11.07.2015 Views

WA Health Misconduct Handling Procedures - Corruption and Crime ...

WA Health Misconduct Handling Procedures - Corruption and Crime ...

WA Health Misconduct Handling Procedures - Corruption and Crime ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY[1] This report presents the <strong>Corruption</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Crime</strong> Commission’s (“theCommission”) review (“the review”) of the Department of <strong>Health</strong>’s (“theDepartment”) management of misconduct 1 across <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. 2[2] From June 2007 to October 2009 the Commission conducted 304interviews; examined the policies, procedures <strong>and</strong> structure of 14 worksites; <strong>and</strong> conducted a survey of <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> staff.[3] The site-based reviews were conducted at Princess Margaret Hospital forChildren (PMH), <strong>WA</strong> Country <strong>Health</strong> Service-Kimberley (<strong>WA</strong>CHS-Kimberley) <strong>and</strong> Royal Perth Hospital (RPH).[4] The Commission also undertook a thematic review of the management<strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>ling of Schedule 4 <strong>and</strong> Schedule 8 drugs 3 in hospitals <strong>and</strong> themanagement of drug-related misconduct.[5] The findings of the various phases of the review can be broadlysummarised as detailed below.(1) Serious, identifiable misconduct risks exist in <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. Thesepose a risk to patient safety <strong>and</strong> have financial impacts.(2) There is limited practical capacity within <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> to deal withmisconduct, <strong>and</strong> no real improvement has occurred over theperiod of the review.(3) Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the work undertaken by <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> during theperiod of the review, there is no evidence the Department hasestablished a misconduct management mechanism.(4) There is no high level ownership or direction of misconductmanagement within <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>.[6] A series of drug-related case studies relating to the h<strong>and</strong>ling ofpharmaceuticals support these findings.(1) A nurse working at a remote area nursing post <strong>and</strong> at a regionalhospital stole <strong>and</strong> self-administered Schedule 8 <strong>and</strong> Schedule 4drugs over a two-<strong>and</strong>-a-half month period.(2) A nurse from an intensive care unit stole the Schedule 8 drugfentanyl from the hospital <strong>and</strong> was found slumped in the toilets.Work colleagues were reluctant to report the behaviour. The theft1 Refer section 4 of the <strong>Corruption</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Crime</strong> Commission Act 2003 for definition of “misconduct”.2 In this report, “the Department” refers to the Department of <strong>Health</strong> situated at Royal Street, East Perth, <strong>and</strong>is the executive or management arm of <strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>. “<strong>WA</strong> <strong>Health</strong>” refers to the whole of the <strong>WA</strong> publichealth system.3 Refer p.vi (Executive Summary) <strong>and</strong> p.7 of this report for definitions of Schedule 8 <strong>and</strong> Schedule 4 drugs.xi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!