26.11.2012 Views

v. clients i. introduction ii. experts iii. services iv. charter

v. clients i. introduction ii. experts iii. services iv. charter

v. clients i. introduction ii. experts iii. services iv. charter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Quality Assurance<br />

Why our <strong>clients</strong> chose IFIC<br />

• We establish a definit<strong>iv</strong>e view on causation.<br />

• We fast track genuine claims.<br />

• We gather appropriate levels of evidence to support<br />

repudiations .<br />

• We undertake rigorous fraud & arson checks.<br />

• Appropriate escalation & involvement of<br />

independent specialists.<br />

• We provide effect<strong>iv</strong>e cost control.<br />

• We provide full regulatory compliance & high levels of<br />

corporate governance.<br />

• Provision of meaningful management information.<br />

• Successful track record (empirical evidence &<br />

testimonials).<br />

• We provide added value (accompanied site visits,<br />

training, white papers, thought leadership).<br />

Quality<br />

• Methodical, Scientific process.<br />

• ISO 9001, 17020.<br />

• Peer review & escalation.<br />

What The Judges Say<br />

The opinion of Lord Brodie in the Outer House Court of Session<br />

"It appeared to me that all those who had investigated the fire and who gave evidence, Mr Smith,<br />

Mr Grant, Station Officer Hannigan and Dr Lygate, were qualified by reason of relevant study and<br />

experience and an informed investigation of the scene to provide an opinion as to the area of origin of<br />

the fire and its source of ignition, and therefore might be described as expert witnesses. Dr Lygate is<br />

more the scientist or engineer. He is academically and professionally well qualified. He was a particularly<br />

careful witness. He was precise in the way he answered questions. He provided detailed reasons for his<br />

opinions under reference to the findings of the fire investigation."<br />

United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia Atlanta D<strong>iv</strong>ision found that:<br />

'Plaintiffs failed substantially to meet their burden of proof in this case. Accordingly, and based on the<br />

court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law that judgement was entered in favour of IFIC’s client the<br />

defendant, Oilmar Co Ltd. It was further ordered that the attached freights, paid into the court's registry<br />

in the amount of $580,000.00, together with the interest that has accrued, be released to Oilmar.'<br />

William S Duffey, JR. United States District Judge.<br />

Competence<br />

• Qualifications and Expertise.<br />

• Licensing.<br />

• CPD.<br />

Care<br />

• Customer service <strong>charter</strong>.<br />

• Relationship management.<br />

• Access to the CEO.<br />

• Pro-act<strong>iv</strong>e case management.<br />

• Plain English, easy to understand reports.<br />

• Easy to do business culture.<br />

Cost<br />

• Accurate recording.<br />

• Transparency of billing.<br />

• Certainty of pricing.<br />

• Monthly reporting.<br />

• Client control of pricing options.<br />

www.ificforensics.com 9<br />

<strong>iv</strong>. <strong>charter</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!