Analiza postojece situacije na odlagalistu Vrtijeljka.pdf

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnimprojektima (IPF TA)EuropeAid/128073/C/SER/MULTIWB4-MNE-ENV-12FAnaliza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpadaiz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnog rješenjai tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta"Vrtijeljka"Analiza postojeće situacijeMart 2013

Program pomoći Evropske unije - IPA 2008 za Albaniju, Bosnu iHercegovinu, Hrvatsku, Bivšu Jugoslovensku Republiku Makedoniju,Crnu Goru, Srbiju, Kosovo*, Tursku i IslandInstrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima(IPF TA)EuropeAid/128073/C/SER/MULTIWB4-MNE-ENV-12FAnaliza načina prikupljanja, transporta itretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje ipriprema idejnog rješenja i tenderskedokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta"Vrtijeljka"Izvještaj o analizi postojeće situacijeMart 2013Dokument br. WB4-MNE-ENV-12F_TEC_Acivity 2.1 Analysis of Existing Situation ReportVerzija 3Datum izdavanja 11.03.2013.Pripremio Vladanka Presburger Ulniković, Ivana Stevanović, Dragan TadićPregledao Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu, Enver Kıyık, Jürgen H. PriesOdobrio Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu*) Ovaj naziv se upotrebljava bez ikakve pristrasnosti vezano za status, i u skladu je sa UNHCR 1244 i stavomMeđunarodnog suda pravde o deklaraciji o nezavisnosti Kosova

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima1Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"Sadržaj1 Uvod 52 Pregled prethodnih studija i postojeće dokumentacije 62.1 Analiza podataka 63 Podaci o lokaciji stanje postojeće lokacije 103.1 Lokacija 103.2 Prirodne karakteristike 113.3 Klima 2 113.4 Geološke i hidrogeološke karakteristike lokacije 133.5 Postojeće stanje na odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka” 154 Uticaj na životnu sredinu postojećeg odlagališta 194.1 Zagađenje podzemnih voda 194.2 Zagađenje površinskih voda 194.3 Emisija gasova sa odlagališta 194.4 Nekontrolisani požari 204.5 Raznošenje smeća 205 Analiza podataka koji će se koristiti za daljaizračunavanja i idejno rješenje 215.1 Analiza stanovništva 215.2 Karakteristike čvrstog otpada 225.3 Količina čvrstog otpada 236 Zaključak 27.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima2Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"Lista tabelaTabela 1 Pregled podataka o sastavu čvrstog otpada ...................................... 8Tabela 2 Prosječne mjesečne temperature na Cetinju [°C]........................... 11Tabela 3 Prosječne mjesečne padavine na Cetinju [mm].............................. 11Tabela 4 Frekvencija vjetra i tišine na Cetinju [prosječna vrijednost u %] . 12Tabela 5 Prosječna godišnja snaga vjetra na Cetinju [po Boforovoj skali] .. 12Tabela 6 Seizmički parametri za region Cetinja ........................................... 14Tabela 7 Broj stanovnika u opštini Cetinje ................................................... 21Tabela 8 Sastav čvrstog otpada koji se odlaže na odlagalište “Vrtijeljka” ... 23Tabela 9 Prosječna gustina sastojka .............................................................. 24Tabela 10 Procjena količine deponovanog čvrstog otpada i pokrivnogmaterijala ..................................................................................... 25.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima3Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"Lista slika i dijagramaSlika 1 Lokacija odlagališta “Vrtijeljka” ................................................ 10Slika 2 Prosječna frekvencija vjetra, ruža vjetrova ................................. 12Slika 3 Prosječna godišnja snaga vjetra .................................................. 12Slika 4 Karta seizmičke regionalizacije Crne Gore ................................ 14Slika 5 Dalekovod preko odlagališta ...................................................... 15Slika 6 Pogled na odlagalište“Vrtijeljka”, ulazna kapija ........................ 16Slika 7 Odlagalište“Vrtijeljka”, stražarska kabina .................................. 16Slika 8 Odlagalište “Vrtijeljka”, čvrsti otpad sa i bez prekrivke ............ 17Slika 9 Odlagalište “Vrtijeljka” – pojava spontanog požara ................... 18PriloziPrilog 1Prilog 2Prilog 3Prilog 4Prilog 5Projektni zadatakTopografska podlogaGeotehnička istraživanjaUpitnik u vezi nesanitarnog odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" u CetinjuProračun produkcije deponiskih gasova.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima4Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"Lista skraćenicaCOWI-IPFKonzorcijum koji sprovodi predstavljeni projekatEUICJIPALEAPLPUOMNEČKOJKPRECToRIPFLPUOSMPUORNSIMPUČOEvropska unijaMeđunarodni sud pravdeInstrument za pred-pristupnu pomoćLokalni ekološki akcioni planLokalni plan upravljanja otpadomCrna GoraČvrsti komunalni otpadJavno komunalo preduzećeRegionalni ekološki centarProjektni zadatakInfrastrukturni projekatLokalni Plan upravljanja otpadomStrateški Master plan za upravljanje otpadom na republičkomnivouStrategija za implementaciju Master plana za upravljanje čvrstimotpadomPUO Plan upravljanja otpadom 2008 – 2012.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima5Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"1 UvodOvaj izvještaj "Aktivnost" predstavlja prvirezultat Zadatka 2 koji se bavi pripremom tenderske dokumentacije zarehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" za Projekat " č r ku ,transporta i tretmana otpada iz Pr c C r r m d r ši tender k d kum c r h b c u d š Vr k " u skladu saProjektnim zadatkom (Prilog 1).CiljeviCilj ovog Izvještaja je da se, nakon ažuriranja dostupnih podataka, identifikuje ianalizira postoje e stanje na lokaciji "Vrtijeljka", kao i izbor relevantnihpodataka neophodnih za izradu idejnog rješenja, odnosno:Stanovništvo Cetinja (vremenske demografske varijacije),Podaci o generisanju čvrstog otpada (obim i sastav)Lokacija i karakteristike lokacije "Vrtijeljka" (podaci o lokaciji,topografija, geotehničke, hidrogeološke i meteorološke karakteristike)Postoje a situacija u upravljanju čvrstim otpadom na odlagalištuUticaj odlagališta na postoje u životnu sredinu (zagađenje podzemnihvoda, zagađenje površinskih voda, emisija deponijskih gasova,nekontrolisani požari, raznošenje sme a).Osnovne informacijeZa potrebe takve analize, Konsultant je sproveo sljede e aktivnosti:Istražni radovi na lokaciji (obilazak, topografska (Prilog 2) i geotehničkaistraživanja (Prilog 3))Korespodencija i intervjui sa predstavnicima opštine Cetinje i Javnogkomunalnog preduze a (JKP) (vidjeti intervju i upitnik za odlagalište"Vrtijeljka", Prilog 4)Pregled prethodnih studija i postoje e dokumentacije.Struktura izvještajaU poglavlju 2 ovog Izvještaja, analizirana je postoje a dokumentacija.Poglavlje 3 daje kratak opis lokacije "Vrtijeljka" i sadašnjeg stanja, kao što sulokacija, i prirodni, klimatski, geološki uslovi. Poglavlje 4 kratko razmatrauticaje odlagališta na životnu sredinu. U poglavlju 5 su dati demografskaprocjena i obračun postoje eg obima i strukture čvrstog otpada pripremljeni odstrane Konsultanta, kao osnov za izradu idejnog projekta. Poglavlje 6 sumirazaključke koji su relevantni za dalju pripremu idejnog projekta..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima7Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"sastavu generisanog čvrstog otpada za opštinu Cetinje, kao i podaci onesanitarnom odlagalištu Vrtijeljka.2.1.1 Demografski podaciVeoma je važno definisati demografske podatke, kako bi se mogli koristiti kaoosnova za projekcije generisanih količina čvrstog komunalnog otpada (ČKO).SIMPUČOLPUOIzvještaj o analiziPodataci o projekcijama stanovništva dati su u Strategiji za implementacijuMaster plana za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom (SIMPUČO) u Crnoj Gori..Strategija daje procjenu promjene stanovništva u centralnom regionu CrneGore, kojem Cetinje pripada, u vidu smanjenja; - 0,80% godišnje za period od2011. do 2014., i u vidu pove anja; + 0,81% godišnje, počev od 2015. godine.U Lokalnom plana upravljanja otpadom (LPUO), rast broja stanovnika uopštini Cetinje procijenjen je na 0,81% godišnje.U Izvještaju o analizi (Zadatak 1) realizovanom u okviru projekta WB4-MNE-ENV-12F uzete su u obzir projekcije iz prethodnih studija i procijenjeno je dae 2013. godine opština Cetinje imati 16.490 stanovnika, dok e se 2014. blagosmanjiti na 16.358 stanovnika.2.1.2 Podaci o generisanju čvrstog otpadaPodaci o proizvedenim količinama čvrstog otpada u postoje im dokumentimaznatno se razlikuju, kao što je ve kazano. Ove varijacije se odnose i nakoličine i na način prezentacije.SIMPUČOSMPUOStrategija za implementaciju Master plan za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom uCrnoj Gori pokazuje da je u Opštini Cetinje 2009. godine generisano 5.882 tonačvrstog otpada. Takođe, u pomenutom dokumentu se navodi da je do 2009.deponovano 19.054 tona čvrstog otpada.U Strateškom master planu za upravljanje otpadom na republičkom nivou(SMPUORN) navedeno je da je 2004. godin u Opštini Cetinje generisano 5,471tona čvrstog otpada i da je 3.999 tona tog otpada deponovano.LPUO U nacrtu Lokalnog plana upravljanja otpadom Prijestonice Cetinje 2011-2015(LPUO), tvrdi se da je u opštini Cetinje 2010. godine generisano 5.501 tonačvrstog otpada.LEAP U Lokalnom ekološkom akcionom planu (LEAP), navodi se slede e:„Dnevno se odloži oko 140 m 3 čvrstog otpada, i to 30 m 3 presovanog sme a,60 m 3 rasutog kontejnerskog sme a i 50 m 3 sme a na divljim lokacijama. Čvrstiotpad se odlaže na nesanitarnoj deponiji koja se nalazi na lokaciji Vrtijeljkaudaljenoj od grada šest kilometara.”UpitnikNa osnovu odgovora predstavnika JKP Cetinje na pitanja iz upitnika koji jepripremio Konsultant za potrebe ovog izvještaja, utvrđeno je da količinaprikupljenog čvrstog otpada iznosi oko 100 m 3 dnevno, dok količina otpada.

Papir ikartonStakloMetalPlastikaTekstilOrganskiotpadOstali otpadInstrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima8Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"deponovanog na nesanitarno odlagalište "Vrtijeljka" 2011. godine iznosi oko10.000-14.000 tona.Izvještaj o analiziIzvještaj o analizi ( adatak 1) takođe se odnosi na podatke dobijene od JKP-a,koji govore da je 2011. godine na uslužnom području opštine Cetinjeprikupljeno 12.000-14.000 tona čvrstog otpada. U izvještaju je takođe navedenoda gore navedeni iznosi obuhvataju i građevinski otpad koji, pod normalnimuslovima, ne bi trebalo da bude prihva en na opštinskom odlagalištu čvrstogotpada.2.1.3 Podaci o sastavu čvrstog otpadaPodaci o sastavu čvrstog otpada su predstavljeni u SMPUO i LPUO,uključuju i i projekcije po periodima. Ovi podaci o sastavu čvrstog otpadaprikazani su u Tabela 1.Tabela 1 Pr d d k vu čvr dTip materijalaSMPUO, MNE, do 2004. (centralna regija) 17% 7% 4% 10% - 30% 32%SIMPUČO, MNE, do 2004.(prosjek za CG) 19% 8% 4% 12% - 27% 30%SIMPUČO, MNE, do 2004. (centralna regija) 17% 7% 4% 10% 5% 25% 32%SIMPUČO, MNE, do 2004. (prosjek za CG) 18% 8% 4% 12% 5% 28% 25%LPUO Cetinje, 2011. 17% 7% 4% 10% 5% 25% 32%LPUO Cetinje, 2015. 20% 9% 5% 13% 5% 25% 23%Izvor: SMPUO i LPUO2.1.4 Podaci o odlagalištu "Vrtijeljka"Ve ina postoje e dokumentacije ne sadrži nikakve podatke koji bi mogli bitirelevantni za preciznu identifikaciju i opis nesanitarnog odlagališta "Vrtijeljka".LEAPIzvještaj opostoje em stanju imogu nostima zaodlaganje ČKO nalokaciji "Vrtijeljka"U Lokalnom ekološkom akcionom planu (LEAP) kaže se: „Uslovi na deponijine zadovoljavaju ni minimum ekoloških standarda, jer deponija nije ograđena,nema rampu za kontrolu i naplatu. Mjesečno je za tamponiranje potrebno 100-150 m tampona, često otpad gori, ne postoji rasvjeta, niti hidroizolacija,pristupni put je uzak i ošte en”.U izvještaju o postoje em stanju i mogu nostima za odlaganje čvrstogkomunalnog otpada na lokaciji "Vrtijeljka", pripremljenom od strane Dr.Refika ejnilovi a 2007. godine, primje eno je da lokacija zagađuje životnusredinu na sljede e načine:agađenje vazduha: prouzrokovano je širenjem prašine i neprijatnih mirisa.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektima9Pod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"agađenje zemljišta (direktno i indirektno): direktan uticaj na zagađenjezemljišta kroz čvrsti otpad odložen na lokaciji. Kvalitet zemljišta jeugrožen supstancama iz komunalnog čvrstog otpada.agađenje vode (i podzemnih i površinskih voda): uzrokovano jeprocjednim vodama koje mogu doprijeti do izvora ijeke Crnojevi a.Štaviše, u izvještaju je takođe dat sljede i komentar: „Kako se neposrednopored lokacije otvorenog smetlišta nalazi privatni objekat to je neophodnoriješiti imovinsko-pravne odnose sa vlasnicima, koji su u toku razgovora sapodnosiocima ovog izvještaja iskazali spremnost na dogovor sa Opštinom”.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"103 Podaci o lokaciji stanje postojeće lokacije3.1 LokacijaNesanitarno odlagalište Vrtijeljka u Prijestonici Cetinje koriš eno je zaodlaganje čvrstog otpada od 1987.godine, a urbanističkim planom iz 1990.definisano je kao lokacija za odlaganje čvrstog otpada.Topografija 1Odlagalište se nalazi u blizini brda Vrtijeljka, udaljenog od Cetinja 5,7 km,blizu magistralnog puta Cetinje-Budva.Prosječna nadmorska visina terena na lokaciji odlagališta je 700-800 m. Naterenu koji okružuje loakciju nalazi se nisko rastinje i slaba vegetacija.Slika 1 Lok c d š “Vr k ”Izvor: Topografska istraživanja sprovedena od strane Konsultanta1 Izvještaj o analizi adatka 1.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"113.2 Prirodne karakteristike 2Cetinjsko polje je formirana u istočnom kraško-kontinentalnom podnožjuplanine Lov en, čiji najviši vrhovi su Štirovnik (1.749 mnm) i Jezerski vrh(1.660 mnm) na kojem je izgrađen mauzolej Petra II Petrovi a jegoša.Cetinjsko polje je okruženo golim krečnjačkim brdima sa strmim padinama.Izuzetno kraški teren uslovio je formiranje nekoliko pe ina na ivici Cetinjskogpolja. Ove pe ine su formirane od podzemnih kanala, komora i sala sa bogatimspeleološkim ukrasima. Posebno su atraktivne Cetinjska pe ina u gradu iLipska pe ina u blizini grada.3.3 Klima 2Cetinje ima umjereno kontinentalnu klimu koju karakterišu suva i topla ljeta saprosječnom temperaturom od 20°C, i blage i vlažne zime sa prosječnomtemperaturom od 2,1°C.TemperaturaProsječna godišnja temperatura na teritoriji cetinjske opštine iznosi 11°C.Prosječna godišnja temperatura se kre e od 0,9°C u januaru do 21,1°C u julu.Prosječne mjesečne temperature na Cetinju date su u Tabela 2:Tabela 2 Pr č m č m r ur C u [°C]Jan Feb Mar Apr Maj Jun Jul Avg Sep Okt Nov Dec0.9 1.9 4.7 9.5 14.2 18.2 21.1 20.7 16.5 11.2 6.9 2.8Izvor: www.cetinje.mePadavineCetinje je poznato po velikom nivou padavina tokom prolje a i jeseni, a smatrase jednim od najkišovitijih gradova u Evropi, sa oko 4.000 mm vodenog talogagodišnje.Uprkos velikoj količini padavina, na teritoriji cetinjske opštine nema površinskihvodotoka i, uopšte, kapacitet vodenih resursa je siromašan. azlog za ovosu kraški sastav stijena i geološka struktura.Podaci o prosječnim mjesečnim padavinama na Cetinju predstavljeni su u Tabela3.Tabela 3 Pr č m č padavine na Cetinju [mm]Jan Feb Mar Apr Maj Jun Jul Avg Sep Okt Nov Dec445 443 358 206 172 114 61 75 181 484 605 592Izvor: www.cetinje.me2 www.cetinje.me.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"12Vjetar Cetinje je sa svih strana okruženo visokim brdima, tako da preovlađujui vjetrovi nisu mnogo jaki. Jači vjetar duva sa jugoistoka, iz pravca Skadarskogjezera i naselja ijeka Crnojevi a. Karakteristike vjetrova su predstavljeneu Tabeli 4 i u Tabeli 5, kao ina slikama 2 i 3.Tabela 4 Fr kv c v r š C u [ r č vr d u %]S SI I JI J JZ Z SZ Tišina1.5 3.7 2.3 11.4 3.8 7.0 3.7 8.7 57.9Izvor: Vrijeme i klima Crne Gore, adojiči B. (1991)Tabela 5 Pr č d š v r C u [ B f r v k ]S SI I JI J JZ Z SZ2.1 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.7 2.0Izvor: Vrijeme i klima Crne Gore, adojiči B. (1991)Slika 2 Pr č fr kv c v r , ruž v r vIzvor: Vrijeme i klima Crne Gore, adojiči B. (1991)Slika 3 Pr č d š v rIzvor: Vrijeme i klima Crne Gore, adojiči B. (1991).

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"133.4 Geološke i hidrogeološke karakteristike lokacijePodaci prikazani u ovom poglavlju predstavljaju kratku prezentaciju o "geotehničkomistraživanju” sprovedenom u avgustu 2012. godine, za potrebeovog projekta, koji je predstavljen u Prilogu 3.Morfološkekarakteristike terenaGeološka strukturaterenaMorfologija postoje e lokacije odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" je tipična kraška sakarakterističnim krajolikom kao što su vrtače, depresije i grebeni. Plato nakojem se nalazi odlagališta izdvaja se veličinom (100,0 m širine i 120,0 mdužine), sa dvije padine od kojih se jedna pruža ka istoku, a druga ka jugu sanagibima od 35 do 45 stepeni. Visina ove lokacije je od 720 m do 760 mnadmorske visine.Teren šireg istraživanja obuhvata formacije Gornjeg trijasa (T3) poput dolomitskogkrečnjaka i masivnih krečnjaka, postepeno formirane iz Ladinskih (T22)krečnjaka sa rožnjacima. Dolomitski krečnjaci i dolomiti su široko rasprostranjenina ovom području prema jugu, od Cetinja ka Vrelima i Očini ima. Dolomitise uglavnom nalaze u zbijenim naslagama (banks), rijetko se nalaze u slojevimai nijesu masivni, smjenjuju i se povremeno sa dominantnim krečnjacima.Blokovi su razdvojeni, ali bez vidljivog kontinuiteta.ajmlađi, Kvartarni nanosi/sedimenti sastoje se od deluvijalne (dl), crvenegline koja se pretežno može vidjeti u depresijama i ponorima, a rijetko napovršini terena. Pukotine i pe ine u krečnjaku su pune crvene gline i finihnaslaga. Duboke pukotine na ovom području su mapirane, i uglavnom seprostiru u pravcu sjeverozapad- jugoistok što je ujedno i pravac seizmičke aktivnosti.Hidrogeološkekarakteristike terenaa osnovu hidrogeoloških karakteristika i funkcija terena, veoma dobro su prikazanevodopropusne stijene i kompleksi.Kao propustljive stijene pukotinskog kraškog poroziteta terena, možemo izdvojitisve karbonatne stijene sa izuzetkom čvrstih dolomita koji se rijetko pojavljuju.Intenzivno mehaničko odvajanje i stepen karstifikacije ukazuju da preovladavakraški porozitet i takvi su tereni bez površinskih voda. Teren koji sesastoji od veoma vodopropusnih stijena formira razbacane/raštrkane kraške izdani.a istražnom prostoru mogu se vidjeti pukotine, pe ine i depresije, kojeobično prate pukotine. One su glavne propusne zone na lokaciji.Voda koja pada na zemlju brzo, kroz mrežu otvorenih pukotina, pe ina i jamainfiltrira se duboko u zemlju. a velikoj dubini, formiraju se raštrkani kraškiizdani. Pražnjenje ovih izdana vrši se kroz izvor ijeke Crnojevi a (Obodskiizvor). Baza karstifikacije je veoma duboka u ovom dijelu terena, skoro donivoa Skadarskog jezera. Deluvijalna glina sa drobinom je klasifikovana kaostijena niske propustljivosti sa intergranularnom i kapilarnom poroznoš u. jihovadistribucija na površini je minimalna, i oni nemaju značajan uticaj nahidrogeološke karakteristike terena.Seizmičnost terenaPrema karti seizmičkog mikro-zoniranja urbanog područja Cetinja sa IvanovimKoritima, jegušima i ijekom Crnojevi a, ova lokacija je dio seizmičkog.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"14područja B3. a navedenu oblast B3, maksimalni očekivani zemljotres ima intenzitetVIII stepeni MCS skale. Seizmički parametri njihovog ponavljanja zavremenski period od 50, 100 i 200 godina, dati su u tabeli 6. Karta seizmičkeregionalizacije Crne Gore predstavljena je na slici 4.Tabela 6 S m čk r m r r CZonaKarakteristične zone terenaPeriod ponavljanjat (godina)Maksimalnoubrzanje tla,a maxSeizmički koeficijentk sB3Krečnjački i dolomitski kompleksi, slojeviteteksture, tektonski savijeni i karstifikovani.Izvor: Izvještaj geotehničkog istraživanja, COWI IPF, 201250 0.12 0.03100 0.17 0.04200 0.25 0.06Tokom sanacije i zatvaranja "Vrtijeljke" svi građevinski radovi moraju biti uskladu sa svim važe im pravilima i principima za projektovanje i izgradnju,kako bi se smanjio seizmički rizik na prihvatljiv nivo, u skladu sa akonom oprostornom planiranju i izgradnji ("Službeni list Crne Gore", 51/08).Slika 4 K r m čk regionalizacije Crne GoreIzvor:Seismic eonisation of Montenegro (’Seizmička rejonizacija Crne Gore’).Autori knjige su V. adulovi , B.Glavatovi , M. Arsovski i V. Mihailov, 1982.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"153.5 Postojeće stanje na odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka”Kao što je ve pomenuto, u cilju identifikacije situacije odlagalištaVrtijeljka,Konsultant je obavio posjete lokaciji i istraživanja odlagališta i okoline,prikupljeni su podaci od predstavnika JKP Cetinje, i sproveo je geološka i geodetskaistraživanja na licu mjesta. Tipični rezultati koji identifikuju situaciju nalokaciji su dati ispod.Životni vijekPodručjePrikupljeni čvrsti otpad u opštini Cetinje se odlaže svakog dana na nesanitarnoodlagalište “Vrtijeljka”, koje se koristi za tu svrhu ve 25 godina.Lokacija “Vrtijeljke” je stjenovita i ima otežan pristup, te stoga nije koriš enaza neku drugu namjenu prije nego što je počela da se koristi kao nesanitarnoodlagalište. Lokacija je okružena rastinjem i slabom vegetacijom.Površina Nesanitarno odlagalište ima površinu prekrivenu sme em od približno 16.300m 2 , što se može videti na topografskoj podlozi koja je snimljena u avgustu2012. godine.Okolna naseljaInfrastrukturaStrujaajbliže naselje se nalazi na oko 500 metara udaljenosti od nesanitarnogodlagališta, ali najbliži objekat (privatna štala) je na oko 100 metara udaljenostiod lokacije i nije u upotrebi.Nema komunalnih ili infrastrukturnih instalacija na lokaciji, osim nedavnopostavljene javne rasvjete.Dalekovod se nalazi blizu ulaza nesanitarne deponije, sa kablovima koji seprotežu iznad parcele nesanitarnog odlagališta i nije povezan na energetskumrežu. Dalekovod je prikazan na slici 5.Slika 5 D k v d r k d šIzvor: Arhiva konsultanta.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"16OgradaUlazPodručje nesanitarnog odlagališta nije ograđeno i ne postoji kontrola pristupadeponiji uključuju i i kamione za prikupljanje otpada. Međutim, uzimaju i uobzir karakteristike topografije, nesanitarno smetlište je praktično nedostupnoiz drugih pravaca osim ulaza.Ulaz je opremljen malom kapijom i stražarskom ku icom, ali je visinapostoje e ulazne kapije manja od 2 metra, što nije adekvatano. Stražarskaku ica nije opremljena potrebnim sanitarnim instalacijama. Pogled na ulaz nesanitarnogodlagališta i stražarsku ku icu prikazan je na slikama 6 i 7.Slika 6 P d d š “Vr k ”, u kIzvor: Arhiva konsultantaSlika 7 Od š “Vr k ”, r ž r k k bIzvor: Arhiva konsultanta.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"17OpremaPrekrivkaaštitaMašinerija deponije neophodna za prevrtanje i sabijanje čvrstog otpada seprivremeno nalazi na lokaciji. Sabijanje čvrstog otpada se vrši bagerom, valjakse ne koristi.Čvrsti otpad se pokriva zemljom 5 do 8 puta u mjesec dana, a debljina slojavarira od 0,5 do 1,5 metara. Materijal koji se koristi za prekrivanje je uglavnomzemlja, ali i građevinski otpad, a s vremena na vrijeme i izlomljen kamen.epropusni sloj nije postavljen na dnu odlagališta te se stoga čvrsti otpadodlaže direktno na tlo. Tlo je propusno, a sve otpadne vode i filtrati iz otpadaidu direktno u zemlju predstavljaju i na taj način direktnu prijetnju zagađenjupodzemnih voda. Lokacija nije zašti ena/okružena drenažnimkanalima koji bi spriječili dopiranje vode iz uzvodnog pravca, što pove avakoličinu otpadnih voda nastalih na tijelu nesanitarne deponije.Slika 8 Od š “Vr k ”, čvr otpad sa i bez prekrivkeIzvor: Arhiva konsultantaEmisija gasovaRecikliranjePristupni putNesanitarno odlagalište nema sistem za prikupljanje gasova, zbog čega dolazido požara. Iz tog razloga, emisija gasova sa odlagališta je začajno smanjena, amože se očekivati manja količina gasa u tijelu deponije. Fotografija požara jeprikazana na slici 9.Sakupljači otpad prisutni su s vremena na vrijeme na nesanitarnom odlagalištu,a prikupljaju materijale koji se mogu reciklirati. Količina recikliranog čvrstogotpada na ovaj način je veoma mala, pa se može smatrati i zanemarljivom kadase radi o smanjenju količine odloženog čvrstog otpada.Pristupni put je dug oko 500 m i širok 4 m, sa pojedinim djelovima širokim od6 do 7 m. Pristupni put je makadamski put..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"18Slika 9 Od š “Vrtijeljka” – pojava ž rIzvor: Arhiva konsultanta.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"194 Uticaj na životnu sredinu postojećeg odlagalištaU skladu sa zahtjevima Projektnog zadatka, Konsultant je analizirao mogu euticaje na životnu sredinu, prvenstveno kroz:agađenje vode (podzemne i površinske vode);Emisiju gasova sa odlagališta;ekontrolisani požari;Sme e koje raznosi vjetar.4.1 Zagađenje podzemnih vodaTokom sprovođenja istražnih bušenja u avgustu 2012. godine nije bilopodzemnih voda u bušotinama.Međutim, kako je krečnjak veoma propusno tlo, gotovo sva količina vodekoja padne na tlo infiltrira se duboko pod zemljom, gdje se nalaze kraškeizdani. Ove izdani se prazne kroz izvor ijeke Crnojevi a, uz mogu nost daprenose zagađenje sa odlagališta na ovaj izvor. Stoga je od vitalnog značajasprovođenje mjera ublažavanja koje e spriječiti infiltraciju vode sa odlagalištau podzemne vode.4.2 Zagađenje površinskih vodaKako nema površinskih voda u blizini nesanitarnog odlagališta “Vrtijeljka”,nisu predviđeni nikakvi uticaji na tokove površinskih voda.4.3 Emisija gasova sa odlagalištaa lokaciji "Vrtijeljka" nema sistema kontrole koji bi pružio precizne podatkeo emisiji gasova na odlagalištu. a osnovu pretpostavki vezanih za raniji čvrstiotpad na Cetinju, na osnovu podataka dobijenih od JKP-a, te na osnovu posjetalokaciji i zatečenog stanja, Konsultant je napravio model stvaranja gasova naosnovu koga procjenjuje emisiju gasova. ezultati ovog proračuna su prikazaniu Dodatku 5..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"20aključak je da je ve ina gasa proizvedena u prethodnom periodu bila spaljenaili ispuštena u vazduh. Takođe je pretpostavljeno i da se dio nastalog gasanalazi i dalje unutar tijela nesanitarnog odlagališta, a može biti oslobođen u bilokoje vrijeme zbog nanošenja/raspoređivanja čvrstog otpada. Očigledno je da,čvrsti otpad, koji je odložen u posljednjih nekoliko godina, još uvijek stvaraštetne gasove, ali i čvrsti otpad koji e se odlagati do zatvaranja nesanitarnogodlagališta e takođe doprinijeti stvaranju štetnih gasova. Stoga, procijenjenakoličina proizvedenog štetnog gasa mora biti prikupljena i obrađena odgovarajuim sistemom prikupljanja gasova.4.4 Nekontrolisani požariBudu i da ne postoji sistem za prikupljanje gasova i da se dnevne prekrivkepreko tijela deponije primjenjuju veoma neorganizovano, uobičajena je pojavanekontrolisanih požara.Zbog pojave nekoliko uzastopnih požara ove godine, ulaz na nesanitarno odlagališteje osvijetljen i čuvar je angažovan 24 časa dnevno.Kako bi se ublažio ovaj negativan uticaj, sistem za prikupljanje gasova morabiti obezbijeđen i opremljen odgovaraju im instalacijama za kontrolisano ispuštanjegasova.4.5 Raznošenje smećaLokacija nesanitarnog odlagališta "Vrtijeljka" je praktično okružena sa svihstrana visokim brdima i prevladavaju i vjetar je prilično nizak. Stoga,raznošenje sme a sa nesanitarnog odlagališta nije značajno.Međutim, zbog neadekvatnog zbijanja čvrstog otpada i neredovnog prekrivanjatijela čvrstog otpada, kao i zbog nedostatka ograde oko nesanitarnogodlagališta, male količine sme a, koje je vjetar oduvao sa nesanitarnog odlagalištamogu biti primije ene u okoloni. Koriš enje prekrivnog sloja, uskladu sa propisima, e spriječiti ovaj negativni uticaj..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"215 Analiza podataka koji će se koristiti zadalja izračunavanja i idejno rješenjeBudu i da različiti izvori podataka pokazuju značajne varijacije, Konsultant jeodlučio koristiti najnovije zvanično ažurirane i odobrene podatke. Dakle, u daljimizračunavanjima, smatra e se relevantnim podaci verifikovani i predstavljeniu adatku 1 Izvještaj o analizi.Priprema idejnog rješenja, kao sljede i korak ovog projekta, bi e preduzeta nakonšto se odobri ovaj izvještaj o trenutnoj situaciji, stoga e se podaciprikupljeni u daljem tekstu iskoristiti za dalja izračunavanja koja e predstavljatibazu za Idejno rješenje za rehabilitaciju odlagališta “Vrtijeljka”.5.1 Analiza stanovništvaDemografski podaci veoma su važni za razumijevanje i predviđanje proizvodnječvrstog otpada. S druge strane, budu i da nije bilo sistematske evidencije opodacima o čvrstom otpadu odloženom na nesanitarnom odlagalištu, i kako bise utvrdio iznos odloženog čvrstog otpada i izračunala proizvodnja gasa u tijelunesanitarnog odlagališta i trenutni status emisije gasova sa odlagališta, bilo jepotrebno utvrditi podatke o stanovništvu za proteklo razdoblje. Ovi podaci suuzeti iz popisa izvršenih do sada.Prema podacima popisa iz 2011, u opštini Cetinje ima 16.757 stanovnika što je2,67% ukupne populacije Crne Gore. Grad Cetinje ima 13.991 stanovnika. Naosnovu podataka iz 1948., na Cetinju se broj stanovnika smanjio sa 25.000 na16.750 stanovnika. Tabela 7 pokazuje promjenu u broju stanovništva u opštiniCetinje između 1948. i 2011. godine.Tabela 7 Br v k u š C3Godina Opština CetinjeGradsko područjeSeosko područjestanovnici % stanovnici %1948 25.114 9.038 36,00 16.076 64,001953 25.549 9.102 35,63 16.447 64,371961 23.503 9.359 39,82 14.144 60,181971 22.024 11.876 53,92 10.148 46,083 www.cetinje.me.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"22Godina Opština CetinjeGradsko područjeSeosko područjestanovnici % stanovnici %1981 20.213 14.088 69,70 6.125 30,301991 20.307 15.946 78,53 4.361 21,472003 18.482 15.325 82,92 3.157 17,082011 16.757 13.991 83,42 2.766 16,51Izvor: www.cetinje.meRast populacijeBroj stanovnika opštine Cetinje opada. Izmedju dva popisa stanovništva 1991 i2011, broj stanovnika Cetinja opao je za 3.550. Paralelno sa Strategijom za implementacijuMaster plana za upravljanje čvrstim otpadom, pretpostavlja se dae se ovaj negativni trend nastaviti do 2014. godine, pos topi od -0,8%godišnje.Takodje je očigledno da se i struktura populacije značajno promijenila, a primjetnaje i migracija ruralnog stanovništva. Prema popisu iz 2011. godine, samo16,51% populacije živjelo je na seoskim područjima opštine Cetinje, u poređenjusa 64% zabilježenih 1948. godine.5.2 Karakteristike čvrstog otpadaOd početka koriš enja nesanitarne deponije, nema evidencije o odloženomčvrstom otpadu, te stoga, ne postoje službeni podaci o količini čvrstog otpadana nesanitarnomodlagalištu Vrtijeljka.S obzirom da do sada praksa recikliranja, odnosno implementacija separacijeizvora reciklabilnog čvrstog otpada, nije bila efikasno organizovana u opštiniCetinje pretpostavlja se da su sve vrste proizvedenog čvrstog otpada odloženena nesanitarnom odlagalištu "Vrtijeljka" s neznatnom količinom koju su recikliralisakupljači sekundarnih sirovina.Godine 2011., nakon stupanja na snagu Zakona o upravljanju otpadom (Sl. ListRCG, broj 64/2011) i drugih relevantnih zakona, odlaganje specifičnog čvrstogotpada na nesanitarno odlagalište “Vrtijeljka” je zaustavljeno (poput dotrajalihvozila, otpad od električne i elektronske opreme, baterije i istrošeni akumulatori,otpadna ulja, otpadne gume, i druge slične vrste otpada).Opasni otpad i medicinski otpad nekada se skupljao i odlagao na lokaciji nesanitarnogodlagališta, kao i industrijski otpad, koji bi mogao da se okarakterišekao kompatibilan sa komunalnim čvrstim otpadom.Građevinski otpad se dijelom odlaže na nekoliko manjih nekontrolisanih nesanitarnihodlagališta, a dijelom ga koristi JKP Cetinje kao svakodnevni pokrivnimaterijal na odlagalištu "Vrtijeljka".Sastav otpadaa osnovu zaključaka predstavljenih u poglavlju 2, Konsultant je napravioizbor podataka o sastavu čvrstog otpada koji e se smatrati relevantnim za daljeproračune. Prihva eni podaci predstavljeni su u sljede oj tabeli..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"23Tabela 8 Sastav čvr d k d ž d š “Vr k ”Sastojak Učešće (%)Papir i karton 17Staklo 7Metal 4Plastika 10Tekstil 5Organski otpad 25Ostalo 32Izvor: adatak 1 Izvještajo analizi, COWI IPF5.3 Količina čvrstog otpadaKoličina čvrstog otpada koji je odložen na nesanitarno odlagalište "Vrtijeljka"do avgusta 2012.godine određena je upoređivanjem rezultata iz dva različitapristupa:1. Proračun konsultanta na osnovu modeliranja deponije, i2. Proračun konsultanta o količini (masi) odloženog otpada i prosječnojgustini čvrstog otpada.5.3.1 Pristup 1 – Modeliranje deponijeDa bi izračunao količinu čvrstog otpada odloženog na odlagalište "Vrtijeljka",konsultant je sproveo model postoje eg otpada pomo u dvije graničnepovršine:Modeliranje gornje površine – na osnovu topografskog istraživanja, iModeliranje donje površine (donji sloj deponije – postoje i podzemninivoi) – na osnovu zaključaka "Geotehničkog istraživanja"Izračunato je da razlika između gornje i donje površine iznosi 99.300 m 3 što jeekvivalentno količini deponovanog čvrstog otpada na lokaciji "Vrtijeljka" uperiod od 1987. do avgusta 2012. godine.5.3.2 Pristup 2 – ProračuniU cilju procjene količine čvrstog otpada na lokaciji potrebno je da se procijenikoličina (masa) i prosječna gustina deponovanog materijala.Proračun o količini čvrstog otpada izvršen je na osnovu podataka o brojustanovnika i specifične količine čvrstog otpada po stanovniku.Prosječna gustina tijela deponije zavisi od sastava čvrstog otpada i količine ivrste inertnog materijala koji se koristi za svakodnevni površinski sloj, ali ta-.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"24kodje i od procesa slijeganja materijala, budu i da je odlagan tokom dužegvremenskog perioda.Konačno slijeganje je proces koji se sastoji od početno-neposrednog slijeganja,primarne konsolidacije i sekundarne kompresije.Slijeganje čvrstog otpadaTreba napomenuti da za razliku od prirodnog tla, u kojoj se ve ina slijeganjadešava u početnoj i primarnoj fazi konsolidacije, slijeganje materijala čvrstogotpada dešava se tokom cijelog radnog vijeka deponije, i glavni efekti slijeganjasu sekundarne kompresije. azlog za to leži u činjenici da sekundarna kompresijaobuhvata sve "skrivene" efekte uključuju i i one povezane sa degradacijom,kako hemijskom tako i biološkom. Efekti sekundarne kompresije mogu smanjitideponiju do 25-40% prvobitne visine i zapremine. Sekundarna kompresijauglavnom zavisi od vremena.Gustina čvrstog otpadaGovore i o "Vrtijeljci", procjenjuje se da slijeganje čvrstog otpada od maksimum37 % treba uzeti u obzir za prve deponovane slojeve, sa postepenimsmanjivanjem do posljednjih godina upotrebe, gdje ne bi trebalo očekivatiznačajnije efekte slijeganja. Budu i da čvrsti otpad nije zbijen upotrebom prese,ve upotrebom bagera sa kašikom, postignuta gustina sabijenog čvrstog otpadase procjenjuje na 0,5 t/m 3 .Gustina čvrstog otpada zavisi od sastava, sadržaja vlažnosti i procenta mineralnihsastojaka. Prosječna gustina čvrstog otpada izračunava se pomo u doljeispisane formule:gdje je:= Udio sastojka u čvrstom otpadu= Prosječna gustina sastojkaVrijdnosti upotrijebljene za distribuciju sastojka u čvrstom otpadu predstavljenesu u Tabeli 8, a prosječna gustina određenih sastojaka čvrstog otpadapredstavljena je u Tabeli 9.Tabela 9 Pr č u kSastojak Prosječna gustina sastojka, ρ n (t/m 3 )Papir i karton 0,065Staklo 0,4Metal 0,8Plastika 0,08Organski sastojci 0,4Ostalo 0,2Izvor: Upravljanje čvrstim otpadom, U -ov Program za životnu sredinu, 2005.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"25Koriste i podatke prikazane gore, prosječna gustina čvrstog otpada u Cetinju, aodložena na odlagalište "Vrtijeljka" iznosi 0,263 t/m 3 .Pokrivni materijalBudu i da nije bilo zabilježenih podataka o upotrijebljenom pokrivnommaterijalu, količina pokrivnog materijala odloženog na nesanitarnom odlagalištu"Vrtijeljka" procijenjena je na osnovu činjenica i predviđanja dobijenihiz Upitnika i intervjua JKP-a. : Čvrsti otpad se pokriva inertnim materijalom 5 do 8 puta mjesečno; Debljina inertnog pokrivnog materijala kre e se od 0,5 m do 1,5 m; Prvih 10 do 15 godina na nesanitarnoj depeniji nije koriš eno pokrivanjeinertnim materijalima; atim je u sljede ih 5 godina pokrivanje vršeno rijetko (vjerovatno samoljeti radi sprječavanja paljenja, širenjačvrstog otpada, prašine i neprijatnihmirisa); Posljednjih 5 godina pokrivanje inertnim materijalima vršeno je kao što jepomenuto gore (5-8 puta mjesečno); Prosječna količina čvrstog otpada u prvih 20 godina perioda koriš enja bilaje oko 2.400 t/godišnje; Pove anje čvrstog otpada zbog prosječnog privrednog rasta od 2%godišnje; Približno 5% smanjenja deponovanog čvrstog otpada zbog aktivnostisakupljača sekundarnih sirovina u posljednjih 10 godina; Približna vrijednost gustine ne-sabijenog čvrstog otpada je 0,263 t/m 3 .Uzimaju i u obzir smanjenje otpada nakon sabijanja, procijenjena gustinačvrstog otpada iznosi 0,5 t/m 3 .Proračuniezultati proračuna na osnovu gore pomenutih predviđanja, za zapreminučvrstog otpada sa i bez slijeganja (od početka upotrebnog perioda do kraja2013) i za procijenjenu količinu inertnog materijala predstavljeni su u Tabela10.Tabela 10 Pr c k č d v čvr otpada i pokrivnog materijalaGodinaDeponovani čvrstiotpadDeponovaničvrsti otpad(sabijen)DeponovanipokrivnimaterijalUkupnisabijeni deponovaničvrstiotpad uključujućipokrivnimaterijal(m 3 ) (t) (m 3 ) (m 3 ) (m 3 )1987 3.532 1.766 2.225 0 2.2251988 3.560 1.780 2.243 0 2.2431989 3.588 1.794 2.261 0 2.2611990 3.741 1.871 2.357 0 2.3571991 3.918 1.959 2.468 0 2.4681992 4.186 2.093 2.637 0 2.6371993 4.235 2.117 2.668 0 2.6681994 4.283 2.142 2.741 0 2.741.

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"26GodinaDeponovani čvrstiotpadDeponovaničvrsti otpad(sabijen)DeponovanipokrivnimaterijalUkupnisabijeni deponovaničvrstiotpad uključujućipokrivnimaterijal(m 3 ) (t) (m 3 ) (m 3 ) (m 3 )1995 4.392 2.196 2.811 0 2.8111996 4.760 2.380 3.047 0 3.0471997 4.925 2.462 3.201 0 3.2011998 4.969 2.485 3.230 0 3.2301999 5.013 2.507 3.509 150 3.6602000 5.134 2.567 3.594 154 3.7482001 5.243 2.621 3.670 183 3.8532002 5.410 2.705 3.787 216 4.0032003 5.618 2.809 4.213 225 4.4382004 5.687 2.844 4.265 398 4.6642005 5.819 2.909 4.364 465 4.8292006 5.880 2.940 4.410 529 4.9392007 5.986 2.993 4.490 599 5.0882008 6.176 3.088 4.632 741 5.3732009 6.451 3.225 5.161 774 5.9352010 6.588 3.294 5.270 823 6.0932011 6.374 3.187 5.736 829 6.5652012 6.615 3.308 6.615 860 7.4752013 8.341 4.170 8.341 1.376 9.717UKUPNO 140.424 70.212 103.946 8.322 112.268Prema rezultatima proračuna prikazanih u Tabela 10, ukupna količina čvrstogotpada deponovanog na “Vrtijeljci” do avgusta 2012. procjenjuje se na 99.438m 3 .5.3.3 ZaključakNa osnovu analiza i rezultata gore predstavljenih, Konsultant je procijenio da jena nesanitarnom odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka” do avgusta 2012. depenovano približno99.500 m 3 čvrstog otpada..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"276 Zaključaka osnovu analize podataka iz postoje e dokumentacije i analize podatakaprikupljenih sa nesanitarne deponije i od predstavnika Opštine Cetinje, za daljupripremu Idejnog rješenja za rehabilitaciju smetlišta, sljede i zaključci se smatrajuvalidnim:a) Prema podacima sa popisa iz 2011. godine, Opština Cetinje ima 16.757stanovnika od čega 13.991 živi na gradskom području.b) Promjena populacije za period od 2011. do 2014. iznosi -0,8 %, na osnovuodobrenog adatka 1 Izvještaj o analizi.c) Količina čvrstog otpada iznosi 0,80 kg/stan./dan, na osnovu odobrenogadatka 1 Izvještaj o analizi.d) Sastav čvrstog otpada za centralni region Crne Gore, koji uključuje opštinuCetinje,predstavljen je u Tabela 8, na osnovu odobrenog Zadatka 1 Izvještajo analizi.e) Proširenje usluga prikupljanja čvrstog otpada za kratkoročni period (2005-2009) projektovano je kao:­ na gradskim područjima, postepeno pove anje sa 85% na 92%;­ na seoskim područjima (za populaciju od preko 190 stanovnika)postepeno pove anje sa 15% na 27%.f) Proširenje usluga prikupljanja čvrstog otpada za srednjoročni period (od2010 do 2014) projektovano je kao:­ na gradskim područjima, postepeno pove anje sa 93,3% na 100%;­ na seoskim područjima (za populaciju od preko 190 stanovnika)postepeno pove anje sa 48,3 % na 75 %;g) Nesanitarno odlagalište Vrtijeljka zauzima površinu od oko 16.300 m 2 , naosnovu rezultata topografskog istraživanja sprovedenog u avgustu 2012.godine. Do rehabilitacije, odlagalište e nastaviti sa radom. Međutim, očekujese da e novi čvrsti otpad biti deponovan na vrh nesanitarnog odlagališta,a ne sa strane..

Instrument za tehničku pomoć infrastrukturnim projektimaPod-projekat: WB4-MNE-ENV-12 F: Analiza načina prikupljanja, transporta i tretmana otpada iz prijestonice Cetinje i priprema idejnogrješenja i tenderske dokumentacije za rehabilitaciju odlagališta "Vrtijeljka"28h) a osnovu zaključaka geotehničkog izvještaja pripremljenog u septembru2012, površina vrha nesanitarnog odlagališta je 100 m širine i 120 mdužine, sa dvije padine, jednom na istoku i drugom na jugu, nagiba 35º do45º.i) Količina čvrstog otpada deponovanog na nesanitarnom odlagalištu “Vrtijeljka”do avgusta 2012. procjenjuje se na približno 99.500 m 3 .j) Očekuje se da e se do kraja 2013. (završne godine) zapremina tijela nesanitarnogodlagališta pove ati do približno 112.500 m 3 , uzimaju i u obzirčvrsti otpad iz Opštine Cetinje.k) “Vrtijeljka“ treba da se zatvori i rehabilituje implementacijom svih neophodnihmjera definisanih EU Direktivama i crnogorskim zakonodavstvomdatim ispod:­ Direktiva o otpadu 2008/98/EC;­ Direktiva o deponiji otpada 1999/31/EC;­ Pravilnik o bližim karakteristikama lokacije, uslovima izgradnje, sanitarno-tehničkimuslovima, načinurada i zatvaranjadeponije za otpad,stručnojspremi, kvalifikacijama rukovodioca deponije i vrstamaotpada i uslovima za prihvatanjeotpada na deponiji(Službeni list CrneGore, 84/2009 i 46/2011);­ akon o upravljanju otpadom (Službeni list Crne Gore, 64/2011);­ Zakon o uređenju prostora i izgradnjiobjekata (Službeni list CrneGore, 51/08, 40/10, 34/11, 40/11 i 47/11)..

Prilog 1

Infrastructure Projects Facilityin Western BalkansWB4-MNE- ENV-12Component F:Analysis of the way ofCollection, Transportand Treatment ofWaste from the OldRoyal Capital of Cetinjeand Preparation of ConceptualDesign andTender Documents forthe Rehabilitation of“Vrtijeljka” DumpsiteTerms of ReferenceApril 2012April 2012

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F2 / 17Document Control SheetClient:IFI:Sector/Country:Project Identification:Activity Title:European CommissionEuropean Investment BankEnvironment– MontenegroWB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component FAnalysis of the way of Collection, Transport and treatment ofWaste from Old Royal Capital of Cetinje and Preparation ofConceptual Design and Tender Documents for the Rehabilitationof “Vrtijeljka” DumpsitePrepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:ORIGINALNAME: NAME: NAME:Rene BoestenDATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE22.05.2011REVISIONNAME NAME NAMERene BoestenVassilis EvmolpidisDATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE29.06.2011REVISIONNAME NAME NAMEJan Skajaa Rene Boesten Vassilis EvmolpidisDATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE28.07.2011REVISIONNAME NAME NAMEJan SkajaaDATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE07.10.2011REVISIONNAME NAME NAMEVassilis EvmolpidisJan Skajaa Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu Vassilis EvmolpidisDATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE15.12.2011REVISIONNAME NAME NAMEJürgen Pries Dr Merih Kerestecioğlu Vassilis EvmolpidisDATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE28.03.2012WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F3 / 17Contents1 Background .................................................................................................................. 62 Overall Objective .......................................................................................................... 63 Specific objectives and purpose ................................................................................... 64 Specific background and information ............................................................................ 74.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 74.2 Previous Studies and existing Documentation ....................................................... 74.3 Key Environmental Regulations of Montenegro ..................................................... 74.4 Risks and Assumptions .......................................................................................... 85 Detailed Tasks and deliverables ................................................................................... 85.1 Task 1 Analysis ...................................................................................................... 85.1.1 Activity 1.1: Analysis of the options for way of collection,transport and treatment of municipal waste ........................................................ 85.1.2 Activity 1.2: Siting and conceptual design of the preferred optionfor a transfer station ............................................................................................ 95.1.3 Activity 1.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for TransferStation .............................................................................................................. 105.2 Task 2 Preparation of Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation of“Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite ....................................................................................................... 105.2.1 Activity 2.1: Analysis of Existing Situation ........................................................ 105.2.2 Activity 2.2: Conceptual design of the Rehabilitation of theDumpsite .......................................................................................................... 115.2.3 Activity 2.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for theRehabilitation .................................................................................................... 125.3 Task 3: Assistance during Tendering ................................................................... 125.4 Outputs and planning ........................................................................................... 136 Project Coordination and Meetings ............................................................................. 136.1 Coordination and meetings .................................................................................. 136.2 Facilities for the Consultant and access to information ........................................ 147 Experts’ profiles .......................................................................................................... 148 Incidental expenses .................................................................................................... 169 Requirements for Reporting and Deliverables ............................................................ 1610 Budget ........................................................................................................................ 17WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F4 / 17AbbreviationsCAPEXCBADG ELARGECEIAEIBEUEUDEPAFSIFIIPFKEMNEMoMMoSDTNPVOPEXPIUPMPROCONSTETAToRWBIFCapital ExpenditureCost Benefit AnalysisDirectorate General for EnlargementEuropean CommissionEnvironmental Impact AssessmentEuropean Investment BankEuropean UnionEuropean Union DelegationEnvironmental Protection AgencyFeasibility StudyInternational Financing InstitutionInfrastructure Projects Facility projectKey ExpertMontenegroMinutes of MeetingMinistry of Sustainable Development and TourismNet Present ValueOperational ExpenditureProject Implementation UnitProject ManagerNational Project Implementation Unit in the Field of Communal Servicesand EnvironmentShort Term ExpertTechnical AssistanceTerms of ReferenceWestern Balkan Investment FrameworkWB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F5 / 17Terms of ReferenceProject Title:Assignment TitleThe Assignment:The Promoter:(MoSDT)The Beneficiaries:The Investor:The Consultant:The Financier:Infrastructure Projects Facility Technical Assistance Window(IPF TA) Western BalkansWB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F- Analysis of the Way ofCollection, Transport and Treatment of Waste from the OldRoyal Capital of Cetinje and Preparation of Conceptual Designand Tender Documents for the Rehabilitation of “Vrtijeljka”DumpsiteThe Contract of which these Terms of Reference form a part.Ministry for Sustainable Development and TourismPROCON which is the National Project Implementation Unit(PIU) in the Field of Communal Services and Environmentand Cetinje MunicipalityCetinje MunicipalityCOWI IPF (IPF2) Consultant. The Entity contracted to carryout the works described in these Terms of Reference.European Investment Bank (EIB) and local financeWB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F6 / 171 BackgroundMontenegro has entered into a finance agreement with the European Investment Bank(EIB) for the implementation of the “Montenegro Solid Waste” project (the Project).The total investment under the Project is estimated to be approximately EUR54,000,000 for the benefit of municipalities throughout Montenegro.The Government of Montenegro, the Beneficiary, has established a Project ImplementationUnit (PIU) for the purposes of implementing the project. The PIU is the NationalProject Implementation Unit in the Field of Communal Services and Environment(PROCON). The Project will benefit from Technical Assistance under the WesternBalkan Investment Framework (WBIF), which will be directed initially towards specificoutputs to mobilise projects or specific components of identified projects.The Government of Montenegro passed, in 2005, the Strategic Master Plan for SolidWaste and in 2007 the National Waste Management plan (February 2008), which envisagethe construction of seven regional sanitary landfills for the needs of all 21 municipalities,recovery of the existing dumpsites, procuring equipment and machinerywith the aim of a better level of equipment of the public utility service companies andfor resolving the issues of hazardous waste disposal.2 Overall ObjectiveThe overall objective of the Project is to develop EU-standard Integrated SustainableSolid Waste Management in Montenegro, as defined in the National Strategic MasterPlan adopted in 2005. The Project concerns inter alia the construction of new sanitarylandfills, recycling and composting facilities, including the implementation of the firstdisposal cells of up to 5 new inter-municipal sanitary landfills, with transfer, recyclingand composting facilities, as well as the rehabilitation of existing dumpsites.Under the Project, ToRs for separate components will be drafted which can be implementedby different resources and with varying durations.3 Specific objectives and purposeThe general objective of this Component is the provision of an adequate waste managementsystem in the Municipality of Cetinje.The specific objectives of this Component are:to prepare an analysis of the way of collection, transport and treatment of wastefrom the Old Royal Capital of Cetinje;to prepare the conceptual design and tender documents for necessary infrastructurecomponents as i.e. the construction of a transfer station;to prepare the conceptual design and tender documents for the rehabilitation of theexisting dumpsite “Vrteljka”WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F7 / 174 Specific background and information4.1 BackgroundCetinje, the Old Royal Capital of Montenegro, is located in a karst area, at an altitudeof 640-750 m. It lies at a distance of 10-12 km from the Adriatic Sea, the Bay of Kotorand Skadar Lake. The Municipality of Cetinje covers an area of about 900 km 2According to the latest population census of 2009 (Monstat – Statistical Office), theMunicipality of Cetinje has about 18,000 inhabitants (including the 3,000 inhabitants inthe villages). According to the Republic-Level Solid Waste Strategic Master Plan, thetotal municipal solid waste generation is about 5,500 Ton /year. There are no significantseparate collection and recycling activities.The municipal solid waste of the Old Royal Capital Cetinje is presently disposed in thedumpsite “Vrtijeljka” but this dumpsite does not meet the requirements of the EU andMontenegrin legislation. The dumpsite “Vrtijeljka“ needs to be closed and rehabilitated.Pursuant to the Strategic Master Plan, the Municipality of Cetinje should dispose itswaste at the sanitary landfill “Livade“ in Podgorica, which was constructed in 2007.According to the Waste Management Plan 2008 – 2012, a transfer station needs to beconstructed in Cetinje to facilitate the transport of the waste to “Livade”.4.2 Previous Studies and existing DocumentationThe following documentation has been identified which are relevant to the project:Report on the current situation and possibilities for disposal of solid municipalwaste at the site of “Vrtijeljka” – the municipality of Cetinje, December 2007, Prof.Dr. Refik Zejnilovic et. al;Strategy for Implementation of the Solid Waste Management Master Plan in Montenegro,Egis BCEOM International, February 2009Preparation and Implementation of a Republic-Level Solid Waste Strategic MasterPlan Republic of Montenegro, GOPA Consultants, 2004Waste Management Plan 2008 – 2012 for MontenegroForecast for tender “ME-Podgorica: IPA — equipment/vehicles for waste collectionand transport 2011/S 72-116513”Local Environmental action plans4.3 Key Environmental Regulations of MontenegroThe Project will be implemented in compliance with the legislation of Montenegro andapplicable EU Directives in the field of waste management. EIB and EU guidelines onthe preparation of feasibility studies should be taken into consideration.WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F8 / 174.4 Risks and AssumptionsAccording to the Waste Management Plan 2008 – 2012, a transfer station needs to beconstructed in Cetinje to facilitate the transport of the waste to the “Livade” landfill. Itis assumed that a transfer station is indeed the most cost and environmentally effectivesolution for disposing the waste at the “Livade” landfill. If the analysis demonstratesthat this not the case, the Consultant is required to provide alternatives.For the rehabilitation as well as for the construction of the transfer station, it is expectedthat Environmental Impact Assessment Studies need to be prepared. The decisionwhether indeed an EIA study is required is made by the Environmental Protection Agencybased on a request for decision from the investor(s).5 Detailed Tasks and deliverables5.1 Task 1 Analysis5.1.1 Activity 1.1: Analysis of the options for way of collection,transport and treatment of municipal wasteThe purpose of this task is to prepare an analysis for the need for a transfer station to beestablished in Old Royal Capital of Cetinje to transport municipal solid waste from theOld Royal Capital of Cetinje to the regional landfill “Livade” of Podgorica, and to analysealternatives in terms of treatment of waste (collection and recycling of waste).The study shall include economic, financial and environmental factors in determiningthe need for a transfer station and options for collection and recycling of the waste, andcompare two or three different options for transport of municipal solid waste from Cetinjeto the Livade landfill including, inter alia:Direct haul by compaction collection trucks,Reloading into open semitrailers without compaction (directly or via floor/dozer),Reloading via hopper into compacting containers and transport via truck,Bailing and transport by truck.The cost comparisons shall be expressed as total capital and operating costs over a 20-year period (NPV, applying a discount rate per annum in accordance with the Montenegrinlegislation).Environmental concerns to be included in the study are inter alia:CO 2 emissionsNO X emissionsNumber of transportsNoise/dust/odourLitteringWB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F9 / 17Waste quantities should be based on data on present waste generation of municipal solidwaste, derived from the documents listed in 4.2 and estimates of future waste generationfor an equal number of years as the lifetime of the investment with the longesteconomic lifetime. This includes estimates of future quantities of waste recycled orotherwise disposed of by methods other than landfilling at Livade landfill. The estimateshall also include waste from the Vrtijeljka” dumpsite, if the decision is to move thewaste as the preferred option for rehabilitation (see section5.2.2).The Consultant will prepare a report comparing the different methodologies and criteriafor choices together with a recommendation for the best option.The report and recommendations shall be discussed and approved by PROCON and theOld Royal Capital of Cetinje before the following phases of the project continues.5.1.2 Activity 1.2: Siting and conceptual design of the preferredoption for a transfer stationIn case the preferred option is a transfer station (and not direct haul of waste in collectiontrucks), conceptual design of the transfer station shall be carried out. This includesinter alia:Site identification and analysis of site considerations (e.g. traffic patterns, distanceto primary road network, environmental considerations, and others),Acceptance of site by Municipality of Cetinje,Obtaining of urban-technical conditions and other preconditions and requirementsform the authorities for obtaining building permit,Conceptual design, including, but not necessarily limited to:o Overall layouto Access road (principles and simple cross section)o Equipmento Soil, earth and concrete work as requiredo Fencing, gate, weight bridge and otherso Operations and maintenanceo Cost estimateIf the result of the analysis under Task 1 indicates that the most economical and financiallyand environmentally feasible option is direct haul by compacting trucks, the followingactivity 1.3 shall not been carried out. Then the activity 1.3 shall be revised andthe man days which are foreseen for the preparation of the Tender Documents shall beused for a detailed outline report for options for source-segregation and selective collectionof recyclable waste fractions and establishment of equipment for pre-processingand preparing the waste for recycling, e.g. balers and other equipment at the chosensite. This should be supported by a more comprehensive recycling study for Old RoyalCapital of Cetinje and possible surrounding municipalities (which is outside the scopeof this study).It is assumed that no geological, hydrological and waste composition analysis are to becarried out at this stage, and that sufficient information about waste quantities andWB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F10 / 17composition is available from the Municipality of Cetinje. The Consultant is requiredto identify if any such analyses are necessary for the later stages by a detailed review ofavailable information and to include an estimate of associated costs in the tender documents.Any EIA to be conducted for the transfer station is outside the scope of this study andshall be conducted by the Municipality of Cetinje.The activity shall be reported in a Siting and Conceptual Design report to be approvedby PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje before the following phases of the projectcontinue.5.1.3 Activity 1.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for TransferStationTender Documents for the construction of the transfer station, in accordance with thelegislation and regulations of Montenegro, shall be prepared. The Tender Documentsshall include the following parts as a minimum:Invitation for Tenders;Instructions to Tenderers;Forms of Tender and Tender Security;General Conditions of Contract (Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-build,FIDIC Yellow Book)Particular Conditions;Evaluation matrix/criteria;The Tender Documents will be prepared in compliance with the rules and requirementsof the European Investment Bank, i.e. signed Financial Agreement between the EIBand the State of Montenegro for "Montenegro Solid Waste”, and require the approvalof PROCON, and the "no objection" from the EIB, the Municipality of Cetinje andfrom the Ministry for Sustainable Development and Tourism.5.2 Task 2 Preparation of Tender Documents for the Rehabilitationof “Vrtijeljka” Dumpsite5.2.1 Activity 2.1: Analysis of Existing SituationThe information available about the “Vrtijeljka” dumpsite is rather limited and from2007. The information needs to be updated and the Consultant is required to prepare acomplete overview of gaps in the information. The following needs to be determined:Approximate amount of waste being deposited on the siteType of wastePeriod for disposal and date for last disposal (to determine if the dumpsite is still inits active phase)WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F11 / 17Topographical information needs to be available. If not, a survey shall be carried outunder this project allowing for calculation of area and approximate volumes of waste, ifthis cannot be established in any other way.An assessment of the geological and hydrogeological conditions shall also be made forthe site. If necessary, water samples shall be taken and analysed in order to check thecurrent impact on surface and/or ground water. In the event that soil has been appliedas top layer the thickness and quality of the soil shall be checked.The analyses of the environmental impacts of the current dumpsite may include:Groundwater pollution,Surface water pollution,Landfill Gas Emissions,Uncontrolled fires,Wind blown litter.Any EIA to be conducted for the remediation of the dumpsite “Vrtijeljka” is outside thescope of this study and shall be conducted by the Municipality of Cetinje.The activity shall be reported in a report describing the existing situation.5.2.2 Activity 2.2: Conceptual design of the Rehabilitation of theDumpsiteBased on the information obtained under activity 2.1, the Consultant prepares a conceptualdesign of the rehabilitation project, including specific closure and remediationmeasures for the actual site.Emphasis shall be put on a realistic and feasible option, not only with respect to investmentcosts, but more importantly with respect to subsequent operation costs andlikelihood for proper maintenance of the measures. The following options are discussed:Shaping of dumpsite surface and installation of top coversTaking into consideration the level of seismic activitiesControl of landfill gas emissionsHydraulic measures in the aquiferExcavation and removal of the wasteEstablishment of surrounding fencesLeachate managementThe most probable methodology is to clean up the site, keep the waste on the site, coverthe waste by a layer of low permeable soil, and re-cultivate the area.The design includes a description of monitoring activities that are recommended to beinitiated if relevant in order to document the future situation.The design report is subject of approval by PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje.WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F12 / 175.2.3 Activity 2.3: Preparation of the Tender Documents for theRehabilitationBased on the analysis of existing situation, including all measures proposed and agreedin the conceptual design report, the procurement strategy must be determined. Tenderdocuments for the rehabilitation, in accordance with the legislation and regulations ofMontenegro, need to be prepared. The tender documents shall include the followingparts as a minimum:Invitation for Tenders;Instructions to Tenderers;General Conditions of Contract (Conditions of contract for works contract or plantand design-build, FIDIC Red or Yellow Book);Particular Conditions;Requirements;Evaluation matrix/criteria.The procurement strategy will determine which of the contract complexes will be applied.In case the decision is to carry out the tender according to the FIDIC Red book(Works contract), a main design project must be available, prepared by another party,outside these TORs.The Tender Documents will be prepared in compliance with the rules and requirementsof the European Investment Bank, i.e. signed Financial Agreement between the EIBand the State of Montenegro for "Montenegro Solid Waste” and requires approval fromPROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje and "no objection" from the EIB.5.3 Task 3: Assistance during TenderingThe assignment will be led by the Component Project Manager who shall providetechnical assistance and on the job training to PROCON during the tendering processand the tender opening and evaluation. This shall include as a minimum:Planning and assistance to organize and attend pre-tender meetings, site visits, clarificationmeetings and preparing draft responses to questions of tenderers;Reviewing the queries raised by tenderers and preparing draft responses to be approvedand distributed by PROCON to all tenderers. Assistance in preparing theMoMs and draft tender addendum notices;Being present in the tender opening and assistance for preparing the draft theminutes of tender opening;Attending to the meetings of the Evaluation Committee as an Observer and providingassistance during the evaluation process;Prepare the draft Tender Evaluation Reports;Assistance for any necessary post-tender correspondence with tenderers,Assistance to PROCON during the pre-contract clarification and negotiation meetingsAssistance to prepare the Contract to be submitted to the “no objection” of the EIB.WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F13 / 175.4 Outputs and planningThe project is expected to commence in May 2012.5.4.1 Outputs and Planning related to Tasks 1Activities/OutputsTask 1 AnalysisReport on Analysis of the optionsfor way of collection, transport andtreatment of municipal wasteSiting and conceptual design of thepreferred option for a transfer stationPreparation of the Tender Documentsfor Transfer StationIndicative dates5.4.2 Outputs and Planning related to Tasks 2Within 4 weeks following the commencementWithin 6 working weeks following the approval of themethodology reportWithin 8 weeks following the approval of the Siting andConceptual Design reportActivities/OutputsIndicative datesTask 2 Preparation of Tender Documents for Rehabilitation of “Vrtijeljka” DumpsiteReport for Analysis of Existing SituationWithin 9 working weeks following the commencementConceptual design of the Rehabilitationof the DumpsiteportWithin 1 week following the approval of the analysis re-Preparation of the Tender Documentsfor the Rehabilitation designWithin 6 weeks following the approval of the conceptualreport6 Project Coordination and Meetings6.1 Coordination and meetingsPROCON will coordinate all activities, including communication between the Consultantand The Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism and the Municipality ofCetinje. All activities shall be carried out in close cooperation with the appointed projectmanager at PROCON.Regular meeting shall be held with PROCON to report and discuss progress, criticalissues and all aspects of the work.PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje will provide the Consultant with all relevantdocuments, reports, maps that they have, as well as the ones they manage to providefrom the relevant institutions. The duty of the Consultant is to check the quality andappropriateness of this information.The assignment will be led by the Component Project Manager (CPM) who will reportto the overall Project Manager (PM) of the project. The CPM is responsible for ensuringprogress to plan, for coordination with PROCON and for reporting / highlightingcritical issues in project execution of their respective component.WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F14 / 17The CPM will organise meetings for the discussions and review of the reports. At thesemeetings the presence of PROCON and the Municipality of Cetinje is required, and theMinistry for Sustainable Development and Tourism and the EIB will be invited.Minutes of the meeting will be prepared by the CPM who shall also ensure timelycomments and approval of the reports.The Project Manager (PM) of the overall project is responsible for supervision of theproject, quality control and internal reporting to the environment KE and to IPF2 TeamLeader (TL) who then reports to EC DG ELARG.6.2 Facilities for the Consultant and access to informationThe IPF2 Consultant will work in the local IPF project office in Podgorica.PROCON with assistance of the Municipality of Cetinje and MoSDT shall provide accessto all available and relevant information, maps, studies, legal documents etc. at nocost to the Consultant.All expenses including but not limited to taxes, fees, duties stamps etc. obligatory andnecessary for the application/follow-up/approval are outside of the scope of the Consultantand shall be born by the Investor.The cost of communications material, printing and report production is also covered bythe Consultant.7 Experts’ profilesThe Consultant should ensure that the appropriately qualified experts are available foreach task defined above. For this project, the following staffing is foreseen:Experts’ Profile:Education:Specific Requirements:General Requirements:Language Skills:Component Project Manager (CPM) (senior) / Solid wasteexpertA degree in environmental engineering/civil engineering or educationrelevant to the tasksMinimum 10 years experiences in projects related to municipalservices (water, wastewater, solid waste etc.)Experience of minimum 5 years in municipal waste managementservicesExperience in at least 2 landfill design or landfill rehabilitationprojects according to the relevant EU Directives;Experience in cooperation with local, regional and national governmentsin the field of waste management;Experience as project manager in multidisciplinary projects;Proficiency in oral and written EnglishWB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F15 / 17Working days:Task 1: 40 daysTask 2, 60 daysTotal: 100 daysExperts’ Profile:EducationSpecificRequirements:GeneralRequirements:Language Skills:Working days:Solid waste Expert (senior)A degree in civil engineering, environmental engineering or similar educationrelevant to the tasksMinimum 10 years experiences in projects related to infrastructural services(water, wastewater, solid waste etc.)Experience with engineering design of solid waste management facilitiessuch as transfer stations, recycling facilities, composting etc. or dumpsiterehabilitation and/or landfill design,Experience with software to prepare engineering designsMinimum 10 years of experience in multidisciplinary environmental projects;Proficiency in oral and written EnglishKnowledge of the Montenegrin language will be an assetTask 1: 30 daysTask 2: 40 daysTotal: 70 days,Experts’ Profile:EducationSpecific Requirements:General Requirements:Language Skills:Working daysProcurement Expert (senior)A degree in civil engineering, environmental engineering or equivalent educationrelevant to the tasksExperience in developing tender documents in at least 2 public funded municipalsolid waste management projects;Experience in the use of FIDIC and EIB/EBRD/WB procurement guidelines;Procurement experience in West Balkan countries will be an assetMinimum 10 years of relevant experience;Proficiency in oral and written EnglishTask 1: 20 daysTask 2: 30 daysTotal: 50 daysExperts’ Profile:Education:Solid Waste Expert (Junior)A degree in environmental engineering/civil Engineering or education relevantto the tasksWB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F16 / 17SpecificRequirements:General Requirements:Language Skills:Working days:Experience in municipal waste management projectsExperience in landfill design and/or operation or landfill rehabilitation projectsaccording to the relevant EU Directives;Experience in multidisciplinary projects; Minimum 5 years of relevant experience.Proficiency in oral and written EnglishKnowledge of the Montenegrin language will be an assetTask 1: 35 daysTask 2: 60 daysTotal: 95 days8 Incidental expensesThe Project office for this assignment will be in Podgorica. As defined in the IPF2Contract, the incidental expenses in this contract will be the cost of travels of the STEexperts within the region to/from the Project Office – not including the transfers fromtheir home offices to the Project Office –, per diems of the experts during such missionswhen overnight stays are necessary. In addition, if necessary, field surveys willbe carried out to be included in incidental expenses, see section 10.9 Requirements for Reporting and DeliverablesAll reports will be delivered in electronic copy to PROCON and the municipality ofCetinje. All reports shall be prepared in English. PROCON will ensure that the municipalityof Cetinje, and the MoSDT will receive a copy for commenting.All other project outputs and communication will be in English. Minutes of Meetingsshall be prepared and distributed to the participants by the Consultant during the ProjectActivities. Draft Minutes of Meetings must be commented within seven calendardays.The comments to the draft final outputs shall be submitted to the Consultant in maximum3 weeks. Following the receipt of comments on Draft Final Outputs, the FinalOutputs will be produced in two weeks and will be submitted for approval to PROCONand for their no-objection to the EIB.The final approval of the PROCON should be sent to the Consultant with an officialletter. The no-objection of the lead IFI and of the Promoter may be sent by letter and/orby electronic message.Following the approval of the Tender Documents for the transfer station and for therehabilitation of the dumpsite and closure of the project PROCON and for their noobjectionto the EIB shall draft in maximum 7 days a “works completion certificate”.WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

WB4-MNE-ENV-12 Component F17 / 17The final approval of the PROCON should be sent to the Consultant with an officialletter. The no-objection of the lead IFI and of the Promoter may be sent by letter and/orby electronic message.After these have been received, reports are submitted to EC DG ELARG, together withthe above approval/no-objection.10 BudgetThe indicative budget for these services is EUR 194,360 including EUR 8,340 for contingenciesand EUR 19,220 for Incidental expenses.WB4-MNE-ENV-12F-ToR_Cetinje-Ver2-20120430

Prilog 2

Prilog 3

D.O.O. p r o j e c t i n g , e n g i n e e r i n g and s u p e r v i s i o nE L A B O R A T ETHE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL ’’VRTIJELJKA’’ FOR CITY OFCETINJENIKSIC,September, 2012.

E L A B O R A T ETHE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL ’’VRTIJELJKA’’ FOR CITY OFCETINJEPROJECT MANAGER:GENERAL MANAGER:______________________________Andrija Delibašić, M.Sc. geol.____________________________Vukašin Gredić, M.Sc. geol.

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJEStudy:THE GEOTECHNICALPROPERTIES OF THEGROUND FOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTIONOF EXISTING SANITARY LANDFILL‘’VRTIJELJKA’’ FOR CITY OF CETINJEHolder of Elaborate:"GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o., NikšićProject manager:Andrija Delibašić, M.Sc. geologyAssociates:Dragomir Vukašinović, M.Sc. geologyVukašin Gredić, M.Sc. geologyIssuing date: September, 2012.

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJELIST OF GRAPHICAL APENDIX:1. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA, R 1:25 000,2. GEOLOGICAL MAP OF WINDER STUDY AREA, R 1:25 000,3. ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL TERRAIN MAP, R 1:1 000,4. GEOTECHICAL CROSS-SECTION OF TERRAIN 1-1’ I 2-2’, R 1:500,5. ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL PROFILES OF RESEARCH BOREHOLES, R 1:100,6. ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL PROFILES OF RESEARCH TRIAL PITS, R 1:50.THE DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL:1. RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES OF SAMPLES

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE1. INTRODUCTION"GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o. from Niksic performed detailedgeotechnical field explorations of existing sanitary landfill "Vrtijeljka", city ofCetinje, for the reconstruction Study purpose based on the accepted offer,number 0606/012 dating from 06.06.2012, by the Investor of theproject. With its implementation the Elaborate will be done to obtainnecessary geotechnical basis for reconstruction Study.Exploration has consisted of field, laboratory and cabinet work. Fromthe field work was carried out reconnaissance of the site, engineeringgeologicalmapping of the field, drilling exploratory wells, core mapping ofthe exploration wells, digging of exploration trial pits and mapping of it,sampling for laboratory testing, installation piezometric structures inboreholes and geotechnical supervision of field work. In the laboratory wascarried out detail analysis of samples. Subsequently, based on the resultsobtained and data collected from the fund documentation and literature,Elaborate on geotechnical properties of the terrain has been done forsanitary landfill reconstruction Study purpose.In the Study are presented data on the morphology, geologicalstructure, hydrogeological characteristics and seismic properties of theground as well as the engineering-geological properties of the specificformations. In the specific chapters the geotechnical conditions for reconstructionof the landfill has been presented as well as recommendationsfor project managers.On the performance of field and laboratory work and in Elaboratework out Dragomir Vukašinović M.Sc. geology, Andrija DelibasicM.Sc. geology and Vukašin Gredić M.Sc. geology have been participated.The works were carried out in August and September 2012.strana 1

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE2. POSITION OF EXPLORATION AREALocation of the existing sanitary landfill is on the left side of the mainroad Cetinje-Budva, locality Vrtijeljka. Landfill location is situated about 1km from the main road and is connected with the local road. Explorationarea, geodetically mapped, is situated on area of approximately 4.50 haand existing sanitary landfill occupies area of some 1.65 ha.Location is presented In Appendix No. 1.3. TYPE AND SCOPE OF PERFORMED WORKS3.1. Field worksNext field works have been performed:o reconnaissance of the micro-location; aimed at preliminary detection oflocation and research activities planning;o engineering-geological mapping of the terrain; was performed on theentire site that has been geodetically mapped around (4.5 ha). For fieldmapping, method of spring and engineering-geological processesdetection was used. Engineering-geological map of the terrain ispresented in appendix 3;o exploration drilling; 6 exploration geomechanical wells has been drilledwith depths from 3.0 to 15.0m. Successively with the drilling of the wells,core of the boreholes has been mapped. Engineering-geological profilesof the exploration wells are given in Appendixes No. 5. The followingtable provides an overview of the performed exploration wells:Table No 1: Performed exploration wells:WellDepth(m)Coordinate Y Coordinate X Elevation ZB-1 3.00 4 691 752.15 6 578 141.36 756.10B-2 3.00 4 691 744.38 6 578 179.92 755.35B-3 15.00 4 691 749.50 6 578 208.14 753.75B-4 15.00 4 691 692.46 6 578 153.71 755.70B-5 3.00 4 691 704.26 6 578 141.22 757.45B-6 3.00 4 691 710.27 6 578 127.01 757.65strana 2

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJEo the installation of piezometric construction; in performed explorationwells 42.0 m length of piezometric structure has been installed.Piezometric structure is pipe with the cover both made from PVC withbottom perforations;o digging of exploration trial pits; exploration trial pit was dug to the depthof 1.0 m. After was mapped. Engineering-geological profile is given inAppendixes No. 6. The following table provides an overview of theperformed trial pit:Table No 2: Performed exploration pit:Pit markDimension (m)CoordinateElevationY X ZR-1 2.50 x 0.50 x 1.00 4 691 678.33 6 578 138.56 755.10o taking of samples for laboratory geotechnical analysis; during mappingof the core exploration boreholes and exploration pit 8 samples of thesoil sample and 2 rock samples were taken, as well as 1 sample forProctor and CBR test.o the expert-geotechnical supervision was performed continuously duringperformance of field exploration works by the geotechnical engineer.3.2. Laboratory analysisSoil samples from sanitary landfill were taken. Partial geomechanicalanalyses have been performed on taken soil samples. Only identificationclassificationtests were performed with determination of: lithology, specificgravity, density and dry density.Rock samples were determined with: density, compressive strength,angle of internal friction and cohesion.Sample from exploration pit was tested for moisture condition withProctor test and also CBR values were determined.3.3. Cabinet worksIn cabinet, the interpretation of results of exploration work has beendone, also its processing and synthesis with data from the funddocumentation and literature. Based on all of that, the Elaborate on thegeotechnical properties of the terrain for reconstruction Study of an existingsanitary landfill, city of Cetinje locality “Vrtijeljka”, has been done.strana 3

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE4. EXPLORATION RESULTS4.1. Morphological characteristics of the terrainMorphology of sanitary landfill "Vrtijeljka" location is typical Karst withcharacteristic landforms like sinkholes, depressions and reefs. Landfillplateau depicts with size (100.0 m wide and 120.0 m long), with to slopesspreading one to the East and second to the South with inclinations 35º to45º. Elevation of the site is from 1080 m to 1176 m above sea level.Location morphology is presented in engineering-geological map andprofiles given in Appendixes No. 3 and No. 4.4.2. Geological structure of terrainGeological structure of terrain can be seen on Basic Geological Map"Kotor" 1:100 000 with interpreter (Institute for Geological and GeophysicalResearch, Belgrade, 1962-1969). Terrain of wider exploration includesUpper Triassic formations (T3) of dolomitic limestones and massivelimestones, gradationally developing from Ladinian (T 2 2 ) limestones withchert. Dolomitic limestones and dolomites are widely distributed on area,going to the South, from Cetinje to Vrela i Očinići. Dolomites are usually intick banks, rarely stratified or massive, changing occasionally withdominant limestones. Blocks are separated but without apparentcontinuality.Youngest, Quaternary depositions consist from deluvial (dl) red claydominantly seen in depressions and sinkholes, while rarely seen on terrainsurface. Fractures and caverns in limestones are filled with red clay andfine debris.Terrain of wider exploration area by the geotectonic structure belongsto “High karst” zone and “Old Montenegro” anticlinorium (axis is dippingSoutheast) changing to “lower Zeta” sinclinorium. Paleorelief is crosssectedwith faults differently orientated. Deep faults were mapped on thisarea; generally spreading Northwest-Southeast and Northwest-Southeastare also directions of seismic activity.Geological map of the wider area is presented in Appendix No. 2strana 4

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE4.3. Hydrogeological characteristics of the terrainBased on hydrogeological characteristics and functions of the terrainvery well water permeable rocks and complexes were depicted.As permeable rocks of fracture-karst porosity in the terrain we cansort out all the carbonate rocks with the exception of solid dolomites whoappear very rarely. Intensive mechanical separation and degree ofkarstification indicate that prevails karst porosity and such terrains arewithout surface waters. The terrain made of very well water permeablerocks forms scattered karts aquifer type. On exploration area fractures,caverns and depressions, that usually accompany faults, can be seen.They are the main sinking zones on the site. Water that falls on the groundquickly, through a network of open fractures, caverns and caves infiltratedeep into the ground. At great depth scattered karst aquifer is formed.Discharge of this aquifer is through the spring of Crnojevića River(Obodska springs). Karstification base is very deep in this part of theterrain, almost to the level of Skadar Lake.Deluvial clays with debris are classified as low permeability rocks ofintergranular and capillary porosity. Their distribution on the surface isminimal, and they do not have a significant impact on the hydrogeologicalcharacteristics of the field.During exploration drilling (August 2012.) there was no undergroundwater appearance in exploration wells.4.4. Seismicity of the terrainAccording to the map of seismic microzonation of urban areas Cetinjewith Ivanova Korita, Njeguši and Rijeka Crnojevića, this location is a part ofseismic area B 3 . For the mentioned area B 3 , the maximum expectedearthquake is with intensity of VII degree MCS scale. Seismic parametersfor return periods of time for 50, 100 and 200 years are:ZoneTable No 3: seismic parametersCharacteristic zones of the terrainReturnperiodt (god)Maximumaccelerationof the soila maxSeismiccoefficientk s50 0.12 0.03100 0.17 0.04tectonically folded and karstified. 200 0.25 0.06B 3Limestone and dolomite complexes,stratified and banked in textures,strana 5

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE4.5. The modern geological processes and phenomenaFrom modern geological processes and phenomena at the site ofexploration planar erosion and karstification are present.Planar erosion has affected the entire field and the intensity isdifferent depending on the type of environment in which it takes place.Mostly eroded surface deluvial sediments are subject to planar erosion. Inthe limestone dominant formation, planar erosion intensity is low.Karstification is expressed in the limestone since the limestone ishighly tectonically fractured. It is estimated that karstification depth goes upto several hundred meters. In terms of engineering-geologicalcharacteristics terrain is stable.4.6. Engineering-geological characteristics of selected areasBased on the analysis of existing documentation relating to thelocation and other related terrains, engineering-geological location mappingand exploration drilling can be concluded that the field is basically built outof solid rock (limestone and dolomite). At one end of location is existinglandfill. Sections viewed from the surface are:• Mound (DR, PR)n - an artificial mound, and materials of the existinglandfill (in terrain profile it is section numbered 1). Material compositionis heterogeneous, unsorted, medium consolidated. It is compiled fromdebris and limestone blocks, dust and various municipal waste. It coverspart of the site. Mound thickness is variable, from minimal to over 10.0 m(central part of the landfill between wells B-3 and B-4). According tobuilding standards GN-200 this material belongs to Class II and III of theexcavation. Physical and mechanical parameters of this section are notconsidered as a landfill material is not sorted and there is a large rangeof values (from limestone blocks to the waste of plastic, metal, wood orconstruction debris).• Limestone (K, D) - massive dolomitic limestone or dolomite that formsthe base and the back of the field to a wider area (in terrain profile it issection numbered 2). These are massive rocks, fractured on surface,degraded and karstified, whitish in colour. When drilling or digging thisdolomitic limestone is broken into pieces, debris or dust. Fractures andcaverns in the surface zone are enlarged by karstification and filled withstrana 6

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJEred clay and limestone debris. Limestones are stable and wellsupportingformation. The water level is deep in the ground. Accordingto building standards GN-200 this material belongs to the category V toVI of the excavation. A good basis for founding. Physical andmechanical parameters of this environment (based on foundingdocumentation and immediate field assessment) are given in thefollowing table:Table 4: Physical-mechanical parameters for limestoneParametersRange of the valuesγ (kN/m 3 ) 26.0 - 27.0ϕ ( 0 ) 30.0 - 35.0c (kN/m 2 ) 400.0 - 500.0q u (kN/m 2 ) 1000.0 - 15000.0E (MPa) 1700.0 - 2000.0ν 0.25 - 0.28Engineering-geological units are shown in Appendixes No.4, 5 and 6.strana 7

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE5. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THELANDFILLGeotechnical conditions for reconstruction of the landfill are complex.Section that is favourable in geotechnical terms for construction ofnecessary facilities is the limestone section. On the site they are partiallycovered with a thick layer of the existing landfill. Landfill itself is not suitablefor any construction on it. If any facility is planned to be build it is requiredto remove the landfill from the site and perform the founding in thelimestone.Allowed load capacity of limestone is good while the subsidence isnegligible because it is virtually undeformable. To calculate the allowableloads Goodman's formula for ultimate bearing capacity of foundations infractured rock formations:qf2[ 1+(45+ϕ/2)]= q tguWhere are:q f - limit load of the foundation in the fractured rocksq u - uniaxial compressive strength of rocks under the foundationϕ - angle of internal friction of the rock mass under the foundation.Permitted load q a is obtained when the ultimate bearing capacity isreduced for the safety factor value (q a =q f /F s ). Value of the safety factor F srange from 3 to 5. In this case, the adopted value for Fs is 5. The adoptedvalues for parameters used in the calculation are:ϕ = 30 o , q u = 1200 kN/m 2 , F s = 5Result of calculation:q f = q u [ 1+ tg 2( 45+ϕ / 2)] - limit loadq f = 1200 [ 1 + tg 2( 45 + 30/ 2)] = 4800 kN/m 2q a = q f / F s- allowable loadq a = 4800/5 = 960 kN/m 2As it can be seen from the calculation allowable load of the substrateis high. Subsidence is negligible since it is practically undeformableformation.strana 8

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJELimestone is good in terms of allowable load, subsidence andstability. It is not suitable in terms of hydrogeological properties since it istectonically fractured, faulted, cracked and karstified, high permeable rock.All the water that falls on the ground infiltrates deep into the ground wherethey form scattered karst aquifer. This aquifer is discharged throughsprings of Crnojevića River (Obodska springs). This means that the watertakes all pollution from the landfill deep underground.It is necessary to provide waterproof basis for future landfill, watersfrom landfill should not be washed down and drained in the ground withoutpurification.strana 9

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROJECT MANAGERS ANDCONTRACTORSIn the design and construction of the facilities to keep in mind the followingrecommendations: excavation for the facilities foundations can be performed completely bymachines, with excavator and pikamers, since the material belongs tothe II and III to V and VI category excavation by GN-200 categorisation, landfill has poor geotechnical properties on one side so it needs to beremoved if any facilities are planned there, all facilities should be founded in the limestone since they have goodgeotechnical properties, Large fractures and caverns if they occur in the initial excavation isnecessary to clean of red clay and debris and space should be filled withbroken stone or lean concrete, for future landfill waterproof surface at the basis should be providedsince limestone basis is well-permeable and karstified, wastewaters from the landfill must be purified before being released tothe ground, geotechnical engineers presence is recommended in the execution offoundation excavation and groundwork.strana 10

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJE7. CONCLUSIONLandfill terrain site "Vrtijeljka" in Cetinje from engineering-geologicalaspect is built from underlying limestones. At one end is existing landfill.Foundation conditions are generally favourable in geotechnical but areproblematic in terms of hydrogeological conditions. Location is stable undernatural conditions.From the hydrogeological point of view, the terrain is one of the wellpermeable,fractured and karstic porosity. The water level is deep insidethe ground where it forms a scattered karts aquifer.The facility is in seismic zone with the expected maximumearthquake intensity of VIII degree MCS scale.Permitted load of limestone as a base for foundation of buildings ishigh (over 500 kN/m 2 ), while the subsidence is negligible. Basicexcavations can be carried out completely by machines. Excavation offoundations and groundwork should be run with geotechnical monitoring.Nikšić, September 2012.Project manager:________________________Andrija Delibašić, M.Sc. geologystrana 11

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJELITERATURE AND FUND DOCUMENTATION• Antonijević R. et al., (1962-1969): Basic geological map of "Kotor"1:100 000 with an interpreter, Institute for Geological andGeophysical Research, Belgrade,• Jokić D., Ivanović K. et al., (1983): Seismogeological basis andseismic microregionazation of urban area Cetinje with Njeguši,Ivanova Korita and Rijeka Crnojevića, Institute of GeologicalExploration SR Montenegro - Titograd,• Radulović M., (2000): Hydrogeology of Montenegro karst, Specialedition, book XVIII, Podgorica,• Fund documentation: "GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o., Nikšić.strana 12

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJEGRAPHICAL APPENDIX

THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GROUNDFOR STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTINGSANITARY LANDFILL "VRTIJELJKA", FOR CITY OF CETINJETHE DOCUMENTARYMATERIAL

IZVJEŠTAJ O ISPITIVANJU BROJ __12/08/012__Naziv podnosioca zahtjeva:Objekat: Deponija "Vrtijeljka", Opština CetinjeBroj zahtjeva/ugovora:Vrsta materijala: tloDatum podnošenja zahtjeva: Broj uzoraka: 10 8Adresa:Datum uzorkovanja: avgust 2012. godineTelefon/fax: /Zahtijevano ispitivanje: identifikaciono-klasifikaciona i otporno-deformabilna svojstva po standardimaUzorkovao: "GEOTEHNIKA Montenegro" d.o.o., NikšićTABELARNI PRIKAZ REZULTATA LABORATORIJSKIH ISPITIVANJAoznakauzorkadubinauzorkovanjaγ γ d γ s e n W frakcijaLL PL PI CI modul stišljivosti M v (MPa) φ c(g/cm 3 )B-1 (0.70-1.00) 1.88 1.76 2.63 0.49 33.08 6.82 10 42 17 29 2B-2 (2.20-2.50) 1.92 1.81 2.62 0.45 30.92 6.08 21 44 18 14 3B-3 (1.40-1.70) 1.89 1.77 2.64 0.49 32.95 6.78 16 38 30 12 4B-3 (3.00-3.30) 1.95 1.83 2.68 0.46 31.72 6.56 10 41 15 34 0B-4 (1.70-2.00) 1.97 1.86 2.66 0.43 30.08 5.91 6 27 21 42 4B-4 (5.50-5.80) 1.90 1.81 2.58 0.43 29.84 4.97 5 26 31 34 4B-5 (2.00-2.30) 1.98 1.85 2.60 0.41 28.85 7.03 0 42 16 38 4B-6 (0.20-0.50) 1.97 1.84 2.65 0.44 30.57 7.07 9 33 19 34 5(%) (%) > 60.0 2.0-60.0 0.06-2.0 0.06-0.002

BorholenumberSamplingdepthL A B O R A T O R Y T E S T S - R O C KPoisson's ratioUniaxial compress. strenght Poin load test Water contenet Unit weight Specif. gravity Density index Porosity Young's modulusMPa MPa (%) g/cm 3 g/cm 3%MPaNoσ c σ i W γ w γ sn eEv1 B-3 (6.7-7.0)17.84 1.14.8 2.4372.667 0.9148 0.09 243210.312 B-4 (10.6-11.0) 35.304.2 4.20 2.644 2.690 0.9832 0.02 21.442 0.32

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-1_0.7-1.0percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 102.0-60.0 420.06-2.0 170.002-0.06 29< 0.002 2grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-2_2.2-2.5percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 212.0-60.0 440.06-2.0 180.002-0.06 14< 0.002 3grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-3_1.4-1.7percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 162.0-60.0 380.06-2.0 300.002-0.06 12< 0.002 4grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-3_3.0-3.3percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 102.0-60.0 410.06-2.0 150.002-0.06 34< 0.002 0grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-4_1.7-2.0percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 62.0-60.0 270.06-2.0 210.002-0.06 42< 0.002 4grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-4_5.5-5.8percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 52.0-60.0 260.06-2.0 310.002-0.06 34< 0.002 4grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-5_2.0-2.3percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 02.0-60.0 420.06-2.0 160.002-0.06 38< 0.002 4grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PERTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARTLocation:Vrtijeljka-Cetinje1009080Sample:B-6_0.2-0.5percentage passing (%7060504030201000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100fractions %> 60 92.0-60.0 330.06-2.0 190.002-0.06 34< 0.002 5grain size (mm))DATE: avgust 2012, Nikšićstandard: JUS U.B1.018

PROKTOROV OPITObjekat:Porijeklo materijala:Vrijeljak CetnjeR-12.001.951.901.85Suva zapreminska masa ρ d (g / cm 3 )1.801.751.701.651.601.551.501.451.401.351.300 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Vlažnost w (%)REZULTATI ISPITIVANJA:E= 600 kNm/m 3Laboratorijski broj 101ρ d max = 1.84 g/cm 3 ; Specifična težinaρ6.7 %s = 2.67w opt =g/cm 3 ;LEGENDA:Linija zasićenja pri stepenu zasićenosti Sr=100 %Intpretacija krive Lagranžovim polinomomEksperimentalne tačkeIspitao: Intepretirao: Ovjerio:

Objekat:Porijeklo materijala:Vrtijeljaka CetinjeR-12.42.22Suva zapreminska masa (g/cm 3 )1.81.61.41.210.80.60 2 4 6 8 10 12 14C B R ( % )PODACI ISPITIVANJAPROKTOROV OPITBroj udaraca - N10 1430CBR vrijednost (%)7913E =600kN m/m 3Bubrenje ( % )Suva zaprem.masa (g/cm 3 )Vlažnost prije opita (%)01.80 01.83 1.846.2Optimalna vlažnost w opt = 6.7Maksimalna suva1.84zapreminska masa ρ d max =(%)(g/cm 3 )Vlažnost posle opita (%)6.26.196.18CBR( 100 %ρ d max) =10.2(%)Ispitao: Intepretirao: Overio:0 00 0

Prilog 4

Questionnaire for "Vrtijeljka" dumpsite in CetinjeTeam commentsMr. Popivoda answers (from PUC Cetinje)1. Location data?Already described in Task 1: Analysis Report2. What year begun waste disposal on dumpsite „Vrtijeljka“?1977 (operating for 35 years)Analysis Report says 1987 (25 years). Zdenka will check once again which year is statedin official Montenegrin documents.3. Estimated waste amount on dumpsite „Vrtijeljka“ (in m 3 )?Approx. 490.000 cubic meters (around 35.000 cubic meters per year i.e. 14 tons)4. Waste disposal area, with specified area that is still in use, and recultivated area?Waste disposal area, 150 times 100 i.e. around 15.000 sq. meters.Dumpsite is covering periodically with levelling towards entrance gate (preparation forwinter period).There is no area recultivated according to standards. When say dumpsite sanitation, theyinclude only covering dumpsite periodically with ground cover layer.5. In relation to previous question describe the way of recultiavation: type ad thickness ofcover layer?-6. Waste amount disposing to dumpsite „Vrtijeljka“(daily (in tons and cubic meters)/yearly(in tons and cubic meters))?100 cubic meters per day i.e. 11-14 tons16 cubic meters of pressed waste per day7. Number of days of waste disposal on dumpsite, per year?Every day i.e. 365 days per year (not in full capacity)8. Number of inhabitants covered by the waste collection service?See Analysis ReportUrban area is approx. 100% covered plus two Nature Parks, Skadar Lake and LovcenMountain.9. Is the waste scattered along the edges of the dumpsite?Yes, partly along the edges.

10. Vicinity of watercourses/water sources/water intake?No watercourses/water sources/water intake in the vicinity of dumpsite. Skadar Lake isaround 5000 m away.11. If so, whether dumpsite is upstream or downstream?-12. Previous use of dumpsite land?The rocky meadows, with no specific purpose at least 50 years13. Is waste being covered after disposal?Yes, 5-8 times per month, to assure access for trucks.14. If being covered describe:a. Type of material,Ground, construction waste, available materials from excavationb. Thickness of cover layer,Depends on the needs, sometimes it goes to 2 or even 3 meters, but not less than0,5m.c. How often (daily/weekly/monthly),5-8 times per monthd. Is cover layer being compacted and in what way?Yes, using only weight of the truck or dredger bucket loading.No compactors.15. Are there any collectors of secondary raw materials? If yes, what are the estimatedamounts of collected materials?Yes, negligible amounts.16. What is the distance of nearby residential area?Around 500 meters, small Roma settlement17. What is the distance of individual houses?100 m, neighbours object, assume it is stable or similar18. Width and quality of access road, distance of category road (e.g. state road) and distanceof railway, if any?Access road 4m wide, on some parts 6 and 7m.500m macadam access to the dumpsiteNo railway close to the dumpsite.19. Is transmission line or other installations crosses over the dumpsite?Transmission line is 50 m away from the dumpsite land border.

Electricity for dumpsite lightening is conducted month and a half ago. This is borrowedelectricity (unofficial) for security purposes.20. Is in the vicinity of the dumpsite any protected area (Nature Park, Natural Park, CulturalHeritage etc.) and what is their distance from the location?No.

Prilog 5

ESTIMATED PRODUCTION OF THE LANDFILL GAS:To estimate the production of landfill gas was used a model for the emission of landfill gas(LandGEM), U.S.Agency for Environmental Protection (Environmental Protection Agency).The annual amount of produced methane can be determined using the following equation:QCH4n 1 Mi= k L0i=1 j= 0,1 10 ektijWhere:QCHannual amount CH4 (m3/god);4injkL0increment(1 godina);initial year for the waste acceptance;increment (0,1 godina);speed of forming CH4 (god-1);potential capacity of forming CH4 (m3/t);Mimass of waste deposited in the i-year (t);tijage of the j- section of waste mass Mi deposited in the i-year;Theparameters used foragiven model are:Start depositing 2012k = 0,004 god3L = 100 m / t01content CH4 : 49 vol. %content CO2 : 50 vol. %other : 1 vol. %1

Estimated production of landfill gas at the landfill , depending on the year of disposal is:TABLE 4Year Biogas-total Methan Carbon Dioxidem3/year m3/h m3/year m3/h m3/year m3/h1987 15543,6 1,8 7616,36 0,9 7771,8 0,91988 30602,1 3,5 14995,02 1,7 15301,0 1,71989 45195,4 5,2 22145,77 2,5 22597,7 2,61990 59889,1 6,8 29345,65 3,3 29944,5 3,41991 74785,8 8,5 36645,06 4,2 37392,9 4,31992 90276,3 10,3 44235,40 5,0 45138,2 5,21993 105374,3 12,0 51633,39 5,9 52687,1 6,01994 120093,6 13,7 58845,87 6,7 60046,8 6,91995 134716,2 15,4 66010,95 7,5 67358,1 7,71996 150385,7 17,2 73688,98 8,4 75192,8 8,61997 166163,6 19,0 81420,15 9,3 83081,8 9,51998 181518,0 20,7 88943,83 10,2 90759,0 10,41999 196464,8 22,4 96267,75 11,0 98232,4 11,22000 211358,6 24,1 103565,72 11,8 105679,3 12,12001 226145,3 25,8 110811,18 12,6 113072,6 12,92002 241086,8 27,5 118132,55 13,5 120543,4 13,82003 256358,1 29,3 125615,48 14,3 128179,1 14,62004 271337,5 31,0 132955,38 15,2 135668,8 15,52005 286307,5 32,7 140290,68 16,0 143153,8 16,32006 300960,6 34,4 147470,70 16,8 150480,3 17,22007 315506,9 36,0 154598,36 17,6 157753,4 18,02008 330317,2 37,7 161855,44 18,5 165158,6 18,92009 345756,8 39,5 169420,84 19,3 172878,4 19,72010 361193,0 41,2 176984,55 20,2 180596,5 20,62011 375083,3 42,8 183790,81 21,0 187541,6 21,42012 389491,8 44,5 190850,97 21,8 194745,9 22,22013 410930,0 46,9 201355,71 23,0 205465,0 23,52014 394817,2 45,1 193460,44 22,1 197408,6 22,52015 379336,2 43,3 185874,75 21,2 189668,1 21,72016 364462,2 41,6 178586,49 20,4 182231,1 20,82017 350171,5 40,0 171584,02 19,6 175085,7 20,02018 336441,0 38,4 164856,11 18,8 168220,5 19,22019 323249,0 36,9 158392,01 18,1 161624,5 18,52020 310574,2 35,5 152181,37 17,4 155287,1 17,72021 298396,4 34,1 146214,25 16,7 149198,2 17,02022 286696,1 32,7 140481,11 16,0 143348,1 16,42023 275454,6 31,4 134972,77 15,4 137727,3 15,72024 264653,9 30,2 129680,41 14,8 132326,9 15,12025 254276,7 29,0 124595,57 14,2 127138,3 14,52026 244306,3 27,9 119710,11 13,7 122153,2 13,92027 234726,9 26,8 115016,21 13,1 117363,5 13,42028 225523,2 25,7 110506,36 12,6 112761,6 12,92029 216680,3 24,7 106173,34 12,1 108340,1 12,42030 208184,1 23,8 102010,22 11,6 104092,1 11,92031 200021,1 22,8 98010,35 11,2 100010,6 11,42032 192178,2 21,9 94167,30 10,7 96089,1 11,02033 184642,8 21,1 90474,95 10,3 92321,4 10,52034 177402,8 20,3 86927,38 9,9 88701,4 10,12035 170446,7 19,5 83518,91 9,5 85223,4 9,72036 163763,4 18,7 80244,08 9,2 81881,7 9,32037 157342,2 18,0 77097,67 8,8 78671,1 9,02038 151172,7 17,3 74074,63 8,5 75586,4 8,62039 145245,1 16,6 71170,12 8,1 72622,6 8,32

450000,0400000,0350000,0300000,0250000,0200000,0Biogas-total m3/yearMethan m3/yearCarbon Dioxide m3/year150000,0100000,050000,00,0198719901993199619992002200520082011201420172020202320262029203220352038TABLE 5LANDFILL GAS PRODUCTION RECAP. FOR THE PERIOD BETWEEN 2012 – 2064TOTAL PRODUCTION OF LANDFILL GAS 12203007,08 m3/yearTOTAL PRODUCTION OF METHANE 5979473,47 m3/yearCARBON DIOXIDE TOTAL PRODUCTION 6101503,54 m3/yearMAXIMUM PRODUCTION OF LANDFILL GAS 46,91 m3/hMAXIMUM PRODUCTION OF METHANE 22,99 m3/hCARBON DIOXIDE MAXIMUM PRODUCTION 23,45 m3/hMAXIMUM SPECIFIC GAS PRODUCTION OF THE LANDFILLGAS160,3E-4 m3/tdayMAXIMUM SPECIFIC PRODUCTION OF METHANE 785,7E-5 m3/tday3