Marginal Rail Infrastructure Costs in Finland 1997 ... - Liikennevirasto

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12KOLARI0.8ROVANIEMI1.00.1KELLOSELKÄ4.1KEMIJÄRVITORNIO1.0RÖYTTÄLAURILA3.47.5KEMI7.1OULUPESIÖKYLÄ0.3KASKINENMÄNTYLUOTORAUMAUUSIKAUPUNKIVAASA2.56.214.21.5 0.84.01.9KOKKOLAPIETARSAARIPORI1.72.11.5PARKANO9.7KOKEMÄKIRAISIONAANTALITURKULIELAHTI6.4HANKO4.52.211.111.112.5KARJAAPÄNNÄINENSEINÄJOKI12.7 2.622.714.028.6TOIJALARAAHEHAAPAMÄKI2.92.6VILPPULA4.24.912.10.31.020.1RIIHIMÄKIKERAVA4.212.5YLIVIESKA1.2TUOMIOJA2.6HAAPAJÄRVISAARIJÄRVIMÄNTTÄ10.2TAMPERE ORIVESIVALKEAKOSKI24.816.1KIRKKONUMMIHELSINKIFigure 3.1. Finnish rail network and gross tonnes carried (million) on lines in 2005(excluding electrically powered commuter trains; Finnish Rail Administration)1.18.76.43.821.80.77.23.318.87.62.3JÄMSÄNKOSKILAHTI0.6HYVINKÄÄ17.01.4PYHÄKUMPUJYVÄSKYLÄHEINOLAMIKKELIKONTIOMÄKI2.36.23.66.7SIILINJÄRVI6.5KUOPIOPYHÄ-SALMIPIEKSÄ-MÄKI7.43.66.027.6KOUVOLA14.67.13.30.20.310.41.3IISALMILUUMÄKIJUURIKORPIHAMINAKOTKASKÖLDVIK LOVIISA4.3VUOKATTI2.011.41.916.90.8VIINIJÄRVIVARKAUSHUUTOKOSKISAVONLINNA5.84.00.8VARTIUSNURMES1.211.21.5UIMAHARJUILOMANTSI5.65.0IMATRALAPPEENRANTAVAINIKKALALIEKSAJOENSUUPARIKKALA0.4SÄKÄNIEMI6.5NIIRALA
13Table 3.3 presents technical features of track sections available in registers. There areseveral variables available for describing technical quality and service levels. As theresults in section 4 indicate, the potential performance of many of the variables hasnot necessarily been revealed yet, and opportunities remain for further research.Table 3.3. Technical and quality features of track sectionsVariableLength of track section(geographical)Length of tracks on sectionMultiple tracksElectrificationTechnical quality/level of serviceSwitchesMaximum axle loadMaximum speedIndicatorkilometrekilometre (with multiple tracks accounted for)numberyes/noe.g. classification of materials by technical vintage, conditionindex, service level categoriesnumbertonnesspeed limitVariable costs include following undertakings on track sections:• Maintenance consists of daily maintenance, repairs and on-calls. Also, smallscale replacements of structures, equipment and devices are included.• Renewals consist of extensive renewing of structures, equipment and devices,which are at the end of their technical and/or economic life-cycle.Table 3.4 presents the annual volumes of variable infrastructure costs in the data astotals for all track sections. The volume of costs varies from year to year mainly dueto changes in the budget, but also e.g. cost efficiency targets have an impact.Depending on the year, also e.g. stations and marshalling yards may have a largeremphasis in renewal programs leaving less budget for renewals on lines.It must be noted, that variable infrastructure costs on lines are a fraction of the totalbudget of the Rail Administration. For example in 2005, the total budget was M€ 495(including new investments).Table 3.4. Variable costs on track sections in this study (M€ in prices of 2005)M€ 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Maintenance 80 74 73 54 57 58 74 80 60Renewals 175 194 158 130 105 122 84 102 97Total 255 268 231 184 162 180 158 182 157
Page 1: A 3/2007Marginal Rail Infrastructur
Page 4 and 5: Finnish Rail AdministrationPublicat
Page 6 and 7: 4Tervonen, Juha & Pekkarinen, Saara
Page 8: 6Table of Contents1 INTRODUCTION...
Page 11 and 12: 93 General description of the metho
Page 13: 11(Table 3.2, Figure 3.1). The leng
Page 17 and 18: 15The CD is a restricted case of th
Page 19 and 20: 17The level of renewals apparently
Page 21 and 22: 19The cost elasticity with respect
Page 23 and 24: 215 Review of methodology and resul
Page 25: 23ANNEX 1Track sections in the Finn
Page 30: Publisher:Finnish Rail Administrati

Marginal Rail Infrastructure Costs in Finland 1997 ... - Liikennevirasto

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?