- Page 6 and 7: RPHRoyal Perth HospitalSchedule 4 D
- Page 8 and 9: 2.3.5 Identifying Misconduct ......
- Page 11 and 12: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY[1] This report pr
- Page 13: [11] The Commission examined the Se
- Page 16 and 17: (b)(c)a public officer corruptly ta
- Page 18 and 19: were three fundamental issues raise
- Page 20 and 21: (3) Notwithstanding the work undert
- Page 22 and 23: [25] The review shows these workpla
- Page 24 and 25: subsequent review at WACHS-Kimberle
- Page 26 and 27: Central to this is the need to comm
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER TWOCOMMISSION REVIEW2.1 Sco
- Page 31 and 32: … there is no specific training o
- Page 33 and 34: identified misconduct, which it cat
- Page 35 and 36: impartially as it should be if I [h
- Page 37 and 38: (3) Training and education programs
- Page 39 and 40: example, nurses or doctors) their e
- Page 41 and 42: misconduct was occurring or not. Pr
- Page 43 and 44: compliance, or that they had any gr
- Page 45 and 46: • the framework of policies relat
- Page 47 and 48: [125] The review focused on actual
- Page 49 and 50: … we started counting [Panadeine
- Page 51 and 52: checks on the clinical aspect of ad
- Page 53 and 54:
(2) regional to district hospitals
- Page 55 and 56:
medication chart … sometimes it d
- Page 57 and 58:
Pharmacist plus support staff). The
- Page 59 and 60:
… I’ve checked our policy and p
- Page 61 and 62:
... there probably is scope for abu
- Page 63 and 64:
… I have a heightened awareness [
- Page 65 and 66:
(b)The notion that the misconduct r
- Page 67 and 68:
(2) endeavoured to improve communic
- Page 69 and 70:
The available policies, guidelines
- Page 71 and 72:
2.5.4.1 Risk Register Review[233] T
- Page 73 and 74:
approach is not adopted by SMAHS”
- Page 75 and 76:
emails each day … we’re busy cl
- Page 77 and 78:
temazepam … I asked the staff mem
- Page 79 and 80:
they were entitled to “take” fr
- Page 81 and 82:
… the hospital has got rid of the
- Page 83 and 84:
[287] Executives had varying views
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER THREEISSUES RELEVANT TO THE
- Page 87 and 88:
issues raised and recommendations m
- Page 89 and 90:
[310] Several SHEF members raised t
- Page 91 and 92:
… sure, budget always plays a par
- Page 93:
… I don’t know that it’s [Cor
- Page 96 and 97:
• The Schedule 8 cupboard in whic
- Page 98 and 99:
esuscitation room. There had been t
- Page 100 and 101:
[363] Local level inquiries were ma
- Page 102 and 103:
[373] The Commission is not critica
- Page 104 and 105:
… a doctor was raiding the ED [em
- Page 106 and 107:
• 78.4% of respondents were from
- Page 108 and 109:
[384] Question 2: As an employee wi
- Page 110 and 111:
• 81% of respondents indicated th
- Page 112 and 113:
Management has demonstrated to me a
- Page 114 and 115:
The Department of Health is serious
- Page 116 and 117:
[408] Question 15: To whom within W
- Page 118 and 119:
[414] Scenario 5: A junior doctor i
- Page 120 and 121:
Criminal Code; there is also a risk
- Page 122 and 123:
constitute misconduct and the syste
- Page 124 and 125:
[438] The Commission also conducted
- Page 127:
APPENDIX113
- Page 131 and 132:
MISCONDUCT MANAGEMENT IN WA HEALTH:
- Page 133 and 134:
YEAR MONTH MISCONDUCT-RELATED ACTIO
- Page 135 and 136:
YEAR MONTH MISCONDUCT-RELATED ACTIO
- Page 137 and 138:
YEAR MONTH MISCONDUCT-RELATED ACTIO
- Page 139 and 140:
YEAR MONTH MISCONDUCT-RELATED ACTIO
- Page 141:
WA Health Organisational Integrity
- Page 144 and 145:
Corporate Governance and Public Hea
- Page 146 and 147:
Misconduct Resistance: Framework Ov
- Page 148 and 149:
Progress: Completed InitiativesMisc
- Page 151 and 152:
ENDNOTES1 In its response the Depar
- Page 153:
34 Note in this section some totals