- Page 1 and 2: BRITISH SIGN LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTI
- Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe are very gratefu
- Page 6 and 7: CONTENTS (continued)THE FURTHER AND
- Page 8: 1.INTRODUCTIONThis study, conducted
- Page 13 and 14: Interviewees were selected on the b
- Page 15 and 16: TABLE 1Type of approach‘Natural a
- Page 17 and 18: 3.3. ‘NO SPECIFIC POLICY’Betwee
- Page 20 and 21: THE SCHOOL SECTOR:LINGUISTIC ACCESS
- Page 22 and 23: 5.3. PRESENTING STATISTICS ON THE P
- Page 24 and 25: 6.THE NUMBER OF PROFESSIONALS WHOPR
- Page 27 and 28: 6.1.3. RECOMMENDATIONS■■■■T
- Page 29: CHART 4 Location of deaf ‘other p
- Page 32 and 33: 7.THE QUALIFICATIONS OF PROFESSIONA
- Page 34 and 35: There are a limited number of types
- Page 37 and 38: Table 7 BSL qualifications among To
- Page 39: ■■As has already been demonstra
- Page 42 and 43: The title ‘Communication Support
- Page 44 and 45: 8.PRE-SCHOOL ISSUES: INFORMED CHOIC
- Page 46 and 47: There is UK-wide evidence that unde
- Page 48 and 49: ToDS (who may be Educational Audiol
- Page 50 and 51: Table 8 Types of assessment done by
- Page 52 and 53: 9.SCHOOL YEARS: LINGUISTIC ASSESSME
- Page 54 and 55: 9.3. LATE DIAGNOSISThe cochlear imp
- Page 56 and 57: 9.7. ASSESSMENTS OF LINGUISTIC STRA
- Page 58 and 59: 10.SCHOOL YEARS: ACCESS ISSUES10.1.
- Page 60 and 61:
10.2. STAFFING ISSUES10.2.1.THE ToD
- Page 62 and 63:
10.4. ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENTSThe Disa
- Page 64 and 65:
CHART 9 Instances of special arrang
- Page 66 and 67:
CHART 11 Instances of special arran
- Page 68 and 69:
■■■■■■There is a need f
- Page 70 and 71:
The wide range of types of informat
- Page 72 and 73:
A ToD currently visits three times
- Page 74 and 75:
12.2. THE NUMBER OF DEAF STUDENTS I
- Page 76 and 77:
Table 14 compares selected qualific
- Page 78 and 79:
Table 16 All students* 2001/2002-20
- Page 80 and 81:
CHART 13 Age groups of deaf/hearing
- Page 82 and 83:
13.THE NUMBER OF PROFESSIONALS WHOP
- Page 84 and 85:
■■ways in which the current str
- Page 86 and 87:
They all indicated some kind of fas
- Page 88 and 89:
■■■■■■More staff are op
- Page 90 and 91:
15.ISSUES RELEVANT TO BOTH FE ANDHE
- Page 92 and 93:
It is known that it can sometimes b
- Page 94 and 95:
The Association of Notetakers does
- Page 96 and 97:
Bearing this in mind, between 200 a
- Page 98 and 99:
Qualifications relating to other ta
- Page 100 and 101:
Communication Support Workers■ Th
- Page 102 and 103:
One college, which attracts a high
- Page 104 and 105:
Table 22 Deaf/HI FE student enrolme
- Page 106 and 107:
■■■■■■■■All college
- Page 108 and 109:
The validation processCurrently, 30
- Page 110 and 111:
A related issue is the lack of stan
- Page 112 and 113:
■■There is a need for robust qu
- Page 114 and 115:
19.FULL LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONSTHE
- Page 116 and 117:
7.2. OTHER PROFESSIONALS■There is
- Page 118 and 119:
■■■■■■■■■■There
- Page 120 and 121:
■Equality Forward’s ‘Deaf Stu
- Page 122 and 123:
■There is anecdotal evidence that
- Page 124 and 125:
Knoors, H. (2007) ‘Educational Re
- Page 126 and 127:
Scottish Parliament (2006) ‘Acces
- Page 128 and 129:
APPENDIX 2GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS CO
- Page 130 and 131:
) Competency in BSL/English interpr
- Page 132 and 133:
The word ‘deaf’ is used through
- Page 134 and 135:
APPENDIX 5RELEVANT SQA QUALIFICATIO
- Page 136 and 137:
APPENDIX 7PROPOSED SQA QUALIFICATIO