32 3.1. Symmetry considerations at the strong-<strong>in</strong>teraction vertexFigure 3.1 – The three tree-level diagrams considered <strong>in</strong> the RPR framework. Special emphasis is put onthe strong-<strong>in</strong>teraction vertices.3.1 Symmetry considerations at the strong-<strong>in</strong>teraction vertexThe relations among the coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants <strong>in</strong> the strong-<strong>in</strong>teraction vertices of the various kaonproductionreactions, depicted <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.1, can be derived effortlessly. This is made possible bymeans of the isosp<strong>in</strong> symmetry of the strong force. In the strong-<strong>in</strong>teraction vertex, the hadroniccoupl<strong>in</strong>gs are proportional to the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients〈g KΛN (∗) ∼ I K = 1 2 , M K I ; I Λ = 0, MΛ I = 0∣ I N (∗) = 1 〉2 , M I , (3.3)N (∗)〈g KΛ∆ ∗ ∼ I K = 1 2 , M K I ; I Λ = 0, MΛ I = 0∣ I ∆ ∗ = 3 〉2 , M ∆ I ∗ , (3.4)<strong>and</strong>〈g KΣN (∗) ∼ I K = 1 2 , M K I ; I Σ = 1, MΣI ∣ I N (∗) = 1 〉2 , M I , (3.5)N (∗)〈g KΣ∆ ∗ ∼ I K = 1 2 , M K I ; I Σ = 1, MΣI ∣ I ∆ ∗ = 3 〉2 , M ∆ I ∗ . (3.6)We adopt the follow<strong>in</strong>g conventions for the isosp<strong>in</strong> states of the N (∗) , ∆ ∗ , K (∗) <strong>and</strong> Σ particles,p, K (∗)+ , N ∗+ → ∣ ∣I = 1 2 , M I = + 1 2〉,n, K (∗)0 , N ∗0 → ∣ ∣I = 1 2 , M I = − 1 2〉,Λ → |I = 0, M I = 0 〉 ,Σ + → −|I = 1, M I = 1〉 ,(3.7)Σ 0 → |I = 1, M I = 0〉 ,Σ − → |I = 1, M I = − 1〉 ,∆ ∗+ → ∣ ∣I = 3 2 , M I = + 1 2〉,∆ ∗0 → ∣ I =32 , M I = − 1 〉2 .The phase of the Σ − state is taken to be positive. With this choice, the Condon-Shortley phaseconvention dictates a m<strong>in</strong>us sign for the Σ + state. Us<strong>in</strong>g these isosp<strong>in</strong> states to calculate theClebsch-Gordan coefficients of Eqs. (3.3)–(3.6), we easily f<strong>in</strong>d the conversion factors of <strong>in</strong>terest.
Chapter 3. Kaon production <strong>in</strong> data-poor reaction channels 33The strong coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants for the Λ-production channels are found to be isosp<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependentg K (∗)0 Λn = g K (∗)+ Λp ,g K (∗)0 ΛN ∗0 = g K (∗)+ ΛN ∗+ .(3.8a)Only two coupl<strong>in</strong>g-constant conversion factors are given, s<strong>in</strong>ce the exchange of ∆ isobars is forbidden.The strong-<strong>in</strong>teraction vertices for p(γ, K 0 )Σ + can be related to those for p(γ, K + )Σ 0 through thefollow<strong>in</strong>g relationsg K (∗)0 Σ + p = √ 2 g K (∗)+ Σ 0 p ,g K (∗)0 Σ + N ∗+ = √ 2 g K (∗)+ Σ 0 N ∗+ ,−1g K (∗)0 Σ + ∆∗+ = √ g K 2 (∗)+ Σ 0 ∆ ∗+ ,(3.8b)<strong>and</strong> for K + Σ − production from the neutron one hasg K (∗)+ Σ − n = √ 2 g K (∗)+ Σ 0 p ,g K (∗)+ Σ − N ∗0 = √ 2 g K (∗)+ Σ 0 N ∗+ ,g K (∗)+ Σ − ∆ ∗0 = 1 √2g K (∗)+ Σ 0 ∆ ∗+ .(3.8c)F<strong>in</strong>ally, the transformation of the p(γ, K + )Σ 0 amplitude to the n(γ, K 0 )Σ 0 one, only requires somem<strong>in</strong>us signsg K (∗)0 Σ 0 n = − g K (∗)+ Σ 0 p ,g K (∗)0 Σ 0 N ∗0 = − g K (∗)+ Σ 0 N ∗+ ,(3.8d)g K (∗)0 Σ 0 ∆ ∗0 = g K (∗)+ Σ 0 ∆ ∗+ .3.2 The unbound neutron as kaon-production targetIn order to assess the predictive power of the RPR formalism, we will first focus our attention onreactions with a neutron target. Only data for the n(γ, K + )Σ − channel have been published <strong>and</strong>we will use this reaction to judge the reliability of our formalism <strong>in</strong> Paragraph 3.2.3. Besides theconversion coefficients <strong>in</strong> the strong <strong>in</strong>teraction vertex, one also needs transformation rules for theEM coupl<strong>in</strong>g constants. This is addressed <strong>in</strong> Paragraph 3.2.2. First, we touch on the subject ofgauge <strong>in</strong>variance.3.2.1 Gauge-<strong>in</strong>variance restorationA crucial constra<strong>in</strong>t for the kaon-production amplitude is gauge <strong>in</strong>variance. It is well-known that thet-channel Born diagram by itself does not conserve electric charge. In Ref. [38], an elegant recipeto correct for this was outl<strong>in</strong>ed. Add<strong>in</strong>g the electric part of a Reggeized s-channel Born diagramensures that the p(γ, K + )Y amplitude is gauge <strong>in</strong>variant.For the K 0 Λ- <strong>and</strong> K 0 Σ 0 -production reactions, this gauge-<strong>in</strong>variance-restoration procedure is irrelevant,because the kaon-exchange amplitude vanishes. The n(γ, K + )Σ − reaction is the only channel with aneutron as target <strong>and</strong> a charged kaon <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al state. S<strong>in</strong>ce the neutron is electrically neutral,the electric part of the s-channel Born diagram is identically zero. A gauge-<strong>in</strong>variant amplitude isobta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the electric part of a Reggeized u-channel Born diagram.