11.07.2015 Views

Carotid Artery Endarterectomy vs. Stenting - WVU School of Medicine

Carotid Artery Endarterectomy vs. Stenting - WVU School of Medicine

Carotid Artery Endarterectomy vs. Stenting - WVU School of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation options◦ Duplex Doppler ultrasonography◦ <strong>Carotid</strong> Doppler ultrasonography◦ Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)◦ <strong>Carotid</strong> angiography (gold standard)• Not done as <strong>of</strong>ten because this is an invasiveprocedure associated with risk <strong>of</strong>ischemic/hemorrhagic event◦ Sensitivity/specificity <strong>of</strong> noninvasive teststo predict stenosis >70% is 83-86%/89-94%


To Screen or Not to ScreenCurrent recommendations◦ USPSTF: recommends against screeningfor asymptomatic carotid artery stenosisin the general populations◦ American Heart Association/AmericanStroke association: screening is unlikelycost effective.◦ The American Society <strong>of</strong> Neuroimaging:Screening for general population is notrecommended but may be considered forpatients older than 65years with riskfactors <strong>of</strong> vascular disease.


WHO TO TREAT◦ Treatment recommended for:• Asymptomatic pts with >60% stenosis• Symptomatic pts with >50% stenosis


<strong>Carotid</strong> <strong>Artery</strong> <strong>Endarterectomy</strong>◦ Performed through neckincision, usually alongsternocleidomastoidmuscle◦ Proximal and distalcontrol <strong>of</strong> artery isobtained◦ While patient isheparinized, internal andexternal carotid arteriesare clamped◦ Longitudinal arteriotomyis performed, carotidplaque is removed, andvessel is closed over apatch


<strong>Carotid</strong> <strong>Artery</strong> <strong>Stenting</strong>◦ Catheter withumbrella tip isinserted through thefemoral artery◦ Balloon is inflated todilate artery◦ Stent is placed inartery to maintainpatency◦ Filters are used tocapture embolicparticles


Direct comparison <strong>of</strong> CEA <strong>vs</strong>. <strong>Stenting</strong>◦ Several studies exist comparing theefficacy/safety <strong>of</strong> CEA to stenting.◦ Studies are designed to look atpost-procedure outcome. (i.e.stroke, embolism, hyperperfusioninjury, etc.)


Direct comparison <strong>of</strong> CEA <strong>vs</strong>. <strong>Stenting</strong>◦ WALLSTENT trial◦ N: 219 patients◦ <strong>Carotid</strong> arteries were60-90% occluded◦ Patients randomlyassigned to treatmentgroup◦ 1-yr follow-up:significantly higher rate<strong>of</strong> post-procedure strokewith angioplasty andstenting groupcompared to CEA group(12.2 <strong>vs</strong> 3.6%)◦ SAPPHIRE STUDY◦ N: 334 patients◦ Symptomatic carotidstenosis <strong>of</strong> ≥50% orasymptomatic stenosis<strong>of</strong> ≥80%◦ Looking for end point <strong>of</strong>major cardiovasculardisease within 1 year.◦ Result: majorcardiovascular diseasewas more common inCEA patients. Howeverrevascularization wasless necessary in CEApatients.


CEA <strong>vs</strong> stenting in elderly patients◦ Retrospective study <strong>of</strong> pts ≥75 years old◦ N: 53 pts◦ Primary outcome: MI, stroke within onemonth <strong>of</strong> treatment◦ Incidence <strong>of</strong> stroke within 30 days <strong>of</strong>treatment was higher in stenting than inCEA group (11.3% to 1.8%, P


Meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> CEA <strong>vs</strong>. <strong>Carotid</strong> arterystenting◦ Number <strong>of</strong> trials: eight◦ Total N: 2942◦ Outcome: stroke/death/MI at 30 daysand 1 year post procedure◦ Result: The rates <strong>of</strong> stroke did notdiffer significantly between CEA andCAS. However, the relative risk <strong>of</strong> MIwas significantly higher in CEApatients. Re-stonsis after 1 yearoccurred more <strong>of</strong>ten in CAS patients


CaRESS: 4 year outcomes◦ N: 397 patients◦ Study looked at outcomes 4 years postprocedure◦ Endpoints evaluated:• Primary: mortality, stroke and MI• Secondary: re-stenosis, repeat angiographyand carotid revascularizatoin◦ Results:• Primary endpoints: No significant differencebetween CEA and CAS• Secondary endpoints: CAS resulted more <strong>of</strong>tenin need for repeat procedure due to restenosis


CONCLUSION◦ Patients with significant comorbiditieswho are poor surgical candidates aremore likely to benefit from angioplastyand stenting than CEA◦ In considering elderly patients there is anacute (


References◦ Liu, Zhenjie, et al: <strong>Carotid</strong> <strong>Artery</strong> <strong>Stenting</strong> Versus <strong>Carotid</strong><strong>Endarterectomy</strong>: Systematic Review and meta-analysis; World Journal <strong>of</strong>Suergery; vol. 33: pp. 586-596 (2009)◦ Zarins, C.K., et al; <strong>Carotid</strong> Revascularization Usuing Endareterectomy or<strong>Stenting</strong> systems; Journal <strong>of</strong> Endovascular Therapy; Vol. 16: pp. 397-409(2009)◦ Brahmanandam, Soma, et al; Clinical results <strong>of</strong> <strong>Carotid</strong> <strong>Artery</strong> <strong>Stenting</strong>Compared with <strong>Carotid</strong> <strong>Artery</strong> <strong>Endarterectomy</strong>; Journal <strong>of</strong> VascularSurgery, Vol. 47: pp. 343-349 (2008)◦ Eskandari, M.K., et al; Does <strong>Carotid</strong> <strong>Stenting</strong> Measure Up to<strong>Endarterectomy</strong>? A Vascular Surgeon’s Experience; Archives <strong>of</strong> Surgery,Vol.139, pp. 734-738 (2004).◦ Greelish, J.P., et al; Nonsurgical carotid revascularization; UpToDate,www.uptodate.com.◦ Greelish, J.P., et al; <strong>Carotid</strong> endarterectomy: Preoperative evaluation,surgical technique, and complications; UpToDate, www.uptodate.com.◦ Kastrup, A., et al; Comparison <strong>of</strong> angioplasty and stenting with cerebralprotection versus endarterectomy for treatment <strong>of</strong> internal carotid arterystenosis in elderly patients; Journal <strong>of</strong> Vascular Surgery, Nov. 2004.


QUESTIONS?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!