Integer Ambiguity Resolution For Precise Point Positioning

More documents

Recommendations

Info

WL– Uncalibrated Delay For FixingVI Hotine-Marussi‣ Results (Receivers Used: AOAD/ASH/TRM=5/3/1)Fixing Rate For All 93%, For Independent 99%Lower Fixing Rate 75% For CrossCorrel. ReceiversTRIM29659.00+ASHREC (100%) AOA/M_T+TRIMREC (76%)
Uncalibrated Delay --- Narrow-Lane(1)‣ Difference Of Narrow-Lane Between SatellitesnΔb( i,j,l)= b ( i)− b ( j)= Δδp+ Δnn( )nnlsat , i , ji , j , lVI Hotine-MarussiΔδpnsat , i , j=Δbn( i,j,l)− Δni , j , l‣ Constant ? NOTime/Position Dependent Bias, Up To 5cmGood Agreement Within A Time Interval
Page 1 and 2: VI Hotine-MarussiVI Hotine-Marussi
Page 3 and 4: Motivation (1)VI Hotine-Marussi‣
Page 5 and 6: Strategy For Very Huge NetworkVI Ho
Page 7 and 8: Precise Point PositioningVI Hotine-
Page 9 and 10: Ambiguity Fixing For LC Solution‣
Page 11 and 12: WL--Estimation Of Uncalibrated Dela
Page 13: WL- Uncalibrated Delay For Fixing
Page 17 and 18: Integer Ambiguity Substitution‣ D
Page 19 and 20: Validation (1)VI Hotine-Marussi‣
Page 21 and 22: Validation (3)VI Hotine-MarussiFixe

Integer Ambiguity Resolution For Precise Point Positioning

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?