WA Health Misconduct Handling Procedures - Corruption and Crime ...
WA Health Misconduct Handling Procedures - Corruption and Crime ...
WA Health Misconduct Handling Procedures - Corruption and Crime ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY[1] This report presents the <strong>Corruption</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Crime</strong> Commission’s (“theCommission”) review (“the review”) of the Department of <strong>Health</strong>’s (“theDepartment”) management of misconduct 1 across <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. 2[2] From June 2007 to October 2009 the Commission conducted 304interviews; examined the policies, procedures <strong>and</strong> structure of 14 worksites; <strong>and</strong> conducted a survey of <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> staff.[3] The site-based reviews were conducted at Princess Margaret Hospital forChildren (PMH), <strong>WA</strong> Country <strong>Health</strong> Service-Kimberley (<strong>WA</strong>CHS-Kimberley) <strong>and</strong> Royal Perth Hospital (RPH).[4] The Commission also undertook a thematic review of the management<strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>ling of Schedule 4 <strong>and</strong> Schedule 8 drugs 3 in hospitals <strong>and</strong> themanagement of drug-related misconduct.[5] The findings of the various phases of the review can be broadlysummarised as detailed below.(1) Serious, identifiable misconduct risks exist in <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. Thesepose a risk to patient safety <strong>and</strong> have financial impacts.(2) There is limited practical capacity within <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> to deal withmisconduct, <strong>and</strong> no real improvement has occurred over theperiod of the review.(3) Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the work undertaken by <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> during theperiod of the review, there is no evidence the Department hasestablished a misconduct management mechanism.(4) There is no high level ownership or direction of misconductmanagement within <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>.[6] A series of drug-related case studies relating to the h<strong>and</strong>ling ofpharmaceuticals support these findings.(1) A nurse working at a remote area nursing post <strong>and</strong> at a regionalhospital stole <strong>and</strong> self-administered Schedule 8 <strong>and</strong> Schedule 4drugs over a two-<strong>and</strong>-a-half month period.(2) A nurse from an intensive care unit stole the Schedule 8 drugfentanyl from the hospital <strong>and</strong> was found slumped in the toilets.Work colleagues were reluctant to report the behaviour. The theft1 Refer section 4 of the <strong>Corruption</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Crime</strong> Commission Act 2003 for definition of “misconduct”.2 In this report, “the Department” refers to the Department of <strong>Health</strong> situated at Royal Street, East Perth, <strong>and</strong>is the executive or management arm of <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. “<strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>” refers to the whole of the <strong>WA</strong> publichealth system.3 Refer p.vi (Executive Summary) <strong>and</strong> p.7 of this report for definitions of Schedule 8 <strong>and</strong> Schedule 4 drugs.xi