Analysis and inventory of FP7 marine-related proposals - European ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Countries with the highest number of participation per specific programmeFigure n° 11 shows the most involved countries in marine-related proposals per specifi c programme.Countries with the highest number of participations in marine-related proposalsper specific programme 2007-20081009080706050403020100NO; 110NL; 130ES; 126IT; 155FR; 200DE; 225UK; 279NO; 1NL; 1ES; 1IT;FR; 5DE; 5UK; 5NO; 12NL; 14ES; 25IT; 8FR; 31DE; 29UK; 58NO; 55NL; 25ES; 37IT; 54FR; 46DE; 26UK; 78SP1 SP2 SP3 SP4NONLESITFRDEUKFigure n° 11: Breakdown of countries with the highest number of participation to marine-relatedproposals selected for funding per specifi c programmeThe results confi rm the high number of participations of the United Kingdom, Germany andFrance within marine-related proposals selected for funding in 2007-2008 across the 4 specifi cprogrammes. It also shed lights on the signifi cant discrepancies between countries in terms ofparticipation to the individual specifi c programmes. It is especially striking within “CAPACITIES”(SP4) when looking at Norway and Italy which rank 2nd and 3rd whereas France and Germanyonly rank 4 th and 6 th .30
Analysis andinventory of FP7 marine-related ed proposalsposa• Countries with the highest number of coordinators per specific programmeFigure n° 12 shows the countries with the highest number of coordinators per specifi c programme.Countries with the highest number of coordinations in marine-related proposalsper specific programme 2007-2008100%80%60%40%20%NO; 8NL; 13ES; 10IT; 11FR; 21DE; 15UK; 37NO;NL; 1ES; 1IT;FR; 2DE; 3UK; 4NL; 4NL; 4ES; 21IT; 5FR; 22DE; 11UK; 35NO; 9NL; 2ES; 1IT; 7FR; 7DE; 2UK; 10NONLESITFRDEUK0%CoordinatorSP1CoordinatorSP2CoordinatorSP3CoordinatorSP4Figure n° 12: Breakdown of countries with the highest number of coordination per specifi c programmeover 2007-2008The results confi rm that the United Kingdom, France and Germany are the most active countriesin assuming the role of coordination in marine-related proposals selected for funding in2007-2008. However, here again, there are quite signifi cant discrepancies between countrieswhen looking at each specifi c programme individually. While the number of coordinators acrossspecifi c programmes is quite balanced for the UK and France, it is not the case for Germanywhose number of coordinators within “PEOPLE” (SP3) and especially “CAPACITIES” (SP4) isrelatively low in comparison to “IDEAS” (SP2). The United Kingdom counts the highest numberof coordinators in each specifi c programme for marine-related proposals. Eleven ERC grantsout of 14 have been awarded to researchers coming from the seven countries presented here(UK: 4, DE: 3, FR: 2, ES: 1 NL: 1). The three other countries hosting principal investigators ofmarine-related ERC grants are Belgium, Switzerland and Israel.France ranks second for “PEOPLE” (SP3) with 22 coordinators just before Spain (21). Franceranks also second for “COOPERATION” (SP1) with 21 coordinators and 3rd ex aequo withItaly for “CAPACITIES” (SP4). Norway ranks second for “CAPACITIES” with 9 coordinators.Germany ranks third for “COOPERATION” (SP1), 4 th for “PEOPLE” (SP3) with 12 coordinatorsand also 4 th within “CAPACITIES” with 2 coordinators, ex aequo with the Netherlands.31
Page 1 and 2: EUROPEANCOMMISSIONEuropeanResearch
Page 3 and 4: EUROPEAN COMMISSIONAnalysis and inv
Page 5 and 6: Analysis andinventory of FP7 marine
Page 7 and 8: Analysis and inventory of FP7 marin
Page 15: Analysis andinventory of FP7 marine
Page 18 and 19: 2. Proposals submitted per Specific
Page 20 and 21: The results refl ect at a glance, t
Page 22 and 23: Breakdown of marine-related proposa
Page 24 and 25: • “IDEAS” (SP2)The “IDEAS
Page 26 and 27: International Outgoing Fellowship s
Page 28 and 29: of pan-European interest 32 . This
Page 30 and 31: CAPACITIESNb proposalssubmittedNbPr
Page 34 and 35: 6. ConclusionsThe results of this f
Page 36 and 37: 1. “COOPERATION” (SP1)• Abbre
Page 38 and 39: ERA-NET219262 ARIMNET219235 EMIDACo
Page 40 and 41: 1.6. Theme 6: Environment (includin
Page 42 and 43: 218637 CORFATCost effective corrosi
Page 44 and 45: SEC-2 Increasing the Security of in
Page 46 and 47: 3. “PEOPLE” (SP3)• Abbreviati
Page 48 and 49: 208841 ECODOMAdvancing Understandin
Page 50 and 51: 235005 NITRICOS220894 NITROFORAM239
Page 52 and 53: 220129 MARPAH219607 MEDAT-ARCHIVESM
Page 54 and 55: INFRA-3 Support to policy developme
Page 56 and 57: 4.4. Research Potential (REGPOT)4.4
Page 69: European CommissionAnalysis and inv
Page 72: KI-32-10-354-EN-CThis study is a fi

Analysis and inventory of FP7 marine-related proposals - European ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?