11.07.2015 Views

Résumés du XXXIIIe Congrès International de droit et de santé ...

Résumés du XXXIIIe Congrès International de droit et de santé ...

Résumés du XXXIIIe Congrès International de droit et de santé ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Self-Regulation of Addiction-Related Complaints: A Study of Nurses in aDisciplinary JurisdictionDiane Kunyk, University of Alberta (diane.kunyk@ualberta.ca)Addiction is a bona fi<strong>de</strong> medical condition expressed amongst some members of mostoccupations and professions. When it occurs within the health professions, there are profoundsaf<strong>et</strong>y implications for patients receiving care — and to the health of the highly skilled andvalued health professional. When self-regulating, the health professions are responsible forensuring that their members <strong>de</strong>livery safe and <strong>et</strong>hical care. Given their pe<strong>de</strong>stal status in thecommunity, the management of addiction amongst the health professions provi<strong>de</strong>s anopportunity to enact and mo<strong>de</strong>l their values regarding addiction and its treatment. Un<strong>de</strong>r thesame Health Professions Act in one Canadian province, handling of addiction-related complaintsappears incongruent b<strong>et</strong>ween disciplines. For physicians, a confi<strong>de</strong>ntial health program provi<strong>de</strong>sfor diagnosis and evi<strong>de</strong>nce-based, subsidized treatment followed by a monitoring program thatinclu<strong>de</strong>s random testing for relapse upon r<strong>et</strong>urn to work (for at least 5 years). Registered nurses,rather, are subject to a formal investigation of the complaint followed by a Hearing Tribunal to<strong>de</strong>termine guilt of unprofessional con<strong>du</strong>ct and sanctions. Informed by relational <strong>et</strong>hics, a studywas <strong>de</strong>signed to examine the situation of nurses as it relates to addiction. Findings raise questionsregarding the authenticity of professional discipline for <strong>de</strong>aling well with this issue.5. Addressing Difference: Recognise and Accept, Don’t DiscriminateDiscrimination: When is Refusal to Treat Appropriate?Andrew Alston, Flin<strong>de</strong>rs University (andrew.alston@flin<strong>de</strong>rs.e<strong>du</strong>.au)Discrimination is based on the recognition of difference. Some discrimination is acceptable, forexample, awarding a prize to the best performer in an exam. Other discrimination is unacceptableand usually unlawful, for example, when it is because of race, religion, sex, sexuality, maritalstatus, pregnancy, age or disability. When a health professional discriminates against a patient,there will usually be a stated reason. There may also be one or more un<strong>de</strong>rlying reasons. Usually,it is the un<strong>de</strong>rlying reasons and not the stated reasons that i<strong>de</strong>ntify wh<strong>et</strong>her con<strong>du</strong>ct isinappropriate. Examples of stated reasons are: Patient is obese; Patient is a smoker; Patient is analcoholic; Patient’s life style is inappropriate. Examples of un<strong>de</strong>rlying reasons are: Re<strong>du</strong>cedchance of recovery; Economy measures; Penalty for bad con<strong>du</strong>ct; Risk to patient; Personaldislike of the patient. When are un<strong>de</strong>rlying reasons inappropriate? How can they be i<strong>de</strong>ntified asthe real reasons for discrimination? What can patients do to avoid inappropriate discrimination orto seek redress when they have been inappropriately discriminated against?27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!