106* “Let*the*little*children*come*to*me…”*But*should*we*baptise*them?**In* any* regard,* there* is* little* to* connect* this* account* with* baptism.* As*Spurgeon* once* put* it,* “There* is* no* line* of* connection* so* substantial* as* a*spider's*web*between*this*incident*and*baptism,*or*at*least*my*imagination*is*not*vivid*enough*to*conceive*one.”**He*backs*this*claim*up*with*three*arguments.***It*is*very*clear,*Dear*Friends,*that*these*young*children*were*not*brought*to*Jesus*Christ*by*their*friends*to*be*baptized.*“They*brought*young*children*to*him,*that*he*should*touch*them,”*says*Mark…*In*the*next*place,*if*they*brought*the*children*to*Jesus*Christ*to*be*baptized,*they*brought*them*to*the*wrong*person;*for*the*Evangelist,*John,*in*the*fourth*chapter,*and*the*second*verse,*expressly*assures*us*that*Jesus*Christ*baptized*not,*but*his*disciples:*this*settles*the*question*once*for*all,*and*proves*beyond*all*dispute*that*there*is*no*connection*between*this*incident*and*baptism.**But* you* will* say,* “Perhaps* they* brought* the* children* to* be* baptized* by* the* disciples?”*Brethren,*the*disciples*were*not*in*the*habit*of*baptizing*infants,*and*this*is*clear*from*the*case*in*hand.*If*they*had*been*in*the*habit*of*baptizing*infants,*would*they*have*rebuked*the*parents*for*bringing*them?*If*it*had*been*a*customary*thing*for*parents*to*bring*children*with*such*an*object,* would* the* disciples,* who* had* been* in* the* constant* habit* of* performing* the* ceremony,*have*rebuked*them*for*attending*to*it? 30 **Acts%2:38,39%*Again* a* classic* text* in* the* conversation* between* credobaptists* and*paedobaptists,* Peter’s* command* to* “Repent* and* be* baptised”* is* applied* to*“you*and*your*children*and*for*all*who*are*far*off*–*for*all*whom*the*Lord*our*God*will*call.”*Credobaptists*have*traditionally*emphasised*the*facts*that*the*promise*is*not*for*all*children,*but*those*who*repent,*those*who*are*called,*and* that* this* excludes* infants.* Can* it,* however,* also* exclude* children* old*enough* to* repent* and* to* profess* faith?* Are* we* stopping* children* from*obeying*Jesus’*commands*by*refusing*them*baptism*when*they*themselves*request*it?**We*should*firstly*ask*what*is*meant*by*“children”*in*Acts*2:39.*The*Greek*phrase* is* “τοῖς* τέκνοις* ὑμῶν”.* This* “denotes* the* child* in* relation* to* his*parents* and* forefathers” 31 *not* children* as* opposed* to* adults.* Therefore,*many*times*the*word*τέκνον*is*used*in*the*New*Testament*to*refer*to*adults.*The*point*being*made*is*not*that*this*is*for*children*as*well*as*for*adults,*but*that* this* is* for* people* from* every* generation* and* from* every* nation.* Each*generation*of*believers*in*every*nation*must*come*to*repent*and*be*baptised.*The*fact*that*this*is*a*command*does*not*automatically*imply*that*it*is*a*command*that*children*must*obey*if*they*are*to*be*faithful*disciples*of*Jesus.*There* are* many* other* commands* in* the* New* Testament* given* to* disciples*which*we*infer*do*not*apply*to*children,*and*that*in*no*way*is*their*disciple:********************************************************************30*Charles* Spurgeon,* Children%Brought%to%Christ,%not%to%the%Font%http://www.spurgeon.org*/sermons/0581.htm*accessed*15/8/2012.**31*Colin*Brown,*“Child”*285.*
FOUNDATIONS*107**ship* compromised* as* a* result.* So,* we* do* not* think* that* “The* one* who* is*unwilling* to* work* shall* not* eat”* (2* Thess* 3:10)* applies* to* ten* year* olds!*Neither*would*we*see*commands*to*marry*(1*Cor* 7:*9,*36),*or*even*to*“be*fruitful*and*multiply”*(Gen*1:28)*as*applying*to*children.*To*suggest*that*we*must*baptise*children*because*the*command*to*repent*and*be*baptised*applies*to*children*begs*the*question.***Matthew%28:18,20%*Similarly* to* the* previous* passage,* here* we* have* a* clear* biblical* command*concerning*the*baptism*of*disciples.*However,*here*the*command*is*given*to*us*as*the*church*to*baptise*them,*rather*than*to*the*individual*disciple*to*be*baptised.**Again,*one*must*ask*whether*one*can*ever*be*faithful*to*the*command*to*“make* disciples* of* all* nations,* baptising* them…”* if* one* delays* baptism* in*order*to*perceive*the*credibility*of*their*profession*of*faith.*Again,*all*credo:baptists* agree.* Their* two* year* old* may* sing,* “I* have* dethided* to* follow*Jethuth”* but* they* do* not* immediately* baptise* her.* The* question* remains,*“how*long*a*delay*is*wise*in*the*case*of*children?”**Are%we%avoiding%a%clear%implication%of%the%New%Testament?%*Is* the* baptism* of* believing* children* strongly* implied* if* not* directly*commanded?*Does*the*near*immediate*baptism*of*people*coming*to*faith*in*Acts*imply*that*a*long*wait*between*faith*and*baptism*is*always*wrong?*Does*Titus*1:6*imply*the*necessity*of*discerning*a*child’s*faith*in*a*way*that*this*paper*denies?**Acts%2:41%etc.%*The* immediate* baptism* of* three* thousand* who* profess* faith* on* the* day* of*Pentecost* might* be* seen* as* strong* evidence* against* the* need* to* delay*baptism* until* evidence* of* faith* is* observed.* Other* evidence* could* also* be*mounted* from* Acts* to* suggest* that* baptism* was* fairly* immediate* upon*profession* of* faith. 32 *Firstly,* we* should* note* that* the* baptisms* in* Acts* are*largely*happening*in*the*context*of*a*persecuted*church.*For*example,*on*the*day* of* Pentecost,* the* three* thousand* baptised* were* all* professing* faith* in*Christ*in*the*city*where*he*had*recently*been*crucified.*There*was*little*doubt*that*the*cost*of*discipleship*was*extremely*evident*to*them.************************************************************************32*E.g.*Acts*8:12,*8:38,*9:18,*10:48,*16:15,*16:33,*19:5*and*especially*22:16.*!