11.07.2015 Views

NPA Annual Report 2011/2012 - National Prosecuting Authority

NPA Annual Report 2011/2012 - National Prosecuting Authority

NPA Annual Report 2011/2012 - National Prosecuting Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY – VOTE 24 For the year ended 31 March <strong>2012</strong><strong>NPA</strong> Strategic Objective 3: Improved prosecution of JCPSofficials charged with corruptionTable 15: Strategic Objective: Improved prosecution of JCPS officials charged with corruptionStrategic ObjectiveNumber of JCPS Personnel convictedof corruptionValue of assets linked to corruption andfraud frozenAudited/Actual Performance TargetPerformance Against Target2008/09 2009/10 2010/11<strong>2011</strong>/12<strong>2011</strong>/12Actual%Deviation ontargetChange overperiod 2010/11-<strong>2011</strong>/12Reason forDeviationn/a 4082%2970.7%5077.0%10772.6% 19114% 269% A zerotoleranceapproachfollowed bythe JCPSCluster tofraud andcorruptionwithin itsranksn/a R5m R0 R2m R3.079m 53.9% 100% TargetexceededTable 16: Performance indicators for improved prosecution of JCPS officials charged with corruptionPerformance IndicatorTime to finalise a JCPS corruptionprosecutionAudited/Actual Performance TargetPerformance Against Target2008/09 2009/10 2010/11<strong>2011</strong>/12<strong>2011</strong>/12Actual%Deviation ontargetChangeover period2010/11-<strong>2011</strong>/12n/a n/a n/a 9months 9.3months -3.3% n/a (newindicator)75% 69.4% 20Reason forDeviationNew IndicatorNumber of freezing orders for JCPSofficialsValue of freezing orders for JCPSofficialsNumber of completed AFU cases reJCPS prosecutions for corrupt activitiesValue of completed cases re JCPSprosecutions for corrupt activitiesn/a n/a 0 5 11 120% 100% Target exceededn/a n/a 0 R2m R3.079m 53.9% 100% Target exceededn/a n/a 0 2 7 250% 100% Target exceededn/a n/a 0 R2m R0.061m -96.9% 100% Substantiallybelow targetdue to lackof largercases. Poorperformancein Q4% of SMS members that are vetted n/a n/a n/a 21 73% 42% 22 -10.9% 3.2% In the previousyear the <strong>NPA</strong>did not monitorthe number ofsms membersthat havecertificates_____________________________________19 The percentage represents the conviction rate of cases in JCPS Officials charged with corruption20 The percentage represents the number of cases finalised within the target of 9 months from enrolment of these cases21 In the previous year the <strong>NPA</strong> did not monitor the number of sms members that have certificates22 <strong>NPA</strong> measures applications as the vetting process falls outside the ambit of the <strong>NPA</strong>.23 In the previous financial year the <strong>NPA</strong> did not monitor the number of prioritised non-sms members that have certificates37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!