens miljö, produktion ochsociala värden. Program för Skogskonferensen 2004, Ultuna 30/11-1/12 2004. (In Swedish)Anon., 2004. Skogen har mer att ge! Exkursionshandledning, Remningstorp 13 maj2004. (In Swedish)Anon., 2005. Analysis systems for sustainable multi-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>.<strong>Programme</strong> plan Jan. - Sept. 2005.118
Anon., 2005. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>. Development and implementation ofdecision support tools for sustainable and mulit-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> second phase programmeplan Oct. 2005- Dec. 2009. (November 30, 2005.)Anon., 2005. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>. Final report for phase 1, Ocotber 2002– September 2005.Anon. 2006. Analysis systems for sustainable multi-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>.<strong>Programme</strong> plan 2006.Anon. 2007. Analysis systems for sustainable multi-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>.<strong>Programme</strong> plan 2007.Anon. 2008. Analysis systems for sustainable multi-purpose forestry. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Heureka</strong> <strong>Programme</strong>.<strong>Programme</strong> plan 2008.Anon., 2007 Mini <strong>Heureka</strong>. Faktablad (in English)Anon., 2007 RegVis. FaktabladAnon., 2007 PlanVis FaktabladAnon., 2007 BeståndsVis. FaktabladAnon., 2008 Ivent. FaktabladAnon. ,2005. Effektivare mångbruk av skogen. <strong>Heureka</strong>s vårexkursion Sundsvall den24/5 2005. Exkursionshandledning.Edenius, L., Lind, T., Lämås, T., Mikusiński, G., Nyström, K., Wallerman, J. & Wikström,P., 2004. Reserapport – Arbetsmöte mellan forskningsprogrammen CLAMS och <strong>Heureka</strong>,2004-09-09 - 11 i Corvallis, Oregon. Stencil.Elfving, B. 2004. Grundytetillväxtfunktioner för enskilda träd, baserade på data från riksskogstaxeringenspermanenta provytor. SLU, Inst för skogsskötsel. Stencil 2004-01-26.(In Swedish)Elfving, B. 2005. En grundytetillväxtfunktion för alla trädslag i hela landet. SLU, Inst förskogsskötsel. Stencil.Ingemarson, F. (Ed.) 2005. Har skogen mer att ge? <strong>Heureka</strong> årsrapport 2004. (Can theforest deliver more? <strong>Heureka</strong> annual report 2004) Faculty of forest science, SLU. Reportno. 20. Umeå (In Swedish with English summary)Mattsson, L., Gong, P. & Boman, M. 2003. Miljöekonomisk skogsforskning. In: Lundgren,L.J. (Ed.): Vägar till kunskap - Några aspekter på humanvetenskaplig och annanmiljöforskning. Stockholm/Stehag: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion, pp. 149-165.(In Swedish)Ringvall, A. 2009. Nyutvecklade applikationer för avdelningsvis fältinventering. <strong>Heureka</strong>sårsrapport 2008.119
- Page 3:
ContentsResearch Programme 5Applica
- Page 7 and 8:
Growth and yieldmodelsSP1 Forest Ec
- Page 9 and 10:
forest production, and social value
- Page 11 and 12:
Applications of the Heureka systemT
- Page 13 and 14:
data, improving opportunities to in
- Page 15 and 16:
User valueA complete decision suppo
- Page 17 and 18:
opment scenarios for a stand that w
- Page 19 and 20:
Programme meeting including an excu
- Page 21 and 22:
forest roads, 10 time periods, four
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 6. Examples of screen layout
- Page 25 and 26:
Implementations in practical forest
- Page 27 and 28:
Thematic research projectsGrowth an
- Page 29 and 30:
600PineSpruceBirch500400Max-age, yr
- Page 31 and 32:
Specification of silviculturaland n
- Page 33 and 34:
zones and other tree groups. Border
- Page 35 and 36:
expresses the expected potential in
- Page 37 and 38:
tions, mainly using current forest
- Page 39 and 40:
ReferencesPopular science publicati
- Page 41 and 42:
identified relationships were used
- Page 43 and 44:
Fulfilment of objectivesThe goal of
- Page 45 and 46:
Soil biogeochemical modellingProjec
- Page 47 and 48:
Scientific resultsSoil carbon model
- Page 49 and 50:
model (Fig. 18). In addition, the w
- Page 51 and 52:
Hodson, M.E., Langan, S.J. & Wilson
- Page 53 and 54:
phytes, fungi, lichens, invertebrat
- Page 55 and 56:
forest net value revenues and the p
- Page 57 and 58:
Wood propertiesProject leader: Lars
- Page 59 and 60:
pulpwood energy wood sections) are
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 1. Properties that can be pre
- Page 63 and 64:
Hannrup, B. et al. (manuscript). Mo
- Page 65 and 66:
value model, based on both stand at
- Page 67 and 68: uscript in prep.Working papersLindh
- Page 69 and 70: een tested.Estimates of forest para
- Page 71 and 72: Conference proceedingsNilsson, M.,
- Page 73 and 74: Selection of plot data to represent
- Page 75 and 76: set, in the BIOMASS and IRIS projec
- Page 77 and 78: the end of the project period. The
- Page 79 and 80: y a study of the consequences for H
- Page 81 and 82: Field trials in the project Data ac
- Page 83 and 84: Fulfillment of objectivesThe main e
- Page 85 and 86: vests? As a result, for the identif
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 26. The spatial layout of ha
- Page 89 and 90: Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisPro
- Page 91 and 92: !"#$%&'N)';%&4&32-2",3',6'5-2-'6,%'
- Page 93 and 94: problems. Spatial problems pose par
- Page 95 and 96: Forest owner behaviour and dynamics
- Page 97 and 98: area between these size groups has
- Page 99 and 100: Programme managementWhen the second
- Page 101 and 102: Funding and expenditureFundingThe s
- Page 103 and 104: Publications in phase I and phase I
- Page 105 and 106: Freeman, M., Severinsson, T., Moré
- Page 107 and 108: Pettersson, H. & Ståhl, G. 2006. F
- Page 109 and 110: forests at the landscape level. MSc
- Page 111 and 112: Lanvin, J-D. Bajric, F. Wilhelmsson
- Page 113 and 114: ceedings from the 24th EARSeL Sympo
- Page 115 and 116: ceedings 3rd Forest Engineering Con
- Page 117: Lämås, T., Ståhl, G. och Dahlin,