m/s. shah alloys ltd. summary record of the proceeding - Board for ...
m/s. shah alloys ltd. summary record of the proceeding - Board for ...
m/s. shah alloys ltd. summary record of the proceeding - Board for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
BOARD FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION<br />
CASE NO. 1 3/2010 : M/S. SHAH ALLOYS LTD.<br />
SUMMARY RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HEARING HELD<br />
ON 23.04.2012 BEFORE BENCH CONSISTING OF<br />
SHRI NIRMAL SINGH, CHAIRMAN AND SHRI Y.K.GAIHA, MEMBER<br />
BENCH<br />
I<br />
Present<br />
M/s. Shah Alloys Ltd.<br />
UBI<br />
SBI<br />
BOB<br />
IDBI<br />
PNB<br />
BOM<br />
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd.<br />
OBC<br />
IOB<br />
Name and Designation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Representative S/Shri/Ms<br />
Vivek Sibal, Advocate<br />
R.V.Shah, CMD<br />
Dr. H. M. Parikh, Consultant<br />
Yashpal Mehta, Fin. Consultant<br />
B Ghosh, Director<br />
Chandrashekhar Paliwal, AGM<br />
Dhiren Jain, CM<br />
Jay Kan Prasad, DGM<br />
Anil Tiwari, Advocate<br />
J.C.Patel, Chief Manager<br />
Neha Rastogi, Officer<br />
Ranjitha Godbole, GM<br />
Imran Khan, Manager<br />
Surinder Kumar, Sr. Manager<br />
Gaurav Tyagi, Law Officer<br />
A. Gopinath, AGM<br />
M. Balachandran, DGM<br />
N.K. Grover, DCM<br />
Inder Singh, Sr. Manager<br />
*****<br />
1.1 Ba s ed on its a u dited ba la n ce s h eet (ABS) a s on 30.9.2008 M/ s . Shah<br />
Alloys Ltd . filed a referen ce with BIFR u / s 15(1) <strong>of</strong> SICA. Th e referen ce wa s<br />
ta ken u p <strong>for</strong> con s idera tion s o a s to determ in e th e s ta tu s <strong>of</strong> com pa n y s<br />
1
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
s ickn es s on 31.5.2010 a n d 5.7.2010. In th e h ea rin g h eld on 31.8.2010, th e<br />
Ben ch decla red th e com pa n y a s a s ick in du s tria l com pa n y u / s 3(1)(o) <strong>of</strong><br />
SICA a n d a ppoin ted Un ion Ba n k <strong>of</strong> In dia (UBI) a s Opera tin g Agen cy u / s<br />
17(3) <strong>of</strong> SICA to prepa re a Dra ft Reh a bilita tion Sch em e (DRS) <strong>for</strong> th e<br />
com pa n y, a s per Section 18 <strong>of</strong> SICA a n d th e en clos ed gu idelin es , based on<br />
<strong>the</strong> DRS to be submitted by <strong>the</strong> company.<br />
1.2 The hearing in <strong>the</strong> case was held on 30.11.2011(MA) be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong>.<br />
1.3 In <strong>the</strong> last hearing held on 17.01.2012, <strong>the</strong> Bench issued <strong>the</strong> following<br />
directions :-<br />
(i) OA (UBI) to file a copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy report to th e Boa rd s <strong>of</strong>fice with in<br />
a period <strong>of</strong> 15 days, with copies to all secured creditors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company.<br />
(ii) Th e com pa n y to n egotia te with a ll s ecu red creditors <strong>for</strong> s ettlem en t <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir dues and submit DRS to <strong>the</strong> OA within 30 days.<br />
(iii) Th erea fter, UBI (OA) to con ven e a join t m eetin g <strong>of</strong> a ll con cern ed a n d<br />
s u bm it a fu lly tied-u p DRS b e<strong>for</strong>e th e Boa rd s <strong>of</strong>fice with in a period <strong>of</strong> 08<br />
weeks.<br />
(iv) Th e Ben ch Officer, Ben ch -I to delete th e n a m e <strong>of</strong> J in da l Steel & Power<br />
Ltd from <strong>the</strong> mailing list, as <strong>the</strong>y are unsecured creditors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company.<br />
(v) The next hearing in <strong>the</strong> case will be held on 24.04.2012.<br />
2.1 In toda y s h ea rin g (23.04.2012), th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> Un ion Ba n k <strong>of</strong><br />
In dia (UBI) (OA) s ta ted th a t TEV Stu dy report h a s been received on ly on<br />
16.04.2012. OA (UBI) will convene a joint meeting <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> lenders and will<br />
s u bm it its report with in a period <strong>of</strong> on e m on th . On a query from <strong>the</strong> Bench<br />
w h eth er th e com pan y h as en tered in to s ettlem en t <strong>of</strong> its d ues , th e<br />
repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> OA (UBI) s ta ted th a t th ey a re n ot a wa re <strong>of</strong> a n y s u ch<br />
settlement whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> company has done.<br />
2.2 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> SBI s ta ted th a t th ey h a d filed a n a pplica tion in<br />
which certa in objection were ra is ed. He a dded th a t in th e Con cu rren t<br />
Au ditors Report, it wa s observed th a t th e com pa n y du rin g two qu a rters<br />
2
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
en din g Sep 2011 a n d Dec 2011 h a s pa id Rs .30.6 9 crores to grou p company<br />
(M/ s SAL Steels Ltd). Th e s a id pa ym en t were m a de in two in s ta llm en ts <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs .15.00 crores in Sep 2011 a n d a n oth er <strong>of</strong> Rs .15.69 crores in Dec 2011.<br />
These payments were m a de to M/ s SAL Steels Ltd on a ccou n t <strong>of</strong> less<br />
con s u m ption <strong>of</strong> power produ ced by M/ s SAL Steels Ltd. He a dded th a t a s<br />
per th e a greem en t en tered between th e s ick com pa n y a n d M/ s SAL Steels<br />
Ltd in 2005-06, th e s ick com pa n y is requ ired to pa y a tota l a m ou n t <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs .62.00 crores <strong>for</strong> towa rds les s dra wa l <strong>of</strong> power by th e s ick com pa n y. Ou t<br />
<strong>of</strong> th is Rs .62.00 crores , th e s ick com pa n y h a s a lrea dy pa id Rs .30.69 crores .<br />
Th e s ick com pa n y did n ot s h a re th is in <strong>for</strong>m a tion a bou t such agreement<br />
between th e s ick com pa n y a n d M/ s SAL Steel Ltd with th e Ba n ks a n d on ly<br />
recen tly on Feb 2012 th is lia bility wa s obs erved th rou gh Con cu rren t<br />
Au ditors report. Th u s , s u ch pa ym en t <strong>of</strong> du es to grou p com pa n ies a m ou n ts<br />
to divergen ce <strong>of</strong> fu n ds .<br />
Fu rth er, th e s ick com pa n y h a s in ves ted a pprox<br />
Rs .95.00 crores in M/ s SAL Steel Ltd during 2005-06. However, in term s <strong>of</strong><br />
CDR pa ck a ge, M/ s SAL Steel Ltd wa s requ ired to pa y ba ck Rs .15.00 crores<br />
to th e s ick com pa n y every yea r from FY 2010, wh erea s , th e s ick com pa n y<br />
h a s a lrea dy pa id M/ s SAL Steel Ltd a s u m <strong>of</strong> Rs .30.69 crores . No<br />
permission was taken from <strong>the</strong> secured creditors. On a qu ery from <strong>the</strong> Bench<br />
w h eth er S BI w ou ld lik e to file w ritten s ubm is s ion s on th e line <strong>of</strong> s ubm is s ion s<br />
m ad e in <strong>the</strong> hearin g, th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> SBI a greed a n d s ta ted th a t th ey<br />
will file written s u bm is s ion s brin gin g ou t th eir objection s with in a period <strong>of</strong><br />
two weeks.<br />
2.3 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> Ba n k <strong>of</strong> Ba roda (BOB) s ta ted th a t th ey received<br />
th e copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy report on ly on 16.04.2012. OA (UBI) be directed to<br />
convene a joint meeting at <strong>the</strong> earliest.<br />
2.4 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> IDBI s ta ted th a t th e tota l expos u re <strong>of</strong> a ll <strong>the</strong><br />
Ba n ks a n d In s titu tion in th e com pa n y a m ou n ts to Rs .614.00 crores plu s a n<br />
interest <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>. She added that <strong>the</strong>y support <strong>the</strong> objection raised by SBI on<br />
th e ba s is <strong>of</strong> Con cu rren t Au ditors Report. Sh e a dded th e en tire tra n s a ction<br />
lea ds to divers ion <strong>of</strong> fu n ds . Th e com pa n y h a s a lrea dy s ou gh t two<br />
3
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
res tru ctu rin g u n der CDR pa ck a ge i.e. in 2006 a n d 2009. Sh e requ es ted <strong>the</strong><br />
Ben ch th a t even th ou gh TEV Stu dy report h a s been received, IDBI requ es ts<br />
th a t a n SIA (Special In ves tiga tive Au dit) be con du cted on th e a ccou n ts <strong>of</strong><br />
th e com pa n y on th e lin e <strong>of</strong> ca s h flow, debts etc. Th e com pa n y is s h owin g<br />
h u ge debts ou t <strong>of</strong> wh ich a pprox 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se debts perta in s to th ree tra de<br />
creditors , wh ich looks like th ey a re group companies or gen eric com pa n y,<br />
wh ich n eeds to be a s certa in ed.<br />
In terven in g, th e ld a dvoca te represen tin g<br />
th e com pa n y s u bm itted IDBI n eed to file a ppropria te MA a pplica tion<br />
rega rdin g th is .<br />
regarding this.<br />
Ben ch observed th a t IDBI ca n a ls o file written s u bm is s ion s<br />
2.5 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> Pu n ja b Na tion a l Ba n k (PNB) s ta ted th a t th ey<br />
had received <strong>the</strong> copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Study report on 19.04.2012. PNB will analysis<br />
and submit its comments in <strong>the</strong> joint lenders meeting.<br />
2.6 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> Ba n k <strong>of</strong> Ma h a ra s h tra (BOM) s ta ted th a t <strong>the</strong>y<br />
received th e copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy report yes terda y a n d will s u bm it its<br />
comments in <strong>the</strong> joint lenders meeting, after analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
2.7 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> Ka ru r Vya s a Ba n k Ltd (KVBL) s ta ted th a t th ey<br />
received <strong>the</strong> copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Study report only recently.<br />
2.8 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> Orien ta l Ba n k <strong>of</strong> Com m erce (OBC) s ta ted th a t<br />
th ey h a d n ot received th e copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy report till da te. Th e ld<br />
a dvoca te repres en tin g th e com pa n y s ta ted th a t th e com pa n y h a s a lrea dy<br />
sent to all <strong>the</strong> creditors. The Bench obs erved th at a copy <strong>of</strong> TEV S tud y report<br />
to be provided to OBC.<br />
2.9 Th e repres en ta tive <strong>of</strong> IOB s ta ted th a t th e Ba n k h a s in ves ted in Bon ds<br />
and go by <strong>the</strong> stand <strong>of</strong> OA (UBI).<br />
2.10 Th e ld a dvoca te repres en tin g th e com pa n y s ta ted th a t M/ s MECON<br />
Ltd h a s con du cted th e TEV Stu dy a n d s u bm itted its report. Th e com pa n y,<br />
4
5<br />
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
in s pite <strong>of</strong> direction to OA (UBI) to circu la te a copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy report, th e<br />
com pa n y h a s circu la ted th e copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy report to a ll th e s ecu red<br />
creditors on 16.04.2012.<br />
In th e TEV Stu dy report, on pa ge 9, it is n oted<br />
that th e s ch em e is tech n ica lly a n d fin a n cia lly via ble. Th e ld a dvoca te<br />
repres en tin g th e com pa n y a dded th a t th e com pa n y a grees with th e view<br />
s u bm itted by IDBI th a t two CDR pa cka ge were fa iled a n d TEV Stu dy report<br />
h a s <strong>record</strong>ed th is rea s on s <strong>of</strong> CDR fa ilu re. Th e report its elf s h ows th a t th e<br />
com pa n y h a s followed a ll th e com m itm en t, wh erea s Ba n ks did n ot s ta n d to<br />
th e com m itm en t <strong>of</strong> both CDR package.<br />
IDBI wa s ta lkin g a bou t th ree<br />
creditors , th e tota l ou ts ta n d in g a ga in s t th es e th ree tra de creditors on ly<br />
a m ou n ts to Rs .90.00 la kh s a s a ga in s t th e tota l ou ts ta n din g <strong>of</strong> Rs .50.0 0<br />
crores . Th e a llega tion <strong>of</strong> th e s ick com pa n y givin g m on ey to grou p com pa n y<br />
M/ s SAL Steels Ltd is pu rely in term s <strong>of</strong> th e Power pu rch a s e agreement<br />
en tered by th e s ick com pa n y in 2005-06, wh erein , M/ s SAL Steels Ltd<br />
ca n n ot s ell th e power a lrea dy ea rm a rked <strong>for</strong> th e s ick com pa n y to a n y th ird<br />
pa rty. At th e s a m e tim e, if th e s ick com pa n y does n ot con s u m e its requ ired<br />
u tiliza tion , th e s ick com pa n y will pa y fixed ch a rges over th e s a m e. Th e ld<br />
a dvoca te a dded th a t s in ce SBI is goin g to s u bm it a written s u bm is s ion s on<br />
th e s u bm is s ion s m a de in th e h ea rin g, th e com pan y will file its reply to th e<br />
written s u bm is s ion s <strong>of</strong> SBI. On a query from <strong>the</strong> Bench abou t th e w ork ing <strong>of</strong><br />
th e com pan y , th e ld a dvoca te repres en tin g th e com pa n y s ta ted th a t th e<br />
com pa n y h a s a ch ieved a tu rn over <strong>of</strong> Rs .850.00 crores in th e FY 2011-2012<br />
a t a n 30% ca pa city u tiliza tion . Th e com pa n y is m a kin g ca s h los s <strong>of</strong> a pprox<br />
Rs.100.00 crores <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> year. The company currently employs approx 3000<br />
workers . La s tly, th e ld a dvoca te drew th e a tten tion <strong>of</strong> th e Ben ch to th e fa ct<br />
th a t in s pite <strong>of</strong> TEV Stu dy con du cted a t th e in s ta n ce <strong>of</strong> len ders , SBI h a s<br />
a ga in is s u ed n otice u / s 13(2) <strong>of</strong> SARFEASI Act, 2002 vide th eir letter da ted<br />
14.02.2012 received on 16.02.2012. He a ls o a dded th a t SBI is h oldin g les s<br />
th a n 75% <strong>of</strong> th e s ecu red debts .<br />
Th e ld a dvoca te fu rth er a dded th a t th e<br />
la bou r on s eein g th is n otice h a s gon e to Labour Cou rt <strong>of</strong> Gu ja ra t a n d<br />
Labour Cou rt <strong>of</strong> Gu ja ra t h a s is s u ed a n in ju n ction , th a t la bou r h a s <strong>the</strong> first<br />
ch a rge on th e s a le <strong>of</strong> a n y a s s ets by th e com pa n y. Th e ld a dvoca te fu rth er<br />
a dded th a t du e to th is a ct <strong>of</strong> SBI, reh a bilita tion proces s h a s been
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
des ta bilized a n d lea d to grea t la bou r u n res t in th e com pa n y. Th e company<br />
has not been able to pay <strong>the</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 3-4 months.<br />
2.11 Ha vin g con s idered th e s u bm is s ion s m a de in th e h ea rin g a n d m a teria l<br />
on <strong>record</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Bench issued <strong>the</strong> following directions :-<br />
(a) OA (UBI) to con ven e a join t m eetin g a n d s u bm it a fu lly tied-up<br />
DRS, a fter exa m in in g th e TEV Stu dy report s u bm itted by MECON Ltd<br />
to th e Boa rd <strong>of</strong>fice a n d OA with in a period <strong>of</strong> 45 da ys , a s a greed in<br />
<strong>the</strong> hearing.<br />
(b) Sta te Ba n k <strong>of</strong> In dia (SBI) to file written s u bm is s ion s on th e<br />
objection ra is ed by th e con cu rren t Au ditors Report, a s a greed in th e<br />
hearing, with in a period <strong>of</strong> two weeks with copy to OA (UBI) a n d th e<br />
company. Th erea fter, th e com pa n y to file its reply on th e written<br />
s u bm is s ion s <strong>of</strong> SBI, if a n y, with in a fu rth er period <strong>of</strong> two weeks with<br />
copy to SBI and OA (UBI).<br />
(c) IDBI to file written submissions as agreed in <strong>the</strong> hearing, if <strong>the</strong>y<br />
wis h rega rdin g SIA, with in a period <strong>of</strong> 15 da ys with copy to OA (UBI)<br />
a n d th e com pa n y. Th erea fter, th e com pa n y to file its reply on th e<br />
written s u bm is s ion s <strong>of</strong> SBI with in a fu rth er period <strong>of</strong> two weeks with<br />
copy to IDBI and OA (UBI).<br />
(d)<br />
Th e com pa n y to n egotia te a n d en ter in to s ettlem en t with a ll th e<br />
secured creditors.<br />
(e)<br />
Th e com pa n y to file copy <strong>of</strong> th e order <strong>of</strong> Labour Cou rt <strong>of</strong><br />
Gujarat, on <strong>the</strong> injunction order in respect <strong>of</strong> workers within 15 days.<br />
6
Case No..13/2010<br />
M/S Shah Alloys Ltd<br />
(f)<br />
The company to provide a copy <strong>of</strong> TEV Study report to OBC.<br />
(g) The next date <strong>of</strong> hearing in this case is fixed on 13.08.2012.<br />
(YK GAIHA)<br />
MEMBER<br />
(NIRMAL SINGH)<br />
CHAIRMAN<br />
7