20.06.2015 Views

Illicit trade in native wildlife - witnesses Ando, Plant, Dawson, Green

Illicit trade in native wildlife - witnesses Ando, Plant, Dawson, Green

Illicit trade in native wildlife - witnesses Ando, Plant, Dawson, Green

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CORRUPTION AND CRIME COMMISSION<br />

OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA<br />

COMMISSIONER: Kev<strong>in</strong> James Hammond<br />

Held at Perth on the 23rd day of November 2004<br />

Counsel Assist<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Stephen Hall SC<br />

Counsel Attend<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

John C. Hammond<br />

Michael L. Tudori<br />

Copyright <strong>in</strong> this document is reserved to the Crown <strong>in</strong> right<br />

of the State of Western Australia. Reproduction of this<br />

document (or part thereof, <strong>in</strong> any format) except with the<br />

prior written consent of the Attorney General is prohibited.


t1/nj<br />

CCC<br />

HEARING COMMENCED AT 10.01 AM<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes. I see Mr Paull. I see Mr Hammond. Mr<br />

Tudori's not here at this stage.<br />

MR HALL: Mr Tudori's not here at this stage. He tells me<br />

that he's likely to return by 11 o'clock.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right.<br />

MR HALL: And it shouldn't be necessary to recall Mr <strong>Green</strong><br />

until that time.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Thank you. So where are we today?<br />

MR HALL: Mr <strong>Ando</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the witness box, sir, and I will<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to exam<strong>in</strong>e him.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right.<br />

ANDREA GIOVANNI ANDO:<br />

EXAMINED BY MR HALL SC (Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g):<br />

MR HALL: Now, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, I'm <strong>in</strong> a position to play you the<br />

video of Mr <strong>Green</strong>'s testimony at the private hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> regard<br />

to what you told him on the occasion that you met at your<br />

father's house. I wonder if that video could be played.<br />

VIDEO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: That's what you did, wasn't it, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---No.<br />

Well, do you recall that one of the calls that you made to Mr<br />

<strong>Green</strong> that I played to you yesterday, you <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />

matter had been sorted. Do you recall that?---Yes.<br />

I suggest to you that you had sorted the matter by tak<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

return fax of the registration details from CALM and ensur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that no one saw them?---I can assure you that I have not seen<br />

the return fax. I remember do<strong>in</strong>g the fax but I have not seen<br />

the return fax.<br />

So the return fax was never on your desk?---I do not recall it<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g on my desk.<br />

You've never suggested to anybody that perhaps it was removed<br />

by accident?---No.<br />

That's not a story that you've considered tell<strong>in</strong>g?---No.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 121<br />

10.02


t1/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Remember yesterday I asked you about your private<br />

hear<strong>in</strong>g transcript, and you told the Commissioner yesterday<br />

that the first time you knew what the registration details<br />

were - that is, who the owner of the car was - was when you<br />

were shown the response at your private hear<strong>in</strong>g?---That's<br />

correct.<br />

Well, at your private hear<strong>in</strong>g - this is at page 123 - you were<br />

asked this question. This is before you were shown the return<br />

facsimile; understand that?---Yes.<br />

You were asked:<br />

"Have you ever conducted a registration check on a vehicle<br />

registered to a Philip <strong>Green</strong>?---Not that I - - well,<br />

yes. Yes."<br />

When I asked you about that yesterday you said you'd done<br />

registration checks on him before; is that right?---I was<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g with the special <strong>in</strong>vestigations unit for 2 years - -<br />

Yes?--- - - and Phil <strong>Green</strong> was a person of <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

Yes?---So there would have been 100 registration checks that<br />

we did conduct dur<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

On Phil <strong>Green</strong>?---Yes.<br />

And it was one of those you were referr<strong>in</strong>g to when you were<br />

giv<strong>in</strong>g your evidence, was it?---That's correct.<br />

Well, let me take you on then <strong>in</strong> your evidence, because it<br />

goes on <strong>in</strong> this way. Question:<br />

"And can you recall when you conducted this check?---I can't<br />

remember.<br />

"Now, you've <strong>in</strong>dicated that you th<strong>in</strong>k you've conducted a<br />

registration check for a vehicle registered to a<br />

Philip <strong>Green</strong>. Do you recall whether you took any<br />

action <strong>in</strong> relation to that check?---No.<br />

"You - - ?---Didn't take any.<br />

"You sent the <strong>in</strong>formation off <strong>in</strong> the usual way to the West<br />

Australian police?---Our current policy <strong>in</strong> our office<br />

is that if we get anonymous <strong>in</strong>formation that take it<br />

as a gra<strong>in</strong> of salt. So when I did that check I took<br />

it as a gra<strong>in</strong> of salt. There were no <strong>witnesses</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

forward. I had no <strong>witnesses</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g forward.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 122


t1/nj<br />

CCC<br />

"So <strong>in</strong> relation to the check for <strong>Green</strong> you had anonymous<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation; is that correct?---I had anonymous<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation of a rego of a person."<br />

It's quite clear that you were talk<strong>in</strong>g about the call I played<br />

to you yesterday?---I th<strong>in</strong>k there's - - there's two stories<br />

mixed up <strong>in</strong> that - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 123


t2/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - two stories mixed up <strong>in</strong> that - - that same<br />

comment, if you look at it properly.<br />

MR HALL: Really?---I was asked if I'd done a check on Mr<br />

<strong>Green</strong>.<br />

Yes?---And I agreed to that because we <strong>in</strong>vestigated Mr <strong>Green</strong> a<br />

couple of years ago. And then I - - I would have gone on - -<br />

asked another question and went on about receiv<strong>in</strong>g faxes<br />

because I was - - got asked what the policy <strong>in</strong> relation to BCI<br />

checks is.<br />

Well, I don't th<strong>in</strong>k so, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. This is your explanation,<br />

you see, that you're giv<strong>in</strong>g as to why you haven't followed up,<br />

why you didn't take any action, and you say, "Well, I didn't<br />

take any action because it was an anonymous call and I took it<br />

with a gra<strong>in</strong> of salt." It's quite clear you're talk<strong>in</strong>g about<br />

the call I played yesterday, isn't it?---No. I don't - -<br />

that's - - that's what I mean. I <strong>in</strong>vestigated Mr <strong>Green</strong> and a<br />

number of other aviculturists over 2 years. I conducted an<br />

operation. I headed an operation and <strong>in</strong> that operation we<br />

knocked Mr <strong>Green</strong> off and he - - he lost $40,00 worth of birds.<br />

Yes. You told us that yesterday; but how many times have you<br />

received anonymous <strong>in</strong>formation about Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---Well, that<br />

was just dur<strong>in</strong>g that operation. No other time. I didn't know<br />

that was Mr <strong>Green</strong> until I saw the fax at the - - at the<br />

hear<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Look, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, I put it to you it's quite clear from this<br />

transcript that you were talk<strong>in</strong>g about the anonymous<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation you received <strong>in</strong> September this year?---But how<br />

could that be if I didn't know who - - who the person was?<br />

But you did, didn't you, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---I did at the hear<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

You did know. You did receive the registration check back?---<br />

No. I didn't.<br />

So, are you say<strong>in</strong>g that you had no idea, no <strong>in</strong>kl<strong>in</strong>g at all,<br />

that the registration number you were given <strong>in</strong> that call was<br />

Mr <strong>Green</strong>'s until you were shown it here?---That's correct.<br />

It never occurred to you that that might be Mr <strong>Green</strong>'s?---No.<br />

Never occurred to you that someone might have been test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

your <strong>in</strong>tegrity?---No.<br />

Well, can I play you 198, please.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 124<br />

10.07


t2/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Right. That's you speak<strong>in</strong>g to your wife, isn't<br />

it?---That's correct.<br />

This is the 16th of September. This is some several days<br />

before the private hear<strong>in</strong>g occurs?---This was dur<strong>in</strong>g a time -<br />

-<br />

Now, wait until I ask you a question. This is some days<br />

before the private hear<strong>in</strong>g occurs and you have speculated that<br />

someone has set you up with a rego check at a time when you<br />

say you have no <strong>in</strong>kl<strong>in</strong>g that this rego check has got anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to do with Mr <strong>Green</strong>. Why is that?---I had a number of people<br />

come <strong>in</strong>to my office say<strong>in</strong>g they were go<strong>in</strong>g to do a search<br />

warrant on my office and <strong>in</strong> my house. They looked through all<br />

my paperwork, they looked for registrations, they looked for<br />

BCI checks. I got two young kids at home. My wife is<br />

stress<strong>in</strong>g at home. That's 3 hours or couple of hours after<br />

they did all that and my wife's ask<strong>in</strong>g me questions and I<br />

don't know what the hell was go<strong>in</strong>g on. They want to go<br />

through my house and the last th<strong>in</strong>g I wanted was my wife to be<br />

stressed, about 13 people on a summons to go through my own<br />

home, with a 6 month old kid and a 3 year old kid.<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong> - -?---Now, is that fair?<br />

- - do you <strong>in</strong>tend to answer my question?---That's - - that's<br />

the answer.<br />

No. It's not. I'm ask<strong>in</strong>g you why you thought you had been<br />

set up <strong>in</strong> regard to this rego check if you had no <strong>in</strong>kl<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

the registration check related to Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---I don't know.<br />

You see, I put it to you that why you thought you'd been set<br />

up is you knew the registration check related to Mr <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

You knew you'd released those details and that's why you felt<br />

you were susceptible, you were vulnerable?---I can tell you<br />

why. Because the only th<strong>in</strong>g the officers looked for <strong>in</strong> my - -<br />

and I gave them everyth<strong>in</strong>g I had, was BCI checks and rego<br />

checks.<br />

And they didn't f<strong>in</strong>d this BCI check, did they?---I don't know.<br />

Well, I can tell you that the BCI check that is <strong>in</strong> our<br />

possession came from BCI. The one that was sent to CALM was<br />

not located - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 125


t3/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - was not located?---Well, I don't know where<br />

that is.<br />

Well, you know you removed it, didn't you?---I did not remove<br />

it.<br />

Why were you say<strong>in</strong>g to your wife, "It could of got caught up<br />

<strong>in</strong> paperwork. I don't know where it is"? You were try<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

stories you might give, weren't you?---No.<br />

Well, why say, "I didn't take the rego off my desk" if the<br />

truth was you'd never received it back at all?---I - - I<br />

recall advis<strong>in</strong>g other officers that I had not received that<br />

fax after a few days.<br />

Well, why say that, "I didn't take it off my desk", if you'd<br />

never got it back?---I don't know what - - I don't even know<br />

what that's about.<br />

Well, they're your words; surely you can help?---I do not<br />

recall. I was under immense stress on that day. I don't know<br />

what that means.<br />

What you were do<strong>in</strong>g here clearly was try<strong>in</strong>g out, advanc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

possible explanations that you might give for conduct that you<br />

knew was improper?---You're try<strong>in</strong>g to put words <strong>in</strong> my mouth.<br />

Like, it's a bit unfair to do that.<br />

Well, do you disagree with that, do you?---I do disagree.<br />

Can you give me some other plausible explanation for this<br />

conversation?---Well, I wanted to tell my wife that I have - -<br />

a summons on my home and at work, that the Crime Corruption<br />

Commission were there and they were look<strong>in</strong>g for regos. That's<br />

it. I don't know what - - what it was about.<br />

"With that rego check. They would of set me up with that - -<br />

"?---Why - - why would my wife know about any rego checks<br />

anyway? I do hundreds - - there are probably a thousand rego<br />

checks. If you go through BCI over seven years - -<br />

Which rego check were you talk<strong>in</strong>g about?---I don't know.<br />

Well, you were only talk<strong>in</strong>g about one: "They would have set<br />

me up with that rego check"?---I do not know. I don't know.<br />

That's the best you can do, is it?---Yes.<br />

All right. Now, I asked you yesterday, when you first gave<br />

evidence, about receiv<strong>in</strong>g a telephone call from Mr <strong>Plant</strong>; do<br />

you recall that? On the morn<strong>in</strong>g of - - ?---Yes.<br />

- - the 16th?---Yes.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 126<br />

10.12


t3/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: And he said he wanted to get through some<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation to Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>. You rang Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>?---Yes, I did.<br />

And he asked you to tell Mr Mell and you told Mr Mell?---Yes,<br />

I did.<br />

And you told me yesterday that at around that time, you<br />

believe you also called Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---That's correct.<br />

And that was <strong>in</strong> relation to your understand<strong>in</strong>g that Mr <strong>Green</strong><br />

was go<strong>in</strong>g to the eastern states and would see your mutual<br />

friend Charlie?---Well, not a mutual friend, but a friend - -<br />

a person that I know.<br />

Would see Charlie?---Yes.<br />

And that's Charlie Sultana?---That's correct.<br />

Who is also - - he has a bus<strong>in</strong>ess, doesn't he, sell<strong>in</strong>g birds,<br />

amongst other animals?---Yes.<br />

What have your deal<strong>in</strong>gs been with him?---No deal<strong>in</strong>gs. I've<br />

only met him through Phil and he's come around my place. He's<br />

met my family, my kids, my mum and dad. I met at Phil's<br />

party.<br />

Right. Have you ever been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> any way at all <strong>in</strong><br />

send<strong>in</strong>g birds to him?---Not me personally, no.<br />

Not you personally?---No.<br />

When you say not you personally, I mean, have you - - ?---<br />

Well, I've never sent birds - -<br />

- - <strong>in</strong>volved - - do you know of birds be<strong>in</strong>g sent to him by<br />

anyone related to you or who you are a friend of?---Well, when<br />

we're do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigations, a number of aviculturalists <strong>in</strong><br />

Western Australia sent birds to Charlie Sultana because he's<br />

one of the biggest dealerships <strong>in</strong> - -<br />

Yes?--- - - <strong>in</strong> the eastern states.<br />

Have you ever been asked to provide birds to be sent to Mr<br />

Sultana?---No.<br />

If you did, you would certa<strong>in</strong>ly report that to your superiors,<br />

I assume?---Most probably. Depends - - I don't know - - yeah,<br />

probably - - I don't know. I do not know.<br />

Right. What was the urgency about r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Green</strong> about<br />

Charlie on this occasion?---Well, I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g over for<br />

a party of some sort so I just wanted to - - them to say hello<br />

to Charlie for me.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 127


t3/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: All right. What made you th<strong>in</strong>k he was go<strong>in</strong>g over<br />

there for a party?---Because I'd talked to Mr <strong>Green</strong> on<br />

numerous occasions prior and he said, yeah, he had a do over<br />

there, at Charlie's place.<br />

Right. What's that got to do with you?---Well, I say hello to<br />

many people that Mr <strong>Green</strong> associates - - associates with, and<br />

I just thought I'd say gidday. It's got a lot to do with me,<br />

when I f<strong>in</strong>d him to be a fairly nice person.<br />

Did you not th<strong>in</strong>k that there was some risk <strong>in</strong> you call<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

person who you had just been told was to be searched?---No,<br />

because I didn't tell him anyth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Before you go on, Mr Hall, were you mean<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

tender 198?<br />

MR HALL: Yes. Thank you, sir.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO19.<br />

MR HALL: Thank you, Commissioner.<br />

EXHIBIT KO19 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape of telephone conversation<br />

Barcode 198<br />

COMMISSIONER: Can I take this opportunity, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, simply to<br />

say that the oath you took yesterday still applies and that it<br />

is important that you tell the truth when questioned <strong>in</strong> this<br />

Commission.<br />

(TO MR HALL): Go on, Mr Hall.<br />

MR HALL: Thank you, sir.<br />

(TO WITNESS): All right. Well, I'd like to ask you the<br />

question aga<strong>in</strong> that I asked you yesterday, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. Is it not<br />

the case that you gave a coded warn<strong>in</strong>g to Mr <strong>Green</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the <strong>in</strong>formation you had received from Mr <strong>Plant</strong>?---There is no<br />

coded warn<strong>in</strong>g. I - - I don't understand what you're talk<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about. I rang Mr <strong>Green</strong> because I got the phone call.<br />

Obviously, be<strong>in</strong>g a friend, I might have felt a bit, but I - -<br />

there was no code words and there was no <strong>in</strong>formation passed on<br />

to Mr <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

You rang Mr <strong>Green</strong> with<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>utes of - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 128


t4/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - Mr <strong>Green</strong> with<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>utes of receiv<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation from Mr <strong>Plant</strong>?---I don't - - I don't remember when<br />

I did it. I just made sure - -<br />

Well, perhaps I can rem<strong>in</strong>d you?---I made sure I told Mr<br />

<strong>Dawson</strong>, who is the <strong>in</strong>vestigator, and I was a bit concerned as<br />

why Customs had dealt with me when I got told that I had no -<br />

- had no deal<strong>in</strong>gs with them at all any more, because I'd been<br />

taken out of the special <strong>in</strong>vestigations unit. I had a<br />

supervisor <strong>in</strong> the office that could have been called, so I<br />

made sure that the right people knew.<br />

Well, hav<strong>in</strong>g received this <strong>in</strong>formation and speak<strong>in</strong>g to Mr<br />

<strong>Dawson</strong> and Mr Mell, you had ample opportunity to tell them<br />

that Phil <strong>Green</strong> was a friend of yours - this person who you<br />

knew was about to be searched?---I didn't want to say anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about that.<br />

You didn't want to, no?---Because he was a friend of m<strong>in</strong>e 14<br />

years ago, and I keep on go<strong>in</strong>g back to it, that I'd been - -<br />

And he was still a friend of yours?---Yes.<br />

Can we hear 199, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: "Today" you emphasise. Why "today"?---I don't know.<br />

When's Charlie Sultana's birthday?---Well, when he was go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

over - - I seriously don't - - I just thought it was around<br />

this time of year.<br />

Well, do you know when Charlie Sultana's birthday is?---No.<br />

But I just knew that - -<br />

Would it surprise you to know it's <strong>in</strong> February?---Yes.<br />

Why were you emphasis<strong>in</strong>g the word "today"?---I don't know.<br />

Well, I suggest to you you were emphasis<strong>in</strong>g it because what<br />

you were try<strong>in</strong>g to convey to Mr <strong>Green</strong> was that he was about to<br />

be the subject of enforcement action?---But I don't understand<br />

how someone can th<strong>in</strong>k that's go<strong>in</strong>g to be someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to enforcement action. I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g over for a party<br />

at Charlie's place, and I just made sure that he wished him a<br />

happy birthday, because I probably wouldn't speak to him<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Well, that should be enough then, shouldn't it, leav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

message?---Well, I wanted to speak to him face to face.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 129<br />

10.17


t4/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: All right. But there's no need to do more than<br />

that, is there?---Well, he could have come and visited me or<br />

whatever.<br />

Yes?---I can recall r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g him aga<strong>in</strong>. I wanted to speak to<br />

him.<br />

Right. Well, how many times did you call him?---Well, I<br />

eventually got him on the phone.<br />

Well, how many times did you call him?---Twice. I called him<br />

on a mobile and couldn't get him, so then I called him at<br />

home.<br />

All right. This was at 8.23. A m<strong>in</strong>ute later - - can we<br />

listen to 200, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: That was very fa<strong>in</strong>t, but you accept that that was<br />

you leav<strong>in</strong>g a message on Anne Gracie's mobile telephone?---<br />

That's the same message, yes.<br />

Same message, yes. A m<strong>in</strong>ute later. What was the urgency?---I<br />

was try<strong>in</strong>g to get a hold of him to speak to him.<br />

Well, what was the urgency about wish<strong>in</strong>g Charlie a - - ?---<br />

Because - -<br />

- - "happy birthday today"?---Because I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

be leav<strong>in</strong>g soon. That's what he had told me the week before.<br />

Yes. Why was there any necessity to make several calls about<br />

this?---Because I wanted to speak to him. Because not<br />

everyone answers their messagebank.<br />

And you did get through to him eventually, didn't you?---Yes.<br />

What did you say to him then?---I just - - I don't know. I<br />

probably said - - I can't recall. I'm sure I told him to wish<br />

Charlie a happy birthday.<br />

Mm hm. Anyth<strong>in</strong>g else?---Not that I can recall.<br />

So that was the full content of the message that you wanted to<br />

convey to him; just to wish Charlie happy birthday?---Well,<br />

he said to me he's <strong>in</strong> the middle of someth<strong>in</strong>g, and that was<br />

it. When someone sort of cuts you short, that's the end of<br />

the conversation then, isn't it?<br />

Well, did you th<strong>in</strong>k that what might have been occupy<strong>in</strong>g him<br />

was <strong>in</strong> fact the search that you had received advice of?---<br />

Well, I don't know.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 130


t4/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Let's listen to 180.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 180?<br />

MR HALL: 180.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 131


t5/sa<br />

CCC<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: That's you and Mr <strong>Green</strong> speak<strong>in</strong>g?---Yes.<br />

All right. You gave a rather know<strong>in</strong>g laugh after he said he<br />

was <strong>in</strong> the midst of hav<strong>in</strong>g a good day actually. What did you<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k he meant by that?---Well, it sounded like - - it sounded<br />

like he was <strong>in</strong> the middle of someth<strong>in</strong>g because there was a lot<br />

of noise <strong>in</strong> the background and he - - the way he spoke there<br />

just sounded like he was cutt<strong>in</strong>g me off and he was busy. And<br />

I could - - well, yeah, I can imag<strong>in</strong>e obviously there's<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g - - someth<strong>in</strong>g go<strong>in</strong>g on but I didn't know exactly<br />

what except for the <strong>in</strong>formation that I received from Malcolm<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>.<br />

You must have - - must have at least suspected that the search<br />

was, <strong>in</strong> fact, go<strong>in</strong>g on at that time?---Possibly. Yes.<br />

Well, this giv<strong>in</strong>g Charlie a happy birthday was simply code,<br />

wasn't it, to warn him that he was to be searched?---No. We -<br />

- there's no codes.<br />

You were very <strong>in</strong>sistent about him pass<strong>in</strong>g on a message from<br />

you to give Charlie a happy birthday - three telephone calls -<br />

even though Charlie's birthday was not for several months. Is<br />

that what you're tell<strong>in</strong>g us?---He - - he's a truck driver and<br />

he's hard to get a hold of and I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g over there<br />

for a do so I just made sure he - - and that's what I thought<br />

it was for. He said he was hav<strong>in</strong>g a do at Charlie's place.<br />

I see.<br />

(TO COMMISSIONER): Commissioner, can I tender 199 and 200?<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes. That's KO20 and KO21.<br />

EXHIBIT KO20 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

EXHIBIT KO21 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

MR HALL: And 180 is already KO7.<br />

COMMISSIONER: K07. Thank you.<br />

MR HALL: Did you tell any of your superior officers that you<br />

had had communication with Mr <strong>Green</strong> on this day?---No.<br />

After?---No.<br />

Why not?---Because I - - I thought it was irrelevant. When I<br />

got told by Customs that they were go<strong>in</strong>g to do a search on his<br />

place with<strong>in</strong> half an hour, you know, that - - that's got<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g - - that's why I tried to keep my distance from it. I<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 132<br />

10.22


t5/sa<br />

CCC<br />

got taken out of the special <strong>in</strong>vestigations unit. I wanted no<br />

more to do with it. I was under extreme stress. I had got<br />

threats from people and all I got from my office was, "You<br />

need to deal with a counsellor", which was great, and I got a<br />

lot of respect for that but I kept my distance from it. I had<br />

my problems with Rick <strong>Dawson</strong>. We used to be great friends.<br />

We didn't see eye to eye for a while and there was - - so I<br />

just thought I'll keep clear from those situations. And<br />

that's why I was put on general duties. I didn't need any<br />

more stress <strong>in</strong> relation to any more of those sort of<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations. That's why I pulled out of it.<br />

MR HALL: Did you cont<strong>in</strong>ue to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a relationship - - a<br />

friendly relationship with Phil <strong>Green</strong> after this time?---Yes.<br />

Did you meet with him follow<strong>in</strong>g the execution of this search<br />

warrant?---I - -<br />

On or about the 21st of September?---We probably met a couple<br />

of times.<br />

Did you speak to him about be<strong>in</strong>g summonsed by this Commission<br />

to give evidence at the private hear<strong>in</strong>g?---No, because I got<br />

told I'm not allowed to talk about the summons.<br />

Where did you meet him?---I don't remember.<br />

Yes.<br />

(TO COMMISSIONER): Commissioner, at this time I would ask<br />

that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> be stood down aga<strong>in</strong>. I wish to call some other<br />

<strong>witnesses</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: If you'd please sit down - - stand down to the<br />

back for the moment, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>.<br />

WITNESS WITHDREW<br />

MR HALL: Can I call Mr Malcolm <strong>Plant</strong>.<br />

MALCOLM ROSS PLANT affirmed:<br />

COMMISSIONER: Right. Thank you. Please sit down, Mr <strong>Plant</strong>.<br />

EXAMINED BY MR HALL SC:<br />

MR HALL: Now, Mr <strong>Plant</strong>, as we've heard <strong>in</strong> other evidence, you<br />

are a Customs officer, I th<strong>in</strong>k?---That is correct. Yes.<br />

And what's your position with<strong>in</strong> Customs?---I'm an<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation officer.<br />

How long have you worked <strong>in</strong> that area <strong>in</strong> the Customs Service?-<br />

--Approximately 10½ years.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 133<br />

M.R. PLANT XN


t5/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Now, does your job br<strong>in</strong>g you <strong>in</strong>to contact with the<br />

Department of Conservation and Land Management?---It does.<br />

Do Customs on occasion conduct jo<strong>in</strong>t - - -<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 134


t6/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - on occasion conduct jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>vestigations with<br />

CALM?---We do, yes.<br />

And I assume that relates to matters <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wildlife</strong>?---<br />

That's correct, yes.<br />

Does Customs have some responsibility <strong>in</strong> respect to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g illegal importations and exportations of flora<br />

and fauna?---Yes. We are designated <strong>in</strong>spectors under the<br />

Environmental Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act and we<br />

operate with an MOU with the Department of Environment &<br />

Heritage which adm<strong>in</strong>isters that Act and we conduct<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations on their behalf and monitor and police the<br />

border <strong>in</strong> relation to that Act.<br />

Can you give some idea of how many jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>wildlife</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations you've been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>?---Approximately about<br />

27.<br />

And can you assess the success of jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>wildlife</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations with CALM?---On the whole, very successful.<br />

Have you ever had cause to suspect that <strong>in</strong>formation from jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigations have been compromised?---I have, yes.<br />

Are you able to give us some examples of such compromises<br />

occurr<strong>in</strong>g?---I can. In August 2000 I was - - I'd received<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation from CALM <strong>in</strong> relation to a - - a person who had<br />

some macaws on his National Exotic Bird Register, which was a<br />

requirement under an old scheme which the predecessor for DEH<br />

used to run, which was the Department of Environment which was<br />

an exotic register for imported birds and progeny. And the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation was that this person was falsify<strong>in</strong>g his birds had<br />

died and he was keep<strong>in</strong>g - - he hadn't notified CALM, which was<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrat<strong>in</strong>g that on behalf of DEH, that the birds had died<br />

and he was offer<strong>in</strong>g the places on his register for payment<br />

which was an offence under the old Wildlife Protection Act<br />

which was the Act which was <strong>in</strong> force prior to the EPBC Act<br />

which carried a two-year sentence. After liais<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

Department of Environment <strong>in</strong> - - sorry, Environment Australia<br />

which was the predecessor, the previous name of Environment &<br />

Heritage <strong>in</strong> Canberra and <strong>in</strong> relation to obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g warrants on<br />

that person we planned to actually execute warrants - - I<br />

swore - - I drafted warrants and planned to conduct a full<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to the matter, but four days prior to the<br />

actual execution of those warrants, the suspect attended CALM<br />

offices and volunteered the <strong>in</strong>formation that his birds had<br />

died and he wished to amend his register.<br />

Now, do you have another example of such a compromise?---Yes.<br />

In October 2002, I was conduct<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to - -<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 135<br />

10.27


t6/kr<br />

CCC<br />

with CALM as a jo<strong>in</strong>t operation <strong>in</strong> relation to the activities<br />

of a suspect trafficker <strong>in</strong> <strong>wildlife</strong> who was provid<strong>in</strong>g eggs to<br />

couriers and as part of that operation, CALM and Customs - -<br />

we provided covert cameras <strong>in</strong> remote areas, with CALM, <strong>in</strong><br />

which to monitor the possible poach<strong>in</strong>g on targeted nest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas. The idea was that once we could identify that those<br />

nest<strong>in</strong>g sites were be<strong>in</strong>g poached, we could then - - would give<br />

us a better time-frame <strong>in</strong> relation to when the courier was due<br />

to come over. We cont<strong>in</strong>ued the monitor<strong>in</strong>g, both Customs and<br />

CALM shared the view<strong>in</strong>g of tapes and the chang<strong>in</strong>g of tapes,<br />

etcetera, and after we were advised that the eggs - - that had<br />

actually hatched and were now chicks, it became a domestic<br />

issue because the MO for us is that basically they've got to<br />

be eggs, so therefore the risk - - -<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 136


t7/nj<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - so therefore the risk for <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement was reduced and therefore we decided to pull the<br />

cameras out. Approximately a week to 2 weeks after those<br />

cameras were pulled out I was advised by CALM that the nests<br />

which we had cameras <strong>in</strong> had been robbed.<br />

MR HALL: Robbed of the chicks?---Yes.<br />

All right. So <strong>in</strong> both of those cases you, I take it, believe<br />

that the operations were compromised by some leak of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation?---I do, yes.<br />

In respect of <strong>in</strong>formation, do I take it that it's necessary <strong>in</strong><br />

order to be effective <strong>in</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g this sort of illegal<br />

activity, particularly if you're <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t operation, to be<br />

able to trust those with whom you're work<strong>in</strong>g?---Very much so.<br />

And there needs to be able to be, to the extent necessary, a<br />

free exchange of <strong>in</strong>formation between the agencies?---Where<br />

it's legally possible, yes.<br />

Have these past compromises had any effect upon the view of<br />

Customs as to what <strong>in</strong>formation it can properly pass - - safely<br />

pass to CALM?---Yes, it has, but it was more a case of who we<br />

pass it to.<br />

Yes?---I believe that what we did was, we tightened our<br />

dissem<strong>in</strong>ation to a very select few, and with the understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that it would not go any further and that we could control the<br />

operation better that way.<br />

Right. Now, we've heard that there was a search on Mr Philip<br />

<strong>Green</strong>'s premises on the 16th of September 2004. Were you<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> that search?---I was.<br />

And why was the Customs Service <strong>in</strong>volved?---Australian Customs<br />

Service was conduct<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to an organisation<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly based <strong>in</strong> the eastern states, but which we believed the<br />

person whose residence we executed warrants on was <strong>in</strong>volved,<br />

and it was <strong>in</strong> relation to the importation of exotic eggs <strong>in</strong>to<br />

Australia and the collection for - - of eggs for export, both<br />

<strong>in</strong> contravention of the EPBC Act. And also we believed there<br />

may be some exotics already on - - illegally imported exotics<br />

on the premises.<br />

This was a nation-wide operation?---It was, yes.<br />

And I th<strong>in</strong>k there were a number of search warrants also<br />

executed <strong>in</strong> the eastern states?---That's correct.<br />

Now, on the morn<strong>in</strong>g of the 16th of September did you make a<br />

telephone call to Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---I did.<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 137<br />

10.32


t7/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Where were you when you made that telephone call?---<br />

I was at premises of Mr <strong>Green</strong>'s.<br />

Execut<strong>in</strong>g the warrant?---Assist<strong>in</strong>g the execution of the<br />

warrant. It was a CALM warrant.<br />

It was a CALM warrant?---Yes.<br />

Okay. Now, what did you say to Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---Words to the effect<br />

that I was try<strong>in</strong>g to get <strong>in</strong> contact with Officer <strong>Dawson</strong> but<br />

was unable to contact him, and asked him if he could pass on a<br />

message to him.<br />

And the message was - ?---That we were <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g - - that<br />

we were do<strong>in</strong>g an operation <strong>in</strong> New South Wales, and - - words<br />

to the effect that we were do<strong>in</strong>g an operation <strong>in</strong> New South<br />

Wales and we believed that Mr <strong>Green</strong> was <strong>in</strong>volved and, as a<br />

result of that we would be execut<strong>in</strong>g a warrant later on that -<br />

- on his premises.<br />

All right. Well, <strong>in</strong> fact you were execut<strong>in</strong>g the warrant at<br />

that time?---Yes.<br />

And you were aware that this was <strong>in</strong> fact a way of test<strong>in</strong>g Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>'s <strong>in</strong>tegrity?---That is correct, yeah.<br />

Now, <strong>in</strong> fact, I th<strong>in</strong>k - - was Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> also with you at the<br />

time of the execution of the warrant?---He was, yes.<br />

Are you able to tell me whether you observed that Mr <strong>Dawson</strong><br />

received a telephone call whilst you were do<strong>in</strong>g the warrant?--<br />

-Yes. He did receive a phone call.<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 138


t8/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: What about Mr <strong>Green</strong>? Did he receive any telephone<br />

calls?---I wasn't <strong>in</strong> a position to see that.<br />

All right. Now, when you spoke to Mr <strong>Ando</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention to execute a warrant on Mr <strong>Green</strong>, did he <strong>in</strong> any way<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate to you that Mr <strong>Green</strong> was a personal friend of his?---<br />

No, he did not.<br />

Now, were you aware that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> had previously been a member<br />

of the special <strong>in</strong>vestigation unit at CALM?---Yes.<br />

Did you at any stage know that he had a personal friendship<br />

with Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---No.<br />

Has Mr <strong>Green</strong> long been a person of <strong>in</strong>terest to both Customs<br />

and CALM?---He's def<strong>in</strong>itely been an <strong>in</strong>terest to Customs and<br />

from <strong>in</strong>formation I've received from CALM, yes, I understand of<br />

great <strong>in</strong>terest to them as well.<br />

And now, I th<strong>in</strong>k you've been present dur<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Ando</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g his<br />

evidence, have you?---Yes.<br />

You've heard him say that <strong>in</strong> relation to this relationship he<br />

has with Mr <strong>Green</strong>, he considers it to be a matter - - a<br />

private matter and that he keeps his work separate from that.<br />

Can you tell me, <strong>in</strong> relation to Customs and the conduct of<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t operations, if you knew that someone - and bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>d Mr <strong>Ando</strong> has previously been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />

relat<strong>in</strong>g to Mr <strong>Green</strong> - if you knew that someone <strong>in</strong> such a<br />

position had a friendly relationship with a person who was<br />

under <strong>in</strong>vestigation, would you consider that to be a risk <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to the <strong>in</strong>vestigation?---Def<strong>in</strong>itely.<br />

Is it someth<strong>in</strong>g that you would expect to - - if it was a<br />

Customs officer <strong>in</strong>volved, that he would report it to you?---<br />

Yes.<br />

In such a circumstance, would you take some steps to limit the<br />

amount of <strong>in</strong>formation available to such a person?---Yes, I<br />

would.<br />

Both, I take it, <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terests of the <strong>in</strong>vestigation and <strong>in</strong><br />

their own <strong>in</strong>terests?---That's right. It's fair to them.<br />

Now, can you tell me, Mr <strong>Plant</strong>, <strong>in</strong> relation to the Customs<br />

Service, do Customs conduct security vett<strong>in</strong>g or security<br />

clearances on its officers?---Yes, we do.<br />

To what level are Customs officers security cleared?---The<br />

general area of Customs, most officers are to the protected<br />

level. Officers <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestigation section and <strong>in</strong>telligence<br />

section are to the highly protected level.<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 139<br />

10.37


t8/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: And that security clearance, does that <strong>in</strong>volve, to<br />

your knowledge, some background check<strong>in</strong>g of the person?---Yes.<br />

It's passed to the AFP to conduct those <strong>in</strong>quiries.<br />

All right. If CALM were to implement such a system <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to its <strong>in</strong>vestigative officers, would that provide a<br />

measure of comfort for Customs <strong>in</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

conduct<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>t operations?---I believe it would make it<br />

easier, yes.<br />

I th<strong>in</strong>k there may well be some <strong>in</strong>formation that you are<br />

prohibited from pass<strong>in</strong>g to CALM because of its security<br />

status, is that right?---That is correct, yes.<br />

You may have been present when I asked Mr Mell some questions<br />

about the database that CALM has, certa<strong>in</strong> elements of which<br />

have got audit track<strong>in</strong>g on, the licens<strong>in</strong>g database doesn't;<br />

does Customs utilise audit track<strong>in</strong>g?---Yes, we do.<br />

Do you use that on all your databases?---Yes, we do. I<br />

understand from all the Customs systems, we have our own audit<br />

trail and also with<strong>in</strong> our shared databases. If it's police<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e systems, only authorised persons are able to access<br />

that and you must have a reason to access that system and it<br />

is, aga<strong>in</strong>, this is an audit capacity on those systems to<br />

actually who does it and our jo<strong>in</strong>t - - our other systems where<br />

we jo<strong>in</strong>tly have <strong>in</strong>telligence systems with other agencies,<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>, there are audit capacities with<strong>in</strong> each of those<br />

systems.<br />

I asked Mr Cresswell some questions about - - -<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 140


t9/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - Mr Cresswell some questions about bird<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g and the level of sophistication. Is it your<br />

experience <strong>in</strong> the 10½ years or so that you've worked <strong>in</strong> the<br />

area that bird smuggl<strong>in</strong>g has become more sophisticated?---Yes.<br />

You mentioned also that there was - - at least <strong>in</strong> the matter<br />

that you were <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Green</strong> for, there was an<br />

exchange. There was both exotics be<strong>in</strong>g imported as well as<br />

Australian <strong>wildlife</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g exported. Does the importation also<br />

carry significant risks?---The importation has huge risks <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to quarant<strong>in</strong>e risks it imposes. Apart from - - we<br />

were talk<strong>in</strong>g about the avian flu situation. You have<br />

varieties of Newcastle's disease, which can decimate aviaries<br />

and then obviously we're look<strong>in</strong>g at our own <strong>native</strong> varieties<br />

as well as was previously stated the poultry <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Now, one of the examples that you gave of a previous suspected<br />

compromise was where the register at CALM was not correct and<br />

then the person concerned came <strong>in</strong> and sought that it be<br />

amended?---Mm.<br />

In respect of, for example, illegally imported birds, do you<br />

rely upon the accuracy of the State licens<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether birds are, <strong>in</strong> fact, illegally imported or<br />

legitimate?---Yes.<br />

If there are deficiencies <strong>in</strong> that system would that underm<strong>in</strong>e<br />

your imperatives <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g such matters?---<br />

It would. Yes.<br />

Yes. Thank you, Mr <strong>Plant</strong>. That's all the questions I have.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hammond.<br />

MR HAMMOND: I don't have any questions, Mr Commissioner.<br />

NO CROSS-EXAMINATION<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Thank you.<br />

(TO MR HALL): Mr <strong>Plant</strong> may now be excused?<br />

MR HALL: Yes. He can.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr <strong>Plant</strong>, thank you for your evidence. You're<br />

free to go, if you wish.<br />

WITNESS WITHDREW<br />

MR HALL: Yes. I call Rick <strong>Dawson</strong>.<br />

23.11.04 M.R. PLANT XN 141<br />

10.42


t9/sa<br />

CCC<br />

RICKY DAVID DAWSON sworn:<br />

COMMISSIONER: Thank you. Please sit down, Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>?---Thank<br />

you.<br />

Mr Hall.<br />

EXAMINED BY MR HALL SC:<br />

MR HALL: Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>, you're a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer with the<br />

Department of Conservation and Land Management?---Yeah.<br />

That's correct.<br />

How long have you been employed <strong>in</strong> that department?---About 7½<br />

years.<br />

Do you have any <strong>in</strong>vestigative experience prior to that time?--<br />

-Yeah. I did 21 years <strong>in</strong> the Navy as an <strong>in</strong>vestigator.<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with the New South Wales Police, West Australian<br />

Police, AFP, Customs.<br />

Now, your present position is what?---It's been re-titled.<br />

I'm now the Senior Investigator of the Special Compliance<br />

Operation Unit, which used to be a special <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />

unit, formerly known as a special <strong>in</strong>vestigator.<br />

Right; but your job duties haven't changed, I take it?---No.<br />

Not at all. Not at all.<br />

Now, we've just heard from Mr <strong>Plant</strong>. Can you confirm that on<br />

occasions you conduct jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>vestigations with the Customs<br />

Service <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>wildlife</strong> traffick<strong>in</strong>g?---Yeah.<br />

Absolutely.<br />

Is that what the Special Investigations Unit, or whatever it<br />

may now be called, focuses on? The more complex,<br />

sophisticated - -?---Yeah. Absolutely. But, I mean, we do a<br />

wide range of th<strong>in</strong>gs. We've been tasked by a lot of th<strong>in</strong>gs by<br />

our executive director to look <strong>in</strong>to. The more complex, more<br />

serious <strong>in</strong>vestigations. And part of our role is to liaise<br />

with other State agencies and deal with the more serious<br />

offences with<strong>in</strong> CALM.<br />

Now, <strong>in</strong> talk<strong>in</strong>g about those more serious offences, is it known<br />

to you that some of the Australian fauna that is either taken<br />

illegally from the wild or exported is of very significant<br />

value overseas?---Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, my research with<br />

Traffic Oceania and <strong>in</strong>formation from Customs and other<br />

agencies suggests that our <strong>wildlife</strong> is extremely valuable<br />

overseas.<br />

Are there particular species of birds that are at risk <strong>in</strong> this<br />

regard?---Most of the parrots are - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 142


t10/nj<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - of the parrots are, <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g degree of.<br />

There's no doubt that our black cockatoos are worth a lot more<br />

overseas. Gang-gangs, some of the eastern states' black<br />

cockatoos. Galahs and corellas have value overseas. Our<br />

parrots are quite unique, so yes; they are valuable.<br />

MR HALL: Now, can you tell me that <strong>in</strong> the conduct of your<br />

work have you had any suspicions that CALM operations have<br />

been compromised?---We - - I had received some <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

from a couple of sources that suggested that that may be the<br />

case. What we were do<strong>in</strong>g at the time was, we - - you get that<br />

all the time. People - - the best type of defence for them is<br />

offence, and you often get - - they try to tarnish. So what<br />

we do when we'd received the <strong>in</strong>formation, we were actually<br />

collat<strong>in</strong>g it and validat<strong>in</strong>g it and try<strong>in</strong>g to make a decision<br />

as to where we would be send<strong>in</strong>g that, but yeah; we have.<br />

We heard Mr Mell say yesterday that one source of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

was tapes of conversations between Mr Manc<strong>in</strong>i and Mr <strong>Green</strong>;<br />

is that correct?---That's correct.<br />

Now, did these issues relate to Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---We had listened to<br />

some - - I'd received <strong>in</strong>formation and, as a result of that,<br />

what we try to do is validate it, so we were fairly conv<strong>in</strong>ced<br />

that Mr <strong>Green</strong> and Manc<strong>in</strong>i were aware of us listen<strong>in</strong>g to him,<br />

so when we listened to the tapes we were quite cautious as to<br />

what we believed, but they were talk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> code or <strong>in</strong> - - <strong>in</strong><br />

not so much specifics. We received some <strong>in</strong>formation which<br />

suggested that - - Mr <strong>Green</strong> would say, "My mate" or "Your<br />

mate" or "Our mate" or "The mate over there" or "Your mate up<br />

there."<br />

So you had no name at that stage?---Not at all. But what we<br />

did do is, if you actually listen to this - - spend a fair bit<br />

of time and listen to the tapes you could actually pick up a<br />

bit of a sequence. And I didn't listen to the actual tapes<br />

personally until after they were vetted by Nick Phillips, my<br />

partner, who spent a lot of time do<strong>in</strong>g so. And when you put<br />

them <strong>in</strong> sequence you could actually see that there was contact<br />

between Phil <strong>Green</strong> and "My mate's mum" or "dad". So what we<br />

did was we then conducted CCR checks and established that Phil<br />

<strong>Green</strong> had contacted the <strong>Ando</strong> residence, or <strong>Ando</strong> senior<br />

residence. As a result of that we were then try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

establish what that meant.<br />

Right. Now, I take it that your powers of <strong>in</strong>vestigation are<br />

really quite limited. You are an <strong>in</strong>vestigator, generally<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g, who focuses on <strong>wildlife</strong> offences?---Yeah. I've made<br />

it very clear to my superiors that my job is to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> and not to <strong>in</strong>vestigate my fellow officers. I passed<br />

the <strong>in</strong>formation as I've seen it's my duty to do so, and that's<br />

as far as it's gone. I mean, there seems to be a perception<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 143<br />

10.47


t10/nj<br />

CCC<br />

that I've been out to get Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. That couldn't be further<br />

from the truth.<br />

MR HALL: Now, <strong>in</strong> fact, I th<strong>in</strong>k it was the case that it was<br />

the CCC that approached CALM rather than the other way round?-<br />

--That's quite - - quite ironically, we were <strong>in</strong> the process<br />

that morn<strong>in</strong>g of work<strong>in</strong>g out what we should do with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation when we were requested to attend the CCC that<br />

afternoon. There was a bit of banter <strong>in</strong> the office that maybe<br />

we were be<strong>in</strong>g listened to <strong>in</strong> the office. It was quite - -<br />

quite a surprise to us, and very disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, I must add.<br />

Disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g that - - ?---Oh, well, I mean, I - - me and<br />

Andrew, as he said, were good friends. I trusted him<br />

implicitly. I mean, dur<strong>in</strong>g his tough times I tried to support<br />

him.<br />

Can you tell me whether the allegations that have been made<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of this hear<strong>in</strong>g about Mr <strong>Ando</strong> - and you're<br />

aware that he's been suspended now for some period of time - -<br />

?---Sure.<br />

- - has that had an impact upon morale with<strong>in</strong> CALM?---There's<br />

no doubt with<strong>in</strong> the office that collectively the office is<br />

concerned about their private and professional <strong>in</strong>tegrities<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g compromised. For me, as I said, you know, I - - I<br />

actually like the guy. I mean, he's got a great family. I've<br />

had him at my house. It's - - it's a bit surreal. It's a bit<br />

hard to believe.<br />

Well, whilst these allegations were pend<strong>in</strong>g, did this have an<br />

impact upon the way <strong>in</strong> which you could conduct <strong>in</strong>vestigations?<br />

The way you dealt with <strong>in</strong>formation?---I came from the navy<br />

where I had a very high-security clearance, and I come from an<br />

area where you always operated on the need to know, and from<br />

the day I jo<strong>in</strong>ed the department, <strong>in</strong> consultation with Dave<br />

Mell, we actually tried to start - - adopt a need to know<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, so we started to do that. But as a result of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation that started to filter through about Andrew, then<br />

I felt it was important that we then really were quite<br />

cautious about what we did. And <strong>in</strong> fact, we went to measures<br />

where we - - where we would pretend that we were go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

somewhere else than we where we were go<strong>in</strong>g. We'd pretend to<br />

work on other jobs. Very cautious about leav<strong>in</strong>g stuff ly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

around. But <strong>in</strong> fairness, that's someth<strong>in</strong>g that we've probably<br />

adopted for some time anyway.<br />

All right?---Even Andrew's been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> that where he<br />

worked for me.<br />

Yes. I was com<strong>in</strong>g to that. He <strong>in</strong> fact worked <strong>in</strong> the area of<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigations with you for a - - ?---Yeah. It was<br />

about 18 months. It wasn't 2 years.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 144


t10/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Whilst he was work<strong>in</strong>g with you I take it he had<br />

access to the <strong>in</strong>telligence database?---Limited. It's quite a<br />

hard system to operate. Andrew had some access to some<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, sure.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 145


t11/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Now, was Mr <strong>Green</strong>, Mr Phil <strong>Green</strong>, a person of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest at that time?---Mr Phil <strong>Green</strong>'s been a person of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest for a few years now. Andrew's listened to the tapes.<br />

In the early days, Andrew was tasked with the responsibility<br />

with Customs to jo<strong>in</strong>tly listen to the tapes and was quite<br />

clear <strong>in</strong> them days, when they had no idea of us listen<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

them, they were provid<strong>in</strong>g unsolicited <strong>in</strong>formation about their<br />

activities, and Andrew was very aware of them activities. In<br />

fact, he reported them to me.<br />

Was Mr <strong>Green</strong> <strong>in</strong> fact prosecuted?---Yes, he was.<br />

Now - - ?---And as Andrew said, he did head up that - - that<br />

was the first job he had when he first come and jo<strong>in</strong>ed, yeah.<br />

Did he tell you either at that time or at any subsequent time<br />

that he had a friendly relationship with Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---It's one<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g I f<strong>in</strong>d very surpris<strong>in</strong>g. I had no idea that he had any<br />

relationship with him at all. I still f<strong>in</strong>d it hard to believe<br />

that he had a relationship with him at that time when we<br />

conducted the <strong>in</strong>vestigation. We took $32,000 worth of birds<br />

off Mr <strong>Green</strong>. He wasn't very happy.<br />

No, I can imag<strong>in</strong>e. Now, I take it that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> was <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>vestigations as well?---Yeah, many. I mean, he's a<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigator, you know? He's been - - he's been very<br />

competent <strong>in</strong> years gone by, you know, had good results. Still<br />

up to the last few days. I mean, I saw him deal with a lot of<br />

section 79 notices, which is illegal import of birds and he<br />

actually dealt with them.<br />

Now, I don't want to get too much <strong>in</strong>to the detail, but there<br />

are certa<strong>in</strong> forms that have to be lodged by those who both<br />

keep birds and then <strong>in</strong>tend to send them outside of Western<br />

Australia?---Yes, that's correct.<br />

Now, Mr Mell told us about different types of licence that can<br />

be - - ?---Yes.<br />

- - kept, and there are returns that have to be made,<br />

particularly by dealers?---Yes.<br />

And those returns are <strong>in</strong>tended to enable the Department of<br />

Conservation & Land Management, if it needs to do so, to check<br />

the providence of a bird, to determ<strong>in</strong>e where it's come from?--<br />

-Yes, that's the - - that's the aim of it.<br />

Yes. In the course of your career as an <strong>in</strong>vestigator with<br />

CALM, have you come across any allegations that these records<br />

are falsified on occasion to legitimise wild-caught birds?---<br />

In consultation with Andrew, and this is some of the issues<br />

where he - - he reckons we - - I tried to steal his thunder,<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 146<br />

10.52


t11/kr<br />

CCC<br />

and as far as I'm concerned, that's - - that's not the case,<br />

but we - - we worked on <strong>in</strong>formation and I've got a l<strong>in</strong>e that I<br />

use quite consistently. It's all about the paperwork. And<br />

that's what it's about. If you can actually legitimise birds,<br />

then their value becomes, you know, far more. So yes, there -<br />

- I mean, there has been <strong>in</strong>formation or suggestion over the<br />

time of birds mov<strong>in</strong>g illegally. You hear snippets from the<br />

eastern states as well as you do here about ways and means<br />

that they try to legitimise birds.<br />

MR HALL: Now, I want to ask you about some other persons of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest. Mr Richard Polglase, is he a person of <strong>in</strong>terest for<br />

CALM?---Yeah. He's - - he has a large collection. He's moved<br />

it east, he's moved it west, he's - - he's - - there's been<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation that's come through on numerous occasions about<br />

his potential activities. He - - his movements and the way<br />

he's done it and the <strong>in</strong>formation has def<strong>in</strong>itely made him a<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t of <strong>in</strong>terest - - sorry, I beg your pardon, a person of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest. There's probably no one <strong>in</strong> our office that would<br />

not disagree with that.<br />

And has he been a person of <strong>in</strong>terest for some years?---Yes.<br />

Was he a person of <strong>in</strong>terest at the time that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> was <strong>in</strong><br />

the special <strong>in</strong>vestigations unit?---Probably from about then,<br />

but <strong>in</strong> the early days <strong>in</strong> fact, I had used Mr Polglase to<br />

assist us <strong>in</strong> the hous<strong>in</strong>g of birds that we'd seized and had<br />

considered him at the time to be someone we could probably<br />

trust, but that changed as time went on.<br />

You may have been present when Mr <strong>Ando</strong> gave evidence that on<br />

an occasion he collected some yellow-tailed black cockatoos<br />

from Mr Polglase that were for his father. Were you aware<br />

that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> had ever had any deal<strong>in</strong>gs with Mr Polglase?---No.<br />

No. I conducted an <strong>in</strong>spection of Mr Polglase's aviaries a<br />

couple of weeks ago and he never mentioned it to me either.<br />

Now, Mr <strong>Ando</strong> received an anonymous report <strong>in</strong> early September<br />

of activity <strong>in</strong> the Moora area. Were you present when that<br />

tape was played?---Yes.<br />

And I th<strong>in</strong>k you may have also seen the video, did you?---Yes.<br />

As an experienced <strong>wildlife</strong> officer, do you accept that that<br />

tape and video-tape appears to <strong>in</strong>dicate suspect behaviour?---<br />

Oh, absolutely.<br />

Would you <strong>in</strong>vestigate it?---Yeah. Absolutely.<br />

Is there some procedure <strong>in</strong> place for how duty officers are to<br />

treat anonymous reports of alleged illegal conduct?---Andrew<br />

said before that we receive a lot, and some of them you need<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 147


t11/kr<br />

CCC<br />

to validate. I mean, people can be malicious and provide<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation that, you know, may not be true. So that's why we<br />

go through a bit of a process, so if you receive that<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, then you would go and conduct BCI checks with<br />

them. I mean, if that <strong>in</strong>formation had been current, I would<br />

have contacted the local police or the Moora <strong>wildlife</strong> officers<br />

and seen if they could attend the area - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 148


t12/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - if they could attend the area. I believe it<br />

was some days later, from the - - is that the case?<br />

MR HALL: Yes?---Yeah. Okay. So, we - - you know, we would<br />

have def<strong>in</strong>itely conducted a formal <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to that and<br />

if we'd found out that had been Phil <strong>Green</strong> I know that he's a<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t of <strong>in</strong>terest - - sorry, a person of <strong>in</strong>terest for Customs<br />

and I would have passed that <strong>in</strong>formation on as well.<br />

Now, you've mentioned gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from BCI. There is<br />

a procedure whereby that's done. A formatted document that<br />

you'd utilise?---Yeah. In fairness, I've probably only ever<br />

done it five or six times. It's normally been the<br />

responsibility of the person that works with me to do that.<br />

So - - but my understand<strong>in</strong>g of - - of how I've done it <strong>in</strong> the<br />

past is either a fax, or now you can go by email - - it's sent<br />

off to BCI. Then it's normally returned reasonably promptly<br />

and then you deal with whatever comes.<br />

All right. Well, on the morn<strong>in</strong>g of the 8th of September 2004<br />

- - it may not have been the morn<strong>in</strong>g. At some time on that<br />

day did Mr <strong>Ando</strong> speak to you about an anonymous report that<br />

he'd received?---I don't recall the day but I - - I clearly<br />

recall the <strong>in</strong>cident because it was as a result of two separate<br />

bits of <strong>in</strong>formation, two different <strong>in</strong>formation that we had<br />

about someone who potentially may have been nest robb<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Another one was done by an officer by the name of Matt Dowl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- and it was dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2 weeks that I'd been away on a<br />

kangaroo job just previously - and he'd actually, you know,<br />

filled out IRs, done the checks and whatever, and I followed<br />

up. And then that morn<strong>in</strong>g Andrew came to me with words to the<br />

effect of, "I've received anonymous <strong>in</strong>formation", which is not<br />

unusual, "About someone look<strong>in</strong>g at - - someone with a ladder<br />

on their car and galahs look<strong>in</strong>g very stressed." Now, at the<br />

time I was very busy. I can't recall whether I said, "Can you<br />

please do the rego?", or he offered, but either way Andrew<br />

went off and conducted the rego check. Well, he said to me<br />

that he was go<strong>in</strong>g to.<br />

Right. Now, did you ever hear back from him?---Yes. I can't<br />

recall whether it was the next day or the day after. He<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itely came back <strong>in</strong>to my office. He said to me words to<br />

the effect of, "It's anonymous <strong>in</strong>formation. The rego doesn't<br />

match the vehicle", or words to that effect. And I had a<br />

laugh with him at the time say<strong>in</strong>g that anyone driv<strong>in</strong>g around<br />

with a ladder on their roof chas<strong>in</strong>g galahs is an amateur and<br />

is ask<strong>in</strong>g to be caught. And at no time did he say to me that<br />

he had not received the fax. If he had not received the fax<br />

then I would have suggested to him that he should probably resend<br />

it.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 149<br />

10.57


t12/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Now, the fax mach<strong>in</strong>e at these BCI reports come <strong>in</strong>,<br />

is it a dedicated one? Is there one fax mach<strong>in</strong>e that they<br />

come <strong>in</strong> on?---It's our dedicated fax but it's <strong>in</strong> the operation<br />

room away from everyone and, you know, faxes come <strong>in</strong> without<br />

people be<strong>in</strong>g aware.<br />

Right. Have you seen Andrew <strong>Ando</strong> collect faxes from that fax<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e?---Sure. In fact, the day that he come to me I was<br />

fairly - - Andrew had actually done the BCI check that day -<br />

or a BCI check - because I walked past him at the pr<strong>in</strong>ter and<br />

I was chatt<strong>in</strong>g to him, as we always do. We get on very well<br />

and have up until the 16th. And he - - he had a BCI form<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g out of the pr<strong>in</strong>ter. I saw the head<strong>in</strong>g. I could not<br />

tell you what it was - - what the topic was but it was out of<br />

the pr<strong>in</strong>ter as opposed to the fax.<br />

And was this before or after the conversation where he first<br />

told - - ?---It's def<strong>in</strong>itely after.<br />

After?---I had a - - I have a - - a belief that - - or I felt<br />

at the time that it was probably the fax that he was go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

send off <strong>in</strong> relation to the <strong>in</strong>formation. But, you know, we<br />

get lots of - - lots of calls come <strong>in</strong>. We do lots of rego<br />

checks.<br />

Now, you've told me what you would have done had you received<br />

this <strong>in</strong>formation. What you would expect a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer to<br />

do hav<strong>in</strong>g received this <strong>in</strong>formation. And I th<strong>in</strong>k you went on<br />

to say that the fact that it was Phil <strong>Green</strong> - - we've seen the<br />

BCI report now, which we've obta<strong>in</strong>ed from BCI. It shows that<br />

that car was, <strong>in</strong> fact, Phil <strong>Green</strong>'s. Mr <strong>Green</strong> and his wife<br />

have conceded that they're on the video. Does that enhance<br />

the significance of the <strong>in</strong>formation as far as you're<br />

concerned?---Oh, absolutely. That time of year; prime nest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

time, prime egg time. Information - - that I and Andrew are<br />

aware that Mr <strong>Green</strong>'s been - - you know, well, it's been<br />

suggested that he'd been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> that type of activity. I<br />

mean, absolutely we'd be <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g it.<br />

All right. Well, Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>, mov<strong>in</strong>g on to another topic. Can<br />

you tell me where you were at about 8.30 am on the morn<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the 16th of September?---I was at 27 Marar<strong>in</strong>ga Way, Wundowie.<br />

And that's Mr <strong>Green</strong>'s address?---It is .<br />

And what were you do<strong>in</strong>g there?---I was execut<strong>in</strong>g a search<br />

warrant <strong>in</strong> company of Customs, Police as a result of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation that was provided to us by the CCC.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 150


t13/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Hav<strong>in</strong>g said that, were you look<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />

whether offences <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wildlife</strong> had been committed?---Yes.<br />

And were some items seized?---We seized an <strong>in</strong>cubator and a<br />

number of galah, corella, major mitchell and a red-tail egg<br />

and some chicks.<br />

Are you aware that Customs conducted a number of searches <strong>in</strong><br />

the eastern states that were related to this <strong>in</strong>vestigation?---<br />

I am aware, yes. I wasn't aware until that day.<br />

Right. Now, <strong>in</strong> regard to the execution of that warrant, had<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong> been told that that warrant was to be executed prior<br />

to that day?---Prior to that day? No. I got a phone call<br />

from him from that day. I was requested that day by the CCC<br />

to - - that they were go<strong>in</strong>g to do an <strong>in</strong>tegrity test on Andrew,<br />

which is not a great feel<strong>in</strong>g when you're try<strong>in</strong>g to conduct a<br />

search and it's aga<strong>in</strong>st one of your fellow officers, but, you<br />

know, this is an opportunity to see whether these allegations<br />

were true. So I - - I agreed to do it, and yes, I received a<br />

phone call from Andrew suggest<strong>in</strong>g that a search warrant was<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to be conducted later on, or words to that effect,<br />

because Malcolm couldn't contact me. And that's the basis of<br />

it.<br />

Right. And you didn't tell him that <strong>in</strong> fact you were do<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that search at that time?---No. My words to him were that - -<br />

because on the board I was supposed to be at Cal<strong>in</strong>giri, and I<br />

said to him, "Oh, I must have been away from the phone. I<br />

didn't hear Malcolm call<strong>in</strong>g me. Have you contacted the boss?"<br />

and he said no, he hadn't but he would.<br />

Now, did he <strong>in</strong>dicate to you either <strong>in</strong> that conversation that<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact he knew <strong>Green</strong>; that <strong>Green</strong> was a personal friend of<br />

his?---No.<br />

Did he <strong>in</strong>dicate to you that he <strong>in</strong>tended to call <strong>Green</strong> very<br />

shortly after mak<strong>in</strong>g the call to you?---No.<br />

Did you notice whether Mr <strong>Green</strong> took a telephone call while<br />

you were present?---He received numerous calls. In fact, he<br />

received one call from Peter Manc<strong>in</strong>i from gaol, and Peter<br />

Manc<strong>in</strong>i got on the phone and had a talk to me as well from<br />

gaol.<br />

Right. You may have heard me put some of the questions that I<br />

did to Mr <strong>Plant</strong>. I wonder if you might comment on whether you<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k some of the propositions I put to him might make a<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> your work<strong>in</strong>g environment. In regard to security<br />

check<strong>in</strong>g, is that someth<strong>in</strong>g that could be implemented <strong>in</strong> the<br />

CALM environment?---Security check<strong>in</strong>g of persons?<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN 151<br />

11.02


t13/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Security clearances of <strong>in</strong>vestigative officers?---I<br />

mean, it can't hurt, can it? I mean, <strong>in</strong> the environment that<br />

I'd come from before - - before this was, you know, I had very<br />

high security clearance.<br />

Is it important to you and to CALM to have a close and<br />

cooperative work<strong>in</strong>g relationship with Customs?---I've worked<br />

very hard over the last 7 years. Malcolm <strong>Plant</strong>, if anyone,<br />

will tell you I've worked very hard to try and foster a good<br />

relationship with Customs, and if you look around Australia I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k CALM and Customs <strong>in</strong> WA have the best relationship and,<br />

as a result, there's been some 27 offences.<br />

Now, if there has been leaks of <strong>in</strong>formation from CALM, does<br />

that run a risk that it could imperil the relationship between<br />

Customs and CALM?---Oh, no doubt. And, you know, as a result<br />

of this I'm hopeful that us and Customs are go<strong>in</strong>g to move<br />

forward from this.<br />

Good. Thank you, Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hammond?<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes. If it please you, Mr Commissioner.<br />

CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR HAMMOND:<br />

MR HAMMOND: Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>, you said that you were a friend of Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>'s up until recently; is that correct?---Well, I haven't<br />

seen him s<strong>in</strong>ce the 16th of September.<br />

That be<strong>in</strong>g the day on which he was suspended from office at<br />

CALM?---Yes. Yeah.<br />

And would you describe yourself as a close friend of Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?-<br />

--No, not at all. But he's been to my house.<br />

And you socialise together?---On a couple of occasions. Me<br />

and Andrew - - you need to know that when you work <strong>in</strong> a<br />

special <strong>in</strong>vestigations section you work close together as a<br />

group. We've been out do<strong>in</strong>g sandalwood jobs, spent plenty of<br />

time away.<br />

And you had told him, had you not, that you were an<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigator with the navy?---Yeah. Sure.<br />

And you had told him you acted as an <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>vestigator<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g other officers?---Yeah. No doubt. Yeah. That<br />

was <strong>in</strong> a previous job. It's not someth<strong>in</strong>g that I wanted to do<br />

<strong>in</strong> CALM.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XN XXN 152


t13/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: And is it the case that Mr Mell appo<strong>in</strong>ted you as<br />

an <strong>in</strong>vestigator to <strong>in</strong>vestigate Mr <strong>Ando</strong> - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 153


t14/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: - - - <strong>in</strong>vestigate Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---I mean, <strong>in</strong> the terms<br />

of what you're say<strong>in</strong>g, yes, that's correct. But what he was<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g was try<strong>in</strong>g to validate. I mean, it - - it's - - you've<br />

got to understand, I mean, people try and do this all the<br />

time, try and cast aspersions. I'm sure there's stuff<br />

float<strong>in</strong>g around about me. The best way to protect your people<br />

and - - is - - is to <strong>in</strong>vestigate it and see if there's any,<br />

you know, substance to the rumour.<br />

But Mr Mell appo<strong>in</strong>ted you to <strong>in</strong>vestigate Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, that's<br />

correct, isn't it?---Oh, he appo<strong>in</strong>ted me to look <strong>in</strong>to it.<br />

Now, whether he actually said "<strong>in</strong>vestigate him", no. I don't<br />

- - I don't th<strong>in</strong>k I was actually <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g him. I<br />

actually - - I was just - -<br />

Well, Mr Mell - - ?--- - - substant - -<br />

You've heard Mr Mell's evidence, haven't you?---Yeah.<br />

And Mr Mell said he appo<strong>in</strong>ted two people to <strong>in</strong>vestigate Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>?---Yeah, me and Nick Phillips looked <strong>in</strong>to it. No doubt<br />

about it.<br />

So he did appo<strong>in</strong>t you to <strong>in</strong>vestigate Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?<br />

MR HALL: Commissioner, I said this before, but perhaps I<br />

should say it aga<strong>in</strong>; I object to this l<strong>in</strong>e of question<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The allegations that are made <strong>in</strong> this Commission do not depend<br />

<strong>in</strong> any way upon anyth<strong>in</strong>g done by Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> by way of<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the conduct of Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. The evidence that is<br />

relied upon by the Commission to establish that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> - - or<br />

will be relied upon by the Commission to establish that Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong> has engaged <strong>in</strong> corrupt conduct is quite <strong>in</strong>dependent of<br />

anyth<strong>in</strong>g done by Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: I'll let Mr Hammond cont<strong>in</strong>ue for the moment.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes. May it please you, Mr Commissioner.<br />

(TO WITNESS): So I take it your answer is "yes" to that<br />

question?---Yeah, we - - we conducted <strong>in</strong>quiries, sure.<br />

Yeah, and what were the nature of those <strong>in</strong>quiries that you<br />

conducted <strong>in</strong> relation to Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---We listened to some tapes.<br />

We did some CCR checks, call charge record checks and that's<br />

it. End of story.<br />

And you must have felt that you had a conflict of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, if you were on a personal relationship<br />

with him?---I never felt like I had a conflict at all. I was<br />

actually hop<strong>in</strong>g that they wouldn't be true.<br />

But hadn't you, over the years, also had conflict with Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>?---Me and Mr <strong>Ando</strong> parted ways. He was, as he said<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 154<br />

11.07


t14/kr<br />

CCC<br />

himself, he was very stressed. If - - if you actually have a<br />

good look <strong>in</strong>to that, I actually had him <strong>in</strong> my office. I<br />

suggested he take counsell<strong>in</strong>g. I went to the boss, I<br />

supported him all the way through that. Yes, we did have a<br />

conflict. He had more of a conflict with me than I had with<br />

him. I th<strong>in</strong>k that's a little unfair.<br />

MR HAMMOND: And your evidence to the Commissioner is that Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong> was very competent as a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer until the last<br />

few days of his employment?---Well, I had no reason until I<br />

received the <strong>in</strong>formation. Even to that day, I mean, all I had<br />

was <strong>in</strong>formation that he'd contacted Phil - - oh, sorry, that<br />

Phil <strong>Green</strong> had contacted his parents.<br />

And you also told the Commission that an allegation had been<br />

made by Mr <strong>Ando</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st you to the effect that he'd tried to<br />

steal your - - you'd tried to steal his thunder, is that<br />

correct?---Oh well, I didn't even realise - - I didn't even<br />

realise that was an issue. The boss called me <strong>in</strong> and said<br />

that Andrew thought that I was tak<strong>in</strong>g all the credit for<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g done. Me and Andrew discussed that at length and<br />

if that was the case, I apologised to him for that and agreed<br />

to rectify that and we - - we departed, I believe, on good<br />

terms.<br />

In relation to compla<strong>in</strong>ts that are received by CALM, is it not<br />

the case that there are a lot of compla<strong>in</strong>ts received on a<br />

daily basis?---Oh, absolutely.<br />

And not all of those compla<strong>in</strong>ts are <strong>in</strong>vestigated?---No. I<br />

mean, as an officer, you need to make some decisions at the<br />

time.<br />

And if the compla<strong>in</strong>t is one where the caller is anonymous,<br />

does that derogate from the strength of the compla<strong>in</strong>t?---No,<br />

we've had some very good success on anonymous, so what you do<br />

is you take the compla<strong>in</strong>t, you <strong>in</strong>vestigate it, you see if<br />

there's anyth<strong>in</strong>g - - any substance to it and then you move<br />

forward from there. Without anonymous compla<strong>in</strong>ts, you know,<br />

no police force <strong>in</strong> the world would be able to work.<br />

And you say on the date on which the check that BCI was done<br />

allegedly by Mr - - well, done by Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, that you thought<br />

you saw him <strong>in</strong> the facsimile room?---No, not at all.<br />

You didn't th<strong>in</strong>k you saw him?---No. Not at all. I said, and<br />

I'm clear with this, I'm fairly sure that he may have typed it<br />

up on his computer, sent it to the pr<strong>in</strong>ter, but I saw<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itely him go<strong>in</strong>g to the pr<strong>in</strong>ter pick<strong>in</strong>g up a BCI request<br />

form - -<br />

But you didn't - - ?--- - - from the pr<strong>in</strong>ter.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 155


t14/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: You didn't - - ?---I've no - - I've no - - I<br />

don't know if he sent it, I don't know if he received it.<br />

And you don't know what was on that BCI form, do you?---Not at<br />

all. No.<br />

So what happened <strong>in</strong> that room is pure speculation on your<br />

part?---No, I didn't speculate that anyth<strong>in</strong>g happened <strong>in</strong> that<br />

room.<br />

Well, you spec - - you say that he had a BCI form <strong>in</strong> his<br />

hands?---Yeah. I - - I'm quite clear. I don't know if you<br />

understand, what happens is the pr<strong>in</strong>ter and the fax are some<br />

distance away. I'm walk<strong>in</strong>g past my office to the other w<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and Mr <strong>Ando</strong> picked up a BCI form from the pr<strong>in</strong>ter which had to<br />

have been generated from our office. That is all I said.<br />

And did you notice that <strong>in</strong> your capacity as a colleague of Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>'s or <strong>in</strong> your capacity as <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---No, I<br />

noticed it as I walked past. I mean, I was just there.<br />

When you - - were you orig<strong>in</strong>ally appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>? Do you recall when that was - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 156


t15/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: - - - you recall when that was?---I was - - I was<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the allegation that had been made<br />

and, as a result of that, it was some time before. But what<br />

had actually happened was, we had had some problems with<br />

Telstra of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g CCRs, so there was a 2-month lag <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to us gett<strong>in</strong>g clearance, because they've changed the<br />

way they do it. We used to receive all our CCRs by fax, and<br />

we had some huge problems with our computer system and the<br />

security stuff so it took a couple of months. In that time<br />

I'd been appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the Director of Nature Conservation to<br />

look <strong>in</strong>to the kangaroo <strong>in</strong>dustry, which is my number one<br />

priority, and I had operations and plans to undertake. So as<br />

a result of that some time had actually elapsed before we were<br />

<strong>in</strong> a position to receive that. As soon as we received the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation we then tried to correlate it, and I was<br />

discuss<strong>in</strong>g it with my boss that morn<strong>in</strong>g of the 16th.<br />

You say you were shocked by Mr <strong>Ando</strong>'s behaviour after you<br />

discovered the <strong>in</strong>formation that you'd received?---Shocked by -<br />

- I don't know what you mean.<br />

You and Mr Phillips, I th<strong>in</strong>k it was - particularly Mr Phillips<br />

- listened to tapes?---Yes.<br />

And those tapes <strong>in</strong>dicated that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> may be leak<strong>in</strong>g - - ?---<br />

The tapes <strong>in</strong>dicated - - I'll tell you straight. The tapes<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that Phil <strong>Green</strong> - "my mate" - was - - he had to call<br />

his mate's mum to f<strong>in</strong>d out how to talk to her for a little<br />

while that day. As a result of that we then correlated the<br />

tim<strong>in</strong>gs, the CCRs and the time when he said he was go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

call and when he called back to talk to Peter Manc<strong>in</strong>i, they<br />

all correlated <strong>in</strong> a nice neat package. I provided that<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation to my boss. I never made any other assumptions<br />

apart from that. They're the facts.<br />

And your boss is who?---Dave Mell.<br />

And are you superior to Mr <strong>Ando</strong> <strong>in</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g?---I'm a level 3.<br />

And what was Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, to your knowledge?---He did - - when he<br />

come and worked for me he got to act<strong>in</strong>g level 3. I th<strong>in</strong>k he's<br />

back to a 2 or 1. I couldn't tell you.<br />

And was it you that wanted him removed from the special<br />

compliance operations unit?---No. The decision was made<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly by the boss. He was actually - - he was quite<br />

irrational. He was quite distressed at the time. The<br />

decision was made by the boss that it was <strong>in</strong> his best<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests. It was maybe believed that he was probably not<br />

suited to the role. He has - - as he said, he received some<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g phone calls, and they were concern<strong>in</strong>g him. That<br />

decision was made <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terests of Mr <strong>Ando</strong> and that's just<br />

the way it is.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 157<br />

11.12


t15/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: Do you recall some heated arguments between<br />

yourself and Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---No. I recall me and Mr <strong>Ando</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

discussions, him vent<strong>in</strong>g his - - you know, his problems <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to what I did or what I had done over a period of<br />

time, me sitt<strong>in</strong>g there listen<strong>in</strong>g and lett<strong>in</strong>g him have his - -<br />

have his go, and then try<strong>in</strong>g to work from that po<strong>in</strong>t. I mean,<br />

he had some issues with the way I conduct bus<strong>in</strong>ess and, you<br />

know, it's only reasonable that you listen to what they've got<br />

to say, and if there's some substance to it, try and change<br />

the way you do your bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong> says that the relationship between you and he became<br />

so broken down that at one po<strong>in</strong>t an argument endured for an<br />

hour and a half and you broke down cry<strong>in</strong>g; is that correct?--<br />

-That's not true. We had some discussions that went for that<br />

length of time, no doubt, but as far as break<strong>in</strong>g down and<br />

cry<strong>in</strong>g, that's not the truth.<br />

Is it the case that employees were regularly allowed to use<br />

equipment belong<strong>in</strong>g to CALM?<br />

COMMISSIONER: We're go<strong>in</strong>g down this track aga<strong>in</strong>, which is of<br />

no relevance really to this <strong>in</strong>quiry, Mr Hammond.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Sir, <strong>in</strong> the private transcript which has now been<br />

made public those allegations were put to my client. I can<br />

take you to them if you like.<br />

MR HALL: Well, they're not be<strong>in</strong>g put now.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Well, I understand they now form part of the<br />

record, and they also form the basis upon which an adverse<br />

<strong>in</strong>ference can be made aga<strong>in</strong>st my client. If counsel doesn't<br />

wish to take that issue up <strong>in</strong> relation to the private use of<br />

equipment then I'll desist from this l<strong>in</strong>e of question<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

MR HALL: I don't wish to take that matter up.<br />

MR HAMMOND: So there'll be no issue <strong>in</strong> relation to the use of<br />

equipment by CALM officers.<br />

COMMISSIONER: No.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Mr Commissioner, I'm loath to trespass on the<br />

direction that you made yesterday <strong>in</strong> relation to impugn<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g to impugn the credibility of <strong>witnesses</strong> called before<br />

the Commission who have spoken aga<strong>in</strong>st Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. I have a<br />

number of matters that I wanted to put to this witness which<br />

relate purely to issues of credibility, and I'd seek your<br />

direction <strong>in</strong> that regard. They don't relate to the specific<br />

allegations concern<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Ando</strong> but they do relate to this<br />

person's position as an <strong>in</strong>vestigator of Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. And I would<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 158


t15/nj<br />

CCC<br />

put to you that <strong>in</strong> that regard they are relevant. But I'm<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly keen not to trespass - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON XXN 159


t16/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: - - - keen not to trespass.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Well now, what are the factual issues which<br />

have emerged from Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>'s testimony which are relevant to<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong>? They are, I suppose, the issue concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

facsimile.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes.<br />

COMMISSIONER: What else?<br />

MR HAMMOND: He's made statements about Mr <strong>Ando</strong>'s competency<br />

but they've generally been favourable.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes.<br />

MR HAMMOND: He's made statements to the effect about the<br />

breakdown <strong>in</strong> the relationship between himself and Mr <strong>Ando</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes.<br />

MR HAMMOND: He's made statements more pert<strong>in</strong>ently about the<br />

fact that he was utilised as an <strong>in</strong>vestigator of Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. I<br />

would have thought upon that basis alone I'd be entitled to<br />

call <strong>in</strong>to question the validity of that appo<strong>in</strong>tment,<br />

particularly bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the relationship that existed<br />

between the two men, which seemed to oscillate between good<br />

and bad, and he can't just be, <strong>in</strong> my respectfully submission,<br />

a one-way street where Mr <strong>Ando</strong>'s reputation is attacked,<br />

particularly bear<strong>in</strong>g - - <strong>in</strong> the context of the fact that this<br />

man is a relatively junior officer at CALM. I th<strong>in</strong>k the whole<br />

system <strong>in</strong> which he worked is surely relevant to his actions.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Go<strong>in</strong>g back - -<br />

MR HAMMOND: And, sir, sorry, if I may just cont<strong>in</strong>ue.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Please do.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Maybe at a later stage, if this matter is taken<br />

further and brought before another tribunal, that it may be<br />

put why these matters weren't raised at the first opportunity.<br />

But I'm happy to accept - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes.<br />

MR HAMMOND: - - whatever your rul<strong>in</strong>gs on - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: Do you want to make any observations, Mr Hall?<br />

MR HALL: Well, I do, Mr Commissioner. Yes. I would have<br />

thought that issues as to credibility only arise if there are<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts of dispute with the witness' evidence. There seems to<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON 160<br />

11.17


t16/sa<br />

CCC<br />

be precious little that Mr Hammond has, <strong>in</strong> fact, disputed that<br />

Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> has given by way of evidence. Invited by you, he<br />

has only <strong>in</strong>dicated those four areas, I th<strong>in</strong>k, one of which<br />

appears to be of no moment at all because Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>'s evidence<br />

is that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> previously had been competent.<br />

In regard to him be<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>vestigator, I've already <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

that whatever Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> did <strong>in</strong> that regard is of no moment at<br />

all to the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the issues before us here. It<br />

would seem therefore, with great respect, that the credibility<br />

of this witness does not - - is really not <strong>in</strong> issue. There is<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g that Mr Hammond can po<strong>in</strong>t to that he takes issue with<br />

that Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> has said that bears upon the matters you have<br />

to determ<strong>in</strong>e. I can't for that reason see why it is relevant.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Well, sir, maybe if I could just add to that.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes, Mr Hammond.<br />

MR HAMMOND: I understand my friend's rebuttal on that po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

but my po<strong>in</strong>t is essentially two fold and that is it also<br />

relates to the culture <strong>in</strong> which Mr <strong>Ando</strong> worked and that is,<br />

<strong>in</strong>deed, significant <strong>in</strong> terms of this Commission's<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation. Now, there was one area which we've already<br />

discounted, because there's no <strong>in</strong>tention to make an adverse<br />

<strong>in</strong>ference, and that is the area where it's alleged that Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong> may or may not have used equipment belong<strong>in</strong>g to CALM but<br />

that's no longer <strong>in</strong> issue as I understand counsel assist<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

But there are other - - several other areas which call <strong>in</strong>to<br />

question the systems which were <strong>in</strong> place at CALM and which<br />

allowed what we say was corrupt or <strong>in</strong>appropriate behaviour to<br />

occur and it was <strong>in</strong> that context that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> was employed, it<br />

was <strong>in</strong> that context that allegations have been made aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

his behaviour. Now, it could well be said, "Why weren't these<br />

matters raised before the Commission when you had the<br />

opportunity?"<br />

Mr Commissioner, there's three broad areas - and I don't<br />

<strong>in</strong>tend to put them to the witness but merely to you - and one<br />

is that CALM officers were <strong>in</strong>deed sanction<strong>in</strong>g corrupt<br />

behaviour, and that is senior officers, <strong>in</strong> that they were<br />

engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the sale of fish through the CALM office, stor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it at the CALM office, sell<strong>in</strong>g it on a cash basis without a<br />

licence to do so. There was persistent download<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

pornographic material on CALM record<strong>in</strong>g equipment and us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CALM discs. This was so rife that employees of CALM either<br />

left - and I can name one of those employees but I won't do<br />

that at this juncture - and <strong>in</strong>deed there was also sexual<br />

harassment perpetrated on various employees.<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON 161


t16/sa<br />

CCC<br />

Now, I know that this is beyond the scope of the <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

of this Commission but I th<strong>in</strong>k it's valuable <strong>in</strong> terms of my<br />

client's position that it - - the scene needs to be set for<br />

the culture <strong>in</strong> which these officers operated - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON 162


t17/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HAMMOND: - - - these officers operated and it also needs<br />

to be acknowledged and recognised that my client is but a<br />

junior officer of CALM operat<strong>in</strong>g under the guidance, either<br />

appropriate or <strong>in</strong>appropriate guidance, of much senior<br />

officers. And there are a number of allegations of this type<br />

which will certa<strong>in</strong>ly reflect, probably adversely, on senior<br />

officers of CALM. We really do not th<strong>in</strong>k that it's good<br />

enough for all the allegations to be levelled at Mr <strong>Ando</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

this vacuum, who is one of the most senior - - who's one of<br />

the most junior officers.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hall?<br />

MR HALL: None of those matters self-evidently relate to<br />

conduct which is <strong>in</strong> any way similar to that, that you are<br />

exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g here, Commissioner. If there are allegations of the<br />

sort that Mr Hammond raises, the appropriate th<strong>in</strong>g to do, <strong>in</strong><br />

fact, the necessary, the lawful th<strong>in</strong>g to do, is to make proper<br />

compla<strong>in</strong>t to the Commission so that they can be <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />

This is not a forum for every matter which Mr Hammond th<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

is somehow relevant under this broad head<strong>in</strong>g of "culture" to<br />

be ventilated. If there were some conduct that <strong>in</strong> a<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gful way impacted upon the allegations made about Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>, then there might be some merit <strong>in</strong> his suggestion, but it<br />

is difficult to see how, even if it were true, engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

sale of fish for cash payment could somehow condone or make<br />

proper what is alleged aga<strong>in</strong>st Mr <strong>Ando</strong>. So with respect, the<br />

matters raised by Mr Hammond could not possibly, on any view,<br />

be relevant to the matters be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigated here, but I<br />

would urge him to do the appropriate th<strong>in</strong>g which is to put<br />

those matters <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g with the appropriate evidential<br />

<strong>in</strong>dications and submit them to the Commission so that they can<br />

be properly and thoroughly <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hammond?<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes. Maybe if I could respond to one part of<br />

that, and that is, Mr <strong>Ando</strong> has the opportunity to raise, <strong>in</strong> my<br />

respectful submission, these allegations now and this is<br />

<strong>in</strong>deed the appropriate forum. Counsel <strong>in</strong> his open<strong>in</strong>g address<br />

aid that corruption <strong>in</strong> the Public Service is an <strong>in</strong>sidious<br />

matter and it can manifest itself <strong>in</strong> many ways. Now, it's not<br />

appropriate, <strong>in</strong> my respectful submission, just to conf<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

climate <strong>in</strong> which Mr <strong>Ando</strong> operated to one or two allegations<br />

without see<strong>in</strong>g the whole picture. Otherwise, <strong>in</strong> my respectful<br />

submission, the <strong>in</strong>vestigation is jaundiced. I mean, it may,<br />

Mr Commissioner - and this is <strong>in</strong>deed the thrust of my response<br />

to counsel assist<strong>in</strong>g - it may expla<strong>in</strong> why Mr <strong>Ando</strong> thought it<br />

was appropriate to cont<strong>in</strong>ue his liaisons with people who were<br />

persons of <strong>in</strong>terest, that there was such a culture that<br />

permeated at CALM that <strong>in</strong>deed it wasn't <strong>in</strong>appropriate for that<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON 163<br />

11.22


t17/kr<br />

CCC<br />

to cont<strong>in</strong>ue because of other actions that he saw carry<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

and be<strong>in</strong>g conducted at CALM himself. And Mr Commissioner, the<br />

- - it seems to me that the broad purposes of this Act - - and<br />

I know it's very convenient for counsel assist<strong>in</strong>g just to<br />

conf<strong>in</strong>e this to one narrow l<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>in</strong>quiry, but the broad<br />

purposes of the Act under section 7A are:<br />

"- - to improve cont<strong>in</strong>uously the <strong>in</strong>tegrity of and to reduce<br />

the <strong>in</strong>cidents of misconduct <strong>in</strong> the Public Sector."<br />

Now, it's all very well to pick out one of the most junior<br />

officers at CALM and po<strong>in</strong>t the gun at him, but what about all<br />

the people that he worked with? Do we really believe that <strong>in</strong><br />

any organisation the <strong>in</strong>sidious effects of <strong>in</strong>appropriate<br />

behaviour, corruption, only exist <strong>in</strong> the realm of one man?<br />

I'm not say<strong>in</strong>g that - - and by that, I don't want to be seen<br />

to be admitt<strong>in</strong>g that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> has <strong>in</strong>deed done anyth<strong>in</strong>g. As his<br />

counsel, I'm not entitled to do that, but it will be said why<br />

haven't these matters been raised? Mr Commissioner, I respect<br />

your direction on the matter and I will only proceed if you<br />

give me authority to proceed.<br />

COMMISSIONER: What counsel assist<strong>in</strong>g suggests as the<br />

appropriate course of action is the appropriate course of<br />

action with respect to any person hav<strong>in</strong>g compla<strong>in</strong>ts, not only<br />

about CALM, but any other public sector <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>in</strong> this<br />

state. What I th<strong>in</strong>k is be<strong>in</strong>g put to me is that there were<br />

other issues which were around the agency at the time and they<br />

<strong>in</strong> some way - - -<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON 164


t18/nj<br />

CCC<br />

COMMISSIONER: - - - and they <strong>in</strong> some way might expla<strong>in</strong> Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>'s actions. Mr <strong>Ando</strong> seems to me, by my observations, to<br />

be of full age and ability, and he's responsible for his own<br />

actions. I cannot see at this stage any of those issues be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at all relevant to this <strong>in</strong>quiry before us. I th<strong>in</strong>k that you<br />

have dealt with Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> on the factual matters upon which<br />

issue can be taken, and I'm not proposed to - - I'm not<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> any way to reverse my previous rul<strong>in</strong>g on what is<br />

before me at this time.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes.<br />

COMMISSIONER: On that basis, have you f<strong>in</strong>ished with Mr<br />

<strong>Dawson</strong>?<br />

MR HAMMOND: I have, Mr Commissioner, thank you.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes. Is there any re-exam<strong>in</strong>ation?<br />

MR HALL: There is not, thank you, sir.<br />

NO RE-EXAMINATION<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Mr <strong>Dawson</strong> is free to go if he<br />

wishes.<br />

WITNESS: Thank you.<br />

WITNESS WITHDREW<br />

COMMISSIONER: We'll adjourn now until quarter to twelve.<br />

HEARING ADJOURNED AT 11.30 AM<br />

23.11.04 R.D. DAWSON 165<br />

11.27


t19/kr<br />

CCC<br />

HEARING RESUMED AT 11.45 PM<br />

COMMISSIONER: Now, Mr Hall, where are we?<br />

MR HALL: Commissioner, I would seek to now recall Mr <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes, if Mr <strong>Green</strong> would come forward, please?<br />

PHILIP GREEN<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Tudori is present?<br />

MR TUDORI: Yes. Yes, sir.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Good. Please sit down, Mr <strong>Green</strong>. You're still<br />

on oath of course?---Yeah.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hall?<br />

EXAMINED BY MR HALL SC (cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g):<br />

MR HALL: Mr <strong>Green</strong>, earlier this year, did you transport,<br />

carry, some West Australian <strong>native</strong> bird eggs to the eastern<br />

states?---That's correct.<br />

And you took them to a Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge, did you?---Correct.<br />

And you had conversations, did you not, with Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge<br />

and also a Mr Grissel about the exportation of such eggs<br />

overseas?---Yeah.<br />

Yes?---Yes.<br />

What were you hop<strong>in</strong>g to get back <strong>in</strong> return?---Oh, just <strong>trade</strong>off<br />

for birds. Orig<strong>in</strong>ally the deal was that they wanted hand<br />

- - wanted birds over there to hand-rear to free-flight.<br />

All right, but subsequently there was some talk of there be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a courier com<strong>in</strong>g every two weeks, was there not?---They told<br />

me about that. I wasn't <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> that.<br />

Right, but you knew that that's what you were be<strong>in</strong>g asked for<br />

eggs for?---They'd asked me <strong>in</strong> one phone call.<br />

Yes?---Yeah.<br />

To fill a consignment that was be<strong>in</strong>g exported overseas?---<br />

They'd asked me, yeah.<br />

Yes. And you couldn't provide as many eggs as they wanted?---<br />

No.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 166<br />

11.45


t19/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: But you looked for them, didn't you?---I had a look<br />

around, yeah.<br />

Yes. Now, <strong>in</strong> the end you were able to take some eggs to Mr<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge?---Yeah. I took three.<br />

Which you carried - - ?---Not from out of the wild, but - -<br />

Well, you carried them personally over to Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge?---<br />

Yes.<br />

And you did that know<strong>in</strong>g that it was illegal to transport eggs<br />

to the eastern states, be they from the wild or laid by<br />

captive birds?---Yes.<br />

Now, you said you were expect<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g back <strong>in</strong> return, an<br />

exotic?---Yeah, bird, yeah.<br />

Yes. Someth<strong>in</strong>g specific?---Oh, yeah. Probably macaws if they<br />

were available, yeah.<br />

A Hyac<strong>in</strong>th Macaw?---No.<br />

Hyac<strong>in</strong>th Macaws are very valuable, aren't they?---Yeah.<br />

COMMISSIONER: What's the prefix?<br />

MR HALL: A Hyac<strong>in</strong>th.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Hyac<strong>in</strong>th?<br />

MR HALL: I take it that refers to the different colours.<br />

They're different coloured birds?---Different species.<br />

I see. All right. So you were hop<strong>in</strong>g to get a macaw; did you<br />

get a macaw from - - ?---No.<br />

- - Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge? Now, Mr Grissel told you on one<br />

occasion, did he not, that the reason why he could have no<br />

further deal<strong>in</strong>gs with you was that a number of couriers had<br />

been <strong>in</strong>tercepted and arrested?---Yes.<br />

And that that had <strong>in</strong> fact closed down the bus<strong>in</strong>ess that was<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g run at that po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time?---Yes.<br />

Now, can I play you this call, please? It's number 173, a<br />

telephone call of the 23rd of August this year.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge is based <strong>in</strong> Queensland I th<strong>in</strong>k, is<br />

that right?---Yeah.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 167


t20/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: And you accept, do you not, that he was there<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g about a courier go<strong>in</strong>g back, com<strong>in</strong>g back - - go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

overseas and com<strong>in</strong>g back a couple of weeks later?---Yeah. I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k that's what he was referr<strong>in</strong>g to. Yeah.<br />

Yeah; and the 60. Was that eggs?---Yeah.<br />

As you understood it?---Yeah. I th<strong>in</strong>k that's what he was<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g about. Yeah.<br />

All right. Can I then take you to 174?<br />

COMMISSIONER: Are you tender<strong>in</strong>g that?<br />

MR HALL: It is already an exhibit, sir. It's KO3.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO3.<br />

MR HALL: Thank you.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Of course. Yes.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: All right. That's aga<strong>in</strong> about the same topic, isn't<br />

it? Provid<strong>in</strong>g eggs for consignment?---Yeah.<br />

For this courier?---Yeah.<br />

And the p<strong>in</strong>k ones you're there say<strong>in</strong>g, I take it, that it's<br />

difficult to get anyth<strong>in</strong>g other than p<strong>in</strong>k galah eggs?---Yeah.<br />

But they are of value overseas. You know that, don't you?---<br />

Lut<strong>in</strong>o galahs?<br />

No. P<strong>in</strong>k and grey. Just ord<strong>in</strong>ary p<strong>in</strong>k and grey galahs?---Oh,<br />

yeah, I suppose. Yeah.<br />

Yes. Now, can I ask you to listen to 175. Before that<br />

starts; Charlie Sultana, do you know him?---Yeah.<br />

Did you go to visit him at some time dur<strong>in</strong>g this year?---<br />

Charlie?<br />

Yes?---Yeah.<br />

Were you go<strong>in</strong>g to a do? A party of some sort?---Oh, his - -<br />

yeah, a party for his grandson. Yeah.<br />

His grandson?---Mm.<br />

Did you go to it?---Yes.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 168<br />

11.50


t20/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Can we listen to 175, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: You accept, don't you, that that's you speak<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Charlie Sultana?---Yeah.<br />

And where Mr Sultana says, "You done a delivery already?",<br />

that's - - you had, <strong>in</strong> fact, taken some eggs over and<br />

delivered them to Mr Grissel, hadn't you?---Yeah. Three galah<br />

eggs.<br />

Three. All right?---From my own birds.<br />

Yes, but you knew that was unlawful to do that?---Yeah, but I<br />

didn't know - - they weren't to be exported. He wanted them<br />

for himself.<br />

And then what Charlie Sultana was tell<strong>in</strong>g you was that they<br />

had been broken - - ?---Apparently. Yeah. One of them.<br />

- - by one of Mr Grissel's children?---Mm.<br />

All right.<br />

(TO COMMISSIONER): That one is tendered, Commissioner, as<br />

KO4. The previous one I played I'm told has not been<br />

tendered. If I could tender 174.<br />

COMMISSIONER: So, 174 will become KO22. 175 is already<br />

registered as KO4.<br />

EXHIBIT KO22 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 174<br />

MR HALL: Thank you, sir. Yes. Can we then play 170?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 169


t21/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Aga<strong>in</strong>, you speak<strong>in</strong>g to Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge?---Yeah.<br />

And when he says that "there's a next trip <strong>in</strong> 2, 2 weeks",<br />

that's the courier, isn't it, who's go<strong>in</strong>g overseas?---I don't<br />

know about overseas; to come over and pick them up, yeah.<br />

To come over here and pick them up?---Well, you'd taken some<br />

over before?---Yeah. I've only been there once with three.<br />

But you knew that these were go<strong>in</strong>g overseas as well, didn't<br />

you?---Not really.<br />

Right. Well, I'll play you some more calls <strong>in</strong> a moment, but<br />

when you then talk about you've "got a few" and you've "been<br />

out", you were out collect<strong>in</strong>g from the wild, weren't you?---I<br />

hadn't collected any from the wild. I was look<strong>in</strong>g around.<br />

You were look<strong>in</strong>g though?---Look<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

And you were look<strong>in</strong>g to fill this order that Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge<br />

had effectively placed with you?---Oh, I was look<strong>in</strong>g around<br />

for mutation stuff for myself.<br />

Yeah. You were look<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong> the bush though?---Mm.<br />

Yes?---Yes.<br />

And the problem was that due to weather conditions the nest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

season seems to have been delayed; is that right?---Yeah.<br />

Pretty much.<br />

I tender that, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO23.<br />

EXHIBIT KO23 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 170<br />

MR HALL: And can we then hear 183, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 170<br />

11.55


t22/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Aga<strong>in</strong>, you and Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge?---Yeah.<br />

And you're not - - well, at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of that conversation<br />

Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge says that, "He" - that is his contact - "is<br />

more worried about the stuff that's the other way as well."<br />

That's the birds that - - the exotics that are be<strong>in</strong>g imported,<br />

isn't it?---Yeah. Could be, yeah.<br />

Well, that was your understand<strong>in</strong>g, wasn't it?---Yeah. What he<br />

was say<strong>in</strong>g, yeah, I wasn't <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> it.<br />

Well, you were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> it to the extent that you expected<br />

to get a macaw <strong>in</strong> return for what you'd - - ?---They were<br />

birds that he had at his property already.<br />

Well, the macaw that you were gett<strong>in</strong>g, you were go<strong>in</strong>g to use<br />

this F10 on, were you?---No.<br />

But you do use that on the exotics that you get?---Use it on<br />

all birds, mm.<br />

To wipe out Newcastle's disease, amongst other th<strong>in</strong>gs?---No.<br />

It's not just - - it's a dis<strong>in</strong>fectant.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 171<br />

12.00


t23/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: We don't have Newcastle's disease <strong>in</strong> Australia, do<br />

we?---Yeah, they had it <strong>in</strong> Newcastle, <strong>in</strong> chicks, but it's not<br />

- -<br />

No, it's not - - ?--- - - specifically for that, it's - -<br />

- - named after Newcastle <strong>in</strong> Australia. Newcastle's disease<br />

is unknown <strong>in</strong> Australia, apart from illegally-imported<br />

exotics; did you not know that?---No, I thought they'd put<br />

down a lot of chooks and chickens over the Newcastle - -<br />

Oh, it's deadly to chickens?---But anyway, I mean, it's not<br />

just for that. It's got about 10 different uses and a lot of<br />

aviculturalists to use on their eggs and their birds. It's<br />

used for nebulis<strong>in</strong>g. Stops candida and other diseases.<br />

"I've been look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 30 white-tails' nests"?---Yeah.<br />

That's white-tailed black cockatoos?---Yeah.<br />

You'd been out look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> those nests?---No. I told you<br />

before, I wouldn't know where there was 30 nests.<br />

But you'd had - - ?---I was just say<strong>in</strong>g it - -<br />

You had been up <strong>in</strong> the bush - - ?--- - - to him to keep him<br />

off my back a bit.<br />

But you had been look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> white-tail nests?---I'd been - -<br />

I'd been look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the bush at different mutations and<br />

different birds, yeah.<br />

And white-tails?---Not specifically, no. Probably - - I only<br />

know where there's - - told you before, one or two, probably.<br />

And you looked <strong>in</strong> those?---One.<br />

With a view to see<strong>in</strong>g if there were any eggs that you could<br />

take?---Just to see what was around.<br />

But if there'd been eggs, you would have taken them?---Not<br />

necessarily.<br />

Well, that was why you were look<strong>in</strong>g?---No.<br />

Are white-tailed black cockatoos highly prized overseas?---<br />

Yeah.<br />

Very valuable birds?---Yeah, you already know that.<br />

Well you know it too, don't you, Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---Mm.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 172<br />

12.05


t23/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Incidentally, can you confirm for me, when I asked<br />

you about whether you had taken any consignments of eggs to<br />

the eastern states at your private hear<strong>in</strong>g, you <strong>in</strong>itially<br />

denied that you did, didn't you?---Yeah.<br />

Can you recall why it was that you told me that you <strong>in</strong>itially<br />

denied it?<br />

MR TUDORI: Sir, I rise at this stage - -<br />

WITNESS: Not really.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Tudori?<br />

MR TUDORI: I question the relevance of this l<strong>in</strong>e of<br />

question<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the scope and <strong>in</strong>tegrity - - <strong>in</strong>to the public<br />

sector. I fail to see the relevance of what this witness has<br />

done relates to <strong>in</strong>quiry <strong>in</strong>to the public sector.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Well, it's not quite an <strong>in</strong>quiry <strong>in</strong>to the public<br />

sector, Mr Tudori. You will recall, and I go back to the<br />

scope and purpose of this proposed exam<strong>in</strong>ation and the scope<br />

and purpose is to enable the Commission to make an assessment<br />

and form an op<strong>in</strong>ion as to whether misconduct by a public<br />

officer <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g but not limited to Andrea Giovanni <strong>Ando</strong> has<br />

or may have occurred, is or may be occurr<strong>in</strong>g or is or may be<br />

able to occur or is likely to occur. And that convoluted<br />

series of words is taken from the Act. I would have thought<br />

that <strong>in</strong> the course of the last day and a half there has been<br />

enough connection established between Mr <strong>Ando</strong> and Mr <strong>Green</strong> to<br />

have justified the l<strong>in</strong>e of question<strong>in</strong>g. Could you make your<br />

objection a bit more specific, however?<br />

MR TUDORI: Mr Commissioner, I have no difficulty if this<br />

relates to the tip-off or any knowledge that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> had of Mr<br />

<strong>Green</strong>'s <strong>in</strong>volvement, but if the question<strong>in</strong>g relates solely to<br />

activities that Mr <strong>Green</strong> has done, that had no knowledge of Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>, then I fail to see the relevance of that.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Right. Do you want to respond to that, Mr<br />

Hall?<br />

MR HALL: Yeah, I'm happy to respond to that, Commissioner.<br />

The relevance is that this is an <strong>in</strong>appropriate relationship,<br />

that is, between Mr <strong>Ando</strong> and Mr <strong>Green</strong>, that it's not merely a<br />

relationship with someone who keeps birds, but with someone<br />

who, on his own admission, is engaged <strong>in</strong> illegal activity<br />

<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g those birds. That places this <strong>in</strong>appropriate<br />

relationship <strong>in</strong>to a much more serious category. This is not<br />

matters of mere speculation on the part of the Commission,<br />

it's not someth<strong>in</strong>g that merely prejudices Mr <strong>Ando</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

course of his work, it's someth<strong>in</strong>g that can potentially have<br />

extremely serious consequences for the enforcement of the law.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 173


t23/kr<br />

CCC<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hammond?<br />

MR HAMMOND: Purely <strong>in</strong> relation to that matter, it hasn't been<br />

established before this Commission that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> was aware that<br />

Mr <strong>Green</strong> may be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> some smuggl<strong>in</strong>g racket. That<br />

material hasn't been put before the Commission.<br />

MR HALL: That is self-evident, I th<strong>in</strong>k, Commissioner.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Well, with respect, it's entirely not. There is<br />

no evidence whatsoever that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> has any knowledge of this<br />

man's activities overseas.<br />

MR HALL: I just thought I'd made it clear that the po<strong>in</strong>t was<br />

to show that the nature of the relationship was <strong>in</strong>appropriate<br />

because of what Mr <strong>Green</strong> was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>, not because Mr <strong>Ando</strong><br />

may have known of that, but because it shows that a<br />

relationship with a person <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>dustry can have very<br />

serious consequences. I have not said, and quite po<strong>in</strong>tedly<br />

have not said, that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> knew of these activities - - -<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN 174


t24/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - of these activities specifically that Mr <strong>Green</strong><br />

was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> but hav<strong>in</strong>g said that I should say to Mr<br />

Hammond that this evidence is not yet f<strong>in</strong>ished and there is<br />

further evidence to put to Mr <strong>Ando</strong> <strong>in</strong> due course.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Will that evidence to be put to Mr <strong>Ando</strong> <strong>in</strong> due<br />

course provide or suggest any l<strong>in</strong>kage - - I'm sorry, you said<br />

to Mr Andu - -<br />

MR HALL: <strong>Ando</strong> - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: - - <strong>Ando</strong> or to Mr <strong>Green</strong>?<br />

MR HALL: It won't suggest l<strong>in</strong>kage with this conduct that Mr<br />

<strong>Green</strong> - - is be<strong>in</strong>g put to Mr <strong>Green</strong> at the moment.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Well, then it's irrelevant, Mr Commissioner.<br />

MR HALL: No, it's not irrelevant. It's not irrelevant for<br />

the precise reason that I just stated which is it<br />

characterises the nature of the relationship. A relationship<br />

with someone who is the subject of enforcement activity might<br />

be thought to be of very little consequence if that person is<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g no more than keep<strong>in</strong>g birds. But if that person is, <strong>in</strong><br />

fact, <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> illegal activity - whether it be to the<br />

knowledge of Mr <strong>Ando</strong> or not - it shows the danger of such an<br />

unlawful - - such an improper relationship. It shows that an<br />

improper relationship of that sort can lead to difficulties <strong>in</strong><br />

the enforcement of the law, whether Mr <strong>Ando</strong> knows that or not.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Sir, that's an <strong>in</strong>credibly long bow to draw, with<br />

respect, and it's - - it's, if you like, a smear on Mr <strong>Ando</strong><br />

virtually by the association. It would suggest that anyone<br />

that one comes <strong>in</strong>to contact with, notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g that you<br />

don't know what their extra curricular activities may be, that<br />

by virtue of those extra curricular activities which you have<br />

no knowledge of that that <strong>in</strong> turn impugns the relationship.<br />

That cannot be right.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Well, that's not the argument for today,<br />

however, but it might - -<br />

MR HAMMOND: No.<br />

COMMISSIONER: - - be the argument for later on. If the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

is to establish the - and I'll borrow a phrase from Mr Hammond<br />

- "the extra curricular activities" of Mr <strong>Green</strong>, might it not<br />

be said that what is already before the Commission clearly<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> that direction?<br />

MR HALL: Yes. That is so. That is so. And I am content - -<br />

there is perhaps one other call that I would seek to play to<br />

Mr <strong>Green</strong> but - - that is so but can I take up one po<strong>in</strong>t that<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN 175<br />

12.10


t24/sa<br />

CCC<br />

Mr Hammond has said? Is not draw<strong>in</strong>g a long bow <strong>in</strong><br />

circumstances where Mr <strong>Green</strong> is and was known to Mr <strong>Ando</strong> to be<br />

a person who had engaged <strong>in</strong> illegal activities <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />

It was not therefore - - it is not a long bow for him to have<br />

at least some consciousness that Mr <strong>Green</strong> might be engaged <strong>in</strong><br />

some activities at the moment and, <strong>in</strong> fact, what this evidence<br />

shows is that that is not mere speculation on the part of the<br />

Commission. So, it is not a long bow to draw at all, with<br />

respect, but I would seek to play perhaps just one more call<br />

<strong>in</strong> regard to this matter.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Well, sir, I ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the objection because<br />

clearly one cannot be impugned or have aspersions cast on them<br />

merely because they don't know of their colleague's<br />

acqua<strong>in</strong>tances or bus<strong>in</strong>ess - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: I look forward - - I look forward to your<br />

argument <strong>in</strong> that connection.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Which is an argument and a submission which<br />

will have to be put - -<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes.<br />

COMMISSIONER: - - and will be of <strong>in</strong>terest but that's jump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ahead a little.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes.<br />

COMMISSIONER: We've got a more <strong>in</strong>stant problem at the moment.<br />

MR HAMMOND: Yes. And can I also say that there's still no<br />

evidence before this Commission that Mr <strong>Ando</strong> is aware of these<br />

- - whatever these activities are that Mr <strong>Green</strong> is engaged <strong>in</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Probably the evidence isn't f<strong>in</strong>ished yet.<br />

(TO MR TUDORI): Back to you, Mr Tudori.<br />

MR TUDORI: Yes. Thank you, Mr Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: I th<strong>in</strong>k you rose on the question of an issue<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g a response that had previously been given. Well,<br />

just clarify that for me.<br />

MR TUDORI: Well, the previous responses have already been<br />

given and they have been given - I don't take any issue with<br />

that - but it's whether this l<strong>in</strong>e of question<strong>in</strong>g can cont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />

and as I understand it Mr Hall has <strong>in</strong>dicated that he won't<br />

persist that except for one more.<br />

COMMISSIONER: One more call.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN 176


t24/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR TUDORI: But it's that one further call I still object to.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes.<br />

MR TUDORI: As, Mr Commissioner, you've put that the character<br />

of this witness is already before the Commission I fail to see<br />

what even one more call could possibly show relevance unless,<br />

of course - - and I accept if it does go to knowledge of Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong> then I don't object to that but unless there's some<br />

direct connection then I do object to it.<br />

COMMISSIONER: We're three-quarters of the way down the<br />

straight. There's one more call to come. We'll let that call<br />

come <strong>in</strong>.<br />

(TO MR HALL): Mr Hall.<br />

MR HALL: And I won't press the question regard<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

previous answers given.<br />

COMMISSIONER: No. No. That's not necessary.<br />

MR HALL: Can we hear 172, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN 177


t25/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Can you confirm for me that that's you speak<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Jason Grissel?---Yeah.<br />

Right. Now, at around that time had you become aware through<br />

reports <strong>in</strong> the media that a number of couriers had been<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercepted and arrested at airports <strong>in</strong> Australia?---Yeah.<br />

And is that what you <strong>in</strong> fact are talk<strong>in</strong>g about with Mr<br />

Grissel?---That's what he's <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g me of, yeah.<br />

Yes. Well, when he says, "Mate, at this po<strong>in</strong>t of time I've<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ished until further notice. They all work for the same<br />

place," you understood him to be talk<strong>in</strong>g about those<br />

couriers?---I gathered that's what he meant.<br />

Yes?---I mean, that was the first conversation that he - -<br />

that I'd had with him.<br />

Yes. Well, except when you'd met him earlier and delivered<br />

some eggs to him?---Yeah. But, I mean, I didn't know that<br />

this was all <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> export then.<br />

Right. Well, you certa<strong>in</strong>ly knew that at this po<strong>in</strong>t, didn't<br />

you?---Oh, yeah. They're tell<strong>in</strong>g me that, yeah.<br />

He's tell<strong>in</strong>g you that, "When they did the two of them <strong>in</strong> - the<br />

two couriers - <strong>in</strong> fact that did the whole five of them <strong>in</strong>, and<br />

so there's no one else that can do the job now with the stuff<br />

that you've got there." So your stuff - your eggs - were<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended for these couriers; yes? Yes, Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---Well,<br />

they were go<strong>in</strong>g to come over and pick and up and take them<br />

back. I mean, at that stage I was only just f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out then<br />

that they were go<strong>in</strong>g overseas.<br />

All right. In respect of the licens<strong>in</strong>g of birds, is it your<br />

experience that the licens<strong>in</strong>g system that exists <strong>in</strong> Western<br />

Australia is lax?---Yeah. Pretty much.<br />

It's such that you can play around with it, isn't it? They're<br />

words that you've used?---I might have used them words, yeah.<br />

Depends what you mean by "play around with it".<br />

All right. Well, what do you mean - - when I said to you,<br />

"It's lax," and you agreed with it, <strong>in</strong> what ways have you<br />

found the licens<strong>in</strong>g system to be lax?---Well, they don't - -<br />

they don't push you to have your returns <strong>in</strong> on time or<br />

anyth<strong>in</strong>g. I mean, you can send them <strong>in</strong> 2 months late if you<br />

forget about them. And I'm away, sometimes Anne does them,<br />

yeah. They don't keep very good track of anyth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

And when you say "they" don't push you, that's the - - ?---<br />

CALM.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 178<br />

12.15


t25/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: CALM don't push you?---Mm.<br />

And what about the process of legitimis<strong>in</strong>g? Have you ever<br />

heard of that?---Legitimis<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Yeah?---How do you mean?<br />

Or cover<strong>in</strong>g. Provid<strong>in</strong>g a cover for a bird. That is, cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a bird on a licence. Have you heard of that process?---I've<br />

heard - - heard it mentioned, yeah. I mean, there's lots of<br />

terms for cover<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Have you heard that term used?---Obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g birds.<br />

Sorry?---Licens<strong>in</strong>g birds. They call cover<strong>in</strong>g obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g birds,<br />

licens<strong>in</strong>g birds, look<strong>in</strong>g after birds.<br />

Have you heard of wild bird - - these wild-caught birds be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

covered by somebody's licence?---I've heard people talk about<br />

it.<br />

Can you expla<strong>in</strong> to me how that can be done - - -<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 179


t26/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - to me how that can be done?---How?<br />

Yeah. How?---Not really. I mean, I haven't done it.<br />

You've heard of it be<strong>in</strong>g done?---Yeah. I've heard people talk<br />

about it <strong>in</strong> conversation.<br />

What's your understand<strong>in</strong>g of how it can be done?---Pardon?<br />

What's your understand<strong>in</strong>g of how it is done?---How they - -<br />

how they cover birds?<br />

Yes?---Possibly if one dies, I suppose, it gets replaced with<br />

another one. I mean, I don't know. I haven't - - I haven't -<br />

- I haven't done it.<br />

If a bird dies, is there any obligation to tell CALM that<br />

that's occurred?---Not that I know of.<br />

So you could then quite easily replace it with a wild bird and<br />

no one would be any the wiser?---Yeah. Possibly, I suppose.<br />

The returns that you're obliged to do; how often do you have<br />

to do those?---Once a year.<br />

When you say that they don't press you for those - - ?---<br />

That's correct.<br />

- - how long then after the year passes have you put <strong>in</strong><br />

returns?---Oh, I th<strong>in</strong>k - - I don't know. I mean, you'd have<br />

to check with CALM. I'd say possibly our last - - not our<br />

last licence, the one before was probably 3 months overdue.<br />

You don't get a - - they send out a renewal probably a month<br />

before. I mean, I'm away most of the time. Sometimes I<br />

forget about it and they don't get back to you. I mean, yeah;<br />

if I do a permit or someth<strong>in</strong>g I might talk to one of the<br />

blokes <strong>in</strong> the office <strong>in</strong> there and they'll say, "Your licence<br />

is up for renewal," or "has expired" and I'll fill it <strong>in</strong> there<br />

and then, or - - yeah; I mean, I don't know. They don't - -<br />

it's not like <strong>in</strong> the eastern states anyway.<br />

Now, on the morn<strong>in</strong>g of the 16th of September this year a<br />

search warrant was executed at your premises, wasn't it?---<br />

Yeah.<br />

You recall that both Customs officers and CALM officers<br />

attended at that time?---Yeah.<br />

And you received a telephone call from Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, didn't you?---<br />

Yeah.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 180<br />

12.20


t26/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Could we hear, please, KO20, which is barcode 199.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: Now, who do you understand the Charlie is that's<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g referred to there? Do you know any Charlies?---Yeah.<br />

I'd say Charlie Sultana it would be, yeah.<br />

Was it Charlie's birthday on the 16th of September?---No. I<br />

couldn't remember when his birthday was, like I said before.<br />

Do you know when his birthday is?---I have rang him for his<br />

birthday, but, I mean, yeah, Andrew would rem<strong>in</strong>d me. I mean,<br />

no; not exactly. I th<strong>in</strong>k you said February or someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

before.<br />

Yes?---Mm.<br />

Do you accept that? It's the 8th of February?---Yeah. I'd<br />

accept it, yeah.<br />

Right. This was a code, wasn't it?---No.<br />

It was a code to let you know that you were about to be<br />

searched?---No, it isn't.<br />

You were be<strong>in</strong>g searched at the time that that occurred?---<br />

Yeah. That's correct.<br />

Can we listen to T180, which is exhibit KO7, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: In say<strong>in</strong>g that you were "<strong>in</strong> the midst of hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

good day, actually", what you were communicat<strong>in</strong>g to Mr <strong>Ando</strong><br />

was that you were <strong>in</strong> fact <strong>in</strong> the middle of a search at that<br />

very moment?---I wasn't communicat<strong>in</strong>g anyth<strong>in</strong>g. I was just<br />

gett<strong>in</strong>g off the phone because I didn't know what was happen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at the time, like I told you before - - -<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 181


t27/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - like I told you before, had 15 people or<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g go<strong>in</strong>g through my house and I had a few phone calls<br />

and I didn't really want to listen to any of them. I was too<br />

busy <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> what was go<strong>in</strong>g on at home.<br />

MR HALL: In respect of this pass<strong>in</strong>g on of the message, did<br />

you ask Mr <strong>Ando</strong> either - - at any later stage why it was so<br />

important that you pass on a message to Charlie Sultana about<br />

giv<strong>in</strong>g him a happy birthday?---No. I'd probably really<br />

forgotten about it. I mean, more <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> what was<br />

happen<strong>in</strong>g at home. Mm. Forgotten all about the call.<br />

Can I suggest to you that you had on an earlier occasion<br />

agreed a form of words - a code - that would be used whereby<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong> would alert you <strong>in</strong> the event that he became aware that<br />

you were ever go<strong>in</strong>g to be searched?---No. Told you before<br />

that's not - - that's <strong>in</strong>correct. I don't know anyth<strong>in</strong>g about<br />

happy birthday be<strong>in</strong>g a code or anyth<strong>in</strong>g like that.<br />

I asked you a moment or two ago whether you'd ever used the<br />

words that "the system that was <strong>in</strong> existence <strong>in</strong> Western<br />

Australia was one that could be played around with." You said<br />

you might have used those words?---Mm.<br />

Were you - - ever suggested to anyone - for example, Mr<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge, the person who has been the subject of some of<br />

those calls I played you - ever suggested to him that it might<br />

be a good idea to deal directly with you because the system<br />

here was one that could be played around with?---Um, I don't<br />

know. I mean, the conversation - - someth<strong>in</strong>g could have come<br />

up <strong>in</strong> conversation. I can't recall all the conversations I<br />

had with him.<br />

Right. Well, why would the laxity of the system help with the<br />

sort of bus<strong>in</strong>ess that you were talk<strong>in</strong>g about with Mr<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge?---I don't know that it would have.<br />

I have one more call that I would then seek to play,<br />

Commissioner. It's 253. It relates directly to these<br />

questions I have just asked.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right.<br />

MR HALL: 253.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: Who were your couple of good contacts, Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---I<br />

can't recall.<br />

Oh, do try harder?---I can't recall. I can't recall the<br />

conversation.<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 182<br />

12.25


t27/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: You were talk<strong>in</strong>g with Mr Coll<strong>in</strong>gridge?---Yeah.<br />

Who you've previously talked to about export<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wildlife</strong> to at<br />

least the eastern states and you're say<strong>in</strong>g to him here, "Why<br />

don't they deal directly with us? We've got a system we can<br />

play around with and we've got a couple of good contacts."<br />

Who are they?---Could have been bird dealers. Could have been<br />

- - I don't know. People I associate with. I mean, I can't -<br />

- noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> that call - - no, I can't recall what that call<br />

was about actually.<br />

Contacts where?---I don't know.<br />

Do you have any contacts <strong>in</strong> the Department of Conservation and<br />

Land Management?---No. It wasn't - -<br />

Do you have any friends there?--- - - to do with them.<br />

Do you have any friends there?---I have friends. Yeah.<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---Yeah. I've already stated that he's a friend and<br />

his parents.<br />

Was he one of the couple of good contacts?---No.<br />

That you were referr<strong>in</strong>g to?---No. I only had one contact <strong>in</strong><br />

there anyway, not a couple. Like you said there, I mean, I<br />

can't - - can't recall what that conversation was actually<br />

about.<br />

Do you consider Mr <strong>Ando</strong> a good contact?---No.<br />

Has he ever assisted you <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g you <strong>in</strong>formation?---The<br />

only <strong>in</strong>formation is that little bit about Moora. You know,<br />

that was cut short, as you already know, you've heard the - -<br />

heard what I've said about that.<br />

He's provided with you - - you with <strong>in</strong>formation on other<br />

occasions, hasn't he?---No.<br />

Commissioner, that's all the questions I have for Mr <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Right.<br />

MR HALL: I tender that, thank you. I've missed 172. It was<br />

tendered as KO - - 172 was tendered as KO6 - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: Oh, right.<br />

MR HALL: - - and can I tender 253.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 253 will be, I th<strong>in</strong>k, KO25. That right?<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 183


t27/sa<br />

CCC<br />

ASSOCIATE: 24.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 24. Oh, because - - yes.<br />

EXHIBIT KO24 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 253<br />

MR HALL: Thank you, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hammond, do you have any questions?<br />

MR HAMMOND: No. Thank you, sir.<br />

NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HAMMOND<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Mr Tudori.<br />

MR TUDORI: No. No questions, sir.<br />

NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR TUDORI<br />

COMMISSIONER: No questions?<br />

MR TUDORI: No.<br />

COMMISSIONER: You don't require Mr <strong>Green</strong> any further?<br />

MR HALL: I don't. No, sir.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Thank you, Mr <strong>Green</strong>. You're free to go and<br />

discharged from further attendance.<br />

WITNESS WITHDREW<br />

COMMISSIONER: I wonder should we adjourn at this stage?<br />

MR TUDORI: Perhaps if I just could announce now that <strong>in</strong> light<br />

of Mr <strong>Green</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g excused or no longer required that will be -<br />

- that will cease my appearance before the Commission.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Thank you, Mr Tudori.<br />

MR HALL: Yes. It would be convenient to do that now,<br />

Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Would that worry you, Mr Hammond?<br />

MR HAMMOND: No. Not at all, sir.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Well, let's say we'll adjourn now and resume at<br />

quarter to two. How's that?<br />

HEARING ADJOURNED AT 12.32 PM<br />

23.11.04 P. GREEN XN 184


t28/nj<br />

CCC<br />

HEARING RESUMED AT 1.47 PM<br />

COMMISSIONER: Now, Mr Hall?<br />

MR HALL: Commissioner, I would seek to recall Mr <strong>Ando</strong>.<br />

ANDREA GIOVANNI ANDO:<br />

COMMISSIONER: Please sit down there, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>.<br />

EXAMINED BY MR HALL SC (Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g):<br />

MR HALL: Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, I asked you yesterday about any deal<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

that you may have had with a Richard Polglase. Do you recall<br />

that?---Yes.<br />

And you told us that you had collected two birds on an<br />

occasion?---That's correct.<br />

Is that the only deal<strong>in</strong>gs that you've had with Mr Polglase?---<br />

That's correct.<br />

So have you spoken to him on the phone at all?---I'm sure I<br />

probably have, yes.<br />

About what?---About work issues, about licens<strong>in</strong>g and stuff. I<br />

don't recall totally, but I've had deal<strong>in</strong>gs with him on the<br />

phone, yes.<br />

Did you speak to him about the collection of these<br />

yellow-tails before you went to collect them?---I'm sure I<br />

did.<br />

When you say you're sure you did, I take it you don't have a<br />

recollection?---Well, I'm sure I contacted - - I'm sure I<br />

contacted him to tell him that I will be pick<strong>in</strong>g them up.<br />

Did you have any understand<strong>in</strong>g of what the transaction was<br />

between your father and Mr Polglase?---The transaction was<br />

that the birds were go<strong>in</strong>g to go through Maurie Luke, so they<br />

were arranged through - - between Polglase and Maurie Luke.<br />

Yes?---When I found out about it, because I'd spoken to Mr<br />

Polglase <strong>in</strong> the past, I thought it would be more wise for the<br />

birds to go directly to dad's cages, otherwise they'd get<br />

stressed out.<br />

Why couldn't the birds be brought directly from Mr Polglase?--<br />

-Because I was go<strong>in</strong>g out that way.<br />

Yes, I know, but why did your father purchase through Maurie<br />

Luke's shop? Why not purchase directly from Mr Polglase?---<br />

Because my father has been do<strong>in</strong>g work for Mr Luke.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 185<br />

1.47


t28/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Do you know what was paid for these birds?---I don't<br />

know.<br />

Have you ever heard the phrase, "dummy permits"?---No.<br />

Never?---Not that I know of.<br />

Ever used that phrase yourself?---I've not used that phrase,<br />

no.<br />

You're quite sure about that?---Yeah. Pretty much.<br />

What do you mean, "pretty much"?---Well, unless I've used it<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>vestigation, I don't recall us<strong>in</strong>g the term "dummy<br />

permit", but there's many terms used for various permits <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

Have you ever heard of that phrase, "dummy permits", <strong>in</strong> the<br />

course of your work?---Not that I recall.<br />

Your father is licensed to keep parrots?---That's correct.<br />

Includ<strong>in</strong>g black cockatoos?---They're all black cockatoos.<br />

All right. Do you know how many of each sort are on his<br />

licence?---When I last did his licence there were three<br />

white-tails, two red-tails and two yellow-tails.<br />

Are the two yellow-tails the yellow-tails that you picked up<br />

from Mr Polglase, I assume?---That's correct.<br />

Do you know where Mr Polglase got them from?---No.<br />

Were you not advised where Mr Polglase had got them from?---<br />

No.<br />

You weren't <strong>in</strong>volved at all <strong>in</strong> the sourc<strong>in</strong>g of those<br />

yellow-tails?---No.<br />

Do you know whether those yellow-tails were provided to your<br />

father <strong>in</strong> return for some work that he had done for Mr<br />

Polglase?---No. I believe he'd done work for Mr Luke.<br />

Had he done anyth<strong>in</strong>g at all by way of a favour or by way of<br />

work for Mr Polglase?---Not that I'm aware of.<br />

Has your father ever held more than the three white-tails that<br />

are on his licence at his premises?---Three white-tails, two<br />

red-tails and two yellow-tails.<br />

Yes. But has he held more white-tails than three?---Not that<br />

I'm aware of.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 186


t28/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Can I ask you to listen to this telephone call?<br />

It's on the 26th of July 2004. It's barcode 212.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 187


t29/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Who's Norm?---Norm is probably Norm Sullivan.<br />

He is <strong>in</strong>volved, is he not, <strong>in</strong> the bird-keep<strong>in</strong>g fraternity?---<br />

He is a bird-keeper, yes.<br />

What was he deliver<strong>in</strong>g to your father?---I'm not totally sure.<br />

I - - I recall try<strong>in</strong>g to organise a number of birds for dad,<br />

and I don't th<strong>in</strong>k he ended up gett<strong>in</strong>g all the birds that he<br />

wanted anyway, and - -<br />

What - - ?--- - - that's why - -<br />

What sort of birds were they?---Well, he was go<strong>in</strong>g to get back<br />

the three white-tails that Norm was look<strong>in</strong>g after for him.<br />

Well, your father's already got white-tails?---No, no. He had<br />

- - he was build<strong>in</strong>g the cages. We received compla<strong>in</strong>ts for a<br />

while, so Norm had took three away to look after while dad<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ished the rest of the cages, because they were <strong>in</strong> a small<br />

cage.<br />

Why did he call them "plants" at first?---Well, there's also<br />

plants <strong>in</strong>volved because I cultivate roses and I also do<br />

fuschias.<br />

And it just happens to be the same number, is it? He's go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>g six plants?---Well, I don't - - I - - I - - I do not<br />

recall that conversation. That's nearly six months ago so I<br />

don't - - I don't recall it.<br />

Could it be that you were call<strong>in</strong>g these birds "plants" because<br />

you were at work and didn't want anyone to know what it was<br />

you were talk<strong>in</strong>g about?---Possibly, but I don't - - I don't<br />

know.<br />

There were six white-tails be<strong>in</strong>g delivered, weren't there?---<br />

No. Not that I know of. Dad - - dad had arranged with - -<br />

with Norm to look after the birds. Now, he'd told me that the<br />

cages are nearly ready so I took it on my bat to r<strong>in</strong>g Norm to<br />

ask for the birds back because the cages were f<strong>in</strong>ished.<br />

Well, if three are be<strong>in</strong>g delivered, how does it make it 10?---<br />

I don't - - that's what I - - that's what I mean. I - - it<br />

doesn't make sense.<br />

Well, it does if they're be<strong>in</strong>g delivered and there are more<br />

white-tails at your father's premises than he is licensed to<br />

keep?---There was never more white-tails at my father's<br />

premises that I'm - - that I'm aware of.<br />

Well, that's what I'm suggest<strong>in</strong>g to you, that he was hold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

white-tails at his premises that <strong>in</strong> fact he wasn't licensed to<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 188<br />

1.52


t29/kr<br />

CCC<br />

keep?---I don't - - I doubt it. I'd made sure that dad's<br />

licences were always kept proper. Now and - -<br />

MR HALL: Well, he kept birds there for Richard Polglase,<br />

didn't he?---No.<br />

You're quite sure about that?---Well, not that I'm aware of,<br />

no.<br />

It won't tell you by look<strong>in</strong>g at that transcript?---Well, I - -<br />

that's what I'm say<strong>in</strong>g. I'm not aware of anyth<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g held<br />

by Richard - -<br />

You're quite sure?---Yeah, I just remember talk<strong>in</strong>g to Richard<br />

Polglase and I picked up two yellow-tails.<br />

And that's it?---And the two - -<br />

That's the sole content of your deal<strong>in</strong>gs with Richard<br />

Polglase?---That I'm aware of, yes.<br />

All right. Well, let's see if we can jog your memory:<br />

"I don't want to talk about it" - you said - "because I'm at<br />

work."<br />

Why didn't you want to talk about it "now" if - - ?---Well,<br />

it's the same reason that - -<br />

- - there was noth<strong>in</strong>g wrong with what you were do<strong>in</strong>g?---We've<br />

gone through this. The same answer as every other answer. I<br />

didn't want to <strong>in</strong>volve anyone at work.<br />

But you're say<strong>in</strong>g that he was licensed to keep these. Why<br />

would you not want to talk to him about it, if he was licensed<br />

to keep these birds?---Because I don't th<strong>in</strong>k it's anyone<br />

else's bus<strong>in</strong>ess. A person's licence is their own personal<br />

licence. It's got no - - no bus<strong>in</strong>ess of anyone else's.<br />

You see your father refers to keep<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> the first one,<br />

that is the first cage, because no one can see it. Do you see<br />

that?---Yeah, because that - - that one there is completed.<br />

That - - that cage there has been there for a very long time.<br />

Yes, but "no one can see it", he says?---Well, because - -<br />

There was some importance that no one could see these birds,<br />

wasn't there?---Because of the compla<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Well, how does not be<strong>in</strong>g able to see them stop them be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

noisy?---Well, pretty obvious, when you see a bird and there's<br />

no wall <strong>in</strong> the way, the noise is go<strong>in</strong>g to be much greater.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 189


t29/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: "No one can see it". The po<strong>in</strong>t was that you didn't<br />

want, or your father didn't want, anyone to see how many birds<br />

were be<strong>in</strong>g kept there?---I - - I - - I can't answer that. I<br />

don't - - I don't know what to answer to that.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 190


t30/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Can we listen to 213, please? Oh, sorry, I should<br />

tender the previous one, Commissioner, which is - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO25.<br />

EXHIBIT KO25 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

MR HALL: And 213.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: In relation to the mak<strong>in</strong>g a lot of noise, there had,<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact - - I th<strong>in</strong>k you told us yesterday there had been a<br />

compla<strong>in</strong>t about the noise they made?---Yes.<br />

And it was at that stage that you declared that your father<br />

was a licensed keeper of birds?---Yes.<br />

Have you ever <strong>in</strong>dicated to your father that the noise wouldn't<br />

be a problem because you were work<strong>in</strong>g at CALM and you were <strong>in</strong><br />

a position to see to any compla<strong>in</strong>ts that were made?---Not - -<br />

no.<br />

Never said anyth<strong>in</strong>g like that?---No. I - - we'd received<br />

compla<strong>in</strong>ts and I told Dad that when you get bigger - - when<br />

the cages are bigger and the birds are on their own they will<br />

be less stressed and they won't be as noisy.<br />

Wasn't the real cause for concern that if they made a lot of<br />

noise it might attract attention and the fact that there were<br />

illegal white tails be<strong>in</strong>g kept at your father's premises would<br />

become known?---No. That's not true. I can tell you what's<br />

true though. Is that on numerous - -<br />

You could just answer the questions, if you would?---No.<br />

That's not true.<br />

Can I tender that, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO26.<br />

EXHIBIT 26 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 213<br />

MR HALL: And can we listen to 214, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 191<br />

1.57


t30/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: So, you have used the phrase "dummy permit"?---<br />

Obviously.<br />

What do you understand it to mean?---I don't know. The - -<br />

see, and that's - - it's clear <strong>in</strong> there as well is whatever he<br />

does it's his - - his bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Well, "Get a dummy," you say?---However he gets the yellow - -<br />

however - - gets the yellow-tails, I don't know.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 192


t31/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: We're not talk<strong>in</strong>g about yellow-tails here, are we?--<br />

-That's what - - that's the only transaction we've had with Mr<br />

Polglase is yellow-tails.<br />

Well, the yellow-tails come <strong>in</strong>, don't they? The yellow-tails<br />

aren't go<strong>in</strong>g out. It's the white-tails that are go<strong>in</strong>g out?---<br />

Well, it's - - like, we're talk<strong>in</strong>g pretty much gobbledegook<br />

there, so - -<br />

Well, perhaps I can expla<strong>in</strong> it to you. "There's some<br />

white-tails here. They're be<strong>in</strong>g kept at your father's place.<br />

They are be<strong>in</strong>g sent out to Victoria. Yellow-tails are com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

back." Is this r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g a bell?---That's <strong>in</strong>correct.<br />

Not correct?---No.<br />

Well, let's go back to the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of this transcript. Your<br />

father's a bit worried about hav<strong>in</strong>g them there too long.<br />

What's he worried about. What are "they"?---Well, that's the<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g. The birds br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> wild birds, okay. Now, throughout<br />

the year we've had up to 30, 40 wild birds on top of the<br />

cages. Now, that's where most of the compla<strong>in</strong>ts come from.<br />

Our neighbour has got cancer, and he made - - we th<strong>in</strong>k he made<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong>al compla<strong>in</strong>t. Now, s<strong>in</strong>ce that orig<strong>in</strong>al compla<strong>in</strong>t my<br />

dad and my neighbour - - and his neighbour have not talked,<br />

okay. So the amount of birds that land on top of his antenna<br />

and make such a racket is phenomenal.<br />

Have you ever suggested to your father that he catch some of<br />

these birds that are com<strong>in</strong>g down on top of the cages to - - ?-<br />

--No.<br />

- - fill an order that someone - - ?---No. I've told him, and<br />

I can quote this - - I told him to get a hose and hose them<br />

away, because that's what I got directed from one of my<br />

officers.<br />

Just so I understand this, you've never told him that he<br />

should go and catch one to fill an order?---Oh, I might have<br />

mucked around. I could have said it muck<strong>in</strong>g around, but - -<br />

Right?--- - - yeah; never.<br />

He's worried about hav<strong>in</strong>g them for too long, not for the too<br />

many. So there's too many. Not too many birds on top of the<br />

cage; there's too many <strong>in</strong> the cages?---Yeah. Because there's<br />

only one cage.<br />

Yeah?---Two - - two red-tails and the white-tails <strong>in</strong> one cage<br />

is not very good.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 193<br />

2.02


t31/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: "When's the quickest?" he said. "When's the<br />

quickest he can get rid of them?" You see that?---Well, I do<br />

not recall that conversation. It's that long ago.<br />

Well, it's not that long ago. It's <strong>in</strong> July this year?---If<br />

you're under the stress that I'm under it's pretty long ago.<br />

Well, a little while ago you told me that the only deal<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

you'd had with Mr Polglase were about the collection of these<br />

two yellow-tails?---I went to Mr Polglase's place, picked up<br />

two yellow-tails. How he arranged the two yellow-tails I do<br />

not know, and I tried to - - he's obviously talk<strong>in</strong>g about<br />

that, so - -<br />

This - - ?--- - - I didn't want to know.<br />

This conversation is not about the collection of those two<br />

yellow-tails, is it?---It is pretty much.<br />

Is it? Expla<strong>in</strong> that to me. What's a dummy permit got to do<br />

with it?---I don't know.<br />

A dummy permit. When you were go<strong>in</strong>g to collect these two<br />

yellow-tails - - ?---I don't arrange - -<br />

- - that had noth<strong>in</strong>g to - - ?---I don't arrange - -<br />

Wait. It had noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with a dummy permit, did it?---I<br />

don't arrange permits.<br />

Well, he says, "I might even do a dummy permit." "Yeah.<br />

Whatever, mate. We'll have them all there by lunch time,<br />

mid-afternoon tomorrow." Now, you are at this time a serv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> officer and someone is talk<strong>in</strong>g to you about a dummy<br />

permit?---That's what I said, "Yeah. Whatever." I didn't<br />

want to know anyth<strong>in</strong>g about it.<br />

You don't want to know about it as a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer at 6<br />

o'clock - - ?---Someone's talk<strong>in</strong>g - - I knock off - -<br />

- - about a dummy permit?---I knock off at 4.30.<br />

Oh, I see. And after 4.30 you're no longer a <strong>wildlife</strong><br />

officer?---I'm a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer all the time. But what he<br />

means and how he does th<strong>in</strong>gs, I didn't want to know, because<br />

that's how I distance myself.<br />

Well, anyway, this is ten past four so you're def<strong>in</strong>itely a<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> officer at ten past four. Why aren't you <strong>in</strong>terested<br />

<strong>in</strong> someone tell<strong>in</strong>g you that they're us<strong>in</strong>g a dummy permit?---I<br />

don't know.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 194


t31/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Surely as a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer that should have<br />

brought - - made alarm bells go off. Someone is us<strong>in</strong>g a dummy<br />

permit to send some birds out of the state?---Well, was there<br />

a dummy permit done? I don't know.<br />

Whether you knew it or not, here's someone tell<strong>in</strong>g you they're<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g it?---Well, what does a dummy permit mean?<br />

Well, what do you th<strong>in</strong>k it means?---I don't know.<br />

Well, sitt<strong>in</strong>g there now, are you tell<strong>in</strong>g me if someone said to<br />

you now, "I'm go<strong>in</strong>g to use a dummy permit to export some birds<br />

out of Western Australia," that that wouldn't cause you some<br />

concern as a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer?---I don't know what he means by<br />

it, I don't know how he did it and I don't know what a dummy<br />

permit means because I don't - - I'm not - - I don't get<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> issu<strong>in</strong>g permits.<br />

Well, you see, you go on to tell him that noth<strong>in</strong>g ever goes<br />

wrong go<strong>in</strong>g out - that is, export<strong>in</strong>g birds from Western<br />

Australia. You say there's - - he's asked - - he asked,<br />

"There's no <strong>in</strong>spection here at all, is there?" and you say,<br />

"Not on the way out, no"?---I said, "Not that I know of.<br />

Well, no; <strong>in</strong> fact on the second page - - ?---Not that I'm<br />

aware of.<br />

About halfway down the page:<br />

"If we were to send them out there's no - - there's - -<br />

actually, I meant to ask you before; there's no<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection here at all, is there?<br />

"No. Not on the way out, no. Yeah, not that I'm aware of."<br />

Well, why are you giv<strong>in</strong>g him that sort of comfort? He's<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g to you about whether there's go<strong>in</strong>g to be an<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection, and you say, "Not that I'm aware of"?---I don't<br />

know.<br />

Why do you th<strong>in</strong>k he might be concerned about there be<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection on the way out, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---I don't know.<br />

Because he's do<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g illegal. That must have occurred<br />

to you - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 195


t32/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - that must have occurred to you?---Not - - not<br />

that I'm aware of.<br />

Didn't it occur to you that he was concerned about an<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection because he was do<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g illegal?---I don't<br />

even know what he meant by it.<br />

You know, don't you, that it's illegal to export fauna, West<br />

Australian fauna from Western Australia?---That's why he was<br />

gett<strong>in</strong>g permits, obviously.<br />

That's why he was gett<strong>in</strong>g a dummy permit, because these were<br />

wild-caught birds?---I don't know - - I don't know what he<br />

arranged to get the yellow-tails. That was his arrangement.<br />

I don't even know where they came from.<br />

You see at the bottom of that page, he's talk<strong>in</strong>g about:<br />

"Yeah, well I will get a permit for - - cause I will probably<br />

do is get a permit to send, say, four or five, oh,<br />

five, and I'll send them out and then the very next<br />

night, I'll send aga<strong>in</strong>."<br />

So there are <strong>in</strong> excess of five - - ?---I don't - - I - -<br />

- - of these th<strong>in</strong>gs he's send<strong>in</strong>g out?---I don't know what he<br />

did to get the yellow-tails. That's what I'm try<strong>in</strong>g to say to<br />

you. All we did was obta<strong>in</strong> two yellow-tails from him.<br />

What were the five th<strong>in</strong>gs that he was obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from your<br />

father, that your father was concerned about because there was<br />

too many of them, that he was send<strong>in</strong>g over east?---I do not<br />

know.<br />

They're white-tails, aren't they?---No. I - - I'm not aware<br />

of any of that.<br />

You - - you've - - all this conversation that you have with Mr<br />

Polglase and you've got no idea, you say, of what he's talk<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about?---No.<br />

No idea what he needs a permit for, no idea what the four or<br />

five are?---All I know is, is that he arranged obviously<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g to get the two yellow-tails and what he did, I don't<br />

know what he did to do that, so he was obviously try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

tell me, but I don't understand what he's go<strong>in</strong>g on about. I'm<br />

just go<strong>in</strong>g, "Yeah, all right. Yeah, all right."<br />

And you've no idea what there were too many of <strong>in</strong> your<br />

father's cages?---Too many black cockatoos <strong>in</strong> a small cage.<br />

Yes, some of which are be<strong>in</strong>g sent over east?---No.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 196<br />

2.07


t32/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Isn't that what you're say<strong>in</strong>g here?---No.<br />

"He's anxious to get rid of them", and Mr Polglase is say<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

"Yeah, well I'm go<strong>in</strong>g to send four or five of those th<strong>in</strong>gs"<br />

over east?---Doesn't say anyth<strong>in</strong>g about "those th<strong>in</strong>gs."<br />

Well, perhaps I'll play you some more then.<br />

(TO COMMISSIONER): Can I tender that, Commissioner?<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO27.<br />

EXHIBIT KO27 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

MR HALL: 215, please?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: It is clear, isn't it, that Richard is com<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

your parents' place to pick these th<strong>in</strong>gs up, the white-tails?-<br />

--No.<br />

"When will he come and pick them up?" your mother asks - - ?--<br />

-It could have been cages, it could have been anyth<strong>in</strong>g. Could<br />

have been plants. I - - I seriously don't know. All I know<br />

is that I picked up two yellow-tails.<br />

Well, it could have been plants? Do plants make a lot of<br />

noise, do they?---Well, the birds make a lot of noise.<br />

Yes. So it's these birds, it's the white-tails, isn't it?---I<br />

- - where did the white-tails come from? I don't - - I don't<br />

understand - -<br />

Well, what do you th<strong>in</strong>k it was? You're play<strong>in</strong>g a role here,<br />

clearly, <strong>in</strong> talk<strong>in</strong>g to Mr Polglase and then talk<strong>in</strong>g to your<br />

parents. What was it that you say he was pick<strong>in</strong>g up?---The -<br />

- I had - - the amount of phone calls I get, I don't even<br />

remember what I did last week, let alone on the 26th of July,<br />

and what that conversation is over. I do not know.<br />

You say:<br />

"But I told him that we want to get them out quick and he<br />

said, `Yeah, fair enough.'"<br />

Now, the reason I suggest you want to get them out quick is<br />

that there are too many for the licence?---I don't know.<br />

Your mother's concerned that they will attract attention<br />

because there's so much noise and - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 197


t33/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - because there's so much noise and you say,<br />

"Well, I'm duty officer so if there's problems we'll sort it<br />

out."?---The noise issues is with<strong>in</strong> the same issue. They're<br />

<strong>in</strong> a small cage.<br />

Well, how are you go<strong>in</strong>g to sort it out if there was a<br />

problem?---I don't know. We're go<strong>in</strong>g to have - - we were<br />

pretty close to f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g the cages obviously.<br />

I suggest to you that you were go<strong>in</strong>g to sort it out because<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g duty officer you would deflect any compla<strong>in</strong>ts that came<br />

<strong>in</strong> until such time as the excess illegal parrots were<br />

removed?---The amount of compla<strong>in</strong>ts we get about noise - - all<br />

noise compla<strong>in</strong>ts get referred onto the shire anyway. Noise<br />

compla<strong>in</strong>ts has got noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with us at all.<br />

You're <strong>in</strong> a position if such compla<strong>in</strong>ts came <strong>in</strong> to receive<br />

them and to deflect them?---It's back to the shire.<br />

Yes. If you pass it onto the shire?---Well, I'll tell the<br />

people to refer to the shire because we got noth<strong>in</strong>g - - we got<br />

no legislation aga<strong>in</strong>st noise.<br />

Can we listen to 217, please? I'm sorry, I should have<br />

tendered that one, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 215 will, I th<strong>in</strong>k, be KO28.<br />

EXHIBIT KO28 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 215<br />

MR HALL: Thank you.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: Right. You're there talk<strong>in</strong>g about Richard Polglase<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g to your father's place to pick up these birds, aren't<br />

you?---I don't recall the conversation.<br />

All right. You see that there's a reference there to Charlie<br />

need<strong>in</strong>g it quick. "Phil doesn't need another one." Oh,<br />

because - - you say, "Because Charlie needed it quick. He got<br />

it from somewhere else." You see you say that?---The only<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g I can remember is that Dad had bred a white-tail and it<br />

was young and we were go<strong>in</strong>g to do a straight swap for an adult<br />

bird.<br />

Right. Well, it wasn't necessary, it would seem, for there to<br />

be six picked up by Mr Polglase because Charlie, who was to<br />

receive one of those six, had got one from somewhere else. Do<br />

you accept that that's what was occurr<strong>in</strong>g?---There was an<br />

arrangement and we - - the arrangement went through. There<br />

was a swap of a young bird, that Dad had bred with Maurie, for<br />

an adult bird. that's the only th<strong>in</strong>g I can remember were the<br />

transaction.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 198<br />

2.12


t33/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Well, what Charlie got though - -?---I don't know<br />

what Charlie got.<br />

- - was a white-tail?---I don't know what Charlie got because<br />

it says - - we didn't need - - we didn't need to give that one<br />

to Charlie so we didn't do it.<br />

So, you don't know what's be<strong>in</strong>g talked about here aga<strong>in</strong>? You<br />

don't know that they're white-tails?---No. I know that Dad<br />

was go<strong>in</strong>g to give the young white-tail - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 199


t34/nj<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - was go<strong>in</strong>g to give the young white-tail to<br />

Maurie to send to Charlie, and that transaction fell through.<br />

And that happened at another time.<br />

MR HALL: Yes. It fell through because Charlie <strong>in</strong> fact got a<br />

white-tail from someone else?---Obviously.<br />

Yes. Indeed, I can show you 1185 - - sorry; 11845. If you<br />

can br<strong>in</strong>g that document on the screen.<br />

(TO WITNESS): An export licence. The call I just played you<br />

was the 27th of July and this is an export licence issued on<br />

the 20th of July, and you can see that Mr Sultana has been<br />

sent a Carnaby's black cockatoo from Mr Luke. So a matter of<br />

a few days before this call that you have with your father.<br />

You see that?---I don't know when the transaction happened,<br />

but I know that dad gave a young Carnaby's cockatoo to Maurie,<br />

and Maurie must have sent it to Charlie.<br />

Yes. So it's pla<strong>in</strong>, isn't it, then that - - ?---But I wasn't<br />

aware - - I'd - - I'd have noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with the arrangement<br />

of that permit and how - - how that bird went over there. I<br />

don't - -<br />

I'm not suggest<strong>in</strong>g you do, but what Charlie had got prior to<br />

this call on the 27th of July was a white-tail black cockatoo.<br />

That's what a Carnaby's is?---Possibly, yes.<br />

Well, not possibly. You know that?---Well, yeah, it is, but I<br />

don't know the dates and when the transaction occurred.<br />

Yes. I'm not suggest<strong>in</strong>g you do, but what I am suggest<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

that the transcript then of the conversation on the 27th of<br />

July, what you're talk<strong>in</strong>g about is white-tailed cockatoos.<br />

You don't need six because Charlie has already got one?---I<br />

don't know.<br />

So there are at least five of them that are at your father's<br />

house that Richard Polglase is com<strong>in</strong>g to collect?---Not that<br />

I'm aware of. You're try<strong>in</strong>g to put words <strong>in</strong> my mouth. It's a<br />

bit unfair.<br />

I'm not try<strong>in</strong>g to put words <strong>in</strong> your mouth. I'm ask<strong>in</strong>g you<br />

what else this conversation of the 27th of July could mean<br />

other than what I am putt<strong>in</strong>g to you?---I don't know.<br />

Well, I'm giv<strong>in</strong>g you a fair opportunity. You tell me what it<br />

means if it doesn't mean what I'm suggest<strong>in</strong>g to you?---I don't<br />

know what it means. I can't remember what - - like I said, I<br />

can't remember what I did last week let alone 6 months ago, or<br />

5 months ago. And you can ask my wife that.<br />

Commissioner, can I tender the export licence?<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 200<br />

2.17


t34/nj<br />

CCC<br />

COMMISSIONER: Which I th<strong>in</strong>k will be KO29.<br />

EXHIBIT KO29 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Export licence<br />

MR HALL: Can we go back to the transcript? Yes. I'm just<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to go back to that. Can we go back to the transcript,<br />

please?<br />

(TO WITNESS): Towards the bottom of that page you say, "So he<br />

will do five, or four first and then five." So there are<br />

either n<strong>in</strong>e or 10 depend<strong>in</strong>g on how you view that. Clearly<br />

there are n<strong>in</strong>e or 10 white-tails; isn't that what it means?--<br />

-I've never seen n<strong>in</strong>e or 10 white-tails.<br />

Well, can you aga<strong>in</strong> suggest any other <strong>in</strong>terpretation that can<br />

be placed upon this, other than the one I'm suggest<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

you?---I've got no comment on that. I can't remember what the<br />

conversation was about.<br />

You know, don't you, that Mr Polglase did <strong>in</strong>deed ship - -<br />

transport two loads of birds from Western Australia to<br />

Victoria?---It could have been, but there was obviously some<br />

arrangement he had made for yellow-tails. I don't know.<br />

You spoke to him about the shipp<strong>in</strong>g out and then the shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

back of yellow-tails, didn't you? The shipp<strong>in</strong>g out of<br />

white-tails, the shipp<strong>in</strong>g back of yellow-tails?---I don't - -<br />

I don't know.<br />

You don't know?---No. He does transactions - - if you go<br />

through his licence, the amount of transactions he's done <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to n<strong>in</strong>e and 10 white-tails is probably pretty high.<br />

In what capacity were you speak<strong>in</strong>g to Mr Polglase? As a<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> officer or on behalf of your father - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 201


t35/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - or on behalf of your father? This is with<br />

your father - - ?---On behalf of - -<br />

- - yes - - ?---On behalf of my father.<br />

I see. Did you ever br<strong>in</strong>g the fact that Mr Polglase had<br />

spoken about dummy permits to anyone - - to the attention of<br />

anyone with<strong>in</strong> the department?---No.<br />

Why not?---I don't know. I <strong>in</strong>vestigated - - I've <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />

Mr Polglase on numerous occasions. I've done <strong>in</strong>spections of<br />

his premises on numerous occasions. I've done <strong>in</strong>spections on<br />

over 100 aviculturalists with the same amount of cockatoos,<br />

the same names that come up all the time and it's just - -<br />

that's my duty and that's what I do. I arrange - - I've - -<br />

I've dropped their numbers after do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>spections on these<br />

people's premises.<br />

You talked about two shipments, two flights; can I show you a<br />

consignment note 11846. As you can see from that, there was<br />

<strong>in</strong>deed a consignment of live birds by Mr Polglase on the 29th<br />

of July 2004 which is two days after your call to your father.<br />

Now, and it was be<strong>in</strong>g sent to a Mr Tanaglia ?<br />

<strong>in</strong> Melbourne.<br />

You heard that name before?---Never.<br />

COMMISSIONER: What was your answer then, sorry?---Sorry, I<br />

never heard that name before.<br />

MR HALL: Sir, I tender the consignment note.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO30.<br />

EXHIBIT KO30 Mr Hall DATE 29.7.04<br />

Consignment note 11846<br />

MR HALL: And can I then show you a second consignment note,<br />

11848, of the follow<strong>in</strong>g day, aga<strong>in</strong> from Mr Polglase to Mr<br />

Tanaglia, of live birds on the 30th of July 2004. I tender<br />

that, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO31.<br />

EXHIBIT KO31 Mr Hall DATE 30.7.04<br />

Consignment note 11848<br />

COMMISSIONER: What was the mean<strong>in</strong>g of "pieces, 1" then "live<br />

birds", no sorry - -<br />

MR HALL: That's a weight, I th<strong>in</strong>k.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 202<br />

2.22


t35/kr<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: It's one box with live birds.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Oh, one box.<br />

MR HALL: Yes, that's correct.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Okay.<br />

MR HALL: It's an item. It becomes apparent <strong>in</strong> another<br />

consignment note that I will show <strong>in</strong> a moment. It would seem<br />

the number of live birds is not actually <strong>in</strong>cluded on the<br />

consignment notes, generally speak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Oh. The "6" doesn't mean birds?<br />

MR HALL: It doesn't. I th<strong>in</strong>k it's a weight, it's 6<br />

kilograms, I th<strong>in</strong>k.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Big birds.<br />

MR HALL: Well, that's the case as well.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Oh.<br />

MR HALL: I th<strong>in</strong>k.<br />

(TO WITNESS): So you can see, consistently with what you were<br />

say<strong>in</strong>g to your father, there were <strong>in</strong> fact two consignments<br />

sent by Mr Polglase to Victoria with<strong>in</strong> a couple of days of<br />

your conversation?---Have you checked Mr Polglase's<br />

transactions? He does on a weekly basis.<br />

Well, what I want - - ?---He sends birds out on a weekly<br />

basis.<br />

Well, he may well do, but - - ?---So how can that be connected<br />

to what I had <strong>in</strong> my conversation - -<br />

Well, it can be connected because you're say<strong>in</strong>g to your father<br />

that "Richard is com<strong>in</strong>g to collect some birds", four and then<br />

five "with<strong>in</strong> a couple of days"?---I don't know who - - where<br />

he was go<strong>in</strong>g to collect them from. That's what I'm say<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The only deal<strong>in</strong>gs was - -<br />

He was collect<strong>in</strong>g them from your father - - ?--- - - was two<br />

yellow-tails from my father. That was - -<br />

He's collect<strong>in</strong>g them from your father. That's pla<strong>in</strong>, from<br />

these conversations?---I don't know where he's go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

collect them from.<br />

Well, why do you th<strong>in</strong>k your mother <strong>in</strong> the previous<br />

conversation was concerned about when he was com<strong>in</strong>g to collect<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 203


t35/kr<br />

CCC<br />

them because of the noise they made, if they weren't be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collected from your father's place?---I don't know.<br />

MR HALL: All right. I tender 215, Commissioner - - sorry,<br />

217.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 217. There were two consignment notes, 11848<br />

is 31.<br />

MR HALL: Yes, and this is the transcript, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Oh, right. 217, KO32.<br />

MR HALL: Thank you.<br />

EXHIBIT KO32 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Transcript of audio tape<br />

Barcode 217<br />

COMMISSIONER: Well, are there two consignment notes?<br />

MR HALL: There are two consignment notes and they were - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: Are you tender<strong>in</strong>g them together as 31?<br />

MR HALL: No. You - - I th<strong>in</strong>k they've been tendered as 30 and<br />

31. The first consignment note was the 29th of July, that's<br />

KO30 and the second was the 30th of July, that's KO31.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Thank you.<br />

MR HALL: Did you have anyth<strong>in</strong>g to do with Maurie Luke<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the transfer of the yellow-tails from Mr<br />

Polglase to your father?---I do recall tell<strong>in</strong>g Maurie to make<br />

sure that he puts them on his returns.<br />

Ah, right. Well, you didn't tell us about that before. What<br />

did you do - - ?---I've told it - -<br />

- - about that?--- - - <strong>in</strong> a previous hear<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

What did you do about that?---I remember call<strong>in</strong>g Maurie to - -<br />

to make sure that - - because my father had the permit - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 204


t36/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - my father had the permit and I check returns<br />

on a regular basis, be<strong>in</strong>g duty officer, and I'd not seen my<br />

father's name on any of the permits but most of the bird<br />

dealers returns aren't always up to date or aren't always done<br />

properly. So, I made sure that Maurie placed those on the<br />

permit.<br />

MR HALL: Right. Did you ever check to see whether Maurie<br />

Luke, <strong>in</strong> fact, had a licence for yellow-tails?---Not that I<br />

recall. What do you mean? Licence for what? He's got a<br />

licence to deal <strong>in</strong> any bird.<br />

Did you check to see whether he had a licence specifically <strong>in</strong><br />

respect of yellow-tails? He has a personal licence as well as<br />

a dealer's licence, doesn't he?---That's correct.<br />

Have you checked his personal licence?---I may have.<br />

What for?---I don't - - <strong>in</strong> the past I've checked everybody's<br />

licence.<br />

Right. Did you check it <strong>in</strong> respect of this matter?---Not that<br />

I recall.<br />

What I'm ask<strong>in</strong>g you specifically is did you check his personal<br />

licence to see whether he was licensed to carry, to own two<br />

yellow-tails?---Not that I recall.<br />

Can I suggest to you that you did and you did so because there<br />

was an attempt to, <strong>in</strong> fact, distance the source of these<br />

yellow-tails - that is, Mr Polglase - from your father to make<br />

it appear that they had come from Mr Luke rather than from Mr<br />

Polglase?---That's <strong>in</strong>correct.<br />

And the reason that that was be<strong>in</strong>g done was that you didn't<br />

want the illegal <strong>trade</strong> <strong>in</strong> the white-tails that was go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

through your father's premises to be l<strong>in</strong>ked back to him by way<br />

of these yellow-tails that he was gett<strong>in</strong>g him to - -?---That<br />

is - - that's totally <strong>in</strong>correct.<br />

All right. Well, let's listen to 218.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: So, the <strong>in</strong>tention was to keep it away from Mr<br />

Polglase all together, wasn't it?---I was pretty honest <strong>in</strong><br />

say<strong>in</strong>g that I got them from Mr Polglase because the - - Dad<br />

did work for Mr - - for Mr Luke not Mr Polglase.<br />

Yes. You've told us that you collected them from Mr Polglase<br />

but what was go<strong>in</strong>g on here was that the records would show<br />

that they came from Mr Luke. That was the <strong>in</strong>tention, wasn't<br />

it?---Because Dad did work for Mr Luke.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 205<br />

2.27


t36/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: I know you say that he did work for Mr Luke, but the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention here <strong>in</strong> regard to the documentation was the<br />

documents would show that they came from Mr Luke and not Mr<br />

Polglase?---Through the returns. Yes.<br />

But Mr Luke had never owned these yellow-tails?---No. What<br />

they should have done - and I don't know why they didn't do it<br />

- is transfer the birds from Mr Polglase to Mr Luke.<br />

But - -?---But how they did it I don't know.<br />

You see Mr Luke is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved precisely <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

place some distance between your father and Mr Polglase.<br />

That's the case, isn't it?---Do you want me to tell you the<br />

honest truth why?<br />

Well - -?---It's because I'm friends with Mr - - Mr <strong>Green</strong>, Mr<br />

Polglase, a lot of other people, and they don't all see eye to<br />

eye. So, that's why I didn't want anyone to get <strong>in</strong>volved with<br />

anyone else while they're there. I mentioned it before <strong>in</strong> one<br />

of the conversations that I - - about not want<strong>in</strong>g to be there<br />

when someone else is there because if people don't like each<br />

other that's got noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with me - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 206


t37/nj<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - that's got noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with me.<br />

MR HALL: Well, there's no - - ?---I can be friends with<br />

whoever I want to be.<br />

There's no reason to believe that Mr Polglase doesn't like<br />

your father. He's go<strong>in</strong>g there to collect birds?---There's - -<br />

I never said that there's no - - there's noth<strong>in</strong>g wrong with Mr<br />

Polglase and my father.<br />

Well, then why couldn't Mr Polglase transfer them directly to<br />

your father?---Because the orig<strong>in</strong>al deal was my father had<br />

done work for Mr Luke. And then the deal was go<strong>in</strong>g to be<br />

between Maurie and Richard.<br />

So when Polglase says, "That way we could keep it away from me<br />

altogether," what did you understand that to mean?---Oh, so<br />

there's no - - so there doesn't have to be a transfer from - -<br />

obviously from Richard - - Mr Polglase to my father.<br />

You see, but at this stage Mr Polglase didn't even know<br />

whether Mr Luke had yellow-tails on his licence?---Mr Luke<br />

doesn't need to have yellow-tails on his licence. He's got a<br />

bird shop.<br />

Yes. But they're clearly go<strong>in</strong>g to be put through his personal<br />

licence?---Well, I can't - - well, that wasn't the case.<br />

Well, he asked you to check it for you and you said, "Yep"?---<br />

Well, if you have - - you've obviously got the other<br />

conversation. I told you last time, I told Mr Luke to put<br />

them on his returns.<br />

Did you check Mr Luke's licence?---Not that I can recall. I<br />

may have, but not that I can recall.<br />

Well, why would you do that? Why would you do such a th<strong>in</strong>g?--<br />

-I don't know.<br />

Well, you have access to the licence database, don't you, as a<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> officer?---Even if I did, it doesn't mean - - it<br />

doesn't mean - - whether he's got yellow-tails or not doesn't<br />

mean anyth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

But you're not supposed to use that access <strong>in</strong> order to help<br />

friends or relatives?---I didn't say - - I never told anyone<br />

about any licences.<br />

So you haven't - - you're tell<strong>in</strong>g me you would not - - ?---If<br />

I did it is because Mr Luke would have asked for it. And if<br />

it was an issue between me and Mr Luke I would have told Mr<br />

Luke if he'd asked me.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 207<br />

2.32


t37/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: So you wouldn't have told Mr Polglase that, yes,<br />

it's f<strong>in</strong>e; Maurie Luke does have yellow-tails on his<br />

licence?---No. Because I didn't want the transaction to be<br />

like that.<br />

Can I tender 218, Commissioner?<br />

COMMISSIONER: 33.<br />

EXHIBIT KO33 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

MR HALL: And might we listen to 219?<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

COMMISSIONER: I th<strong>in</strong>k before Mr Hall rises we just might have<br />

a 10-m<strong>in</strong>ute break, and dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of that break, Mr<br />

<strong>Ando</strong>, I'd ask you to remember what I said to you this morn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about the seriousness of fail<strong>in</strong>g to give correct evidence<br />

before this Commission. Just th<strong>in</strong>k about that. We'll have a<br />

10-m<strong>in</strong>ute break.<br />

HEARING ADJOURNED AT 2.40 PM<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 208


t38/kr<br />

CCC<br />

HEARING RESUMED AT 2.50 PM<br />

COMMISSIONER: Mr Hammond?<br />

MR HAMMOND: Commissioner, dur<strong>in</strong>g the adjournment, I took the<br />

opportunity of speak<strong>in</strong>g to my client, particularly <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to the statement that you made to him prior to ris<strong>in</strong>g for the<br />

adjournment, and I've <strong>in</strong>formed my client about the<br />

consequences of not be<strong>in</strong>g frank with this Commission and I<br />

took that <strong>in</strong>dulgence after speak<strong>in</strong>g to learned counsel<br />

assist<strong>in</strong>g, so I th<strong>in</strong>k there may be a change of heart from my<br />

client <strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g or answer<strong>in</strong>g some of these questions.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Thank you for that <strong>in</strong>telligence, Mr Hammond.<br />

Mr Hall, would you cont<strong>in</strong>ue?<br />

MR HALL: Thank you, Commissioner.<br />

(TO WITNESS): Now, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, you've had an opportunity to<br />

consider the evidence that you've given?<br />

MR HAMMOND: And I'm happy for Mr Hall to ask any questions he<br />

likes about the matters that were discussed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

adjournment. I'll waive the privilege that attaches.<br />

MR HALL: You had an opportunity to th<strong>in</strong>k about the answers<br />

that you've given here today?---I did.<br />

It is the case, is it not, that you knew that there were<br />

numbers of white-tails at your father's - - ?---That's - -<br />

premises?---That's correct. If I just take this opportunity.<br />

I've been pretty afraid through this whole th<strong>in</strong>g, both for me<br />

and my family, for my - - for my father. I had some pretty<br />

bad deal<strong>in</strong>gs when I was <strong>in</strong> <strong>wildlife</strong>, made a lot of friends and<br />

had good relationships with them. I - - I had a lot of<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g calls, was under an immense amount of stress.<br />

Deal<strong>in</strong>g with people <strong>in</strong> gaol for certa<strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gs, certa<strong>in</strong> - -<br />

had been charged under certa<strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gs. It wasn't my scene at<br />

the time. My father got given white-tails from somebody, and<br />

yes, he did swap those white-tails for the yellow-tails.<br />

How many white-tails were there?---I - - I don't know totally,<br />

I just know there was quite a few. Would've been probably<br />

seven or eight.<br />

And the idea was that they would be kept at your father's<br />

premises for as short a time as possible?---That's right.<br />

With a view to them then be<strong>in</strong>g collected by Mr Polglase and<br />

sent to the eastern states?---That's correct.<br />

Who delivered them to your father's premises?---They - - they<br />

came from Peter Manc<strong>in</strong>i. I don't know who they - - who<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 209<br />

2.50


t38/kr<br />

CCC<br />

dropped them off. It was arranged through friends of his and<br />

I don't - - I've never met the man. I know of him. I've<br />

never been to gaol to speak to him. There's a lot of people<br />

and friends that I know that I don't know how they're<br />

connected or whatever, and I don't get told too much. But I -<br />

- I did get told that he had - - if you want to get yellowtails,<br />

then he will supply the white-tails to swap them over.<br />

MR HALL: All right. So these white-tails were kept at your<br />

father's place, then - - ?---Yes, they were.<br />

- - for some time and then they were collected by Richard<br />

Polglase?---That's correct.<br />

And you accept now, don't you, that those telephone calls<br />

between you and Richard Polglase were you arrang<strong>in</strong>g for him to<br />

collect them?---That's correct.<br />

When he was talk<strong>in</strong>g about dummy permits, that was necessary to<br />

do what?---Well, I don't know who he arranges dummy permits,<br />

that's what I was try<strong>in</strong>g to say before. People <strong>in</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

do all the permits. How these people arrange their permits, I<br />

don't really want to know, but I know that they've got large<br />

collections of birds and they're able to cover numbers with -<br />

- with their collection, so how he did his dummy permit, I'm<br />

not 100 per cent sure.<br />

Well, when you say "cover" it means that they can arrange for<br />

the transfers of birds between them that are not necessarily<br />

lawfully kept birds?---Whether they're lawfully kept or not,<br />

dad didn't have them - - didn't keep them lawfully, I admit to<br />

that.<br />

Yes?---Okay. Where they came from, I'm not sure how many he<br />

had or what the numbers were, but I'm assum<strong>in</strong>g that he had<br />

permits to keep white-tails. Like a lot of these people have<br />

large numbers of black cockatoos.<br />

Yes. Of course if you had permits to keep them, there would<br />

be no need to use your father, would there?---No, they weren't<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to use my father, they were just giv<strong>in</strong>g them to my<br />

father so my father could obta<strong>in</strong> the yellow-tails.<br />

But you knew at the time that it was as it is now; unlawful to<br />

export these out of the state?---Yes, I did. Although he had<br />

a permit to do so. But I don't know - - that's what I'm<br />

say<strong>in</strong>g, I don't know how many he had on there.<br />

All right. Now, <strong>in</strong> relation, then, to the yellow-tails, the<br />

yellow-tails were to be effectively a payment back to your<br />

father for do<strong>in</strong>g this?---Yeah. Well, we were giv<strong>in</strong>g him<br />

yellow - - white-tails <strong>in</strong> exchange for the two yellow-tails.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 210


t38/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: All right. The yellow-tails com<strong>in</strong>g from Victoria?--<br />

-Yeah. I don't know where they came from.<br />

All right. But that's what you were talk<strong>in</strong>g about on the<br />

calls? There was to be a pair of those that your father was<br />

to receive?---That's correct.<br />

And that's - - they're the birds that you went to collect from<br />

Richard Polglase?---That's correct.<br />

Then why did Maurie Luke become <strong>in</strong>volved?---Well, that's - -<br />

dad had done quite a bit of work for Maurie and to stop that<br />

connection between my father and other aviculturalists, that's<br />

one th<strong>in</strong>g I wanted to - - to stop - - I didn't really want a<br />

total connection, so technically, I wanted the birds to go<br />

from Richard Polglase to Maurie Luke, to be put <strong>in</strong>to the shop,<br />

to be put through the paperwork and then transfer from Maurie<br />

to my father.<br />

All right. But <strong>in</strong> fact they never went to Maurie Luke at<br />

all?---No, they didn't.<br />

And <strong>in</strong>sofar as the paperwork suggested that the yellow-tails<br />

that your father had got had come from Maurie Luke, that was<br />

not true, was it - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 211


t39/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - that was not true, was it?---I don't even know<br />

if that paperwork was done, because - -<br />

Well, I can tell you?--- - - the only paperwork that was done<br />

was I had told Maurie to put them on his returns.<br />

Yes?---And I did the licence for my father.<br />

Yes, but you told us that you checked to see whether Maurie<br />

had done the paperwork and then contacted him to say, "Put a<br />

return <strong>in</strong>"?---Yes. Correct.<br />

So your <strong>in</strong>tention was that Maurie would put a return <strong>in</strong> which<br />

would provide a documented record that your father had<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed these birds from Maurie Luke?---That's correct.<br />

Whereas you <strong>in</strong> fact knew that he'd obta<strong>in</strong>ed them from Richard<br />

Polglase?---Yes.<br />

Did you look on the licens<strong>in</strong>g database at CALM to see whether<br />

Maurie Luke had - - ?---I seriously do not recall that.<br />

Well, if I were to tell you that there are subsequent<br />

telephone calls where you <strong>in</strong>dicate that you have done so,<br />

would you accept - - ?---Well, then obviously I would of. If<br />

Maurie had said to Richard to check then I possibly would have<br />

checked and - - and would have done it.<br />

Can you tell me, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, given that you were a <strong>wildlife</strong><br />

officer, given that you were charged with the responsibility<br />

for protect<strong>in</strong>g these birds that were be<strong>in</strong>g illegally exported,<br />

why you did this?---The - - well, that never came - - the<br />

source of the birds I was always under the impression were<br />

legitimate off people's licence. The only th<strong>in</strong>g that I may<br />

have closed my eye to was the authority to transfer; to<br />

distance my father from known aviculturalists. Because I did<br />

not want him to come under scrut<strong>in</strong>y by anyone else, so if you<br />

asked me, yes, I did do that to protect my father.<br />

Well, it's someth<strong>in</strong>g more than that, isn't it, because whether<br />

they were lawfully kept or not - and I'll come back to that <strong>in</strong><br />

a moment - they couldn't be exported from Western Australia,<br />

could they?---Yes, they can.<br />

Well, except with a lawful permit?---With a permit, yes, and<br />

that's why I thought Richard Polglase was arrang<strong>in</strong>g permits.<br />

That's what we discussed.<br />

Yes. But he was talk<strong>in</strong>g about dummy permits?---Well, I don't<br />

know what permit he arranged, but he obviously - - he must<br />

have done a permit. I'm assum<strong>in</strong>g he's done a permit. That's<br />

why - - and if that - - that's why I thought I'd disconnected<br />

myself from that, my father got the yellow-tails, he got the<br />

permit. What he does, that's his problem.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 212<br />

2.55


t39/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: It must have occurred to you that when he was<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g about dummy permits that there was at least a<br />

possibility that these were wild-caught birds?---No. I th<strong>in</strong>k<br />

the dummy permits - - I didn't th<strong>in</strong>k he wanted to transfer so<br />

many birds <strong>in</strong> one hit. That's why, you know - - it's pretty<br />

obvious to most <strong>wildlife</strong> officers if someone transfers eight<br />

birds <strong>in</strong> one hit, that's quite a lot of birds. And I didn't<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k - - I don't th<strong>in</strong>k he wanted to be detected <strong>in</strong> that way.<br />

That's why I th<strong>in</strong>k he may have wanted to - - two dummy<br />

permits <strong>in</strong>stead of the one.<br />

Right. Well, <strong>in</strong> those circumstances it must have occurred to<br />

you that if this was - - if they were legitimate birds there'd<br />

be no need to do it this way; to do it <strong>in</strong> two consignments?--<br />

-I don't know what arrangement he had. The only th<strong>in</strong>g - - one<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g I can remember is he said that he had other birds to<br />

send to the eastern states, so how he did it I don't - - I'm<br />

not sure.<br />

You didn't report any of this activity to the people at CALM?-<br />

--No, I didn't.<br />

Even though you knew there was illegality go<strong>in</strong>g on?---The<br />

illegality was the transfer from Peter Manc<strong>in</strong>i to my father,<br />

which I did not want anyone <strong>in</strong> the office to know about, and<br />

that's pretty much - - and the transaction from Richard<br />

Polglase to my father. I didn't want any - - any connections<br />

to anyone to my father.<br />

And your father keep<strong>in</strong>g more birds than <strong>in</strong> fact he had a<br />

licence for?---For a short time, yes.<br />

Yes. Well, however long it was. Why did you never report<br />

this activity to anyone at CALM?---Well, the people like - -<br />

the people that have been mentioned, I used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />

<strong>in</strong>to, and still do. They're people of <strong>in</strong>terest both to CALM,<br />

Customs and everyone. Whether there's evidence aga<strong>in</strong>st them,<br />

people of <strong>in</strong>terest and actually do<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g wrong is two<br />

separate th<strong>in</strong>gs. And, sure, people get charged all the time,<br />

but it doesn't mean I know that they're <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> any<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> smuggl<strong>in</strong>g. It doesn't mean - - I don't go <strong>in</strong>to that<br />

sort of - - I don't want to know. All I was do<strong>in</strong>g was look<strong>in</strong>g<br />

after my father - for my father's <strong>in</strong>terest - that's all I was<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g. I didn't want to associate him to anybody. You know,<br />

I've got friends from <strong>wildlife</strong> carers to aviculturalists to<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> park owners, and it's the same as everyone <strong>in</strong> our<br />

office. They've got friends that deal <strong>in</strong> these th<strong>in</strong>gs, and<br />

we're <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>wildlife</strong> issues. My <strong>in</strong>terest is birds<br />

totally - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 213


t40/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - is birds totally and deal<strong>in</strong>g with these people<br />

I learnt a lot about <strong>wildlife</strong>.<br />

MR HALL: You accept now, don't you, that you acted improperly<br />

<strong>in</strong> the course of your - -?---I agree - - <strong>in</strong> relation to my<br />

father, yes, I did act improperly. But it's - - seriously,<br />

between me and you, is to protect my father from any scrut<strong>in</strong>y.<br />

Well, <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g your father it must have occurred to you<br />

that you were help<strong>in</strong>g Richard Polglase and perhaps Peter<br />

Manc<strong>in</strong>i unlawfully send<strong>in</strong>g white-tails, a protected species <strong>in</strong><br />

Western Australia, to the eastern states?---That's where I<br />

drew the l<strong>in</strong>e. To distance myself from gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

export<strong>in</strong>g. I wanted Dad to have a pair of yellow-tails, pair<br />

of white-tails, a pair of red-tails.<br />

And <strong>in</strong> order to ensure that your Dad got those th<strong>in</strong>gs, you<br />

were prepared to turn a bl<strong>in</strong>d eye to th<strong>in</strong>gs like dummy permits<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g used?---Possibly.<br />

Can you see how that compromised your position as a <strong>wildlife</strong><br />

officer?---Yes. I look at it now and, yes, I totally agree<br />

with you.<br />

Have you had a chance to re-consider the evidence you gave <strong>in</strong><br />

respect to Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---All the other - - I can - - all the<br />

other evidence is - - is pretty much as it was. I seriously<br />

don't remember everyth<strong>in</strong>g that's happened. I seriously do not<br />

remember that many calls and that many deal<strong>in</strong>gs. I've been<br />

under some huge stress of late. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g I did was for my<br />

Dad. That's it. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g I did was to protect him and<br />

protect us from any association with anyone. Learn<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

these people, Phil <strong>Green</strong>'s and - - they're experienced birdkeepers.<br />

I'd been told <strong>in</strong> the past from people <strong>in</strong> the office<br />

not to deal with anyone but I thought well if they're my<br />

friends they're my friends and I thought I could distance<br />

myself from the work issue. Conflict of <strong>in</strong>terest? Yes, I<br />

agree with you, there obviously is a conflict there. But that<br />

doesn't discount other people hav<strong>in</strong>g friends and other people<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g conflict but that's not for me to say.<br />

Well, let me put this to you. When you spoke to Mr <strong>Green</strong> at<br />

your father's house on the 11th of September this year can you<br />

discount the possibility that you gave him the registration<br />

number from the BCI check?---I don't remember gett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

registration number back. Okay. I do not recall gett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

registration number back. I don't know what registration Phil<br />

has but I remember talk<strong>in</strong>g to him about receiv<strong>in</strong>g a report of<br />

someone <strong>in</strong> the Moora area and I did tell him, "I've received a<br />

report from someone <strong>in</strong> that - - <strong>in</strong> the Moora area."<br />

Well, given that you can't recall receiv<strong>in</strong>g the BCI check<br />

back, are you able to say with any certa<strong>in</strong>ty that you didn't<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 214<br />

3.00


t40/sa<br />

CCC<br />

pass that <strong>in</strong>formation onto him? That his registration number<br />

had come back as that of the car seen <strong>in</strong> the area?---I don't<br />

remember talk<strong>in</strong>g anyth<strong>in</strong>g about the vehicle but he said, "I<br />

was <strong>in</strong> the Moora area. It was probably me. Just don't worry<br />

about it." And that's him protect<strong>in</strong>g me to say, "Just - - the<br />

less you know the better it - - better it is."<br />

MR HALL: All right. But <strong>in</strong> tell<strong>in</strong>g you that, <strong>in</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g you<br />

that confirmation, "It was probably me", given the nature of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>formation you'd received - -?---Yes.<br />

- - the proper th<strong>in</strong>g to do was to report that to your<br />

superiors, wasn't it?---When he's - - well, not really because<br />

I couldn't say that Mr <strong>Green</strong> came to my Dad's house and we had<br />

a discussion about a vehicle seen <strong>in</strong> Moora. No. I didn't<br />

want to do that.<br />

You didn't want to do that because Phil was a friend?---That's<br />

right. I didn't want to do that because I didn't want to<br />

associate Phil, me and my father together with anyone <strong>in</strong> the<br />

office.<br />

Well, put all that to one side. Put aside that Phil was your<br />

friend. Put aside that this was occurr<strong>in</strong>g at your father's<br />

house. If this was some person of <strong>in</strong>terest to CALM that was<br />

tell<strong>in</strong>g you, "Yes, I am the person who was seen <strong>in</strong> the Moora<br />

area with a ladder look<strong>in</strong>g for nests", that's <strong>in</strong>formation that<br />

it was your duty to pass on to your superiors, wasn't it?---If<br />

I was <strong>in</strong> a work capacity and I - - and that's when I - - when<br />

I did work with Rick I used to - - to mix - - I used to mix<br />

with a lot of aviculturists and we used to receive a lot of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and all that <strong>in</strong>formation - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 215


t41/nj<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - and all that <strong>in</strong>formation was dissem<strong>in</strong>ated both<br />

to Rick and to Customs. And, yes, I would have, <strong>in</strong> my work<br />

capacity, if I was do<strong>in</strong>g it back then when I was <strong>in</strong> SIU, yes,<br />

I would have, 100 per cent.<br />

MR HALL: If it hadn't been for your friendship and for your<br />

father - - this occurr<strong>in</strong>g at your father's house, you would<br />

have passed this <strong>in</strong>formation on?---If I was <strong>in</strong> my - - <strong>in</strong> work<br />

capacity, yes.<br />

Well, aga<strong>in</strong>, this was a circumstance <strong>in</strong> which your conflict<strong>in</strong>g<br />

loyalties impacted upon your duty?---This is post work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the special <strong>in</strong>vestigations unit. But I was always friends<br />

with Phil.<br />

But that doesn't make a difference, does it, to your duty as a<br />

<strong>wildlife</strong> officer?---I don't know. It's hard because of the<br />

situation I was <strong>in</strong>.<br />

I'd like to ask you similar questions <strong>in</strong> respect to the search<br />

on the 16th of September. Now, we've heard evidence that on<br />

the 16th of September Mr <strong>Plant</strong> told you that that search was<br />

about to occur?---Yes. Yes.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> moments of receiv<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>formation, after pass<strong>in</strong>g it<br />

on to Mr <strong>Dawson</strong>, you rang Mr <strong>Green</strong>. You left two messages and<br />

then spoke to him personally?---I was satisfied that I'd given<br />

the <strong>in</strong>formation, and I don't th<strong>in</strong>k it was go<strong>in</strong>g to make any<br />

difference to any warrant at a later date. I was satisfied<br />

that I advised both Rick and the chief <strong>wildlife</strong> officer, David<br />

Mell. I thought, well, if he gets <strong>in</strong> trouble that's his own<br />

problem, like it's happened <strong>in</strong> the past, and it's the same<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g. When his name come up I thought I'd give him a call.<br />

But wasn't this a time - - given that his name had come up <strong>in</strong><br />

that context, he was about to be searched. This was a time<br />

when you really should have been avoid<strong>in</strong>g mak<strong>in</strong>g contact with<br />

Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---Possibly. Yes. But I'd made the call anyway.<br />

The reason you were prompted to make the call was because<br />

you'd been told this <strong>in</strong>formation about the search. You wanted<br />

to pass that on somehow to Mr <strong>Green</strong>?---I didn't - - I<br />

seriously didn't th<strong>in</strong>k it was go<strong>in</strong>g to make any difference at<br />

all. I got told that with<strong>in</strong> half an hour Phil <strong>Green</strong>'s<br />

residence was go<strong>in</strong>g to be raided. There was raids <strong>in</strong> New<br />

South Wales, there was go<strong>in</strong>g to be raids <strong>in</strong> his house. I<br />

don't th<strong>in</strong>k it would have made any difference at all to the<br />

outcome of what happened to Mr <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

So because you felt that it wouldn't make any difference you<br />

thought there was no harm <strong>in</strong> tell<strong>in</strong>g him?---That's right. I<br />

call - - as you've got conversations of it - - call the<br />

Richard Polglases, the Norms the Phil <strong>Green</strong>s on a regular<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 216<br />

3.05


t41/nj<br />

CCC<br />

basis. I try not do it from work, but I do call them fairly<br />

regularly.<br />

MR HALL: Right. So when you rang him and said to "wish<br />

Charlie a happy birthday today" - - ?---I seriously knew he<br />

was go<strong>in</strong>g to go over east for a do.<br />

Sure?---Okay. I seriously did. And that's all I said. He<br />

said he was <strong>in</strong> the middle of someth<strong>in</strong>g, so I basically laughed<br />

know<strong>in</strong>g that what <strong>in</strong>formation I received from Malcolm <strong>Plant</strong><br />

was he was <strong>in</strong> the middle of a raid, then I laughed. So be it.<br />

There's noth<strong>in</strong>g I can do about it then, is there?<br />

Of course there's noth<strong>in</strong>g you can do about it because<br />

unbeknownst to you the search is actually occurr<strong>in</strong>g, but what<br />

I'm ask<strong>in</strong>g you is when you rang him your <strong>in</strong>tention was to try<br />

and convey to him - - ?---Not - - I don't th<strong>in</strong>k - -<br />

- - that a search was about to occur?---No. I don't th<strong>in</strong>k so.<br />

No.<br />

Well, wasn't that what you were just say<strong>in</strong>g to me a moment<br />

ago? You didn't th<strong>in</strong>k - - ?---No. What I was say<strong>in</strong>g to you I<br />

was prompted - -<br />

It wouldn't make a difference, you said?---Whether I called<br />

him or not I wouldn't have made a difference, I wouldn't have<br />

thought, so I called him anyway.<br />

And said this about wish<strong>in</strong>g Charlie a happy birthday "today"?-<br />

--Well, wish<strong>in</strong>g Charlie happy birthday. I tried to get a hold<br />

of him, yes.<br />

You were <strong>in</strong>tend<strong>in</strong>g to convey to him that he needed to be<br />

careful?---Well, not necessarily, no. Because Phil has been<br />

<strong>in</strong> trouble before and so has everyone else, and that was me<br />

try<strong>in</strong>g to distance myself from issues. If they get <strong>in</strong> trouble<br />

that's their problem, and they've told me that. Because, yes,<br />

I am a junior officer <strong>in</strong> there. I've only been there 7 years.<br />

I am one of the youngest <strong>in</strong> there, and there's people been<br />

there a very long time. There's other issues that have arisen<br />

<strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>in</strong>vestigations under other officers, and I<br />

seriously was <strong>in</strong> some serious stress over work. And now I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k about it maybe I should have listened to my boss and<br />

left when he told me to leave. He told me to leave 12 months<br />

ago and I should have done it then, but I thought my friends<br />

are my friends and that's it. But there was no convey<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

tipp<strong>in</strong>g off or anyth<strong>in</strong>g like that.<br />

You are suggest<strong>in</strong>g to us that your judgment was impaired, are<br />

you?---When I - - when I left SIU, yes. I - - I sought<br />

counsell<strong>in</strong>g over numerous occasions. I had - - I had my wife,<br />

who's pregnant, and a 3-year-old son, and I used to go home -<br />

- -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 217


t42/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - I used to go home and th<strong>in</strong>k I don't really<br />

need this pressure. We don't get paid enough to be put under<br />

such pressure. The <strong>in</strong>vestigators side of it, I loved it. The<br />

friends side of it - - I loved the <strong>wildlife</strong> side, I loved it,<br />

but when it comes down to the crunch some of these th<strong>in</strong>gs, I<br />

prefer not to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> it at all. Some of the<br />

activities that happened <strong>in</strong> the office, you know, I wish it<br />

never came up but, you know, everybody has got friends who<br />

deal with <strong>wildlife</strong> <strong>in</strong> our office. There's no doubt about it.<br />

And I'm not the only one.<br />

MR HALL: Did you become embittered?---Not totally. I still<br />

did my job. If you go back to my record - - the amount of<br />

work I used to do, especially <strong>in</strong> the last 12 months, is just -<br />

- I used to come home happy say<strong>in</strong>g to my wife, "I'm bust<strong>in</strong>g my<br />

arse at work here." You know, I was gett<strong>in</strong>g breaches, I was<br />

issu<strong>in</strong>g cautions, I was flat out every s<strong>in</strong>gle day; and I was<br />

happy.<br />

Well, as well as help<strong>in</strong>g your father as best you could, you<br />

also did look at the CALM computer, didn't you?---In relation<br />

to what?<br />

Well, you were prepared to look at the CALM computer and the<br />

CALM documentation to make sure all the documentation was<br />

correct?---Of - - for my father?<br />

Yes?---Of course, but that's a standard - - it's a standard<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g. Like, the last th<strong>in</strong>g I wanted was my father to have a<br />

licence and there's no record of where these birds come from.<br />

So, even if that record was not true you were prepared to<br />

help?---Well, it wasn't meant to work out the way it did at<br />

the end but the white-tails were legitimate, the red-tails<br />

were legitimate. If you ask me now about the white-tails,<br />

yes, we did receive white-tails. The last th<strong>in</strong>g I wanted was<br />

a transfer of eight white-tails from a Peter Manc<strong>in</strong>i to my<br />

father.<br />

Yes. Well, I said I'd come back to that. You say the whitetails<br />

were legitimate. It must have occurred to you that if<br />

they were legitimate, if they were lawfully kept, there will<br />

be no need to go through this convoluted process of<br />

warehous<strong>in</strong>g them at your father's - -?---It was to protect - -<br />

- - mov<strong>in</strong>g them, send<strong>in</strong>g - - wait. Send<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> two<br />

consignments, hav<strong>in</strong>g dummy permits. There would be no need<br />

for all of that, would there?---There is because if you see a<br />

Mr <strong>Ando</strong> associated to a Mr <strong>Green</strong> or a Mr Manc<strong>in</strong>i it's not<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to look good on my - - on - - at work after be<strong>in</strong>g told<br />

not to deal with anyone. And that's the honest truth. I did<br />

not want my father associated with direct transfers from<br />

aviculturists.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 218<br />

3.10


t42/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Were you concerned about your own position, too?---<br />

In times - - yeah, because I'd be questioned about that.<br />

And you said it wouldn't look good at work if a Mr <strong>Ando</strong> was<br />

associated with those people?---That's correct.<br />

So, that would reflect on you, wouldn't it?---Yes.<br />

You said you didn't <strong>in</strong>tend for it to turn out the way it did<br />

with the records?---Well, I didn't want to have to transfer<br />

eight birds from Peter Manc<strong>in</strong>i to my father and then my father<br />

to Richard Polglase.<br />

Well, what do you now know about what was done with the<br />

records?---I don't know. All I - - I remember call<strong>in</strong>g Maurie<br />

to make sure that the yellow-tails be transferred and make<br />

sure that his paperwork is up to date; and I didn't want<br />

Maurie to get <strong>in</strong> trouble either because I knew my father had<br />

done work for Maurie for white-tails, red-tails and he was<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to ongo<strong>in</strong>g do work for him but I didn't want to put<br />

Maurie out to have him supply all the birds to my father.<br />

Do you not know that Maurie put <strong>in</strong> a return subsequently that<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that the birds that had been given to your father,<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact, orig<strong>in</strong>ated from Phil <strong>Green</strong>?---I'm not aware of that.<br />

Doesn't that - - how does that - - returns normally show<br />

transactions of birds <strong>in</strong> and birds out but it doesn't say that<br />

the birds came from Phil <strong>Green</strong> to my father.<br />

Well, it does to this extent?---Well, I'm not - -<br />

If - - wait?---I'm not totally aware of that.<br />

Wait. Wait. If Mr Luke didn't have any yellow-tails at one<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time, receives them from Mr <strong>Green</strong> and then transfers<br />

them to Mr Oreste <strong>Ando</strong>, that's the only place they could have<br />

come from, isn't it?---No. The birds came from Richard<br />

Polglase though.<br />

I know?---But they should have - - if you ask down to the<br />

letter of the law, the birds should have been transferred from<br />

Richard Polglase to Maurie Luke, from Maurie Luke to my<br />

father.<br />

Yes; and that's what you didn't want to happen?---No. That's<br />

what I wanted to happen. I wanted the birds to go through<br />

Maurie to my father.<br />

I see, but - - I'm sorry, you didn't want them to show that<br />

they had come from Richard - -?- --They'd come straight from -<br />

- to my father. That's correct.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 219


t42/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Yes.<br />

(TO COMMISSIONER): Commissioner, I had a very large amount of<br />

further material but there is little po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> play<strong>in</strong>g some of<br />

that material - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 220


t43/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - some of that material, but it may be<br />

appropriate for it to be reviewed to see whether it should be<br />

put <strong>in</strong> the public forum. That is, by way of tender<strong>in</strong>g it.<br />

COMMISSIONER: So what do you have <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, Mr Hall?<br />

MR HALL: I have <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, Commissioner, that we take a break<br />

so that I can review the balance of the material to see<br />

whether any further of it should be tendered as exhibits <strong>in</strong><br />

these proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Will 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes be adequate?<br />

MR HALL: It would. Can I say at this po<strong>in</strong>t I would seek to<br />

tender 219, which was played before the previous break.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 34.<br />

EXHIBIT KO34 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

Barcode 219<br />

MR HALL: And, Commissioner, I'm rem<strong>in</strong>ded that some of the<br />

earlier exhibits with the KO numbers were tendered at the<br />

private hear<strong>in</strong>g, and whilst you've lifted the restriction on<br />

those private hear<strong>in</strong>gs, perhaps for the sake of completeness,<br />

that you should <strong>in</strong>dicate that those exhibits are also public<br />

exhibits.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes. Hav<strong>in</strong>g lifted the restrictions on<br />

publication of all that occurred <strong>in</strong> the private hear<strong>in</strong>gs, of<br />

which I have done <strong>in</strong> the course of the day, it <strong>in</strong> my view then<br />

follows that the exhibits tendered <strong>in</strong> the private hear<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

now <strong>in</strong> the public arena, as it were, and <strong>in</strong> fact the number<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of exhibits follows on un<strong>in</strong>terrupted. We'll adjourn for 20<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes.<br />

HEARING ADJOURNED AT 3.17 PM<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO 221<br />

3.15


t44/kr<br />

CCC<br />

HEARING RESUMED AT 3.35 PM<br />

COMMISSIONER: Well now, where are we now, Mr Hall?<br />

MR HALL: Yes, Commissioner. I f<strong>in</strong>d that it is necessary to<br />

play Mr <strong>Ando</strong> some further material, notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

answers he's given. But before do<strong>in</strong>g so, I would like to go<br />

back to the issue of the search on the morn<strong>in</strong>g of the 16th.<br />

(TO WITNESS): In that regard, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, I want to understand<br />

exactly what you are say<strong>in</strong>g. You accept, as I understand it,<br />

that it was unwise <strong>in</strong> the circumstances for you to call Mr<br />

<strong>Green</strong> when you had just been told by Mr <strong>Plant</strong> that a search<br />

warrant was to be executed; is that right?---I didn't th<strong>in</strong>k it<br />

- - not - - I didn't th<strong>in</strong>k it was unwise, but look<strong>in</strong>g back at<br />

it now, yes, it does look unwise. But I didn't know I was<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to be raided on the 16th, did I?<br />

Well, you didn't know beforehand, but you knew when Mr <strong>Plant</strong><br />

told you?---That he was go<strong>in</strong>g to be raided?<br />

Yes?---Yes.<br />

And <strong>in</strong> that circumstance, it was not a wise th<strong>in</strong>g to do, for<br />

you to r<strong>in</strong>g Mr <strong>Green</strong> for any reason?---Just - - people's names<br />

come up all the time, it just gives me a - - I don't know,<br />

just refreshes my memory to make - - give someone a phone<br />

call.<br />

Well, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, I know you are not a stupid man, I know you are<br />

an experienced <strong>wildlife</strong> officer; put yourself back on the<br />

morn<strong>in</strong>g of the 16th of September for a moment. You have just<br />

received advice from Mr <strong>Plant</strong> that your friend, Phil <strong>Green</strong>, is<br />

about to be the subject <strong>in</strong> a short time of a search warrant?--<br />

-Yes.<br />

Now, it's not simply his name be<strong>in</strong>g mentioned and, "Oh, I must<br />

contact Phil - -"?---If I wanted to call Phil and tell him<br />

there was a raid, I would've said, "Phil, you are go<strong>in</strong>g to be<br />

raided" and I would've left a message on his mobile phone.<br />

The first time.<br />

Well, that depends on how sophisticated you are?---I'm not<br />

very - - I'm not sophisticated at all. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g - - like I<br />

said before, everyth<strong>in</strong>g I've done is for my father. My house,<br />

I'm <strong>in</strong> debt, I don't make millions of dollars out of <strong>wildlife</strong>.<br />

Everyth<strong>in</strong>g I did was for my father to get some birds.<br />

There's no clandest<strong>in</strong>e anyth<strong>in</strong>g. There's no sophistication.<br />

I don't know what their <strong>in</strong>volvement is with smuggl<strong>in</strong>g, if<br />

there is anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> that, because I don't want to<br />

know.<br />

The best th<strong>in</strong>g for you to do - if that's true - the best th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for you to do <strong>in</strong> that circumstance would be to have avoided<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 222<br />

3.35


t44/kr<br />

CCC<br />

call<strong>in</strong>g Phil at all for any reason?---Well, look<strong>in</strong>g back at it<br />

now, yes, but at the time I obviously didn't th<strong>in</strong>k that.<br />

MR HALL: Can I ask you to listen aga<strong>in</strong> to exhibit KO20 which<br />

is T199.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: Do you notice how you stress the word "today" <strong>in</strong><br />

that call?---Yeah, possibly, but you can tell by the tone of<br />

my voice, it goes up and down all the time.<br />

But you stress the word "today", don't you?---It's - - I<br />

seriously do not recall that - - that day there was a very<br />

stressful day for me, as you can understand.<br />

This is very early <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g, though. This is 8.23.<br />

This is with<strong>in</strong> moments of you be<strong>in</strong>g given the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

about this search?---But like I said, I satisfied myself, I<br />

told my supervisors. I advised them they were go<strong>in</strong>g to be<br />

raided. If I didn't want Phil <strong>Green</strong> to know, then I wouldn't<br />

of said anyth<strong>in</strong>g to anybody. Now, that call, Phil <strong>Green</strong> had<br />

just wanted me to call him. I don't know why I called him.<br />

Look<strong>in</strong>g back at it now, obviously it looks very stupid, but I<br />

don't know why. I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g away but if I was go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to say there's a raid, I would've said there was a raid.<br />

Well, he wasn't go<strong>in</strong>g away that day; how could he have wished<br />

- - ?---He - - he goes away - -<br />

- - Charlie a happy birthday "today"?---To give - - obviously<br />

to give Charlie - - I don't - - I seriously don't know. I<br />

seriously do not know.<br />

You can see, can't you - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 223


t45/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: - - - can see, can't you, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, that this looks<br />

rather like you are try<strong>in</strong>g to tip Mr <strong>Green</strong> off?---I've never<br />

tipped him off before and I don't see why I would tip him off<br />

this time. There was no - - there was no po<strong>in</strong>t. I got told<br />

that Phil <strong>Green</strong> is about to be raided. That's what I got<br />

told.<br />

Yes?---I spent time - - I rang - - I rang Rick <strong>Dawson</strong>. I went<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the office, spoke to Dave Mell. I told Dave Mell. And<br />

then I went and rang Phil.<br />

But he was be<strong>in</strong>g raided "today". He was be<strong>in</strong>g raided that<br />

day?---That's correct.<br />

Yes. But you thought he was travell<strong>in</strong>g over east, but not<br />

that day?---He goes - - that's the th<strong>in</strong>g. He goes fairly<br />

regularly on - - he drives a truck, and try<strong>in</strong>g to get a hold<br />

of him is pretty difficult.<br />

Well, you're not - - ?---I don't know why - - I don't know why<br />

I did it. I seriously do not know why.<br />

You're not seriously ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to us, are you, that you were<br />

try<strong>in</strong>g to pass on a happy birthday message to Charlie<br />

Sultana?---I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g to a do to see Charlie, so<br />

that's what I left - - that's the only message I left on the<br />

phone.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Hang on a moment. Mr Hall, will you trace for<br />

me the three calls and their time l<strong>in</strong>e?<br />

MR HALL: Yes, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: One - - there's - - the first call is at 8.23.<br />

MR HALL: That's correct.<br />

COMMISSIONER: And that's the one to the voicemail.<br />

MR HALL: Yes.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Now, what's the exhibit number for the next<br />

one?<br />

MR HALL: KO21.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Are you <strong>in</strong> a position to play that?<br />

MR HALL: Yes, I am. It's T200. It's very fa<strong>in</strong>t, I th<strong>in</strong>k,<br />

and we might need to turn the volume up.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Yes.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 224<br />

3.40


t45/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: This is 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute later, Commissioner, at 8.24.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

COMMISSIONER: Thank you. Could you now play the land l<strong>in</strong>e?<br />

MR HALL: It's KO7, 180 barcode.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

COMMISSIONER: There are three calls there, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, with<strong>in</strong> a<br />

period of 3 m<strong>in</strong>utes?---That's correct.<br />

All designed to, as you say, convey a message to a Mr Sultana<br />

of happy birthday?---Yes.<br />

Do you seriously ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> to this Commission that those calls<br />

did not have any significance by way of a warn<strong>in</strong>g?---There was<br />

- - there's never been any code or anyth<strong>in</strong>g. Look<strong>in</strong>g at it<br />

now it makes it fairly obvious that that's what it looks like,<br />

but all I can remember is be<strong>in</strong>g told about Phil, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about him, so I'll give him a call. There's noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> my<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d to say, "Shit. You're be<strong>in</strong>g raided," or someth<strong>in</strong>g. I<br />

would have done that <strong>in</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>stance on the mobile. I<br />

wanted to speak to him face to face. I don't know why I did<br />

it but I did it, and then halfway through he cut me off, and I<br />

knew what was go<strong>in</strong>g on. I laughed. It was fairly obvious<br />

that he was be<strong>in</strong>g raided and I just left it as that. And<br />

that's basically what I did. And I thought, well, that's his<br />

problem, not my problem. I had noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with his raid or<br />

whatever was happen<strong>in</strong>g, you know. If he got himself <strong>in</strong>to<br />

trouble that's his problem.<br />

But just go<strong>in</strong>g back one step to when your m<strong>in</strong>d says, "I'm<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to r<strong>in</strong>g Phil," what are you go<strong>in</strong>g to r<strong>in</strong>g Phil for?---I<br />

seriously don't - - I don't know. If someone mentions someone<br />

to me - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 225


t46/sa<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - someone to me I might pick up the phone and<br />

r<strong>in</strong>g them straight away because I hadn't spoken to them for a<br />

while. But I knew he was go<strong>in</strong>g away. I knew he wasn't go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to be too happy about be<strong>in</strong>g raided. Obviously we were go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

discuss it at a later date but there's noth<strong>in</strong>g I can do about<br />

it because it was noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with me. He is a friend and<br />

he would have said, "Yeah. Well, I got raided today", and so<br />

be it. But there's not much else I can really say about it.<br />

COMMISSIONER: Okay. Mr Hall.<br />

MR HALL: You are conced<strong>in</strong>g though that what prompted you to<br />

r<strong>in</strong>g Phil <strong>Green</strong> was this call from Mr <strong>Plant</strong>?---His name popped<br />

<strong>in</strong> my head and I thought well this is the best time to give<br />

him a call. He's <strong>in</strong> the middle of a raid. Then there's not<br />

much I can do to help him out.<br />

So, prior to that popp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to your head you had had no<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention of call<strong>in</strong>g with this message about Charlie's<br />

birthday?---It was - - it was on my m<strong>in</strong>d obviously because he<br />

told me - - I don't know when he told me. It was always on my<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d but for me to catch up with people and talk to people is<br />

very difficult because I like to get home straight away so - -<br />

I've got a lot of friends and the only way I can do it is to<br />

give them a call and if - - if his name's come up then I might<br />

give him a call.<br />

But it wasn't anyth<strong>in</strong>g that prior to that time - - prior to<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g the call from Mr <strong>Plant</strong> it wasn't someth<strong>in</strong>g that - -<br />

?---Not that morn<strong>in</strong>g. No.<br />

- - figured prom<strong>in</strong>ently <strong>in</strong> your m<strong>in</strong>d such that you'd made any<br />

attempt to call Mr <strong>Green</strong> about it before?---I don't know. I<br />

obviously thought about it, yes, but when I don't know.<br />

See, if you were really anxious to call - - to pass on a<br />

message to Mr Sultana about his birthday you could have called<br />

him yourself, couldn't you?---Well, I'm not go<strong>in</strong>g to pay for<br />

an over - - an eastern states call. I can't afford to pay for<br />

those sort of calls.<br />

What? Just to say, "Have a happy birthday."?---My wife would<br />

kill me if she saw that on my - - on the phone bill.<br />

So, this was important enough to make three calls with<strong>in</strong> 3<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes - -?---I obviously wanted to tell him. I don't know.<br />

I've got Messagebank - - goes on whenever it wants to. You<br />

might get a message that was 2 weeks ago. You don't always<br />

listen to your Messagebank.<br />

But that was the first th<strong>in</strong>g you asked when you eventually got<br />

through. "Did you get my message on your mobile?"?---Yeah,<br />

about - - about Charlie - - wish<strong>in</strong>g Charlie a happy birthday.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 226<br />

3.45


t46/sa<br />

CCC<br />

And then he cut me off because he said he was the middle of<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g and I knew what he was <strong>in</strong> the middle of.<br />

MR HALL: You knew he was <strong>in</strong> the middle of - - it was still<br />

fresh <strong>in</strong> your m<strong>in</strong>d?---That's right.<br />

Yeah. It was fresh <strong>in</strong> your m<strong>in</strong>d because - -?---Malcolm <strong>Plant</strong><br />

had rang me.<br />

- - that's, <strong>in</strong> fact, what you wanted to talk to him about?---<br />

No. It wasn't what I - - that's the last th<strong>in</strong>g I'd talk to -<br />

-<br />

Whether it was - -?--- - - to him about on the phone.<br />

Whether it was a pre-arranged code or not your <strong>in</strong>tention was<br />

to pass on to him a warn<strong>in</strong>g?---No. It wasn't. You're try<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to put words <strong>in</strong> my mouth. It's a bit unfair. How many times<br />

can I get asked about the same th<strong>in</strong>g? I come clean with<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g that I wanted to do. All I wanted to do was<br />

protect my father. I don't really care about anyone else. If<br />

they get <strong>in</strong> trouble that's their problem. If I get - - I'm <strong>in</strong><br />

trouble and I'll cop it on the ch<strong>in</strong> but - -<br />

There was noth<strong>in</strong>g at all suspicious about you want<strong>in</strong>g to wish<br />

Charlie Sultana a happy birthday, I assume?---What do you mean<br />

suspicious?<br />

Well, there'd be noth<strong>in</strong>g suspicious about that, is there, from<br />

your perspective?---No.<br />

You're say<strong>in</strong>g that it's just a, "Wish him happy birthday."<br />

Why did you make the call from outside?---Because the last<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g I want anyone to know is that I'm call<strong>in</strong>g Phil <strong>Green</strong>. I<br />

used my mobile outside. I don't talk <strong>in</strong>side.<br />

Because it is <strong>in</strong>herently suspicious that you would be call<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Phil <strong>Green</strong> and you knew that?---We went through this before.<br />

All my - - most of my phone calls have been outside or from<br />

home. The last th<strong>in</strong>g I'd do is <strong>in</strong>troduce that sort of - -<br />

those sort of people <strong>in</strong> the office. We share offices. We<br />

don't have our own private office. Some people have the<br />

luxury of hav<strong>in</strong>g a door, they can close the door and talk to<br />

whoever they want to. I don't have that luxury.<br />

You see, but the first call you made - - who would know that<br />

you were call<strong>in</strong>g Phil <strong>Green</strong>. All you said was, "How are you<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g, mate? I'm just r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g up to make sure you wish<br />

Charlie a happy birthday today."?---I didn't know how long the<br />

phone call was go<strong>in</strong>g to go for. I didn't know who was be<strong>in</strong>g -<br />

- like, half way through he cut me off. I could have been on<br />

the phone for ages.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 227


t46/sa<br />

CCC<br />

COMMISSIONER: But you knew he was be<strong>in</strong>g raided?---Well, there<br />

and then, yes, because he told me he's <strong>in</strong> the middle of<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g and I obviously got advised by Malcolm <strong>Plant</strong> that he<br />

was go<strong>in</strong>g to be raided with<strong>in</strong> half an hour. Whether I was<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to say anyth<strong>in</strong>g to him or what - - wasn't go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

change anyth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

MR HALL: So, you just put two and two together and realised<br />

that because he was be<strong>in</strong>g cagey, because he said he was <strong>in</strong> the<br />

midst of hav<strong>in</strong>g a good day actually, and that sounded<br />

sarcastic, that the raid must have started?---Yes.<br />

Commissioner, I don't <strong>in</strong>tend to take this matter any further.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. Thank you.<br />

MR HALL: I th<strong>in</strong>k Mr <strong>Ando</strong> has been given every fair<br />

opportunity to provide an explanation.<br />

(TO WITNESS): Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, I want to play you some further calls<br />

<strong>in</strong> respect of your deal<strong>in</strong>gs with Mr Polglase. Can I ask you<br />

listen to this call, 224, a call on the 29th of July 2004?<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 228


t47/kr<br />

CCC<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: Now, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>, you said that you hadn't seen these<br />

birds, when I asked you how many were there?---I don't - - I<br />

don't th<strong>in</strong>k I said that.<br />

Yeah, I asked you how many were there and you said you thought<br />

there were about n<strong>in</strong>e, but you hadn't - - ?---That's - -<br />

- - actually seen them?---Dad - - I obviously see them.<br />

You obviously did, because you had a look at them?---Yes.<br />

And <strong>in</strong> fact you were able to say that there were a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

number of pairs?---I do, yes.<br />

In respect of whether - - you see that Mr Polglase says, "Does<br />

he" - I assume means your father - "want any more yellows<br />

after that?" That's about half-way down the second page?---<br />

Yeah.<br />

Yes:<br />

"I'm not sure, mate. What, do they want to do more, do they?"<br />

"What" - sorry - "do they want to do more, do they?"<br />

"He said they'll breed some this year, you know, like<br />

he breeds them every year?" "Yep." "And he said we<br />

can send any if he wants to do it aga<strong>in</strong>, we can send<br />

him a young hand-raised pair or he said, if you know,<br />

older stuff from the scrub."<br />

Do you see that?---Where's that older stuff from the scrub?<br />

Second page - -<br />

"Or, you know, older stuff from the scrub"?---Yeah, I don't<br />

know where he sources his birds from.<br />

Well, he's tell<strong>in</strong>g you?---Well, then - - yeah, well, but I<br />

didn't know that. When we got the white-tails - -<br />

Well, you do now?--- - - he told me that they're legitimate.<br />

You did at this po<strong>in</strong>t?---Yeah, but they're not from WA. Yeah,<br />

I don't - - well, I don't want to lie - -<br />

I'm sorry, it's not the yellow-tails that are com<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

Victoria he's talk<strong>in</strong>g about and he said, "We can send any. If<br />

he wants to do it aga<strong>in</strong>, we can send him a young hand-raised<br />

pair" or he said, "Or, you know, older stuff from the scrub."<br />

This is the stuff go<strong>in</strong>g that way?---No, older stuff - -<br />

To Victoria?--- - - yellows. He's talk<strong>in</strong>g about, "Yeah, yeah,<br />

does he want any more yellows after that?"<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 229<br />

3.50


t47/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Yeah?---Yeah.<br />

That's your father?---That's my father, yes.<br />

Yep?---"He said they'll breed some this year, you know, like<br />

he breeds them every year", yeah.<br />

Yeah?---And he said, "Can send any, if he wants to do it<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>, we'll send him a young hand-raised pair", so send him a<br />

young hand-raised pair of white - - of yellow-tails - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 230


t48/nj<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - hand-raised pair of white - - of yellow-tails<br />

to my father.<br />

MR HALL: Look, whichever way you view it, and I'd suggest to<br />

you it's go<strong>in</strong>g the other way, but whichever way you view it,<br />

here's Polglase tell<strong>in</strong>g you that some older stuff is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

taken from the scrub?---Older stuff from the scrub. Yeah.<br />

Well, I can't deny that that's what was said there.<br />

Well, you told me a while ago that you were <strong>in</strong> the belief that<br />

the birds that were be<strong>in</strong>g dealt with were legitimate birds?---<br />

I didn't know - -<br />

Captive raised birds?---I don't know where Richard Polglase<br />

gets his birds from.<br />

Well, he's tell<strong>in</strong>g you - - ?---I obviously said - - yeah,<br />

well, that's just one sentences <strong>in</strong> a million sentences that<br />

have been said to me. I can't remember everyth<strong>in</strong>g that's - -<br />

like, that gets told you. Like - -<br />

You see, even if it hadn't occurred to you before now that all<br />

of this surreptitious means of send<strong>in</strong>g these birds,<br />

warehous<strong>in</strong>g them, send<strong>in</strong>g them by consignment, us<strong>in</strong>g dummy<br />

permits <strong>in</strong>dicated to you that wild birds were be<strong>in</strong>g taken,<br />

here it was, pla<strong>in</strong> as day?---I'm not deny<strong>in</strong>g anyth<strong>in</strong>g. I<br />

don't know where Richard Polglase gets his birds. I didn't<br />

know. All I know is that we were go<strong>in</strong>g to swap white-tails<br />

for yellow-tails. He talks about ones that are bred and the<br />

rest of it, and I just thought as long as he's got his pair<br />

now, because there was an urgency. There was a fair few days<br />

had transpired that dad was keep<strong>in</strong>g these birds, right. I<br />

wanted the yellow-tails <strong>in</strong> and I wanted those birds out. I<br />

didn't want them at dad's place. They were illegal - -<br />

illegally kept there because he didn't have a permit for that<br />

amount. I admit to that. And we didn't do any other<br />

transactions, but we didn't have - - we don't even have room<br />

for any more yellow-tails. So I was just go<strong>in</strong>g, "Yeah. Yeah.<br />

Yeah. All right. Yeah. Right."<br />

How could you cont<strong>in</strong>ue to labour under the belief that these<br />

birds <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> these transactions were all legitimate birds<br />

when Polglase himself was say<strong>in</strong>g to you, "older stuff from the<br />

scrub"?---I didn't know that <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial transaction.<br />

Well, even if that's so, you know it now. You know it at this<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time. What did you do about it?---Obviously I did<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g about it.<br />

Couldn't possibly be legal to be sourc<strong>in</strong>g older stuff from the<br />

scrub, could it?---I th<strong>in</strong>k I've already admitted to many<br />

illegal th<strong>in</strong>gs that have already happened. I was just<br />

obviously shrugg<strong>in</strong>g him off.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 231<br />

3.55


t48/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: You just - - ?---The last - -<br />

You just weren't <strong>in</strong>terested; you just didn't want to know<br />

where he was gett<strong>in</strong>g the birds from, did you?---No. I didn't<br />

want to know where he was gett<strong>in</strong>g the birds from.<br />

Because you suspected that <strong>in</strong> fact they were com<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

illegal sources?---Not - - no. I - - all I wanted him was to<br />

get the birds. I didn't care when they come from and how they<br />

got them. As long as he arranged the permits and everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was on the paper - - the paperwork was done.<br />

Yep. So long as the paperwork was all straight - - ?---For my<br />

father, yes.<br />

- - it didn't matter to you where these birds had come from?--<br />

-I didn't want - -<br />

Whether they'd come from the scrub or not?---I didn't want to<br />

know how he sourced his birds and who he got them from. He<br />

obviously - - like, unless he physically went there - - I<br />

didn't go to the scrub and get the birds. I didn't even know<br />

the birds were from the scrub. The first ones he said were<br />

legitimate, and he talked about a Gippsland yellow-tail. I<br />

don't even - - like, I've said it before, yeah, okay; I agree<br />

with you. I'm read<strong>in</strong>g this now and obviously I said what I've<br />

said there, but we've had a lot of conversations together and<br />

I was just say<strong>in</strong>g, "Yeah. No worries." As long as the<br />

transaction is done for those two yellow-tails and the<br />

paperwork was there, my father had a licence, I was satisfied.<br />

That's all I cared about.<br />

Mr Commissioner I tender 224.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 224. KO35.<br />

EXHIBIT KO35 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 224<br />

MR HALL: We'll move on now to the 30th of July, and listen to<br />

233, please.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 232


t49/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Charlie Sultana wanted another white-tail?---By the<br />

sounds of it, yes.<br />

Because of the two that had been sent to him previously, one<br />

had died?---I believe so.<br />

And you were try<strong>in</strong>g to locate a white-tail - - ?---Yes.<br />

- - <strong>in</strong> order to send to him?---Yep.<br />

You rang your father about it, but of course, he didn't have a<br />

white-tail that could be sent?---That's right.<br />

So you were go<strong>in</strong>g to r<strong>in</strong>g Phil about it?---Yep.<br />

You were go<strong>in</strong>g to try and source a white-tail so that it could<br />

be sent to Charlie?---I was go<strong>in</strong>g to go to someone else that<br />

had unlicensed ?<br />

birds and they could sell them. That's why<br />

Norm come up.<br />

Well, this is extraord<strong>in</strong>ary behaviour for a <strong>wildlife</strong> officer,<br />

isn't it?---Well, because they asked us if we had any - - any<br />

more white-tails and we didn't want to get rid of the three<br />

that dad had. We'd already done a transaction for two yellowtails.<br />

Right?---And that was it.<br />

So your conduct, really, is extend<strong>in</strong>g beyond protect<strong>in</strong>g your<br />

father for hav<strong>in</strong>g illegal white-tails, this is go<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

step where you're <strong>in</strong> fact help<strong>in</strong>g Charlie Sultana f<strong>in</strong>d one <strong>in</strong><br />

- - ?---Well - -<br />

- - Western Australia?--- - - dad got birds from Peter<br />

Manc<strong>in</strong>i, right, so he had stock tail - - a stock of birds<br />

there. Now, we used the stock extra on top of dad's three, to<br />

swap for the yellow-tails, so he was ask<strong>in</strong>g for white-tails.<br />

That's why they asked me to get one because they knew that we<br />

- - well, obviously knew that we had Peter's birds. Or that<br />

we had extra birds.<br />

They knew that you would be a person who could source a whitetail<br />

for them, or believed you could?---They - - they all know<br />

each other, those people. That's why dad said tell Norm to<br />

give it to them.<br />

Well, why didn't you just say, "Sort it out for yourselves.<br />

Why do I have to get <strong>in</strong>volved"?---Well, that's what dad said<br />

to me. "Tell Norm."<br />

Yeah, but why were you gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved, then?---Because<br />

they'd asked me and dad didn't have any more.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 233<br />

4.00


t49/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Well, you didn't just leave it at that, though. You<br />

were go<strong>in</strong>g to r<strong>in</strong>g Phil <strong>Green</strong>?---To tell him that we didn't<br />

have any extra birds.<br />

Do you know who Charlie sold the white-tails to?---No.<br />

I tender 233.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO36.<br />

EXHIBIT KO36 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

Barcode 233<br />

MR HALL: Might we move forward now to the 9th of August and<br />

listen to 239.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 234


t50/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: So, you were questioned as to whether you had a<br />

relationship with Richard Polglase?---Yes.<br />

By?---Phil <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

Sorry?---Phil <strong>Green</strong>.<br />

And why were you concerned to conceal that?---Because Phil<br />

doesn't like Richard Polglase.<br />

All right?---And he basically told me off. He said, "You<br />

shouldn't deal with him", dah dah dah dah dah. "You should<br />

make Maurie do that." So, I just thought well - - better of<br />

it and then I just agreed with him and that was it.<br />

You didn't want to - -?---Upset.<br />

- - poison your relationship with Phil <strong>Green</strong>?---Oh, not poison<br />

it. I just didn't really - - I told him, "Really, it's none<br />

of your bus<strong>in</strong>ess where I got it from", but I wanted to make<br />

sure that, you know, Dad still got, you know, the birds and<br />

that they were all licensed and legitimate.<br />

Yes. I tender that, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO37.<br />

EXHIBIT KO37 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 239<br />

MR HALL: 243.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: You're there talk<strong>in</strong>g about the yellow-tails that - -<br />

?---That's - -<br />

- - your father has received?---That's correct.<br />

So, the yellow-tails hav<strong>in</strong>g been received, the white-tails<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g gone off, that should be an end of it as far as you're<br />

concerned, shouldn't it?---I don't know. Possibly. Yeah. I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k I wanted Dad to get a pair of gang-gangs.<br />

So, you mean hav<strong>in</strong>g gone through all this you were go<strong>in</strong>g to go<br />

on and help your father get some more birds through Mr<br />

Polglase?---Possibly, but that never really eventuated -<br />

whether I was go<strong>in</strong>g to do that or not - but Dad wanted a pair<br />

of gang-gangs for the last cage. We got four cages. He's got<br />

a cage of yellows; cage of reds; cage of whites; and one cage<br />

to put a pair of gang-gangs <strong>in</strong> - or a collectus ? or whatever -<br />

but just one more cage to fill.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 235<br />

4.05


t50/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Right. Were you go<strong>in</strong>g to send some more white-tails<br />

over to get these gang-gangs?---I don't know. I don't know.<br />

You don't know?---No.<br />

Haven't thought that far?---Obviously - - I was obviously<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to do that because we discussed it. I can't remember<br />

what we were go<strong>in</strong>g to do but Richard said, "If you do the same<br />

deal, or whatever, we'll get some gang-gangs for your Dad."<br />

COMMISSIONER: Do gang-gangs only come from the east?---Yes.<br />

MR HALL: Yes.<br />

(TO WITNESS): Very valuable parrots, aren't they?---Oh,<br />

they're just, yeah, same price as most of the black cockies.<br />

Which is - -?---They do vary.<br />

Yes, but it's <strong>in</strong> the thousands, even with<strong>in</strong> Australia?---Oh,<br />

yeah, 1300 each.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 236


t51/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Yes. Commissioner, I tender - -<br />

COMMISSIONER: That will be KO38.<br />

EXHIBIT KO38 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 243<br />

MR HALL: 245.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: On the second page of that transcript you say, "At<br />

the end of the day, the paperwork, I've done it but used<br />

Maurie's name." What did you do?---I told licens<strong>in</strong>g that the<br />

yellow-tails came from Maurie Luke, so the paperwork for my<br />

father for that day - the day he had them - I wanted to make<br />

sure he had a permit. So I said dad is gett<strong>in</strong>g the two<br />

yellow-tails from Maurie Luke.<br />

Right?---Okay. So then I was go<strong>in</strong>g to tell Maurie. And at<br />

the time I was a bit upset because I'd been told off,<br />

whatever, and I thought, well, they're dad's birds, and then<br />

at the end of the day, you know, anyone can be friends and<br />

anyone can be enemies with people, so it's only people's<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ions.<br />

But you told licens<strong>in</strong>g that your father had got these two<br />

yellow-tails, to put it on his licence, even though no<br />

paperwork had <strong>in</strong> fact come through from Maurie Luke?---It<br />

doesn't matter. My dad needs to have a licence. If someone<br />

gets a bird they need to be licensed straight away, so whether<br />

someone else has done whatever, I ensured my father had a<br />

licence for those birds on his premises on that date.<br />

And you used Maurie's name - - ?---Well, I just said to them<br />

that they got them from Maurie, but they don't - - they don't<br />

put anyth<strong>in</strong>g like that down - - -<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 237<br />

4.10


t52/kr<br />

CCC<br />

WITNESS: - - - put anyth<strong>in</strong>g like that down. So it's up to<br />

Maurie to put it <strong>in</strong> his returns, and he doesn't have to do<br />

that till the end of the month.<br />

MR HALL: All right, but you did that, spoke to licens<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

said that, know<strong>in</strong>g full well that he got them <strong>in</strong> fact from<br />

Richard Polglase?---Yes.<br />

All right. I tender 245.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO39.<br />

EXHIBIT KO39 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

Barcode 245<br />

MR HALL: I have only three more, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. All right; 247.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

MR HALL: I take it that you were say<strong>in</strong>g that you'd "hate to<br />

see the day, you know, when they go to check it", because you<br />

knew that this paper trail was false?---No.<br />

The paper trail was false?---No, not for the red-tail and the<br />

white-tails. My father bought - - my father got the whitetails<br />

from Maurie and the red-tails from Maurie, right? Now,<br />

I had a - -<br />

But for the yellow-tails, it's false?---Sorry?<br />

For the yellow-tails, the paper trail was false?---Well,<br />

technically, yeah. Initially, dad was meant to get yellowtails<br />

from Maurie, but that didn't happen. We've already<br />

discussed that. They came - -<br />

Yeah, yes, we've already - - ?--- - - from Richard Polglase.<br />

- - discussed that, and that's why - - ?---But - -<br />

- - you were - - you'd hate to see the day when they would go<br />

and check it?---That's right.<br />

It's not difficult, Mr <strong>Ando</strong>?---I know, but I'm try<strong>in</strong>g to put -<br />

-<br />

Just concentrate - - ?--- - - extra th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> there that I<br />

don't th<strong>in</strong>k - - you know, like some of the stuff was done<br />

properly and, yes, I do agree to the th<strong>in</strong>gs that were done<br />

wrong with the yellow-tail.<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 238<br />

4.15


t52/kr<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: You knew that if someone did, from CALM, ever went<br />

and checked it, that you would be at risk?---I was concerned.<br />

My father had a permit, I checked the returns and the - -<br />

there was no returns <strong>in</strong> the book at one - - <strong>in</strong> the file at one<br />

stage. Then all of a sudden popped up a whole heap of<br />

photocopies, so I sort of thought, well maybe someone's<br />

checked them or he's handed them <strong>in</strong> late. Bird dealers do<br />

forget to do the returns quite often, but I thought <strong>in</strong> this<br />

circumstance my father needs to have his permit up to date and<br />

the paper trail should be there, so yes, I did tell Maurie to<br />

make sure that the birds he got from him are on the - - on his<br />

returns. And <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the yellow-tails which I got from<br />

Richard Polglase, which were meant to go to Maurie.<br />

That is tendered, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: 40.<br />

EXHIBIT KO40 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

Barcode KO40<br />

MR HALL: 248.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 239


t53/sa<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: Why were you try<strong>in</strong>g to get Maurie to cover whites -<br />

- white-tails <strong>in</strong> as late as August?---It wasn't white-tails <strong>in</strong><br />

August. I th<strong>in</strong>k it was the red-tails.<br />

Well - -?---The white-tails were on the 3rd of July 2003.<br />

Well, if you're ask<strong>in</strong>g him to do that - -?---And he'd already<br />

done it because I didn't see a return on that. So then I - -<br />

Right?---Because I haven't seen any returns. And then I asked<br />

him about the red-tails and I'd actually gone to the computer<br />

and had a look when the - - sorry, you can't do that. Went to<br />

Dad's hard copies, had a look when his first transaction was,<br />

to make sure the date he received those birds - -<br />

Yes?--- - - is the actual date that are put on the returns.<br />

Yes?---And I forgot to look at the red-tails and yellow-tails.<br />

So, I thought as long as they're on the return it doesn't<br />

matter, Dad is licensed to keep them. So, he got the licence<br />

- - when Dad got the birds he got the licence for them.<br />

So, aga<strong>in</strong> you were chas<strong>in</strong>g up Maurie Luke to put <strong>in</strong> the<br />

returns that would establish the birds that were licensed to<br />

your father were supported by - -?---They - - they came - -<br />

- - these returns?---Well, they came from Maurie. The whitetails<br />

- -<br />

Yes?---And the red-tails came from Maurie.<br />

But you were chas<strong>in</strong>g Maurie Luke up to make sure that he put<br />

<strong>in</strong> the right paperwork?---He puts them <strong>in</strong> there. That's<br />

right.<br />

In order to provide that paper trail for your father?---Well,<br />

yeah, that's - - that's the - - the proper way to do it. Even<br />

to cover Maurie. To make sure that he's put them <strong>in</strong> his<br />

returns, too.<br />

All right. I tender that, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO41.<br />

EXHIBIT KO41 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape 248<br />

MR HALL: F<strong>in</strong>ally, 249.<br />

AUDIO TAPE PLAYED TO HEARING<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 240<br />

4.20


t54/nj<br />

CCC<br />

MR HALL: There's noth<strong>in</strong>g else of any relevance <strong>in</strong> this<br />

particular call, Commissioner.<br />

(TO WITNESS): There's a reference there to gangies; that's<br />

gang-gang - - ?---That's correct.<br />

- - cockatoos. Your father wanted to get some of those<br />

through Richard Polglase?---Eventually. Or wherever.<br />

Yes?---Richard's just, you know, say<strong>in</strong>g, you know, he can get<br />

them, but at the end of the day we could have got them through<br />

Maurie or wherever. I just didn't want any more - - he - - he<br />

just wanted them, put it that way.<br />

I tender that, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: KO42.<br />

EXHIBIT KO42 Mr Hall DATE (Unstated)<br />

Audio tape<br />

COMMISSIONER: Is that sufficient unto the day?<br />

MR HALL: It is, Commissioner.<br />

COMMISSIONER: All right. We'll adjourn aga<strong>in</strong> until tomorrow<br />

morn<strong>in</strong>g, and Mr <strong>Ando</strong> will be here at 10.00 for the exam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

to cont<strong>in</strong>ue. We'll adjourn till 10.00 tomorrow.<br />

WITNESS WITHDREW<br />

HEARING ADJOURNED UNTIL 10 AM<br />

WEDNESDAY, 24TH NOVEMBER 2004<br />

23.11.04 A.G. ANDO XN 241<br />

4.28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!