11.07.2015 Views

Résumés du XXXIIIe Congrès International de droit et de santé ...

Résumés du XXXIIIe Congrès International de droit et de santé ...

Résumés du XXXIIIe Congrès International de droit et de santé ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Roberto Catanesi, University of Bari (roberto.catanesi@uniba.it)Gabriele Rocca, University of Genoa (gabriele.rocca@unige.it)This article aims to in<strong>du</strong>ce reflection upon the criminogenesis and criminodynamics of sexualoffenses committed through the use of the intern<strong>et</strong>. To this end, we have taken as a starting pointour experience in an expert witness case study. The case that came to our attention was that ofthe pro<strong>du</strong>ction and Web release of pedo-pornographic material, and sexual violence againstun<strong>de</strong>rage disabled children. The offen<strong>de</strong>r is a young support teacher affected by a sexual statusclassifiable as a Hypersexual Disor<strong>de</strong>r (Kafka, 1994) in Intern<strong>et</strong> Addiction (Orzack, 2000). Hestarted to spend longer and longer hours navigating the Web and finally became compl<strong>et</strong>elyaddicted. His sexual conditions were entirely absorbed by the pedo-pornographic films he saw onthe intern<strong>et</strong>, and to obtain other films from the pedophiles circle, he was in<strong>du</strong>ced to pro<strong>du</strong>ce newpedo-pornographic material himself, for release on the intern<strong>et</strong>. During the trial, the judgescommissioned an expert forensic psychiatry opinion. The intern<strong>et</strong> can be a “liberating”, rapidaccess m<strong>et</strong>hod through which to express the symptoms of a condition of “pathological sexuality”(Krafft-Ebbing, 1965). In literature, an “Intern<strong>et</strong> Addiction” has been shown to be correlatedwith some pre-existing personality traits (Kraut <strong>et</strong> al, 2002; Young, Rogers, 1998).How Do People Change? Results from a RCT on Manualized TreatmentFaye Taxman, George Mason University (ftaxman@gmu.e<strong>du</strong>)Criminogenic needs have been <strong>de</strong>fined as a s<strong>et</strong> of dynamic characteristics of offen<strong>de</strong>rs that areknown to affect offending behaviors. Andrews and Bonta (2010) i<strong>de</strong>ntified the followingcriminogenic needs as important to re<strong>du</strong>cing offending behavior: substance use, anti-socialcognition, anti-social associates, family and marital relations, employment, and leisure andrecreational activities. This study relies on panel data to examine short-term changes in thesedynamic criminogenic needs and i<strong>de</strong>ntifies which need changes have the greatest impact oncriminal offending and illicit drug use among a sample of drug-involved probationers whoparticipated in a 12-month randomized controlled trial (N=251). A series of repeated-measureANOVAs found that clients changed significantly over the time period in several need areas, butsome changes were bi-directional. Generalized estimating equation analyses found thatprobationers who re<strong>du</strong>ced the number of criminally-involved friends, enhanced their workperformance, and <strong>de</strong>creased their frequency of alcohol and drug use had the greatest re<strong>du</strong>ction inself-reported criminal activity. In addition, those who had a <strong>de</strong>crease in the number ofcriminally-involved peers and a re<strong>du</strong>ction in alcohol use days were significantly less likely toself-report drug use over time. These findings suggest that certain dynamic need changes may bemore important for facilitating re<strong>du</strong>ctions in crime and drug use among probationers than others,and that <strong>de</strong>signing interventions to impact these criminogenic needs might improve offen<strong>de</strong>routcomes.25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!