and other physico-chemical variables are less suited to the presence <strong>of</strong> these organisms. Thus,even though several taxa in Oregon streams can be strong indicators <strong>of</strong> perennial flow, members<strong>of</strong> these families will not always be present in every perennial stream, depending on theecoregion, elevation, substrate, canopy, types <strong>of</strong> surrounding landscape uses, etc.Existing modelsIntermittent and especially ephemeral streams are <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked and undervalued <strong>as</strong> habitatfor aquatic invertebrates and other organisms, and few biological <strong>as</strong>sessment techniques takeinhabitants <strong>of</strong> temporary flowing waters into account. Rapid field-b<strong>as</strong>ed tools that distinguishreliably between ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams are critically needed butchallenging to develop. For example, different rapid habitat <strong>as</strong>sessment protocols used inforested headwater streams in several e<strong>as</strong>tern and Midwestern states consistently identifiedephemeral channels, but were significantly less accurate at distinguishing between intermittentand perennial streams (Fritz et al., 2008).OhioDetailed invertebrate sampling and sample preservation techniques for use in headwater streampermanence <strong>as</strong>sessment have been developed by the EPA (Fitz et al., 2006). <strong>Aquatic</strong>macroinvertebrate metrics have been created <strong>as</strong> part <strong>of</strong> a rapid <strong>as</strong>sessment protocol for primaryheadwater streams in Ohio, which are generally small, have shallow pools (generally
North Carolina<strong>Aquatic</strong> macroinvertebrates are included in methodology developed to determine flow durationin North Carolina streams (NC Division <strong>of</strong> Water Quality, 2005). A recommended list <strong>of</strong>perennial taxa h<strong>as</strong> been generated, the majority <strong>of</strong> which are mayflies, caddisflies, and stoneflies,in addition to a few families <strong>of</strong> true flies, beetles, and mollusks. Several <strong>of</strong> the recommendedperennial indicator families, such <strong>as</strong> water penny beetle larvae, riffle beetles, and freshwatermollusks, have also been shown to be more common in or restricted to perennial waters instudies detailed above, and the larger number <strong>of</strong> EPT families considered <strong>as</strong> perennial indicatorsagrees with the overall higher proportion <strong>of</strong> EPT found in perennial waters in other studies.However, several <strong>of</strong> the individual EPT families specified <strong>as</strong> perennial indicators contain generaand/or species that can be considered facultative in Oregon and are not perennial-obligate; some,such <strong>as</strong> the limnephilid caddisflies, are known to have life history adaptations that allowexploitation <strong>of</strong> temporary habitats (Clifford, 1966; Tew, 1971; Wiggins, 1973; Mackay &Wiggins, 1979; Anderson & Dieterich, 1992).For the <strong>as</strong>sessment process, diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> benthic macroinvertebrates found atdifferent ranges <strong>of</strong> search effort is recorded, with rankings <strong>of</strong> “absent”, (no macroinvertebrates),weak (macroinvertebrates observed after intensive searching, i.e. >10 min.), moderate(macroinvertebrates observed after moderate searching, i.e. >1-2 min.), or strong(macroinvertebrates found e<strong>as</strong>ily). The procedure recommends sampling a variety <strong>of</strong> habitats,though little methodology is given, and alternative sampling methods for high flow versus lowflow conditions are not addressed. The stated sampling effort times are low, and are thusunlikely to allow representative sampling <strong>of</strong> different habitats within a stream reach, especiallyby practitioners who are not trained <strong>as</strong> entomologists, which could result in a skewed rating. TheFairfax County Perennial <strong>Stream</strong> Mapping Project (VA) uses a stream identification methodb<strong>as</strong>ed on the North Carolina protocol(www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/watersheds/ps_protocols.pdf) , but because mostmacroinvertebrates are identified only to order in this <strong>as</strong>sessment, they are considered to be onlya secondary indicator <strong>of</strong> stream type.<strong>Macroinvertebrates</strong> in Oregon stream duration <strong>as</strong>sessmentTaxonomic considerationsIn the majority <strong>of</strong> stream duration studies, taxa indicated <strong>as</strong> predominant in a given stream typeare identified to genus or species level. Identification to the family level, although it can be donefairly rapidly in the field, introduces an unavoidable <strong>as</strong>pect <strong>of</strong> uncertainty. For example,indicator species analyses performed on macroinvertebrates in 20 streams in the Central OregonCo<strong>as</strong>t Range found that Dolophilodes, a genus <strong>of</strong> caddisfly in the family Philopotamidae, w<strong>as</strong>found most commonly in perennial streams, but Wormaldia caddisflies, a genus that is also in thefamily Philopotamidae, were <strong>as</strong>sociated with intermittent sites (Banks, 2005). The need toidentify macroinvertebrates to family for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the Oregon <strong>as</strong>sessment tool will notallow the variety <strong>of</strong> genus- and species-level differences in life history traits to be taken intoaccount. In addition, estimates <strong>of</strong> taxa richness will be lower, since multiple species may bepresent within a single family or order within a stream. For example, a study <strong>of</strong> intermittentstreams in western Oregon (Dieterich, 1992) found the highest species richness comprised bymembers <strong>of</strong> just a single family, the Tipulidae (crane flies); the same study found that caddisflies<strong>Macroinvertebrates</strong> <strong>as</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> stream flow duration,The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation13
- Page 1 and 2: Using Aquatic Macroinvertebratesas
- Page 3 and 4: GoalsThe goal of this project is to
- Page 5 and 6: supported different macroinvertebra
- Page 7 and 8: that some studies have found simila
- Page 9 and 10: DispersalAdult invertebrates with s
- Page 11: majority of all caddisflies collect
- Page 15 and 16: Amphipoda), water mites (subclass H
- Page 17 and 18: ScoringThe current Oregon Draft Str
- Page 20 and 21: To sample riffle or run/glide habit
- Page 22 and 23: However, the degree of dryness in b
- Page 24 and 25: Boulton A.J. & Lake P.S. 1992b. Ben
- Page 26 and 27: Li, J., Herlihy, A., Gerth, W., Kau
- Page 28 and 29: Williams, D. D., 1996. Environmenta
- Page 30 and 31: shelter and to filter organic parti
- Page 32 and 33: • Dytiscidae (predaceous diving b