10.07.2015 Views

Marine Transportation of LNG

Marine Transportation of LNG

Marine Transportation of LNG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong>Intertanko ConferenceMarch 29, 2004Bob CurtShip Acquisition Manager, QatargasIIDevelopment


<strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong>• Topics– What is <strong>LNG</strong>?– History <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong>– <strong>LNG</strong> Carrier Fleet– Major <strong>LNG</strong> Trade Routes– <strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars– Safety and Risks <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong>– Technology Advances for <strong>LNG</strong> Vessels– New <strong>LNG</strong> Projects– Qatar <strong>LNG</strong> Projects2


What is <strong>LNG</strong>?• Properties and characteristics– Typically ~ 95% methane (CH 4) with small amounts<strong>of</strong> ethane, propane, butane and nitrogen– Colorless, odorless, non-toxic, non-carcinogenic andin liquid form is ~45% the density <strong>of</strong> water– Vapors are ~ 50% density <strong>of</strong> air and will rise undernormal atmospheric conditions (propane/butaneheavier than air)– Can be stored and transported in insulated tanks atstandard atmospheric pressure4


What is <strong>LNG</strong>?• Flammability characteristics– Flammable when mixed with air concentrationsbetween 5% - 15% (methane)– Not generally considered explosive5


What is <strong>LNG</strong>?• <strong>LNG</strong> spill characteristics– No pollution issues• Small spills evaporate quickly• Large spills flow prior to vaporization• Not a persistent cargo: OPA 90, etc. are notapplicable– <strong>LNG</strong> is cryogenic, contact with some non-cryogenicmaterial causes material to become brittle and fail;exposure to skin will cause cryogenic burns6


History <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong>• Historical <strong>LNG</strong> shipping timeline:– 1912: : First <strong>LNG</strong> plant built in West Virginia– 1914: : Godfrey Cabot patents a barge to carry liquidgas, waterborne transportation technically feasible– 1959: : METHANE PIONEER, converted cargo ship,carries 5km 3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> between Lake Charles and UKdemonstrating feasibility <strong>of</strong> waterborne transportation7


History <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong>• Historical <strong>LNG</strong> shipping timeline:– 1964: : Methane Princes & Methane Progress, 27.4 km 3 ,become first commercial <strong>LNG</strong> vessels, operatingbetween Algeria and the UK– 1969: : Gas Transport membrane system vessels PolarAlaska & Arctic Tokyo, 71.5km 3 , begin service fromAlaska to Tokyo– 1971: : Kvaerner develops 88km 3 Moss sphericalcontainment system8


History <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong>• Historical <strong>LNG</strong> shipping timeline:– 1975: : 100 km 3 size exceeded with delivery <strong>of</strong> Frenchbuilt BEN FRANKLIN, 120km 3– 1979: : Formation <strong>of</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> International GasTanker and Terminal Operators (SIGTTO) topromote safe and reliable operation <strong>of</strong> gas tankers andterminals– 1993: : Polar Eagle and Arctic Sun, 83.5km 3 , with IHIprismatic containment system begin service fromAlaska to Tokyo9


<strong>LNG</strong> Carrier Fleet• Current Fleet Pr<strong>of</strong>ile– Approximately 155 <strong>LNG</strong> carriers in operation with atotal capacity <strong>of</strong> about 18 million m 3• 120 km 3 or larger ~ 125 carriers• 50 km 3 to 120 km 3 ~ 15 carriers• Less than 50 km 3 ~ 15 carriers10


<strong>LNG</strong> Carrier Fleet• Current Fleet Pr<strong>of</strong>ile– About Fifty-five five <strong>LNG</strong> carriers are currently underconstruction• 138 km 3 or greater ~ 46 carriers• Less than 138 km 3 ~ 9 carriers• 5 N/B delivered so far 2004• 6 new orders placed so far 200411


<strong>LNG</strong> Carrier FleetHistorical <strong>LNG</strong> Fleet Growth300250Vessels2001501005001971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006ProjectedYearCurrent FleetNewbuilding FleetSource: The Gas Carrier Register 2003, Clarkson12


Major <strong>LNG</strong> Trade Routes6513


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• <strong>LNG</strong> Carriers are classified by their cargo containmentdesigns• Types <strong>of</strong> cargo containment systems:– Kvaerner-Moss spherical tank– Membrane system• Gaz Transport and Technigaz (GTT) Membrane systems– Mark III, No96, Cs1– IHI Prismatic14


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and ParticularsExisting Worldwide FleetCargo Containment System Market ShareTechnigaz11%Various1%Gaz Transport37%Kvaerner-Moss51%Source: Lloyd’s Register Fairplay, July 200315


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• Kvaernererner-Moss16


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• Kvaernererner-Moss17


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• GTT No 96 Membrane ContainmentSystem18


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• GTT Mark III Membrane ContainmentSystem20


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• GTT Mark III Membrane ContainmentSystemStainless SteelTank cross section showing dualmembrane interior to hull tankStacked foam panels covered byTriplex and Stainless Steel membranes21


<strong>LNG</strong> Vessel Types and Particulars• IHI Self Supporting Type B PrismaticTank22


Safety and Risks <strong>of</strong> <strong>LNG</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong>• <strong>LNG</strong> shipping industry has an excellent safety record– No shipboard fatalities over the life <strong>of</strong> the industryassociated with cargo– No major losses <strong>of</strong> cargo and only one minor <strong>LNG</strong> on-board fire (lightning strike near vent riser, cargo tanksnot affected)– Two groundings resulting in major hull breacheswithout cargo loss23


Technological Advances for <strong>LNG</strong> Carriers• Containment Systems• Onboard re-liquefaction• Alternative Propulsion Units25


Technological Advances for <strong>LNG</strong> Carriers• Large <strong>LNG</strong> vessel Containment Systems• Membrane containment system for L<strong>LNG</strong> shipsconsidered more favorable design– More capacity vs. spherical ship <strong>of</strong> similar size– Suez Canal toll advantage– Faster cool-down <strong>of</strong> tanks– Lower cost due to inherent cost <strong>of</strong> the system andincreased competition due to greater shipyard capacity26


Technological Advances for <strong>LNG</strong> CarriersBenchmark Membrane C<strong>LNG</strong> ShipRepresentative 138 km 3 , 4 cargo tanks270m length x 43m beam x 11.5 draftQatar Membrane L<strong>LNG</strong> Ship (Q-Flex)About 205 km 3 , 5 cargo tanks315m length x 50m beam x 12m draftQatar Membrane L<strong>LNG</strong> Ship (Q-Max)About 250 km3, 5 cargo tanks345 m length x 55 m beam x 12 m draft27


Technological Advances for <strong>LNG</strong> CarriersConventional design is steam turbine with duel fuel: HFOand boil-<strong>of</strong>f<strong>of</strong>f• Diesel more efficient and may be required for higher HPL<strong>LNG</strong> vessels:– Slow speed diesel - twin screw fueled by HFO• Cannot burn boil-<strong>of</strong>f, <strong>of</strong>f, requires on board re-liquefaction– Medium speed dual fuel diesel - single or twin screw,direct or electric drive, fueled by MDO with boil-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong>f orHFO– Gas turbines aero-derivative units - mainly twin screw,fueled with MGO or gas, possible waste heat recoveryto achieve competitive efficiency and high flexibility28but with increased investment


New <strong>LNG</strong> ProjectsLiquefaction Capacity* Under Construction (2003)ProjectEst. Capacity(MMtpa)Trinidad Train 4 5.2Nigeria Trains 4, 5 8.4Egypt 12.0Norway (Snohvit) 4.0Malaysia Tiga (Train 2) 3.4Australia 8.0Ras Laffan (Train 4) 4.7Sakhalin 9.6Total 55.3* 2003 Worldwide <strong>LNG</strong> demand about 125 MM tonsGTI & other industry sources29


Qatar <strong>LNG</strong> Projects• RasGasII: Requires 8 C<strong>LNG</strong> vessels for RG train 5.Production commences end 2006– Destination Europe• QatargasII: Requires 16 L<strong>LNG</strong> vessels for QGII trains 4and 5. Train 4 production commences early 2008– Destination UK• 3-44 additional large trains planned to commenceproduction by 2010-11, 11, each requiring 10-12 12 Q-Flex Qsizevessels– Destination US30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!