11.07.2015 Views

case no. 501/1997 - Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction

case no. 501/1997 - Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction

case no. 501/1997 - Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case No. <strong>501</strong>/<strong>1997</strong>M/a Hindustan Antibiotics Ltdd) In <strong>case</strong> the company fails to make the payment of arrears of sales taxdu es till fin a n cia l yea r 2004-05 <strong>for</strong>th with a m ou n tin g toRs.28,84,67,443/- (excluding interest and penalties) as per the termsof th e SS-07, th e Sa les Ta x Depa rtm en t, Sta te of Ma h a ra s h tra b ea llowed to ta ke coercive a ction a ga in s t M/ s .Hin du s ta n An tibioticsLtd. <strong>for</strong> th e recovery of th e s a les ta x du es of Sta te of Ma h arashtra(in clu din g in teres t a n d pen a lties ) u n der th e provis ion s of BST Act,1959.e) In ca s e th e du es a s per a s s es s m en t orders <strong>for</strong> th e period 2003-04,2004-05 a n d 2005-06 a re n ot con s idered u n der DRS by th e Hon bleBoa rd, th ey be con s idered ou ts ide DRS. Specific order is s oliciteda n d Sa les Ta x Deptt., Govern m en t of Ma h a ra s h tra be a llowed to ta kerecovery a ction a ga in s t M/ s .Hin du s ta n An tibiotics Ltd. <strong>for</strong> th erecovery of s a les ta x du es u n der th e provis ion s of BST Act, 1959 a sarrears of land revenue.1.7 In th e h ea rin g h eld on 2.12.2011 to h ea r MA Nos.6 6 8 & 6 7 3 , th eBench issued the following directions :-(a) Th e Com pa n y is directed to file a written s u bm is s ion s wh y a n a ctionu n der s ection of 33 of SICA be in itia ted a ga in s t th e Boa rd ofDirectors of th e com pa n y <strong>for</strong> n ot followin g th e ASC Gu id elin es , a scla im ed by th e a pplica n t com pa n y M/ s EIPL in Mis c. Applica tion(No.668/2011), within a period of one month with copy to MA (IDBI).(b) M/ s Ellora In fra s tru ctu re Pvt. Ltd (EIPL) is directed to file ca s e lawsupportin g th eir locu s -s ta n d i th a t on ce th e biddin g com pa n y onencashing the returned cheque of EMD continues to remain bidder.(c) MA (IDBI) is directed to file a deta iled report on th e is s u es ra is ed byth e a pplica n t com pa n y M/ s EIPL in Mis c. Applica tion(No.668/2011), within a period of one month.(d) PF Depa rtm en t is directed to a tten d n ext h ea rin g be<strong>for</strong>e th e Boa rd,with ou t fa il. PF Depa rtm en t is a ls o directed to file writtens u bm is s ion s with rega rd to is s u es ra is ed in Mis c. Applica tionNo.673/ 2011 filed by th e com pa n y with in a period of two weeks withcopy to MA (IDBI) and the Company.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!