WW Project Pages.xlsx - City of Springfield

The City of Springfield, OregonCapital Improvement ProgramA Community Reinvestment Plan2012-2016Willamette Rivergene

TABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1SECTION I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMCIP Goals ........................................................................................................................... 6CIP Project Development and Review Process ................................................................. 6Types of Capital Needs ...................................................................................................... 6Project Selection Resources .............................................................................................. 7Facilities PlansWastewater Master Plan ..................................................................................... 7Stormwater Facilities Master Plan ....................................................................... 8DLR Building Condition Report ............................................................................ 8Urban Renewal Plans ........................................................................................... 9Land Use PlansPublic Facilities and Services Plan ...................................................................... 10TransPlan ........................................................................................................... 10Refinement Plans ............................................................................................... 11SECTION II FUNDINGCapital Project Funding ................................................................................................... 14Systems Development Charges ...................................................................................... 15External Revenue Sources ............................................................................................... 16Other Revenues .............................................................................................................. 17City Accounting Funds Used for Capital Resources ........................................................ 17SECTION III FINANCIAL SUMMARIESFinancial Summaries—All Programs ............................................................................... 21SECTION IV PROJECTSProjects Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 23Master Project Map ........................................................................................................ 25APPENDIX A .............................................................................................................................. 193

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYINTRODUCTIONThe City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five‐year Community Reinvestment Planthat describes the funding and construction of City public facilities. A fundamental purpose of the CIP isto facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources. The underlying concept is to program, forfuture expenditure, all reasonably available sources of revenue. Since projected revenue is significantlyless than the needs identified in the City’s infrastructure facilities plans, the CIP is used as the vehicle tofacilitate reconciliation, in the near term, of the competing priorities for scarce capital resources.The CIP is updated annually and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with long termplanning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future, and theultimate construction and operation of those facilities. The CIP identifies the facilities concepts that mayreasonably be expected to be required in the next five years, refines those concepts, and provides apriority list of projects. Priority projects are selected from the long list of needed capital improvementsidentified in the various master plans and refinement plans adopted by the City Council. Once includedin the CIP, the next step is the City’s annual Capital Budget which draws from the first year of the CIP,with such modifications as are necessary or prudent to respond to immediate concerns and the oftenfluid nature of funding opportunities. The 2012‐2016 CIP includes those projects that are currently inthe Capital Budget and in various stages of planning, design, and construction. In addition, the CIPincludes descriptions of projects that have been identified through various facilities planning efforts butdo not currently have complete funding identified. These projects are aimed at improvingneighborhoods, providing for economic growth, improving traffic safety, mobility and access, complyingwith environmental standards, and maintaining the existing city infrastructure. The CIP is the source ofprojects that form the Capital Budget for each ensuing fiscal year.CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEWThe public input process for the CIP begins in October when citizens, organizations, and City staff areasked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP. The Planning Commission and the City Councilthen review the draft CIP and a public hearing is held prior to Council adoption.OCTOBER: CIP PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS STARTSOCTOBER: CAPITAL PROJECT REQUESTS GO TO PUBLIC AND CITY DEPARTMENTSNOVEMBER/DECEMBER: PUBLISH DRAFT CIPNOVEMBER/DECEMBER: BEGIN INTERNAL DRAFT CIP REVIEWJANUARY: PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWS DRAFT CIPFEBRUARY: CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION REVIEWS DRAFT CIPMARCH: PUBLIC HEARING AT CITY COUNCIL ON DRAFT CIPAPRIL: CAPITAL BUDGET PRESENTED TO BUDGET COMMITTEE2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 1

and upgrading and modernizing Franklin Blvd. is seen as the first step to achieving this goal. The nextstep in moving Franklin reconstruction forward will be to complete the required National EnvironmentalPolicy Act (NEPA) documentation, likely an Environmental Assessment (EA). The cost to complete an EAis approximately 50% funded with Transportation Systems Development Charges (SDC) funds, CentralLane Metropolitan Planning Organization (CLMPO) discretionary federal funds, and Springfield EconomicDevelopment Agency (SEDA) funds. Springfield continues to seek external funding through availableopportunities like the annual federal transportation appropriations bill.Over‐Under Channel Pipe Replacement – The Over‐Under Channel is part of the City’s stormwatersystem serving mid‐Springfield from 5th to 28 th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126. The nameof the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyedin both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel. A portion of thepiped system, from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street Channel atMoffitt School, is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) installed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. Staffhas found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of corrosion andminor failures. In FY2011, the City Council approved funding to design a replacement pipe system andidentify the amount of additional funds needed to complete the construction in FY2012.FINANCINGThere are limited sources of funding for capital activity. The principal sources include revenues derivedfrom user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes) which function like user fees. By Council policy, theseare preferentially devoted to preservation of existing public infrastructure. The second major source isSystems Development Charges (SDC), which are designed to recover, from development, the costimpact that development has on public infrastructure, both existing and needed to meet the demandsof development. A large portion of these revenues must, by law, be devoted to capacity increasingcapital activity. Only that portion of SDC revenue which is derived from a reimbursement fee may beexpended for preservation of existing infrastructure. A third major source of capital funding is externalcontributions, in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans, payments by developers for specificimprovements, and assessments of benefitted property owners, also for specific improvements. Othersources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts,and revenue from internally generated charges, also play a role, at present minor.In part, Local Wastewater and Drainage SDC revenues fund debt service for prior capacity increasingprojects and continuing programs, which fund small repair projects and permits. The City sold localwastewater revenue bonds in March, 2009 to fund required sanitary sewer rehabilitation work and thedesign of the Jasper Trunk Line Extension. The City also sold storm drainage revenue bonds in October,2010 to fund several major stormwater initiatives, and a number of capital projects related to the City’sobligation to address stormwater quality, permitting and threatened fish impacts. 1 The City Council has1 For bonding purposes, the local wastewater and stormwater utilities are combined into a single sewer utility.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 3

discussed an additional local wastewater revenue bond sale in 2013 to fund the construction of theJasper Trunk Line Extension and additional high‐priority wastewater and stormwater capital projects.For the 2012‐2016 CIP, a five‐year outlook, one of the most significant aspects is the projection of acontinual decrease in funding for street preservation projects. The main reasons for this are the welldocumented loss of annual funding the City has received from Lane County, the continued deteriorationin the growth of revenues from State and local fuel taxes as increased fuel efficiency drives downrevenue even in the face of increased miles traveled and the recent increase in the State fuel tax, andthe failure of SDC revenues to keep pace with development’s demands for new infrastructure.A second significant aspect of the funding scenario is the current imbalance between user fees and SDCsas sources of capital funding. City staff has documented that in many cases user fees are funding adisproportionate share of capital projects. With the full implementation of the revised SDCs effectiveJanuary 1, 2011, new users will be paying their proportional share of the costs associated withexpanding and upgrading the public transportation, wastewater, and stormwater systems. The revisedSDC’s resulted, in part, from the recent development and adoption of updated facilities plans for thelocal sewer and storm drainage infrastructure. These plans identify significant new capital project andfinancing needs, and the SDC methodologies and charges needed to be updated to reflect new projectsand costs.External sources, such as intergovernmental grants or developer or benefitted property ownercontributions, are an important, but highly volatile funding source. Generally they do not form the basisfor concluding a project can be funded, but rather when such funding sources develop, can be a triggerto increase the priority of a project. Recently, the City has had some success in developing externalfunding for isolated projects, such as the Mill Race Restoration and the Gateway/Beltline intersection.Future success is highly dependent upon the fiscal and monetary policies of other levels of government.For example, the indications of the current Congress that the practice of earmarking funds will not befollowed, may reduce the possibility of securing direct appropriations from the Congress, but maypositively affect the ability of the City to secure federal grants.There are a number of projects added to the CIP for which there are no identified funding sources.Because of limited revenues, even many of the projects traditionally listed in the CIP cannot be fundedduring the next five years. These projects are shown in the CIP to make it possible for the Council andthe public to better understand the scope of the City’s infrastructure need and compare that need tothe resources presently available, and provide the basis for developing long‐term capital financingstrategies.Page 42012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Included is a chart showing annual project funding needs and resources.70,000Capital Improvement ProgramRevenue and Expenditures2012‐201660,00050,00040,00030,00020,00010,0000Revenue Expenditures Revenue Expenditures Revenue Expenditures Revenue Expenditures Revenue Expenditures2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Stormwater Wastewater Transportation Buildings/Property Developer $ shown is 000CONCLUSIONThe Capital Improvement Program serves as a guide for the City’s needed improvements. It is shaped bycitizen input, the best professional judgment of staff and outside experts, and estimates of the City’sprojected financial resources. The CIP is subject to annual review and revision. The directions providedby this document helps the City of Springfield target its resources to capital improvements which bestserve the needs of the citizens of Springfield. The CIP is available on the web for public viewing athttp://www.springfield‐or.gov /Pubworks/CIP.htm.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 5

SECTION ICAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMCIP GOALSThe goals of the CIP include:1) Providing a balanced program for capital improvements given reasonably anticipated fundingover a five‐year or greater planning period and identifying the extent to which resources canmeet capital needs;2) Improving neighborhoods;3) Providing for economic and community growth;4) Improving safety, access, and mobility of transportation modes;5) Complying with environmental standards and improving environmental quality;6) Maintaining the existing City infrastructure; and7) Protect public health and safety.CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW PROCESSCapital improvements must be consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Comprehensive Plan,including the Public Facilities and Services Plan and TransPlan (the transportation element of theComprehensive Plan), and all other Council adopted plans and policies. The relevant plans are listed in asubsequent section of this report.In general, all Capital Projects included in the CIP meet one or more of the following criteria:1) Project addresses State or Federal laws or regulations to eliminate or reduce the potential forenvironmental degradation or health hazards or to address issues that affect the safety andgeneral welfare of the community.2) Project maintains existing assets, extends the useful life of assets, or improves or expandsinfrastructure such that operations are improved.3) Project responds to requests from citizens, neighborhood groups, advisory committees, orgovernment bodies, and provides a public benefit.4) Project is included in local and/or regional infrastructure plans.Once the need for a capital improvement has been determined, those improvements are evaluated witha comprehensive prioritization matrix Appendix A that has been developed for evaluating and rankingprojects within each system to prioritize programming of scarce capital funding. This is the first year ofdevelopment of the prioritization matrix, and represents an attempt to improve the transparency of theCIP but making clear the criteria by which projects are prioritized. Staff will continue to evaluate thematrix definitions to, perhaps, further refine the criteria as appropriate. Comment on this initial effort iswelcome. In the adopted CIP only those capital improvements which are funded within the currentprojections for the appropriate revenue streams are considered adopted. Projects for which the fundingis not identified or programmed are shown strictly for informational purposes only.Page 62012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

TYPES OF CAPITAL NEEDRehabilitation & Preservation of Existing Capital AssetsThe CIP reflects the broad direction of the City Council as set forth in the Financial Management Policiesto preserve existing capital assets before they fall into disrepair and require expensive rehabilitation orreplacement. Preservation is an important tool used to protect or extend a City asset’s useful life. Ifpreservation doesn’t happen on a regular basis, the asset will deteriorate prematurely and its benefit tothe community will be lost. In that event reconstruction may be required. Reconstruction costs arefrequently multiple times the cost of preservation and maintenance, particularly for street surfaces.Rehabilitation is necessary for some capital assets and the City must demonstrate fiscal responsibility byplanning for this need. Inclusion of these projects in the CIP is a necessary task to plan for thatrehabilitation.New Capital Facilities and Capacity EnhancementsAs the City reaches outward into the Urban Growth Boundary or anticipates infill or increased density ofdevelopment in the city limits, the need to plan for expansion of capital assets and provide safe andefficient capital facilities increases. New streets are necessary to provide for the movement of goodsand people and access to property in developing areas. In addition, wastewater and stormwater systemsare necessary to protect water quality and the environment in order to preserve the health, welfare,and safety of the community.PROJECT SELECTION RESOURCESThe following is a list of various plans with descriptive summaries that guide the decisions made aboutCIP project choice. The City draws a distinction between facilities plans, which focus on facility needsand how systems function, and land use plans, which provide more general guidance. General guidancecan inform the development of facilities plans, and can constrain facility development to conform to thepolicy set of the land use planning document. (TransPlan is somewhat of an exception to thesedistinctions, since it is a land use plan that also serves as a facilities plan and does contain specificproject guidance.)FACILITIES PLANSWastewater Master Plan (2008)The City of Springfield provides wastewater collection and conveyance services by way of a system ofpipelines and pump stations that it owns and operates. Along with the City of Eugene, Springfielddischarges to a regional collection and treatment system owned by the Metropolitan WastewaterManagement Commission (MWMC). Springfield’s Wastewater Master Plan provides an assessment ofexisting and future needs for the City’s collection system. Because the City’s system connects to theregional system, the Master Plan must consider and reflect results of the MWMC’s Wet Weather FlowManagement Plan (WWFMP), which identifies system maintenance and rehabilitation activities for thewastewater collection and treatment facilities in the Eugene‐Springfield metropolitan area. Therefore,2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 7

Springfield’s plan provides a local solution for existing and future needs within the context of the similarregional solution.The Master Plan is intended to identify existing and future capacity constraints, determine capacityrequirements and identify system improvements necessary to meet the City’s projected population andemployment growth through the 2025 planning year. The Department of Environmental Quality hasissued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (#102486) for Springfield,Eugene and MWMC, which includes conditions under which treated wastewater can be discharged tothe Willamette River. Included in those conditions is a requirement that Springfield, Eugene and MWMCfully implement a wet weather flow management strategy to comply with the State’s Bacteria Standard,which prohibits storm related overflows. The standard states that no untreated wastewater can bedischarged to the waters of the State or US, except under the following conditions; for flows greaterthan those occurring for the 24‐hour duration, 1 in 5‐year winter and 1 in 10‐year summer storms. Theseconditions formed the baseline assumptions for overflow avoidance in this plan and were consistentwith the assumptions of the WWFMP, which included a number flow reduction projects that werecompleted before the December 31, 2009 regulatory deadline.Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (2008)In 2008, the City Council adopted a comprehensive Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP). Thepurpose of this document is to provide a guide to plan for more comprehensive, efficient, and multiobjectivemanagement of the City’s stormwater system. The majority of the City’s stormwater runoffdrains through an integrated network of pipes and open channels, discharging either directly to themain stem Willamette or McKenzie Rivers or through outfalls to a tributary of either of those rivers.Prior to the SWFMP, the City typically designed and constructed facilities for treating and conveyingstormwater runoff on an individual development or site‐by‐site basis. In addition, as is typical for nearlyall cities, most of the City’s stormwater collection and conveyance system was historically designed andbuilt with the sole objective of addressing flooding issues.Most of the major portions of the City’s stormwater drainage system infrastructure were built duringthe 1960s and as development increased, the system was retrofitted with extensions and additions.Most of the main conveyance system was not upsized to facilitate the increased flows associated withfull City build out.The City also has a Council‐adopted Stormwater Management Plan which establishes goals, policies andimplementation actions to address water quality and management of the stormwater system, includingopen waterways within the City’s jurisdiction. This plan is required and approved by the Department ofEnvironmental Quality as part of its issuance and management of the City’s stormwater dischargepermit. Additionally, the Willamette River and McKenzie River (a tributary to the Willamette River) arelisted on the State’s 303(d) list indicating that water quality standards for specific pollutants in thesestreams are currently not being met. The City must address Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)limitations on the level of certain pollutants through implementation of the Stormwater ManagementPlan and the TMDL Implementation Plan. These plans and requirements impact the nature and designof capital projects that are constructed to manage stormwater.Page 82012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Building & Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work Plan (2011)This plan identifies and addresses capital improvement needs at City owned buildings, including: CityHall, Springfield Museum, fire stations, Public Works maintenance buildings, and the Depot. The Plan,which is in its first year of development, derives from a report prepared in 2006 by the consulting firmDLR Group. That report provided a snapshot of repairs and asset preservation improvements that areimmediately evident, and which have been deferred for various reasons, together with ongoingmaintenance needs and necessary replacement of building systems expected to reach the end of theiruseful life during the next 30 years.The City continues to face several critical building/facilities operations, maintenance and preservationissues. The DLR Buildings Condition Report (DLR) identified $600K deferred/backlog facilities repairneeds and $300K ongoing annual maintenance/preservation needs. City Council was presented the DLRfindings and recommendations in January 2007, and faced the unplanned and unfunded replacement ofFire Station #1 (now Station #16). This heightened the Council’s awareness and commitment to developa funding mechanism to address the City’s immediate buildings repair backlog and to provide for moretimely preservation maintenance of buildings/facilities assets. In FY 2009, the City implemented anInternal Building Preservation Charge and programmed $300k for ongoing preservation and $200k tostart addressing the backlog projects. This funding was cut to $150k in FY 2010; however, $300k isanticipated for the FY 2011 budget. The first priority of staff charged with this capital program was todevelop the City Buildings/Facilities Work Plan inclusive of all City Fire Stations, City Hall, SpringfieldJustice Center, Public Works maintenance facilities, Springfield Depot, and the newly acquired CarterBuilding. This 5‐year work plan is reviewed and updated annually, and used as the basis for projectbudgeting each fiscal year.Additionally, there are other project management responsibilities related to public buildings andfacilities maintenance and preservations that have been identified through previously adopted CIPdocuments, such as preservation projects at the Depot and Booth Kelly and demolition of the Carpentershed and gun range at Booth Kelly. Any future building needs such as new fire station construction willbe addressed through the CIP process.Urban Renewal PlansDowntown Urban Renewal Plan (2007)The primary goal of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is to assist in the revitalization of business andelimination of blight in the downtown area. The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed toobtain these goals. The plan’s projects include:Improvements to streets, sidewalks, bike ways and pathways;Improvements to water, storm and sanitary sewer infrastructure;Improve the visual appearance of the downtown area;Improve and expand the existing public parking facilities;Financial assistance to rehabilitate existing properties and encourage new construction;Acquisition and disposal of land for public improvements.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 9

Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan (1999, updated 2004)The primary goal of the Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan is to eliminate blighting influences found in theRenewal Area. The Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to obtain these goals. The plan’sprojects include:Promote private development and redevelopment;Rehabilitate building stock;Improvements to streets, sidewalks, bike ways, pathways, streetscapes, parks, and open spaces;Utility improvements;Parking;Public facilities;Housing;Public signage and community gateway entrance improvements.LAND USE PLANSPublic Facilities and Services PlanThe Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP) is an element of the Eugene‐Springfield Metropolitan AreaGeneral Plan (Metro Plan). It is the element which identifies significant facilities in general terms andconfirms that those facilities are consistent with the planning policies set out in the Metro Plan. Theprojects identified in the PFSP are generally a subset of the projects contained in the various facilitiesplans. The PFSP does not identify transportation projects, which are covered in TransPlan, but doesidentify wastewater and stormwater projects, among others. The PFSP does not, nor should it, identifyevery project; it includes only those projects identified as significant on the basis of definitions set forthin the PFSP.TransPlan (2002)The Eugene‐Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) is the transportation elementof the Eugene‐Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. While adopted as a refinement to MetroPlan,and therefore technically a land use plan, TransPlan is also intended as a system plan that guides localand regional transportation system planning and development in the Eugene‐Springfield metropolitanarea. TransPlan also serves as the City’s facilities plan (transportation system plan, or TSP) for identifyingprojects needed to meet the transportation demand of residents over a 20‐year planning horizon whileaddressing transportation issues and making changes that can contribute to improvements in theregion’s quality of life and economic vitality. In addition to roadway facilities, TransPlan also calls forsignificant increases in the amount and convenience of transit service, increases in the amount ofbikeways and sidewalks, and an expansion of the existing program of transportation demandmanagement (TDM) travel incentives. TransPlan is a jointly adopted document that serves as a localtransportation system plan for both Springfield and Eugene, which, at present, share a joint urbangrowth boundary. As a result of legislation approved in 2007, the two cities are now in the process ofdeveloping separate urban growth boundaries. The City is currently developing a new SpringfieldPage 102012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

specific Transportation System Plan (TSP) as part of implementation of a City stand alone urban growthboundary. The current TransPlan will remain in force for another year until the new TSP is adopted byCouncil and acknowledged by the State. The CIP includes a project describing the costs and resourcesavailable to Springfield to complete the TSP Project. The TransPlan theme, ‘Improving OurTransportation Choices’, reflects the plan’s focus to provide citizens with a range of safe, convenient,and efficient transportation options characterized by smooth connections between modes. TransPlanstrives to support the need to diversify transportation choices, while avoiding reliance on any onetransportation mode or method of managing the transportation system. TransPlan establishes theframework upon which all public agencies can make consistent and coordinated planning decisionsregarding inter‐ and intra‐jurisdictional transportation.Refinement PlansDowntown Refinement Plan (1986, updated 2005)The primary goal of the Springfield Downtown Refinement Plan is to provide goals and policies throughwhich downtown Springfield may become a more vital and attractive place to shop, conduct business,and recreate. Goals were set forth to guide this revitalization. These goals are:Create a pedestrian and transit friendly downtown;Preserve the past;Reconnect to key natural resource features;Encourage evening activity in the downtown;Create new opportunities for office, commercial, residential, civic, and mixed uses;Ensure adequate parking;Create civic gathering places;Create downtown partnerships;Identify catalyst projects;Create a positive identity for downtown.East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan (1992)The primary goal of the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan is to address the concerns of the citizensliving within the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood. Goals were set to address these concerns. The goals ofthe neighborhood plan are:Encourage a variety of land uses and housing opportunities;Provide a safe and effective transportation system;Provide and maintain public facilities and services;Improve the character and identity of the neighborhood.East Main Refinement Plan (1988)The primary goal of the East Main Refinement Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens living withinthe East Main Refinement Plan Neighborhood. Goals were set to address these concerns. The goals ofthe refinement plan are:2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 11

Provide affordable housing for all segments of the population;Allow flexibility for large vacant areas that are surrounded by mixed uses;Provide for commercial centers which meet the needs of the community;Encourage additional industrial development which is compatible with surrounding uses;Enhance and develop the natural and built environment;Develop recreational facilities which fill the needs of the area;Create a safe and efficient street system;Provide safe, efficient and convenient bicycle facilities.Gateway Refinement Plan (1992)The primary goal of the Gateway Refinement Plan is to refine and augment the Eugene‐SpringfieldMetropolitan Area General Plan to provide specificity for site‐specific land use decisions, and to identifythe near and long‐term public facilities needs to support development and livability of the area. Thisplan incorporates goals and policies, controls and design standards in areas where protections need tobe stringent. These elements are:Community and Economic Development;Residential;Commercial;Industrial;Natural Assets, Open Space/Scenic Areas, and Recreation;Historic Resources;Transportation; andPublic FacilitiesGlenwood Refinement Plan (1999)The intent of the Glenwood Refinement Plan is to provide background information and policy directionfor public and private decisions affecting the growth and development of the Glenwood area. The planwill guide the provision of public service, such as sanitary sewers and street improvements. It will serveas a basis for evaluating private development proposals, such as zone change requests. It will alsoprovide a common framework for those engaged in the conservation, development, and redevelopmentof the area. The Glenwood Refinement Plan is currently being updated. The community direction goalsin the existing plan are:Maintain and improve Glenwood’s sense of identity and community as it transitions into theCity;Maintain the viability of the residential area within Glenwood by conserving and upgrading thequality of existing housing wherever possible while retaining its affordable character;Promote Glenwood as an attractive industrial area because of its easy access to I‐5 and railservice, its convenient location between Eugene and Springfield, and the availability of a varietyof sizes of vacant industrial parcels.Page 122012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Reduce conflicts between industrial and residential development through use of site reviewprocedures.Foster Franklin Boulevard and the McVay Highway as a desirable commercial location whileimproving its visual quality;Encourage a variety of commercial, industrial, and residential uses as an integral part of theGlenwood community;Promote use of rail service as a viable method of transport of industrial materials and goods;Improve bicycle and pedestrian access into, out of, and within Glenwood and along the river;Provide urban services in a timely way, including providing sanitary sewers to those who needthem, improving street drainage, ensuring timely public safety response, and maintaining theviability of James Park or other park facilities;Be sensitive to annexation concerns and provide for voluntary annexation wherever feasible;Provide access to the river and promote development opportunities along the river, which takeadvantage of the river’s natural assets and are sensitive to the river environment;Improve the community’s quality of life by addressing such issues as litter and noise pollution.Mid‐Springfield Refinement Plan (1986)The primary goal of the Mid‐Springfield Refinement Plan is to assign site‐specific plan designations inareas designated “Mixed‐Use” on the Metro Plan Diagram and to recognize the needs of industrial andcommercial land uses and to resolve conflicts with residential neighbors. Goals were set to addressthese concerns. The goals of the refinement plan are:Maximize industrial development potential of industrial designated land;Encourage functional commercial development on commercially designated land along Mainand 42 nd Streets;Preserve the integrity of residentially designated areas;Provide a safe and efficient transportation system;Provide a means to implement the goals and policies of this refinement plan.Q Street Refinement Plan (1987)The primary goal of the Q Street Refinement Plan is to guide land use decisions in the Q Street area.Land use decisions will be made to follow certain goals. The majority of the goals for the refinementplan are:Provide vacant and re‐developable land to allow for commercial development;Encourage commercial shopping centers where safe and efficient vehicular access can beprovided;Participate in efforts to maintain and enhance existing residential neighborhoods and attractmedium and high density residential developments;Implement mitigating measures for noise, dust, and traffic impacts to residential areas;Encourage private and public recreational facilities in high density areas;2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 13

Buffer multiple family development from single family development and residential land fromcommercial land through site plan review;Work with Willamalane to provide adequate park and recreational facilities to residents;Discourage through truck traffic in residentially designated areas;Encourage bicycle path into the design of recreational and new residential facilities.SECTION IIFUNDINGCAPITAL PROJECT FUNDINGThere are limited sources of funding for capital activity. The principal sources include 1) revenuesderived from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes) which function like user fees; 2) SystemsDevelopment Charges (SDCs), which are designed to recover from development the cost impact thatdevelopment has on public infrastructure; 3) external contributions, in the form of intergovernmentalgrants or loans, payments by developers for specific improvements, and assessments of benefittedproperty owners, also for specific improvements; and 4) other sources such as revenue leveraged by taxincrement financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts, and revenue from internally generatedcharges, which at present play a minor role in capital project funding. The City of Springfield’s accountsfor these four revenue sources are in special revenue or enterprise funds, such as the Street CapitalFund, Systems Development Charges funds, and the Wastewater and Drainage Capital funds. The fundsused by the City to record and account for capital funding are listed following this discussion, along withthe limitations imposed by local, state, or federal laws associated with the funding source.USER FEESEach of the three public infrastructure systems (streets, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage) is fundedby fees paid by those who use the system. In the case of the local wastewater and storm drainagesystems those fees are directly billed to users. In the case of the transportation system those fees arecollected in the form of taxes on motor fuel at both the state and local level, and by state fees forlicensing and registration of drivers and vehicles, as well as weight mile taxes imposed on the truckingindustry.City Council policy calls for a portion of those fees, in excess of that required for current operation of thesystems, to be devoted to preservation of the existing systems. However, in the past several years it hasbeen necessary to devote some portion of those revenues to fund expansion of the system, eitherthrough direct funding of capital activity or by funding debt service on revenue bonds. To date, the Cityhas issued revenue bonds in 2009 to fund local wastewater capital activity, and in 2010 to fund stormdrainage capital projects. This level of capital support has produced circumstances which have led tosubstantial increases in user fees for both systems, and created concerns that user fees might beapproaching levels which test the traditional level of citizen support. It is also important to note that theCouncil has discussed a further debt issue in FY 2013 to fund local wastewater needs.Page 142012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Another significant aspect of the funding scenario is the current imbalance between user fees and SDCsas sources of capital funding. City staff has documented that in many cases user fees are funding adisproportionate share of capital projects. Further, the economic downturn experienced in recent yearsled Council to defer significant portions of SDC increases that have been proposed based on updatedfacilities plans. Although the recommended SDC increases were fully implemented effective January 1,2011, the sluggish economic recovery continues to be reflected in a substantially reduced number ofbuilding permits and resultant SDC revenues. Until economic conditions and development activityimproves, existing users of the systems will continue to bear most of the costs associated withexpanding and upgrading those systems.For the 2012‐2016 CIP, a second source of concern is the projection of a continual decrease in fundingfor street preservation projects. State and local fuel tax revenues continue to decline because of thecurrent recession and increased fuel efficiency that reduces revenue even in the face of increased milestraveled. While the Council has increased storm drainage and local wastewater fees to maintain andenhance the level of preservation for those systems, the City no longer has the authority to increase itslocal fuel tax. While the State Legislature approved an increase in the State fuel tax that becameeffective on January 1, 2011, the City does not expect that the increased revenue it will receive from theState will be sufficient to reverse the trend of declining revenues to support the City’s transportationsystem.SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGESThe second major source of capital funding is Systems Development Charges (SDCs). These are chargesimposed on development to provide funding to assure that the City can fund the cost of theinfrastructure needed to serve that level of development. There are several types of SDCs that can beused for capital projects. One of the SDC funds is the “Old” SDCs, which were funds collected under SDClaws in effect prior to 1991, and have different restrictions on use than the current SDC funds.These charges are calculated based upon a methodology which must be adopted by the Council andwhich must conform to State law. The process involves two separate components. The first is animprovement fee which is based on: a determination of which capital projects are needed toaccommodate growth, the amount of additional capacity that is created by those projects, and adetermination of the unit cost of additional capacity calculated by dividing the sum of project costs bythe sum of the capacity created. The second component, a reimbursement fee, is calculated bydetermining the value of the existing system, the amount of capacity available in that system, and thevalue of a unit of capacity. If the system has existing capacity, then development can be charged a feebased upon the units of existing capacity development will require. These charges are increasedannually based on documented increase in the Cost of Construction Index.Unfortunately, the facilities plans which are used to derive the projects to be constructed and thecapacity created by those projects (which dated from the 1970s), had been significantly out of date forboth local wastewater and storm drainage. As a result, fees collected were far below the amount,permissible under the statutes, which were needed to construct improvement projects. In 2008, the2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 15

City did update those two facilities plans and moved in 2009 to update the SDCs. While that processresulted in substantial increases in fees, the decline in development activity has resulted in minimalincreases in SDC revenue. In addition, because of the economic downturn, the Council deferred theincreases as they applied to one and two family residential construction until the fall of 2010, whenCouncil implemented a series of incremental increases with the full fees becoming effective January 1,2011.While the Transportation project list was much more current, having last been updated in 2000, it didnot reflect significant price escalation during the current decade. At the same time that Council updatedthe project lists for the other infrastructure systems, it also updated the costs on the transportation list,leading to a substantial increase in SDCs. As with the local wastewater and storm drainage systems, therecession, and Council deferral of residential increases, have reduced the revenue impact of thoseincreases. The Council has discussed the potential need to review the Transportation project listfollowing completion of the current effort to develop a Springfield specific TSP. It is also likely that theTransportation SDC methodology may be reviewed and updated at that time, since it was not updated in2009.In July 2009, the City Council approved a new revenue source for capital activities in the stormwatersystem; a Stormwater Reimbursement SDC fee. This fee is new for Springfield and provides a paymentfrom new users to the City to pay for a portion of the excess capacity in the stormwater system that wasprovided when the existing system was constructed. Reimbursement SDC’s are less constrained thanImprovement SDC’s because they can be used for maintenance of the existing system as well as forfunding new expansion projects.EXTERNAL REVENUE SOURCESThese sources include both intergovernmental grants and loans as well as contributions by privateindividuals to the cost of infrastructure either through assessments imposed by the City or voluntarily aspart of a proposal to develop property in the City. In many cases these sources of revenue, howeverderived, are accompanied by restrictions on their use.The City regularly receives allocations of transportation funding from Federal programs. TheMetropolitan Policy Organization (MPO) acting through its Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC)allocates Federal formula funds to its member jurisdictions for planning, preservation and constructionprojects on portions of the transportation system that are regionally significant. In addition, the Cityregularly seeks Federal funding directly through efforts focused on the Oregon congressional delegation.The City was instrumental in securing over $20 million in Federal funding to modernize the interchangeat I‐5 and Beltline Road. Most recently, the City received almost $2.2 million in Federal funding underthe American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA), which was created as part of the Federaleconomic stimulus plan. In addition to Federal transportation grants the City has received significanttransportation funding from Lane County in past years, although the County’s fiscal condition makesreceipt of future grants unlikely.Page 162012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

The local wastewater system also benefits from a variety of Federal programs, most notably the CleanWater State Revolving Fund (a program funded by Federal dollars). In recent years, however, Federal aidfor local wastewater activity has declined sharply.Private contributions toward capital funding also are available, but generally in restricted circumstances.In order to facilitate provision of services to a new development, a developer can make a significantcontribution to a particular project when it is needed for the development in question when the Citydoes not have the financial resources to construct the project in circumstances which fit with thedeveloper’s timetable. Lastly, individual citizens sometimes contribute in the form of assessments forspecific projects which benefit their properties. This is done through the creation of a local improvementdistrict (LID), including all of the benefitted properties. The cost of the project is then assessed againstthose properties on a proportionate basis. The 2010 Cherokee LID sewer project is the most recentexample of improvement district financing in the City.OTHER REVENUESThere are two other alternative revenue sources available for capital project funding. The first is taxincrement financing through the two urban renewal districts created by the City – one in Glenwood andone in Downtown. In an urban renewal district additional taxes resulting from increases in assessedvalue are sequestered and made available to the district, which then uses those revenues to supportdebt service on urban renewal bonds used to finance projects within the district. At this point therevenues of either district have not risen to the level deemed adequate to support bond issuance.Nonetheless, that may occur within the period of the CIP, hence some of those projects are included.The second alternative revenue source is an internal charge which is assessed against City departments’operating Budgets to provide funding for preservation and rehabilitation of City buildings and structures.CITY ACCOUNTING FUNDS USED FOR CAPITAL RESOURCESUSER FEE/TAX FUNDSStreet Capital FundPurpose: To account for operation, maintenance, and construction of the City’s streets andtransportation system. This includes the City’s pavement preservation program, signal operations, andstreet light replacement and maintenance. Revenues are generated from a three‐cent local motorvehicle fuel tax and a State fuel tax.Restrictions: Use of these funds is restricted to activities within public rights of way by the OregonConstitution.Wastewater Capital BondPurpose: To account for the construction of capital facilities which are identified within the WastewaterMaster Plan as requiring rehabilitation of the existing system or expansion to support growth anddevelopment. Bond proceeds provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 17

Restrictions: Funding provided by bond proceeds, including interest earnings, are restricted by theterms of the bond contract developed at the time of the bond sale.Wastewater Capital FundPurpose: To account for the operation, construction, and maintenance of the City’s wastewatercollection system. Wastewater user fee collections provide the financing for the expenditures of thisfund.Restrictions: As allowed under state statute, the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund forplanning, constructing, maintaining and operating the wastewater collection system.Stormwater Capital FundPurpose: To account for the operation, construction, and maintenance of the City’s stormwatercollection and treatment system. Stormwater user fee collections provide the financing for theexpenditures of this fund.Restrictions: As allowed under state statute, the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund forplanning, constructing, maintaining, and operating the stormwater collection and treatment system.SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDCS) FUNDSLocal Wastewater Systems Development Charge Reimbursement Capital Projects FundPurpose: To account for available capacity within the existing wastewater collection system that isattributable to growth. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.Restrictions: Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use capital maintenance orconstruction on the wastewater collection system.Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Improvement Capital Projects FundPurpose: To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacity‐enhancing capitalprojects. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.Restrictions: Expenditures of Wastewater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacityenhancingprojects for the wastewater system.Stormwater Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects FundPurpose: To account for available capacity within the existing stormwater system that is attributable togrowth. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.Restrictions: Stormwater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance orconstruction on the stormwater collection system.Page 182012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Stormwater Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects FundPurpose: To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacity‐enhancing capitalprojects. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.Restrictions: Expenditures of Stormwater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacityenhancingprojects for the stormwater system.Transportation Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects FundPurpose: To account for available capacity within the existing transportation system that is attributableto growth. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.Restrictions: Transportation Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance orconstruction on the transportation system.Transportation Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects FundPurpose: To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacity‐enhancing capitalprojects. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.Restrictions: Expenditures of Transportation Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacityenhancingprojects for the transportation systems.EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTION FUNDSCommunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) FundPurpose: To account for Federal grant revenues received for the primary purpose of advancing capitalprojects that primarily benefit low income persons.Restrictions: CDBG funds, including interest earnings, must meet the Federal government criteria ofbenefiting low to moderate income individual’s needs, eliminating slums and blight, and addressingurgent needs.Development Projects FundPurpose: To account for county, State and Federal grants awarded to the City for the purpose ofpreserving or enhancing City facilities. This fund also accounts for funds donated by developers towardthe construction of capital projects directly affected by the particular development.Restrictions: Funding is usually project specific and must only be spent towards those capital projectsfor which they were collected.Special Assessments Capital Project FundPurpose: To account for the interim financing and related costs of construction for public improvementswhich primarily benefit adjacent property owners of the subject capital project. Revenues aregenerated through special assessments being levied against the benefiting properties.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 19

Restrictions: State law restricts assessments to the specific improvement constructed.OTHER FUNDSSpringfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA) FundsPurpose: To account for funds collected and set aside within Urban Renewal Districts as defined andadopted by the City Council.Restrictions: Funds collected within the specified Urban Renewal District and set aside for capitalprojects are restricted for use on capital projects benefiting the Urban Renewal District.Booth Kelly FundPurpose: To account for revenues received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center. Thesefunds are set aside for Capital Improvement projects that improve the Booth Kelly Center.Building Preservation FundPurpose: To account for funds collected and set aside for maintenance and improvements to Cityowned buildings and facilities.Page 202012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

SECTION IIIFINANCIAL SUMMARIESREVENUE FUND BEGINNING 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 TOTAL BALANCESOURCE # BALANCE REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPENDASSESSMENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CURRENT REVENUESBUILDING PRES. RESERVE 420 0 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 2,000 2,000 0OLD SDCs 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SDC (TRANS IMPROV) 447 0 400 390 500 500 750 750 750 740 750 750 3,150 3,130 20SDC (TRANS REIMBUR) 446 0 125 65 149 140 337 334 232 221 75 63 918 824 94SDC (WASTEWATER IMPROV) 443 182 225 96 337 648 407 407 309 34 0 34 1,460 1,219 241SDC (WASTEWATER REIMBUR) 442 494 450 272 278 272 1,597 1,597 853 1,433 500 590 4,172 4,165 7SDC (STORM IMPROVEMENT) 440 463 150 349 150 312 330 396 250 285 250 17 1,593 1,360 233SDC (STORM REIMBURSEMENT) 441 0 90 65 238 108 183 211 156 276 127 128 794 787 7STORM CAPITAL 425 48 517 525 620 660 655 377 625 903 682 682 3,147 3,147 0WASTEWATER CAPITAL 409 1,100 1,151 1,513 312 990 922 925 1,325 1,316 1,124 1,126 5,934 5,870 64STREET CAPITAL 434 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 80 73 7BOOTH-KELLY RESERVE 618 1,758 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 1,758 300 1,458SEDA 429 0 200 200 1,970 1,970 1,965 1,965 1,825 1,825 0 0 5,960 5,960 0Sub-totals:4,125 3,708 3,876 4,954 6,001 7,546 7,363 6,725 7,506 3,908 4,090 30,966 28,836 2,130GRANTS & DONATIONSCDBG** 210LANE COUNTY* 420ODOT* 420 0 0 230 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 230 0FEDERAL GRANT* 420 436 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 436 400 36MWMC SPONSORSHIP 420 0 0 0 0 0SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0WILLAMALANE 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sub-totals:0 436 400 230 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 666 630 36OTHERCAPITAL BOND 428 0 0 0 0 0 0 0WASTEWATER BOND 409 1,532 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 825 0 0 1,532 825 707STORMWATER BOND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UNSPECIFIED WASTEWATER 800 800 22,501 22,501 2,660 2,660 1,000 1,000 1,350 1,350 28,311 28,311 0UNSPECIFIED STORMWATER 5,226 5,226 5,336 5,336 3,916 3,916 3,628 3,628 1,821 1,821 19,927 19,927 0UNSPECIFIED TRANSPORTATION 0 7,789 7,839 31,388 32,478 20,046 19,302 12,328 12,336 5,098 5,106 76,649 77,061 -412UNSPECIFIED BUILDING 1,129 1,129 7,745 7,745 6,250 6,250 26,150 26,150 3,600 3,600 44,874 44,874 0OTHER 100 100 620 320 0 0 76 145 0 0 796 565 231DEVELOPER 420 0 175 175 0 0 0 0 0 175 175 0Sub-totals:1,532 15,044 15,094 67,590 68,555 33,047 32,128 43,182 44,084 11,869 11,877 172,264 171,738 526Grand Totals: 5,657 19,188 19,370 72,774 74,786 40,593 39,491 49,907 51,590 15,777 15,967 203,896 201,204 2,692*These funds may not pass through the City's budget.**Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not included.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 21

Page 222012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

SECTION IVPROJECTSSYSTEMPAGEUNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS .................................................................................. 24ALL PROJECTS MAP ............................................................................................................ 25STORMWATEROverview ..................................................................................................................................... 27Project Map and Legend ............................................................................................................. 29Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................... 31In Process Projects ...................................................................................................................... 35Funding Programmed ................................................................................................................. 43Partially Programmed ................................................................................................................. 53Funding Not Programmed .......................................................................................................... 65TRANSPORTATIONOverview ..................................................................................................................................... 71Project Map and Legend ............................................................................................................. 73Summary of Projects .................................................................................................................. 75Constructed Projects ................................................................................................................... 79In Process Projects ...................................................................................................................... 83Funding Programmed ................................................................................................................. 89Partially Programmed ................................................................................................................. 91Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................ 103WASTEWATEROverview ................................................................................................................................... 121Project Map and Legend ........................................................................................................... 123Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................ 125Constructed Projects ................................................................................................................. 129In Process Projects .................................................................................................................... 131Funding Programmed ............................................................................................................... 137Partially Programmed ............................................................................................................... 141Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................ 149BUILDINGS AND PROPERTYOverview ................................................................................................................................... 155Project Map and Legend ........................................................................................................... 157Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................ 159Constructed Projects ................................................................................................................. 161In Process Projects .................................................................................................................... 165Funding Programmed ............................................................................................................... 169Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................ 173MISCELLANEOUSOverview .................................................................................................................................. 185Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................ 1872012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 23

UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETSOnce projects are identified and selected for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program, a projectpage is created for the project. The project page includes important information about a project suchas: project description, justification, driver, trigger, and status. This information is important forconveying and tracking details as each project moves from conception to construction. The following isa list and description of these elements:Project Description – This is a description or early scope for a project. Many times this description willbe very broad as it may be taken from a master plan or refinement plan and most likely in conceptualform. The actual scope of a project is generally refined through the various phases of project planning,design and delivery.Project Justification – This element explaining scope is continually refined – project planning, design, bidand construction why the project is an identified capital need. Justification includes meeting regulatoryrequirements, correcting existing deficiencies, or periodic preservation to maintain an asset and offsetthe need for costly repairs or replacement in the future.Project Driver – The project driver is usually relevant to the specific project. Typical drivers include theneed to accommodate future growth, regulatory requirements, or the need to maintain public healthand safety. This element helps explain why a project is included within the Capital ImprovementsProgram.Project Trigger – The project trigger is also relevant to the specific project. Triggers can be completionof a previous capital improvement, development within a certain region of the City, or necessarypreservation activities as identified through various asset management tools.Project Status – Status describes the current stage of the Project, e.g. Planning, design, or construction.Specific Plans/Policies related to this Project – This is a list of the various master plans, refinement plans,adopted policies, and/or reports that relate to a project.Improvement SDC Eligibility – Some projects are eligible to receive SDC funding; however most projectsare not eligible for 100% SDC funding. If eligible, this element gives the percent of the total project costeligible for improvement SDCs funds.Expenditure Schedule – Lists various project activities and estimates the timing and cost to accomplishthe project activity.Operational Impact – Estimates the financial impact by fiscal year to the operating budget uponcompletion of the capital improvement. This can be a positive or negative number as some projectsimprove existing facilities reducing the operations and maintenance impact while the addition of newinfrastructure will increase operations and maintenance costs due to adding one or more new assets tothe City inventory.Funding Source – Describes how and when a project will/needs to be funded and the source of thatfunding (e.g. bonds, capital funds, SDCs, grants).Page 242012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 25

Page 262012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

STORMWATEROverviewStormwater projects fall into several categories:Stormwater studies – These projects typically fund the study of an area to provide for a future waterquality feature or system expansion. Projects may include studies for improving water quality in adrainage way, providing data for future Federal funding, or exploring how to improve the existingsystem. Current examples of this in the CIP are the Facility Master Plan update and the UGB ExpansionArea Facility Planning.Stormwater Rehab/Improvements – These projects typically provide upgrades to the City’s existingstormwater system or removal of inactive or potentially unsafe storm lines. Projects may include therepair and upsizing of storm lines, or the addition of storm lines to reduce localized flooding. The Over‐Under Channel Pipe Replacement and Improvements and the 59 th , Aster, and Daisy Street projects fallinto this category.Capacity Enhancement – These projects typically provide additional capacity to the stormwater system.These types of improvements may include an additional detention pond, detention facilities and offlinewater quality treatment facilities. Current examples of this in the CIP are the South 67 th Street and “S”and “T” Street Drainage Projects.Restoration – These projects typically involve restoring streams and waterways. Projects may includerepairing channel deterioration, providing access for fish passage, or improving flow capacity. Examplesof necessary restoration projects include Island Park, Jasper Slough, and Gray Creek/72 nd Street.New Facilities ‐ These projects typically involve the construction of new stormwater facilities as a resultof or in anticipation of new development. Projects may include storm lines built as part of a newsubdivision, and extension of storm main trunk lines.Project MapsSW1SW2SW3SW4SW5SW6SW7SW8SW13SW14SW15SW17SW18Mill Race Restoration59 th , Aster, and Daisy StreetIsland ParkLower Mill Race / Mill Race OutfallsMill Race Stormwater FacilityBooth Kelly DrainageOver‐Under Channel Pipe Replacement& ImprovementsDrainage RepairSCS Channel 6 FIRM UpdateMill Race FIRMHigh Banks Road (42 nd St.) Dike Study”S” and “T” Streets DrainageJasper/Natron DrainageSW20SW21SW22SW23SW24SW25SW26SW27SW28SW30SW31SW32SW33Cedar Creek Intake ReconstructionWoodstave RemovalMcKenzie OxbowIrving Slough Headgate to OutfallsSouth 67 th StreetGlenwoodNorth Willamette HeightsJasper SloughGray Creek/72 nd StreetI‐5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel“Q” Street ChannelMaple Island SloughCorporate Way Pond2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 27

This page left intentionally blankPage 282012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 29

Page 302012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalIn ProcessMill Race Restoration $ 3,900 $ -- - - - 3,900Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ 750- - - - - 750Land Match $ -- - - - - -Federal Funds (420) $ 3,150- - - - - 3,15059th, Aster, & Daisy Street $ 400 $ 2,100- - - - 2,500Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ 298- - - - - 298Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ 102 2,100 - - - - 2,202Other $ -- - - - - -Island Park $ 2,000- - - - - 2,000Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ 257- - - - - 257Revenue Bonds (425) $ 1,743- - - - - 1,743Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -Lower Mill Race $ 1,277- - - - - 1,277Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ 1,120- - - - - 1,120Federal Funds (420) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ 157- - - - - 157MWMC Sponsorship $ 25- - - - - 25Mill Race Stormwater Facility $ 1,767 83 152 - - - 2,002Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ - 83 152 - - - 235Revenue Bonds (425) $ 1,767- - - - - 1,767Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -Booth Kelly Drainage $ 360- - - - - 360Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ 310- - - - - 310Booth Kelly (618) $ 50- - - - - 50Over-Under Channel $ 1,128- 2,472 - - - 3,600Capital Fund (425) $ -- 348 - - - 348Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ 1,128- - - - - 1,128Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- 2,124 - - - 2,124S & T Drainage $ -- - 150 450 - 600Capital Fund (425) $ -- - 76 250 - 326Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - 74 200 - 274Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 31

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalFunding ProgrammedDrainage Repair $ 150 200 200 200 200 200 1,150Capital Fund (425) $ 150 191 129 100 161 109 840Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -9 71 100 39 91 310Metro Waterways Study $ 50 50 50 50 50 - 250Capital Fund (425) $ 25 25 25 25 25 - 125Improvement SDCs (440) $ 25 25 25 25 25 - 125Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - - -Channel Improvement $ 57 100 100 100 100 100 557Capital Fund (425) $ 55 78 78 78 78 78 445Improvement SDCs (440) $ 22 2 2 2 2 12Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ - 20 20 20 20 20 100MS4 Permit Requirements $ 25 30 30 30 30 30 175Capital Fund (425) $ 25 15 15 15 15 15 100Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ - 15 15 15 15 15 75Riparian Land Management $ 38 26 30 47 47 47 234Capital Fund (425) $ 10 10 13 30 30 30 123Improvement SDCs (440) $ - 15 15 15 15 15 75Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ 11 2 2 2 2 9Other $ 27- - - - - 27Jasper-Natron $ 1,000 2,000 2,000 - - - 5,000Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ 1,000- - - - - 1,000Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ - 2,000 2,000 - - - 4,000Channel 6 $ 500- - 1,000 - - 1,500Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ 18- - - - - 18Revenue Bonds (425) $ 482- - - - - 482Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - 1,000 - - 1,000Cedar Creek $ 500- - - - 100 600Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ 500- - - - - 500Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - 100 100Channel 6 FIRM $ - 20 - - - - 20Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ - 20 - - - - 20Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -Page 322012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalMill Race FIRM $ - 20 - - - - 20Capital Fund (425) $ - 20 - - - - 20Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -42nd St. Dike Study $ - 50 - - - - 50Capital Fund (425) $ - 50 - - - - 50Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -Facility Master Plan Update $ 30 170 - - - - 200Capital Fund (425) $ 15 85 - - - - 100Improvement SDCs (440) $ 15 85 - - - - 100Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -Funding Not ProgrammedUGB Expansion Area Facility $ - 100 - - - - 100Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ - 100 - - - - 100Woodstave Removal $ -- - - - 50 50Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - 50 50Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - - - -McKenzie Oxbow $ - 500 500 - - - 1,000Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ - 78 - - - - 78Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ - 422 500 - - - 922I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel $ -- - 105 440 - 545Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (xxx) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - 105 440 - 545Irving Slough Headwaters $ -- - - 416 1,966 2,382Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - 290 345 635Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - - 126 1,621 1,747South 67th Street $ - 325 - - - - 325Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ - 31 - - - - 31Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ - 294 - - - - 2942012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 33

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total"Q" Street Channel $ - 100 100 100 100 100 500Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ - 100 100 100 100 100 500Glenwood $ -- 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 6,000Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- 30 35 175 - 240Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -SEDA Funds (429) $ -- 1,970 1,965 1,825 - 5,760Maple Island Slough $ -- 550 - - - 550Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- 550 - - - 550North Willamette Heights $ -- 60 - - - 60Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- 8 - - - 8Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- 52 - - - 52Jasper Slough $ -- 60 - - - 60Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- 50 - - - 50Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- 10 - - - 10Gray Creek - 72nd Street $ -- - 3,000 3,000 - 6,000Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - 289 38 - 327Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ -- - 2,711 2,962 - 5,673Corporate Way Pond $ - 210 - - - - 210Capital Fund (425) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (425) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ - 210 - - - - 210Annual Totals $ 13,180 6,084 8,304 6,782 6,833 2,593 43,775Capital Fund (425) $ 280 474 608 324 849 627 3,162Improvement SDCs (440) $ 615 319 282 366 255 17 1,854Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ 1 65.40 108 211 276 128 788Revenue Bonds (425) $ 8,800- - - - - 8,800Federal Funds (420) $ 3,150- - - - - 3,150SEDA Funds (429) $ -- 1,970 1,965 1,825 - 5,760Land Match $ -- - - - - -Booth Kelly (618) $ 50- - - - - 50MWMC Sponsorship $ 25- - - - - 25Unspecified Stormwater Funds $ 259 5,226 5,336 3,916 3,628 1,821 20,186Page 342012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 35

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 830001System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityMill Race Restoration Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW1Project Description: Phase I: Move inlet upstream to improve flow; rehabilitate former river channel to carry flow andconnect to existing Mill Race near current inlet; rehabilitate downstream channel. Phase II: lower elevation of inlet to GorrieCreek. Reconfigure Mill Pond to create a meandering channel with a 12-foot wide low flow channel and 15-foot wide highflow benches, similar to the upper Mill Race. The channel between the F Street Bridge and the Mill Pond inlet will benarrowed. The channel in the pond will have a higher riparian terrace alongside each bank, and seasonal wetland pondswill be created. The proposed three seasonal wetland ponds have a total surface area of three acres and connections atthe upstream and downstream ends. At each point, the inlet is designed to be at the channel invert elevation with theoutlet. A rock weir is proposed at each pond outlet to prevent head cuts into the ponds.Justification: Improve water quality on existing drainage way; provide habitat restoration; provide aesthetic environmentalamenities in downtown; support redevelopment of downtown.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Increase water quality along the Mill Race.In constructionProject Status: Phase 1 in construction; Phase II, to be constructed FY 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 3,900 $ 3,150 750Other $ -Total $ 3,900 $ 3,150 $ 750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 30 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Personnel Costs $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50Total $ 330 $ 55 $ 55 $ 55 $ 55 $ 55 $ 55 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ 750 $ 750User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ 3,150 $ 3,150State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Land Match $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 3,900 $ 3,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 362012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 850191System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality59 th , Aster, and Daisy Street Improvement SDC Eligibility: 9.5%Map ID-SW2Project Description: Phase 1 of this project is to install 350 feet of 42 inch storm sewer in the area of South 59th Streetand Aster Street. Phase 2 will be to install additional parallel stormwater pipe in Daisy Street to provide additionalcapacity.Justification: This project will complete a piped storm system for the Mountain Gate area drainage. The current systemnow consists of a piped system in the unimproved Aster Street Right-of-Way that outfalls into a open ditch in a wetlandarea. The wetland then drains back into a piped system. The open ditch does not have the capacity to convey stormwaterfrom large rain events creating a flooding situation over South 59 Street and adjoining properties. Phase II Daisy St.parallel pipe will be needed to provide capacity through the system to the 48th St. channelProject Driver: Citizen complaints, localized flooding and development impacts. The Stormwater Facilities MasterPlan prioritized this project for completion in 2010.Project Trigger: Capacity issue, minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs. Additionalcapacity will minimize liability and risk from flooding.Project Status: Phase I in progress. Phase II deferred pending funding.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master planNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 550 $ 250 $ 300Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,800$ 1,800Other $ 150 $ 150Total $ 2,500 $ 400 $ 2,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ (4) $ 1 $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1)Total $ (4) $ 1 $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 298 $ 298Unspecified $ 2,202 $ 102 $ 2,100Total $ 2,500 $ 400 $ 2,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 37

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityIsland Park Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW3Project Description: These projects are intended to improve stormwater quality from urban runoff in two heavilytrafficked downtown drainage basins. Stormwater from these basins drain to the Springfield Mill Race and the Island ParkSlough, both of which have significantly impaired water quality.Justification: These types of projects are needed to meet the City obligations to improve the quality of urbanstormwater under the Clean Water Act, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater dischargepermit, and support stormwater management requirements of new development downtown. The Stormwater FacilitiesMaster Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Stormwater quality requirementsCommunity Mill Race restorationProject Status: Planning and designing 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Project #16WQStormwater Management PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanMill Race Ecosystem PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 500 $ 500Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,500 $ 1,500Other $ -Total $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 7 1 1 1 1 1 2Personnel Costs $ 8 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 2 $ 2Total $ 15 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 1,743 $ 1,743User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 257 $ 257Unspecified $ -$ - $ - $ - $ -Total $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 382012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityLower Mill Race / Mill Race Outfalls Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW4Project Description: Construct a daylight or diversion pretreatment structure, an offline water quality treatment facility,and a green pipe open channel improvement. Additional detail for this multi-faceted project are in WQ-12 project of theStormwater Facilities Master Plan.Justification: These types of projects are needed to meet the City obligations to improve the quality of urban stormwaterunder the Clean Water Act, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater discharge permit, andsupport stormwater management requirements of new development downtown. The City's agreement with the Corps ofEngineers (ACOE) for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. The StormwaterFacilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirementsfor water entering the Mill Race.Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project.Project Status: Planning and designing 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Stormwater Management PlanEconomic Development DowntownMill Race Ecosystem PlanBooth Kelly Stormwater Master PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 247 $ 247Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,000 $ 1,000Other $ -Total $ 1,247 $ 1,247 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 12 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2Personnel Costs $ 30 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Total $ 42 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 1,120 $ 1,120User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -OWEB grant $ -MWMC sponsorship $ 25 $ 25Unspecified $ 157 $ 157Total $ 1,302 $ 1,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 39

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityMill Race Stormwater Facility Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW5Project Description: Project is a stormwater treatment facility on land immediately north of the present Mill Pond on landrecently acquired from McKenzie Forest Products. The project will intercept and treat stormwater from theindustrial/commercial sub-basin south of Main Street from the Booth Kelly site (the new Woodstave line). The project willinclude open vegetative treatment for problematic pollutants to improve water quality in the Springfield Mill Race. It willalso provide detention for stormwater and enhance planned public amenities in this area. The project will require carefulphasing to coincide with projected Mill Race/Mill Pond work to maximize efficiencies.Justification: Stormwater in this sub-basin discharges into the Mill Race, and includes various industrial pollutants fromlog yards, industrial sites, and heavy downtown vehicle traffic, resulting in periodic violations of state water qualitystandards and presenting hazards to endangered fish species. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE)for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. Unique sites and facilities will enhancethe Mill Race renovation project, and provide educational opportunity and a community amenity while improving waterquality. It may provide some contribution to the Mill Pond renovation project by providing fill material at a low cost.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements forwater entering the Mill Pond. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project forcompletion in 2011.Completion of the Mill Race Restoration ProjectProject Status: Planning and design 2011Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanMill Race ProjectEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ - $ -Engineering $ 650 $ 650Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,200$ 1,200Other $ -Total $ 1,850 $ 650 $ 1,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 4$ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ 30 $ 1 $ 1 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7Total $ 34 $ 1 $ 1 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 1,767 $ 1,767User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 235$ 83 $ 152Unspecified $ -Total $ 2,002 $ 1,767 $ 83 $ 152 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 402012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 810032System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityBooth Kelly Drainage Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-SW6Project Description: Drainage master plan implementation for the Booth-Kelly site.Justification: Stormwater runoff from the City-owned Booth-Kelly property is discharged to the Mill Race. The sitecurrently does not have a drainage system adequate to avoid localized flooding during the wet weather season or providepretreatment of runoff prior to discharge to the Mill Race. A site drainage master plan has been completed to address thisissue in order to support ongoing operation of the Booth-Kelly industrial center and to comply with Clean Water Act stormwater requirements and address Endangered Species Act concerns.Project Driver: The stormwater system in Booth Kelly is aging and under developed. Basic drainage function andwater quality are necessary for discharge into the Mill Race. The Stormwater Facilities Master Planprioritized this project for completion in 2011.Project Trigger: Completion of the Mill Race Restoration ProjectProject Status: Planning and designing 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Booth Kelly Industrial Complex Stormwater Master PlanStormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 60$ 60Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 300$ 300Other $ -Total $ 360 $ - $ 360 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 2.5$ 0.5 $ 0.5 $ 0.5 $ 0.5 $ 0.5Personnel Costs $ 5$ 1.0 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Total $ 7.5 $ - $ 1.5 $ 1.5 $ 1.5 $ 1.5 $ 1.5 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 310 $ 310User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Booth-Kelly 618 $ 50 $ 50Unspecified $ -Total $ 360 $ 360 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 41

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialConstruction and PreservationOver-Under Channel Pipe Replacement &ImprovementsMap ID-SW7Project Description:Improvement SDC Eligibility:Justification: During 2010, staff became aware that some of the existing CMP has reached the end of its useful lifeand is beginning to fail. About half of the 3,900 feet of pipe was installed in 1950 and the remainderinstalled in 1988/89. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan also recommends installing 8,720 feet of36-inch diameter pipe parallel to the existing CMP pipe and other pipes further east to provideadditional capacity to handle existing flows that are conveyed/stored in the channel portion of thesystem during high flows. This project will include evaluating alternatives for reducing the size oreliminating the channel by using different pipe sizes and/or configurations.Project Driver: Identified structural problems in existing CMP. Delay may increase City's risk.Project Trigger: Aged facility at the end of its useful life. Additional capacity needs identified in Stormwater FacilitiesMaster Plan - Project #15FC.Project Status: Consultant selection for alternatives analysis and design.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facility Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 100100Engineering $ 500400 100Land/Right of Way $ 300300Construction $ 2,7002,700Other $ -Total $ 3,600 $ - $ 800 $ 2,800 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ -User Fees 425 $ 348348Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Revenue Bond 425 $ 1,128 1,128Unspecified $ 2,1242,124Total $ 3,600 $ 1,128 $ - $ 2,472 $ - $ - $ - $ -1.9%The Over-Under Channel system includes about 3,900 linear feet of corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP)under the existing channel. This project is intended to replace the existing CMP with a new pipe, aswell as provide a parallel pipe for additional capacity as recommended in the 2008 Stormwater FacilityMaster Plan.Page 422012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 850014System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityDrainage Repair Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-SW8Project Description: This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace olderpipe in the system and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program alsoincludes rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, and the contractual cleaning of large storm sewerpipe. Projects include: Repair West B St. storm outfall to Willamette River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St.,Channel 6, 72nd St. and 48th St. canals; Repair damaged gutter bars causing localized flooding at 2138 9th St., 1105 SSt., 345 22nd St., 1500 B St. and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations; Replace catchbasin at 717 71st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St.intersection, A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin fromintersection of 17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Pipethe backyard drainage ditch between S. 46th - S. 47th St. and Bluebell - Aster St; Drainage repairs on Quarry Street andPark Street.Justification: The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenanceand operating costs of the drainage system by reestablishing stormwater efficiency. Reduced costs would be realized inoperational costs currently expensed by responding to localized flooding problems during rain events.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Citizen requests, field surveys, history of identified problem areas.Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability, capacity needs, opportunities to reducemaintenance costs, citizen requests, aged facilities.Project Status: Accumulating fund for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Springfield Stormwater Management PlanMetro Waterways ProjectDEQ Stormwater Discharge PermitNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 100 $ 10 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,250 $ 140 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185Other $ -Total $ 1,350 $ 150 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (13) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (2) $ (2) $ (3) $ (3)Personnel Costs $ (24) $ (3) $ (3) $ (3) $ (3) $ (4) $ (4) $ (4)Total $ (37) $ (4) $ (4) $ (4) $ (5) $ (6) $ (7) $ (7)FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -User Fees 425 $ 940 $ 150 $ 191 $ 129 $ 100 $ 161 $ 109100Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ 410$ 9 $ 71 $ 100 $ 39 $ 91100Total $ 1,350 $ 150 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 2002012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 43

StormwaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 830017Metro Waterways Study Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Project Description: Springfield is participating along with Eugene and Lane County in an ongoing Army Corps ofEngineers General Investigation Study authorized under the Water Resources Development Act. Springfield’s share (25%)of this approximately $3,500,000 project is $875,000. The current project is a feasibility study necessary to identify futurewater quality projects within the Eugene/Springfield metropolitan watershed. CIP projects, such as Channel Improvements,Floodplain Mapping (currently underway) and McKenzie Oxbow will qualify as in-kind match and satisfy the balance of thelocal obligation. The Cedar Creek Drainage Basin has been identified as Springfield’s highest priority study area. TheCedar Creek Intake reconstruction is identified as the initial project in the Metro Waterways Study. The IntakeReconstruction is identified in a separate project sheet.Justification: This planning study will assist the City in future years to gain access to federal funding (similar to the MillRace funding) for capital improvement projects that address drainage capacity, water quality, and flood control.Project Driver: Currently stormwater from the Thurston area outfalls into Cedar Creek. Future developments willincrease stormwater and impact Cedar Creek.Project Trigger: Future growth, stormwater management and water quality.Project Status: Accumulating fund for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Springfield Stormwater Management PlanMetro Waterways ProjectDEQ Stormwater Discharge PermitTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 250 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 250 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -User Fees 425 $ 125 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 125 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25Other $ -Total $ 250 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ - $ -Page 442012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 850089System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityChannel Improvement Improvement SDC Eligibility: 3.5%Project Description: This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fishpassage, and to correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality, andfish habitat functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfallmodifications, and channel restoration. The adoption of the Springfield Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Planidentifies an additional temperature benefit from channel restoration and shading.Justification: This project addresses the "Take Guidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in theirissuance of the Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook SalmonHabitat. This project also enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality throughchannel restoration improvements. The listing of the Willamette and McKenzie rivers for temperature identifies the needto provide riparian improvement and shading.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory and environmental requirements.The need to meet regulatory requirements and address capacity issues.Accumulating fund for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Springfield Stormwater Management PlanMetro Waterways ProjectDEQ Stormwater Discharge PermitTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 67 $ 7 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 120 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20Other $ 270 $ 30 $ 48 $ 48 $ 48 $ 48 $ 48Total $ 457 $ 57 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 8 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 2 $ 2Personnel Costs $ 39 $ 5 $ 6 $ 6 $ 7 $ 7 $ 8Total $ 47 $ 6 $ 7 $ 7 $ 8 $ 9 $ 10 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -User Fees 425 $ 445 $ 55 $ 78 $ 78 $ 78 $ 78 $ 78Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 12 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ 100$ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20Total $ 557 $ 57 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 45

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 850117System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityMS4 Permit Requirements Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant DischargeElimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements.Justification: In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),which authorizes the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries.The permit requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show thatstormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health andaquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary andappropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007, the City received the permit and thiswill become an ongoing program to maintain the permit.Project Driver: Regulatory and environmental requirements.Project Trigger:Project Status:The work under the MS4 Plan in on going to address permit requirements.Accumulating funds for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008 and the Stormwater Management PlanCity of Springfield Municipal and Development CodesRegulatory RequirementsTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 170 $ 25 $ 25 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30Total $ 170 $ 25 $ 25 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 48 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8Total $ 48 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -User Fees 425 $ 100 $ 25 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ 75$ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15Total $ 175 $ 25 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ -Page 462012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 850093System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityRiparian Land Management Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Project Description: This project provides funding to purchase riparian area lands from private property owners whereneeded to meet City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. It alsoprovides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them. Propertyacquisitions will typically result in increased operational spending to maintain city owned property. Projects developed onproperty acquired may, however, produce savings through reduced spending for flood control and water qualityimprovement activities. Project funding levels have been reduced to conform to eligibility levels for improvement SDCs.Council adoption and implementation of a reimbursement SDC may permit restoration of prior funding levels.Justification: This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Coderequirements and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, some Springfield waterwaysdo not meet federal and state water quality safety standards for human and aquatic life. In addition to the Federal CleanWater Act requirements to improve stormwater quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for at least75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve thisobjective and some riparian protection has been established in the Development Code. In cases where riparian areaprotection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners, this funding will enable the City to identify priorityareas for protection and to compensate property owners.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory requirements and community livability.Development activity impacts on storm drainage flows and water qualityAccumulating funds for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and Stormwater Management PlanCity of Springfield Development CodeClean Water Act and Endangered Species ActMetro Waterways identified land acquisitionsTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ 88 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 87.90 $ 15 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ 14.65 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 13 $ 1 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3Personnel Costs $ 8 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 2 $ 2Total $ 21 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 5 $ 5 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ 90$ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ 1515User Fees 425 $ 153 $ 10 $ 10 $ 13 $ 30 $ 30 $ 3030Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 11.05 $ 1.40 $ 1.40 $ 1.65 $ 1.65 $ 1.65 $ 1.65 1.65Other $ 27 $ 27Total $ 281.05 $ 38 $ 26.40 $ 29.65 $ 46.65 $ 46.65 $ 46.65 $ 46.652012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 47

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesConstruction and PreservationSCS Channel 6 FIRM Update Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-SW13Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the FloodInsurance Rate Map (FIRM) for SCS Channel 6 from 10th Street to the I-5 Channel to incorporate numerous constructionchanges that have occurred along SCS Channel 6 in the past 40 years.Justification: SCS Channel 6 currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. Since the datacollection was done for the original flood plain mapping in the 1960's and 1970's, numerous changes have been made to SCSChannel 6, including widening, narrowing, and piping. Each of these changes was considered insignificant and was doneindependently, so detailed analysis of the affect of the change on the mapped flood plain was not performed. However, whenthe changes are taken in aggregate, there may be an affect on some properties. The City has received a request from acitizen with property along SCS Channel 6 to re-evaluate the current 100-year flood plain boundary and prepare new maps ifneeded. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consultant to develop a scope document for the study and mappingupdate. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Citizen Request to prepare current flood plain maps.Past construction along SCS Channel 6Project Status: Programmed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance ProgramNatural Hazards Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 2020Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 20 $ - $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ -User Fees 425 $ 2020Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 20 $ - $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 482012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesConstruction and PreservationMill Race FIRM Update Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-SW14Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the FloodInsurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Springfield Mill Race from the inlet at Clearwater Park to the outletat Island Park to incorporate construction changesJustification: The Springfield Mill Race currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain as depicted on FEMA'sFIRMs. With the construction of the Mill Race Restoration Project, the City is obligated under federalstatute to prepare new analyses and maps to show the affects of the project on the 100-year floodplain. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consulant to develop a scope document forthe study and mapping update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for fundingthe update work.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Required by federal statute 44 CFR 65.3Mill Race Restoration Project constructionProject Status: Study will commence following funding approval.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance ProgramNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 2020Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 20 $ - $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ -User Fees 425 $ 2020Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 20 $ - $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 49

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesConstruction and PreservationHigh Banks Road (42nd St.) Dike Study Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-SW15Project Description: Conduct a study of the condition of the High Banks Road (42nd Street) Dike to identify any structuralor non-structural deficiencies and to evaluate the potential for obtaining federal accreditation of thisDike as a flood control facility under the National Flood Insurance Program and for compliance with theNational Levee Safety Program.Justification: In October 1983, the City entered into an Agreement with the Soil Conservation Service for theoperations and maintenance of the High Banks Road Dike that was constructed by Lane County in the1950's adjacent to what is now known as 42nd Street. This dike provides flood control protection forareas of Springfield north of Highway 126 west of 42nd Street from McKenzie River flooding. TheFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed an accreditation program for leveesthat are relied upon under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the National LeveeSafety Committee has developed recommendations to Congress for a National Levee Safety Program.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Federal requirements for maintaining/operating flood control leveesStudy needed prior to completion of updated McKenzie River flood plain mapping under the MetroWaterways Project.Project Status: Study will commence following funding approval.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:National Levee Safety ProgramNational Flood Insurance ProgramHigh Banks Road Dike Operation and Maintenance Agreement (1983)Natural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 5050Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 50 $ - $ 50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ -User Fees 425 $ 5050Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 50 $ - $ 50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 502012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesConstruction and PreservationStormwater Facility Master Plan Updates Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Project Description:Justification:Project Driver:Update of the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan. The plan itself identified areas where additionalstudy work is needed. There is also a need to address the proposed UGB amendments identified inthe Commercial, Industrial Buildable Lands study recently completed. The plan project list will be reprioritizedand costs will be revised to represent current values. New technology for sustainabledevelopment and stormwater management at the source is available to reduce overall systemrequirements and long term costs.The Council directed staff to maintain and update the Facility Master plan to provide currentinformation for SDC development, CIP project needs and support for the development community.BMP DS3 of the City's NPDES MS4 permit directs updating of the SWFMP. The data used for thecurrent Stormwater Facility Master Plan represents the system as it existed in 2005 and doesn'tinclude new development and repairs of the existing system. The system model needs to be updatedto the current GIS standard NAD 83 and completed capital project and system upgrades need to bemodeled.Council Direction to update SDC's on 5-yr cycle and regulatory requirements.Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory compliance with the City NPDES MS4 permit, future growth, stormwater management andMaster Plan update will commence following funding approval.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council ObjectiveStormwater Management Plan/NPDES MS4 PermitEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 2525Engineering $ 175175Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 200 $ - $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ -User Fees 425 $ 100 15 85Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 100 15 85Revenue Bonds 425 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 200 $ 30 $ 170 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 51

StormwaterFunding Programmed: YesAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality"S" and "T" Streets Drainage Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW17Project Description: Construct a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along "T" and "S" Streets between10 th and Debra Streets. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan expands upon the original Channel 6 report with anecessary downstream Channel 6 project. Increasing the pipe size or pipe length will increase operational costs slightly.Justification: This project will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the "S" Street area.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Citizen complaints regarding localized flooding. Improvement of County standard streets.Redevelopment and/or completion of Channel 6 improvements and capacity issues.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:SCS Channel 6 ReportNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanStormwater Facilities Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 75$ 75Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 475$ 25 $ 450Other $ 50$ 50Total $ 600 $ - $ - $ - $ 150 $ 450 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 15 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2Total $ 15 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ 274$ 74 $ 200User Fees 425 $ 326$ 76 $ 250Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 600 $ - $ - $ - $ 150 $ 450 $ - $ -Page 522012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #Jasper/Natron Drainage Improvement SDC Eligibility: 83.4%Map ID-SW18Project Description: Construction on channel improvement along the existing drainage ways to serve newdevelopment in the Jasper Natron basin. Impacts to the downstream property owners and natural drainageways located beyond the City's Urban Growth Boundary will need to be assessed and mitigated in the finaldesign. The first year of the project will include additional studies to identify the downstream impacts and designthe project and its mitigation measures. Construction will occur in the following years. The impact on the City'soperations budget is estimated on the conceptual project but may change on final design. There is an expectedincrease in both the annual maintenance and personnel budget.Justification: Will expand the storm sewer system to service future growth.Project Driver: Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the existing Urban Growth Boundary(UGB) to promote future urban development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Planprioritized this project for completion in 2011.Project Trigger: Development within the Jasper/Natron area following completion of the Jasper Trunk Sewer(CIP Map ID WW-10). Council direction.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 250 $ 250Engineering $ 500 $ 500Land/Right of Way $ 500$ 500Construction $ 3,500$ 1,500 $ 2,000Other $ 250 $ 250Total $ 5,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 145$ 29 $ 29 $ 29 $ 2929Personnel Costs $ 15$ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 33Total $ 160 $ - $ - $ 32 $ 32 $ 32 $ 32 $ 32FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 1,000 $ 1,000User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 4,000$ 2,000 $ 2,000Total $ 5,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 53

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityChannel 6 Improvement SDC Eligibility: 3.5%Project Description: Improvements to the existing storm drainage pipes and channel, a proposed by-pass pipe, andconstruct a new regional detention facility. This project needs additional study and design to better meet regulatory goals.It is possible to pursue in phased increments.Justification: This project will increase capacity and help to reduce and eliminate localized flooding along the channel,which will lower annual operations costs.Project Driver: Flooding in area around channel 6, between I-105 and Hayden Bridge Road. Total Maximum DailyLoad goals for shading and channel improvement. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritizedthis project for completion in 2009.Project Trigger: Identified capacity and water quality needs identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Project #4FC and #4 WQProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50$ 50Engineering $ 210 $ 60$ 150Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,240 $ 440$ 800Other $ -Total $ 1,500 $ 500 $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 30 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Personnel Costs $ 14 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3Total $ 44 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 8 $ 8 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 482 $ 482User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 18 $ 18Unspecified $ 1,000$ 1,000Total $ 1,500 $ 500 $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ -Page 542012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityCedar Creek Intake Reconstruction Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW20Project Description: The Cedar Creek drainage is the focus of a comprehensive series of stormwater systemimprovements identified in the Metro Waterways Study. Metro Waterways represents a regional partnership whichincludes state, federal, and local partners, including the US Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Land Management and OregonDept. of Fish and Wildlife, as well as local utilities and jurisdictions and the McKenzie Watershed Council. Projectsidentified in the study focus on enhancing riparian areas and stream habitat for the benefit of endangered species,reducing urban pollutants, and repairing/restoring critical flood control infrastructure on the McKenzie River and CedarCreek.This project, the first of those identified in the multi-year study, is the reconstruction of the intake structure and associatedchannel improvements to the inlet of Cedar Creek from the McKenzie River. This work will provide for managing seasonalflows to both reduce the potential for serious wintertime flooding from the McKenzie River, and ensure adequatesummertime flows for fish habitat and downstream water users, including the Springfield Utility Board. Springfield hasparticipated in the Metro Waterways partnership since 2003.Justification: Improvements will ensure summertime stream flows in Cedar Creek to provide stormwater managementand habitat to endangered species, and will manage high storm flows, which presently threaten citizens’ homes.Project Driver:Metro Waterways Study, Cedar Creek Partnership and Salmon Trout Enhancement Program (STEP)project. The Stormwater Facility Master Plan identified this project as an ongoing need through 2018.Project Trigger: Implementation of the initial project developed out of the Metro Waterways Study and the STEPproject.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Metro Waterways Project.2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 125 $ 100 $ 25Engineering $ 75$ 75Land/Right of Way $ 100$ 100Construction $ 300$ 100 $ 100 $ 100Other $ -Total $ 600 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ 500 $ 500User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 100$ 100Total $ 600 $ 500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 55

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 850177System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityWoodstave Removal Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-SW21Project Description: Project to take the last active portion of the S. A Street woodstave storm line out of service. Thisline is located south of S. A Street, between S.10th Street and S. 18th Street. Portions of this line lie under buildings andacross properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposalrequirements. Initial project cost involves scoping the extent of the removal, permitting and disposal requirements anddeveloping updated costs. Additional funds will then be programmed as needed to complete the project.Justification: This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problemsand costs.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Regulatory and environmental requirements. Delay may increase City's risk of regulatory violations.Citizen request and Council priorityProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50$ 50Engineering $ 100$ 100Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 50$ 50Total $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50 $ 150OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -User Fees 425 $ 50$ 50Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 150$ 150Total $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50 $ 150Page 562012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 830012System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityMcKenzie Oxbow Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW22Project Description: Study of the McKenzie Oxbow area to determine the impact of existing stormwater flows on theMcKenzie River. The study will include options on what needs to be done before the area can be turned over toWillamalane Park. Phase 2 of this project includes construction of facilities and improvements identified in the study.Justification: The McKenzie Oxbow area was donated to the City and has been maintained by the City for some time. In2001, there were plans to turn the area over to Willamalane. However, before that can happen, it is important to find outwhat effects the stormwater has that is draining to the river, and if any changes need to be made prior to the transfer of theland over to Willamalane.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Stormwater quality requirements, Willamalane Park District needs and Council direction.McKenzie Oxbow Management PlanProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master planMcKenzie River Oxbow Natural AreaTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanMetro Waterways Study Project #8WQEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 250$ 250Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 500$ 500Other $ 250$ 250Total $ 1,000 $ - $ 500 $ 500 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 78$ 78Unspecified $ 922$ 422 $ 500Total $ 1,000 $ - $ 500 $ 500 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 57

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityIrving Slough Headgate to Outfalls Improvement SDC Eligibility: 3.5%Map ID-SW23Project Description: The project consists of open channel improvements in multiple locations for flood control and theconstruction of a stormwater storage facility. Water quality improvements will be incorporated into the project whereapplicable to meet regulatory requirements.Justification: This project is identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and will help to reduce localized floodingand provide water quality improvements.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Flood Control and water quality. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project forcompletion in 2010.Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability from flooding incidentsProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanStormwater Management PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 440$ 440Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,757$ 1,757Other $ 185$ 185Total $ 2,382 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,382 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 9$ 1 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2Total $ 9 $ - $ 1 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ 635$ 290 $ 345Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 1,747$ 126 $ 1,621Total $ 2,382 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 416 $ 1,966 $ -Page 582012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualitySouth 67 th Street Improvement SDC Eligibility: 9.5%Map ID-SW24Project Description: Pipe improvements for flood control. Currently, during heavy rainfall the storm system surchargesat 67th and Main Street flooding private property.Justification: Reduce localized flooding identified in Stormwater Facility Master Plan Project #13FC.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Citizen complaints and localized flooding. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this projectfor completion in 2010.Minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 10$ 10Engineering $ 65$ 65Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 250$ 250Other $ -Total $ 325 $ - $ 325 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 2 $ 1 $ 1$ - $ - $ - $ -Total $ 2 $ 1 $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 31$ 31$ -Unspecified $ 294$ 294Total $ 325 $ - $ 325 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 59

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityGlenwood Improvement SDC Eligibility: 8.8%Map ID-SW25Project Description: To improve the stormwater system including pipe and open channel improvements, for flood controland water quality improvements at various locations within Glenwood as identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan(SWFMP), and to support implementation of the existing refinement plan for Glenwood. The project will also involveevaluation and construction/enhancement of stormwater outfall structures to the Willamette River. Specific projects willbe implemented as development occurs, consistent with the Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The City'scurrent effort to update the Glenwood Refinement Plan will likely result in modifications to some of the projects identifiedin the SWFMP, and will be addressed in future system studies that will be performed as the Refinement Plan workproceeds.Justification: Provide infrastructure for new development and to correct existing deficiencies that meet current and futurewater quality requirements.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Stormwater quantity and quality requirements for development within the Glenwood area. TheStormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2013. This project mayrequire reprioritization should the City receive federal funding for the Franklin Boulevard project.Completion of the Glenwood Refinement Plan Update and development within the Glenwood Area.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanGlenwood Refinement PlanI-5 Bridge Replacement PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanStormwater Management PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 300$ 300Engineering $ 1,450$ 700 $ 300 $ 450Land/Right of Way $ 1,000$ 500 $ 500Construction $ 2,500$ 1,200 $ 1,300Other $ 750$ 500$ 250Total $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 100$ 25 $ 25 $ 2525Personnel Costs $ 26 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 5 $ 5 $ 55Total $ 126 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 240$ 30 $ 35 $ 175$ -SEDA 429 $ 5,760$ 1,970 $ 1,965 $ 1,825Total $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ -Page 602012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityNorth Willamette Heights Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW26Project Description: Develop a basin plan to guide new development and redevelopment activities with respect todrainage and water quality.Justification: This is a largely undeveloped area which creates runoff to the Mill Race and the Booth Kelly site. Providea drainage study for future development including water quality elements to protect the Mill RaceProject Driver:Project Trigger:New development and re-development within the North Willamette Heights drainage basin. TheStormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011.Stormwater management and water quality requirements to guide new development and redevelopment.Project Status: Planning stage deferring pending complete fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 60$ 60Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 60 $ - $ - $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 8$ 8Unspecified $ 52$ 52Total $ 60 $ - $ - $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 61

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityJasper Slough Improvement SDC Eligibility: 83.4%Map ID-SW27Project Description: Culvert and open channel improvements for flood control, riparian enhancement and planting forTotal Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) concerns.Justification: Localized filling and degradation of the channel and road crossings cause flooding and erosion. The lackof riparian cover increases temperature and reduces natural resource value of a natural stream. City stormwater currentlydischarges into the Jasper Slough at three locations. The Jasper Slough flows into the Mill Race which has water qualityrequirements.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Localized flooding and regulatory requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized thisproject for completion in 2011.TMDL requirements, local flooding and future development,Project Status: Deferred pending funding and development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanStormwater Management PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 10$ 10Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 50$ 50Other $ -Total $ 60 $ - $ - $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 5$ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 11Personnel Costs $ 10$ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 22Total $ 15 $ - $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Asset. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 50$ 50Unspecified $ 10$ 10Total $ 60 $ - $ - $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 622012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 850148System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityGray Creek/72 nd Street Improvement SDC Eligibility: 21.1%Map ID-SW28Project Description: As outlined in Appendix E of the 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, this project includesconstructing a new open channel to convey discharges from the eastern most portion of Gray Creek to a new outfall toCedar Creek and regrading the existing open channel and down stream piped portions of the conveyance system tomitigate anticipated flooding due to future development.Justification: Provide anticipated flood control for future development combined with localized water qualityimprovements.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Development in the east Springfield area. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this projectfor completion in 2013.Future developmentProject Status: Deferred pending funding and development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Metro Waterways2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 300$ 300Engineering $ 600$ 300 $ 300Land/Right of Way $ 500$ 250 $ 250Construction $ 4,300$ 2,000 $ 2,300Other $ 300$ 150 $ 150Total $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 20$ 5 $ 5 $ 55Personnel Costs $ 4$ 1 $ 1 $ 11Total $ 24 $ - $ - $ - $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ 327$ 289 $ 38Unspecified $ 5,673$ 2,711 $ 2,962Total $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 63

This page left intentionally blankPage 642012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationUGB Expansion Area Facility Plans - Stormwater Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Project Description:Justification:Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Develop a Stormwater Facility Master Plan for each of the areas selected by the City Council forexpansion of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).As part of the proposed 2030 Refinement Plan Project, the City is evaluating several areas forpotential UGB Expansion to address identified deficiencies in the Commercial and Industrial BuildableLands Inventory (CIBL). Urban facility planning will need to occur once the Council determines whicharea(s) are appropriate for UGB expansion.Council approval of UGB Expansion Area(s)2030 Refinement Plan acknowledgement by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation andDevelopmentPending City Council approval of UGB Expansion Areas and 2030 Refinement Plan and fundingidentification.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Metro Plan2008 Stormwater Facility Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 100100Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 100 $ - $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. 441 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 100100Total $ 100 $ - $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 65

StormwaterFunding Programmed: NoAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityI-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel12.7%Map ID-SW30Project Description: Construct a combination flood control/water quality facility. Improve the open channel system andconstruct a 7 acre-foot combination treatment wetland facility on City owned property adjacent to the Gateway NaturalResource area.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Improvement SDC Eligibility:Justification: Improve localized water quality and add capacity to reduce flooding problems.Stormwater quality requirements and capacity needs related to development. The StormwaterFacilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2014.Stormwater Facilities Master Plan identified and capacity issues.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanStormwater Management PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 105$ 105Land/Right of Way $ 440$ 440Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 545 $ - $ - $ - $ 105 $ 440 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 4$ 2 $ 2Personnel Costs $ 10$ 5 $ 5Total $ 14 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7 $ 7 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 545$ 105 $ 440Total $ 545 $ - $ - $ - $ 105 $ 440 $ - $ -Page 662012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: NoAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality"Q" Street Channel Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW31Project Description: Channel repair, riparian enhancement and shading to address temperature issues in the TotalMaximum Daily Load (TMDL) and other water quality concerns. Reduce impact of nuisance species on water quality andbank stability. The Q Street Channel connects to the Alton Baker Canoe Canal near Autzen Stadium. Water qualityimprovements in the Springfield portion of the system will also support other efforts to restore fish habitat in the CanoeCanal.Justification: Improve water quality and temperature on existing drainage way.Project Driver:Stormwater quality requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project forcompletion in 2014.Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory requirements and environmental opportunities.Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanStormwater Management PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanMetro WaterwaysEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 100$ 100Engineering $ 100$ 100Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 300$ 100 $ 100 $ 100Other $ -Total $ 500 $ - $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 16 $ 1 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Total $ 16 $ 1 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -$ -Unspecified $ 500$ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100Total $ 500 $ - $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 67

StormwaterFunding Programmed: NoAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityMaple Island Slough Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW32Project Description: Conduct an engineering study to evaluate capacity needs for future development. Develop avegetation management plan with the intent to improve water quality from the Corporate Park area.Justification: Corporate pond and the Sports Way stormwater channel have overflow outlets that discharge to theMaple Island Slough. A study is needed to evaluate water quality and capacity needs within existing drainage ways.Project Driver: Stormwater quality requirements and flood control. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritizedthis project for completion in 2011.Project Trigger: Identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and new developmentProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 75$ 75Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 475$ 475Other $ -Total $ 550 $ - $ - $ 550 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -$ -Unspecified $ 550$ 550Total $ 550 $ - $ - $ 550 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 682012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

StormwaterFunding Programmed: NoAccount #System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water QualityCorporate Way Pond Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12.7%Map ID-SW33Project Description: Develop a vegetation management plan for the Corporate Pond that discharges to Maple IslandSlough. See Stormwater Facilities Master Plan 43-WQ. Refined construction cost will be developed with the study.Justification: Flood control and regulatory Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program requirements.Project Driver:Stormwater quality requirementsProject Trigger:Identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and citizen driven.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Stormwater Facilities Master PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanTotal Maximum Daily Load Implementation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 60$ 60Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 150$ 150Other $ -Total $ 210 $ - $ 210 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 425 $ -User Fees 425 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 440 $ -Unspecified $ 210$ 210Total $ 210 $ - $ 210 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 69

This page left intentionally blankPage 702012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

TRANSPORTATIONOverviewTransportation projects fall into the categories noted below:Planning and Project Development – These projects range from larger facility planning, to conceptproject planning, to specific project development. Funding for these projects relies heavily on Federaland State funds, with City funds used to supplement project budgets and in some cases provide requiredmatch funding to external resources. Current examples of this in the CIP are the SpringfieldTransportation System Plan and the Franklin Boulevard Planning projects.Maintenance and Operations – These projects are typically programmatic and can provide funding for arange of activities within each project. Street Light Infill and Pole Replacement, Traffic Control Projects,and Intelligent Transportation System investments fall in to this category.Pavement Preservation – These projects are identified by the Maintenance Division through theInfrastructure Management System. Funding for these projects relies heavily on local and State fuel taxrevenues and are supplemented with Transportation Reimbursements SDCs, and federal dollarsprogrammed at the discretion of the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning organization (MPO). Examplesof pavement preservation projects identified in the CIP are the Street Seal and Overlay program and the“A” Street Overlay project.System Improvement, Existing – These projects typically either bring existing infrastructure up to theadopted urban standards, or make capacity and safety improvements to existing facilities. Funding forthese projects rely on all available resources. Current examples of these types of projects in the CIP arethe Gateway/Beltline Intersection improvements and the Glenwood Connector Path project.System Improvement, New Facilities – These projects typically add new infrastructure to the City’stransportation system and are identified within the various planning documents. The trigger for theseprojects is driven mostly by growth and an identified future need to relieve stress on the system.Project funding relies on all available sources.Project MapsTP 1TP 2TP 3TP 4TP 5TP 9TP 11TP 15International Way IlluminationInternational Way PavingRoundabout Ped Crossing TreatmentGlenwood Connector PathGlenwood Connector Path Ext.“A” Street OverlayArt/Collectors Street Seal & OverlaySouth 48 th Street (Main to Daisy)TP 16TP 18TP 21TP 22TP 31TP 38Franklin Boulevard PlanGateway – Beltline IntersectionMaple Island ImprovementsOakdale Pheasant Bike Imp.Franklin Boulevard ReconstructionProjectCherokee Dr. Overlay2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 71

This page left intentionally blankPage 722012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 73

Page 742012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Capital ProjectsTotal Total Total Total Total Total TotalConstructedInternational Way Illumination $ 13- - - - - 13Capital Fund (434) $ 13- - - - - 13Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- - - - - -International Way Paving $ 80- - - - - 80Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 80- - - - - 80Unspecified $ -- - - - - -Roundabout Ped Crossing Tmnt $ 200- - - - - 200Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 200- - - - - 200Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- - - - - -In ProcessGateway - Beltline Intersection $ 1,530 1,287 1,530 1,418 1,249 725 7,739Federal Aid (420) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 750 225 355 605 395 355 2,685Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ 780 1,062 1,175 813 854 370 5,054Other $ -- - - - - -Glenwood Connector Path $ - 2,100 - - - - 2,100Federal Aid $ - 1,200 - - - - 1,200Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- - - - - -State Aid $ - 900 - - - - 900Glenwood Connector Path Ext. $ 1515 230 - - - 260Federal Aid $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 1515 - - - - 30Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- - - - - -State Aid (420) $ -- 230 - - - 230Transportation System Plan $ 105- - - - - 105Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Federal Aid (420) $ 105- - - - - 105EECBG Pedestrian Lighting $ 73- - - - - 73Capital Fund (434) -Improvement SDCs (447) -Reimbursement SDCs (446) -EECBG Signal Lighting $ 117- - - - - 117Capital Fund (434) -Improvement SDCs (447) -Reimbursement SDCs (446) -Federal Aid (420) $ 117- - - - - 117Funding Programmed"A" Street Overlay 208 - - - - - 208Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 208- - - - - 208Unspecified $ -- - - - - -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 75

Transportation and Street Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Capital ProjectsTotal Total Total Total Total Total TotalPartial Funding ProgrammedTransportation Demand Mgmt $ 2020 20 20 20 20 120Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 10- 10 10 10 10 50Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ 1020 10 10 10 10 70Art/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay $ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - 73 - 73Federal Aid (420) $ 400- - - - - 400Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - 194 81 - 275Unspecified $ 600 1,000 1,000 806 846 1,000 5,252Traffic Control Projects $ 297 117 117 117 117 117 882Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 157- 35 35 35 35 297Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 40- - - - - 40Unspecified $ 100 117 82 82 82 82 545Gateway Traffic Improvements $ 500 500 500 416 400 500 2,816Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 250- - - 200 250 700Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ 250 500 500 416 200 250 2,116Intelligent Transportation Systems $ 7750 50 50 50 50 327Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 77- 25 25 25 25 177Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- 25 25 25 - 75Revenue Bonds (xxx) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -50 - - - 25 75South 48th Street (Main to Daisy) $ 175- 927 - - - 1,102Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- 752 - - - 752Other (Developer) $ 175- 175 - - - 350Franklin Boulevard Plan $ 25 1,600 25 25 25 25 1,725Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Federal Aid (420) $ - 400 - - - - 400Improvement SDCs (447) $ 25 100 25 25 25 25 225Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Other (LTD) $ -50 - - - - 50SEDA (429) $ - 200 - - - - 200Unspecified $ - 850 - - - - 850Bridge Preservation $ 1010 10 10 10 10 60Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 10- 10 10 10 10 50Unspecified $ -10 - - - - 10MUTCD Compliance $ -85 85 85 85 85 425Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- 40 40 40 - 120Unspecified $ -85 45 45 45 85 305Funding Not ProgrammedStreet Light Infill & LPS Replmnt $ - 280 280 280 280 280 1,400Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 280 280 280 280 280 1,400Page 762012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Capital ProjectsTotal Total Total Total Total Total TotalLocal Street Seal & Overlay $ 300 300 300 300 300 300 1,800Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Other $ -- - - - - -Unspecified 300 300 300 300 300 300 1,800Street Light Pole Test $ -80 8 8 8 8 112Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -80 8 8 8 8 112Street Lights - NESC Compliance $ 123 3 3 3 3 27Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -3 3 3 3 3 15Other -Unspecified 12 - - - - - 12Arterial/Collector Reconstruction $ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000Arterial/Collector ScheduledMaintenance $ - 500 500 500 500 500 2,500Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 500 500 500 500 500 2,500Local/Residential Reconstruction $ - 300 300 300 300 300 1,500Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 300 300 300 300 300 1,500Local/Residential ScheduledMaintenance $ - 600 600 600 600 600 3,000Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 600 600 600 600 600 3,000Wayfinding $ 5050 50 50 50 50 300Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ 5050 50 50 50 50 300Maple Island Improvements $ 230 550 100 831 - - 1,711Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ 30- - - - - 30Reimbursement SDCs (446) -Unspecified $ 200 550 100 831 - - 1,681Franklin Blvd-TIGER Grant $ -- 25,000 13,000 7,000 - 45,000Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Other -Unspecified $ -- 25,000 13,000 7,000 - 45,000Intelligent Lighting Control $ - 100 100 100 100 100 500Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 100 100 100 100 100 5002012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 77

Transportation and Street Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Capital ProjectsTotal Total Total Total Total Total TotalMain Street Lighting $ - 159 159 109 109 109 645Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 159 159 109 109 109 645Wire Theft Remediation $ - 130 11 11 11 11 174Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 130 11 11 11 11 174RRFB Installations $ -76 26 26 26 26 180Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -76 26 26 26 26 180FYA Left Turns $ -20 15 15 15 - 65Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -20 15 15 15 - 65Oakdale Pheasant Bike Imp. $ -- 330 - - - 330Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Other $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- 330 - - - 330UGB Expansion Area Facility $ -- 75 - - - 75Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Other $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- 75 - - - 75Cherokee Dr. Overlay $ -- 60 - - - 60Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Other $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- 60 - - - 60Annual Totals $ 4,944 8,832 33,411 20,274 13,258 5,819 86,538Capital Fund (434) $ -- - - 73 - 73Improvement SDCs (447) $ 1,514 340 450 700 690 700 4,394Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 2583 78 272 159 13 783Unspecified $ 2,302 7,839 32,478 19,302 12,336 5,106 79,363Other (Developer) $ 175- 175 - - - 350Other (LTD) $ -50 - - - - 50SEDA (429) $ - 200 - - - - 200Federal Aid (420) $ 695 400 - - - - 1,095State Aid (420) $ -- 230 - - - 230Other $ -- - - - - -Page 782012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 79

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: YesAccount #: 850201System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationInternational Way Illumination Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-TP1Project Description: Replace low pressure sodium (LPS) street lights on International Way as a part of Lane TransitDistrict's EmX project.Justification: LTD is reconstructing International Way to accommodate the EmX bus system. The illumination systemwill be reconstructed to facilitate EmX stops and other construction. City will pay to replace the light fixtures and LTD willpay for other improvements.Project Driver: Opportunity for two agencies to cooperate for mutual benefit. International Way is on first priority LPSlight replacement list.Project Trigger: LPS light replacement scheduleProject Status: Committed to LTD to pay for fixtures. LTD has included this work in their construction plans.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TransPlanCouncil GoalsEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 13 $ 13Other $ -Total $ 13 $ 13 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ 13 $ 13Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 13 $ 13 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 802012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: YesAccount #: 850101System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationInternational Way Paving Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-TP2Project Description: LTD has proposed to place a concrete bus lane down the middle of International Way including theportion from Sports Way to Gateway Street, which is currently paved with asphalt. Engineering has looked at theeconomics of leaving the non-bus lane portions of the street in asphalt with just an overlay, or re-paving the street in PCC,and determined that for the long term viability of the street it would be in the best interest of the City to pave all ofInternational Way with PCC. This funding will be set aside to pay the City's share of LTD's project.Justification: LTD is reconstructing International Way to accommodate the EmX bus system. It is in the City's economicinterest to pave the remainder of International Way in PCC to avoid costly future maintenance.Project Driver:Opportunity for two agencies to cooperate for mutual benefit.Project Trigger:LTD EmX ProjectProject Status: Committed to LTD to pay for paving. LTD has included this work in their construction plans.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council adopted Engineering Design Standards and ProceduresEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ 80 $ 80Unspecified $ -Total $ 80 $ 80 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 81

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: PartialConstruction and Preservation Account # 850213Roundabout Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Improvement SDC Eligibility: 32%Map ID-TP3Project Description: Addition of pedestrian crossing improvements to the Pioneer Parkway, Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkway,Hayden Bridge Way Roundabout. The improvements provide pedestrian crossing assistance in the form of a RectangularRapidly Flashing Beacon (RRFB) to provide positive indication for motorists to stop for pedestrians waiting to use the crosswalk.This project is 100% Improvement SDC eligeble as the overall MLK Parkway project is 32% eligible.Justification: Springfield City Council has directed Staff, at the request of a local advocacy group, to implement pedestriancrossing improvements. The design must be compliant with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) andFederal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:City Council directionT1-3, T2-3Local advocacy group request to City CouncilProject has been constructedSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council DirectionEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 20 $ 20 $ -Land/Right of Way $ - $ -Construction $ 180 $ 180 $ -Other $ - $ - $ -Total $ 200 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street 434 $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -SDCs, Imp. (Str.) 447 $ 200 $ 200Unspecified $ -$ -Total $ 200 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 822012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 83

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: YesSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationGlenwood Connector Path Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-TP4Project Description: The Glenwood Connector Path (GCP) is a multi-use path bridge located along the south bank of theWillamette River between the I-5 Bridge and the Oldham property on the north side of Franklin Boulevard. The GCP will connectthe existing bike path from the south side of the Knickerbocker pedestrian/bike bridge in Eugene along the river bank to the southedge of the Oldham property in Glenwood. In the future, the GCP will also be able to connect to the planned GlenwoodRiverfront Path. This ODOT project is related to the Glenwood Connector Path Extension project, which is east of this project.Upon completion of the project by ODOT, the path will be owned and maintained by the City.Justification: The GCP is a crucial link between Eugene and Springfield for bicycles and pedestrians. The GCP provides thenecessary link between the existing Multi-use path in Eugene and the planned Riverfront Bike Path in Glenwood. The GlenwoodRiverfront Path is a planned bike route in TransPlan and the Regional Transportation Plan. Currently, the bicycle lane on thenorth side of Franklin Boulevard does not connect safely to the multi‐use path, forcing cyclists to cross Franklin Boulevardwithout a safe crossing treatment to access the path. The GCP provides for the safe and continuous connection.Project Driver:Project Trigger:A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene andSpringfield.ODOT agreement to build the GCP in conjunction with the I-5 Willamette River Bridge replacementproject.Project Status: The project is in the environmental permitting and preliminary design phase.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TransPlanGlenwood Refinement PlanRegional Transportation Plan Willamalane River Path PlanCouncil GoalEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2,1002100Other $ -Total $ 2,100 $ - $ 2,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 10$ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2Personnel Costs $ 5$ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Total $ 15 $ - $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid* $ 1,2001200State Aid* $ 900900Other 446 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 2,100 $ - $ 2,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -* This funding has been dedicated as part of ODOT's project to replace the Willamette Bridge and will not flow through the City'sbudget.Page 842012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: YesSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationGlenwood Connector Path Extension Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Map ID-TP5Project Description: The Glenwood Connector Path Extension (GCPE) is located along the south bank of the Willamette Riverbetween the Oldham property on the north side of Franklin Boulevard and the Glenwood Blvd. intersection. The GlenwoodConnector Path Extension temporarily connects the Glenwood Connector Path to Franklin Blvd., until the planned GlenwoodRiverfront Path is constructed.Justification: The Glenwood Connector Path Extension is a crucial mid-term temporary link between Eugene and Springfield forbicycles and pedestrians until the Glenwood Riverfront Path is constructed. The Glenwood Riverfront Path is a planned bike routein TransPlan and the Regional Transportation Plan. The Glenwood Connector Path Extension provides for the safe andcontinuous connection between the Glenwood Connector Path (viaduct) and Glenwood Blvd.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene andSpringfield.City agreement to build the GCPE in conjunction with the Glenwood Connector Path, and the I-5Willamette River Bridge replacement project. and the Glenwood Connector Path.Obligating Federal funds and completing project design approvals.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TransPlanGlenwood Refinement PlanRegional Transportation Plan Willamalane River Path PlanCouncil GoalEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ 30 $ 15 $ 15Construction $ 230$ 230Other $ -Total $ 260 $ 15 $ 15 $ 230 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 4$ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ 8$ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2Total $ 12 $ - $ - $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ 30 $ 15 $ 15SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ 230$ 230Other 446 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 260 $ 15 $ 15 $ 230 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 85

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: YesInfrastructure Planning & Inventory StudySpringfield Transportation System Plan Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Project Description: The Transportation System Plan (TSP) update is intended to serve as a blueprint to guide future multimodaltransportation system improvements and investment decisions for the City of Springfield. This project includes aninventory and general assessment of the existing transportation system; a determination of existing and future needs; a roadplan; a public transportation plan; a bicycle/pedestrian plan; a parking plan; a transportation system management and demandmanagement plan; an air, rail, water, and pipeline plan; and a financing and implementation plan.Justification: The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660 Division 12 requiresjurisdictions throughout Oregon to prepare and adopt regional or local transportation plans that serve as the transportationelement for their comprehensive plans (660 012 0015(2) (4)). Plan updates should respond to transportation, land use,environmental, population growth, economic and social changes that have occurred in the community since the TSP was lastprepared. Historically, TransPlan has served as the local TSP for both Springfield and Eugene. However, since the passage ofHB 3337, Eugene and Springfield are required to have seperate UGBs, and thus seperate TSPs.Project Driver: Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) - OAR 660 Division 12Project Trigger:Project Status:HB 3337 - Changes in land inventories and UGB boundaryIn Process - Transportation inventory has been completed by City Staff. Consultant, CH2M Hill, hasbeen hired to assist with other portions of the project. Stkeholder committes have been formed andhave reviewed exiting conditions and policy statements.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Statewide Planning Goal 12, Oregon Highway Plan, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Oregon Transportation Plan,Regional Transportation Plan, Oregon Freight Plan, Metro Plan, TransPlan, Lane County Transportaton System Plan,Willamalane Comprehensive Plan, Local Refinement Plans, Springfield Bicycle Plan, Springfield Development Code,Springfield Engineering Design Standards ManualEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 348 $ 210 $ 138Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 348 $ 210 $ 138 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street 434 $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal - STP-U* 420 $ 105 $ 105 $ -State Aid 420 $ 243 $ 243SDCs. Imp (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 348 $ 348 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -* ODOT has set aside $25,000 for consultant services, with the remaining $80,000 set aside City incurred costs.Page 862012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: YesSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationPedestrian Signal Upgrades Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: The City of Springfield applied for and received a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for EnergyEfficiency and Conservation Projects under the American Recovery and Revitilization Act (Federal stimulus). The Cityreceived $539,400 from the Stimulus package and with direction from City Council divided the grant between City projects andprojects at Willamalane Park and Recreation District and Springfield Public Schools.Justification: This is Federal stimulus money used to provide funding for projects that will create new jobs and reduce energyconsumption. There was no matching funding required for this grant and the grant dollars will be leveraged by energy rebatesfrom the Springfield Utility Board. Between the grant and rebates, Team Springfield will be able to make a significantdifference in several locations by increasing lighting quality and conserving energy and reducing future energy costs.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) requirements and energy conservation.Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant awardedFunding has been received and projects are in design.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Energy Conservation strategiesEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 73 $ 73Other $ -Total $ 73 $ 73 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (12) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2)Personnel Costs $ -Total $ (12) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ 73 $ 73State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 73 $ 73 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 87

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: YesSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationStreet Lighting Upgrades Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: The City of Springfield applied for and received a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for EnergyEfficiency and Conservation Projects under the American Recovery and Revitilization Act (Federal stimulus). The Cityreceived $539,400 from the Stimulus package and with direction from City Council, divided the grant between City projects andprojects at Willamalane Park and Recreation District and Springfield Public Schools.Justification: This is Federal stimulus money used to provide funding for projects that will create new jobs and reduce energyconsumption. There was no matching funding required for this grant and the grant dollars will be leveraged by energy rebatesfrom the Springfield Utility Board. Between the grant and rebates Team Springfield will be able to make a significant differencein several locations by increasing lighting quality and conserving energy and reducing future energy costs.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Upgrading poor lighting fixtures to improved light sources that consume less energy.Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant awardedFunding has been received and projects are in design.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Energy Conservation strategiesEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 117 $ 117Other $ -Total $ 117 $ 117 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (12) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2)Personnel Costs $ -Total $ (12) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ 117 $ 117State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 117 $ 117 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 882012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #: 850194System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation"A" Street Overlay Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-TP9Project Description: Overlay "A" Street from 5th Street to Mill Street, and 4th Street from Main Street to "C" Street.Some locations may require more extensive base repair due to the dilapidated conditionJustification: As part of the construction of the Springfield Justice Center, one block of "B" Street was closed and LaneTransit District (LTD) bus routes were redirected onto "A" Street. "A" Street is due for an overlay which will also bolsterthe structure to withstand the additional stress of the added bus traffic. Along with "A" Street, 4th Street will also beoverlayed between Main Street and "C" Street. This project will be scheduled once all major construction components arecompleted on the Justice Center and all street utility work is done.Project Driver:Project Trigger:The need to preserve the street and provide structure to support heavier bus traffic, and to avoidpotential costly reconstruction.Justice Center completionProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management SystemEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 555 $ 555Other $ -Total $ 555 $ 555 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ 750 $ 750State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ 208 $ 208Unspecified $ -Total $ 958 $ 958 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 89

This page left intentionally blankPage 902012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 870003System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationTransportation Demand ManagementImprovement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: The project includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-autotravel links in the community like the 60th and "E" Street multi-use path, park and ride facilities coordinated with transitstations, and other activities that promote non-single auto travel choices. This funding can be used as the funding sourcefor Bike Lane projects on the Transportation System Development Charge project list.Justification: TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM), or ‘transportationoptions’ (TO) policies and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessaryto meet those requirements. At times, TDM activities include locations that are included on the Transportation SystemDevelopment Charge Project List. For those activities, Transportation Improvement SDC funds can be used to provideproject funding up to the percentage that the project location is eligible per the SDC Project List. The TDM project alsoprovides resources to address state-mandated Green House Gas (GHG) reduction requirements for the transportationsector.Project Driver: TransPlan policies, and state land use, transportation, and GHG reduction laws, statues and rules. TDMand TO program activities promote alternatives to 1-person/1-car auto trips and is a growing aspect of systemmanagement when the funding and/or land is not available to continue to build new system capacityProject Trigger: TransPlan policies, current and pending state regulatory requirements, transportation systemmanagement need.Project Status:Funding balance is for accumulating finds for projects as developedSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TDM Goals Regional Transportation PlanTransPlan State LegislationEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 120 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20Total $ 120 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 50 $ 10$ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 70 $ 10 $ 20 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Total $ 120 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 91

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850008System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationArterial/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-TP11Project Description: A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement sealing and/or overlay of the Arterial/CollectorStreet System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's arterial and collector system at the current Counciltarget of 85% fair or better level, approximately $750,000 to $1,000,000 in funding is needed annually. Following is apartial list with the highest priority overlays:Gateway St. (6,820 ft., $1,398,000)Harlow Rd. (3,934 ft., $807,000) 19 th St. (531 ft., $110,000)Laura St. (2,625 ft., $538,000) 18 th St. (2,069 ft., $424,000)E. 17th St. (945 ft., $194,000) 28 th St. (5.087 ft., $1,046,000)Q St. (1,790 ft., $367,000 ) 35 th St. (2,452 ft., $503,000)W. "D" St. (4,508 ft., $925,000) 42 nd St. (2,889 ft., $592,000)Marcola Rd. (2,602 ft., $534,000)G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $406,000)Commercial Ave. (496 ft., $103,000)Thurston Rd. (2,763 ft., $567,000)Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long termpreventative maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life anddelays more costly repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that iseffectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure.Project Driver: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance andimprovements to the City's capital infrastructure.Project Trigger: Aging facilities and programmed preventive maintenanceProject Status: Ongoing ProgramSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council GoalsInfrastructure Management SystemEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 840 $ 120 $ 120 $ 120 $ 120 $ 120 $ 120120Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 6,160 $ 880 $ 880 $ 880 $ 880 $ 880 $ 880880Other $ -Total $ 7,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ 73 - $ 73Federal Aid 420 $ 400 $ 400State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ 275$ 194 $ 81Unspecified $ 6,252 $ 600 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 806 $ 846 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Total $ 7,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Page 922012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850013System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationTraffic Control ProjectsImprovement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installationof roundabouts at various City intersections. Potential candidate intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd &Marcola Road, 28th & Main, South 21st & Main, South 42nd & Daisy St., 40th & Daisy St., and 28th & Centennial. Themodification of signals may include change to permissive left turns at some existing signalized intersections. Schoolspeed zone beacons, safety projects, and miscellaneous striping and signing improvements may also be implementedunder the Traffic Control Projects. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into thiscategory they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match theallowable SDC funds.Justification: As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop signcontrol. The intersections will meet roundabout or signal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed.The modification of existing signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and to enhance traffic flow.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Specific projects are based upon the amount of available funding.T1-2, T2-2, T4-3Citizen requests, high crash locations, congestionOngoing Project. Funding is programmed as a 'sinking fund' to program resources for future projectsas identified and/or required. A typical intersection upgrade project can range between $250,000 -$1,000,000.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TransPlanCouncil PolicyEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 80 $ 30 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Land/Right of Way $ 55 $ 20 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7Construction $ 747 $ 247 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100Other $ -Total $ 882 $ 297 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 33 $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 9Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 33 $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 9FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 297 $ 157$ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ 40 $ 40Unspecified $ 545 $ 100 $ 117 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82Total $ 882 $ 297 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 93

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850069System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationGateway Area Traffic ImprovementsImprovement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity, relievecongestion, and improve safety. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into thiscategory they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match theallowable SDC funds.Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution; to improvesafety of all modes; and, to support continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years agoresulted in a list of priority projects.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Community growth in the Gateway area. T1-3, T2-2, T4-3Gateway area development and traffic conditionsOngoing. Funding balance is a 'sinking fund' to program resources for highest priority projects likeGateway Street operational and safety improvements. Project may also contribute to Gateway/Beltlinefunding needs.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Gateway Traffic Capacity AnalysisI-5/Beltline Environmental AssessmentCouncil GoalsEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 505 $ 50 $ 100 $ 100 $ 75 $ 80 $ 100Land/Right of Way $ 350 $ 350Construction $ 1,961 $ 100 $ 400 $ 400 $ 341 $ 320 $ 400Other $ -Total $ 2,816 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 416 $ 400 $ 500 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 700 $ 250$ 200 $ 250SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 2,116 $ 250 $ 500 $ 500 $ 416 $ 200 $ 250Other $ -Total $ 2,816 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 416 $ 400 $ 500 $ -Page 942012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 870001System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationIntelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)Improvement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: ITS projects in various locations to increase comunications, capacity, safety and travelerinformation. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given anindividual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds.Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, fuel use, toincrease safety and to allow for continued economic development.Project Driver: Deploying ITS projects enhance the ability to use the transportation system more effectively byextracting the maximum capacity from the system. This will delay the need for adding new lanes andlinks to the system and improve traveler safety and access to traveler information systems.Project Trigger: Ongoing. May provide matching funds to Oregon Department Of Transportation projects with mutualbenefits.Project Status: Ongoing Program. Use as a 'sinking fund' to accumulate resources for highest priority projects.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Regional ITS Operations & Implementation Plan for Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan AreaTransPlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 30 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 297 $ 72 $ 45 $ 45 $ 45 $ 45 $ 45Other $ -Total $ 327 $ 77 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 6 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 6 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 177 $ 77$ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ 75 $ -$ 25 $ 25 $ 25Unspecified $ 75$ 50$ 25Total $ 327 $ 77 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 95

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850162System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationS. 48th Street Connection (Main to Daisy) Improvement SDC Eligibility: 40%Map ID-TP15Project Description: Construct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South48th Street Intersection. A portion of the cost to construct this project is an obligation of current and future developmentsouth of Daisy Street. In 2009, the City received a cash payment of $175,000 to satisfy the obligation of the WestwindEstates development. Remaining funding is pending.Justification: Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street to support plannedland development Project #901 in RTP and TransPlan.Project Driver: Future development and growth will create a need for connection between Daisy and Main Street to beconstructed to alleviate congestion. Adds needed pedestrian crossing.Project Trigger: Future development activityProject Status: Deferred pending funding and future development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TransPlanAgreement between City and Westwind Estates, City Council Resolution 06-35, 7/17/06EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 155155Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 772772Other $ -Total $ 927 $ - $ - $ 927 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 752752Other (Developer 420 $ 350 $ 175175Total $ 1,102 $ 175 $ - $ 927 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 962012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 870007System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationFranklin Boulevard Planning Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Map ID-TP16Project Description: Complete project refinement, including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentationfor future improvements to Franklin Boulevard, the Franklin/Glenwood and Franklin/McVay intersections and theMcVay/Franklin intersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians,and autos. Contribute to the required local match for any federal funding received.Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks,bike lanes, property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning andanticipates redevelopment in the urban renewal district as directed by the Springfield Economic Development Agency.Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfrontarea. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to any Glenwoodarea redevelopment.City priority focus on Glenwood area redevelopmentProject Status: Concept phase complete, NEPA documentation funding gap identified to complete NEPA analysis.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council PriorityGlenwood Refinement Plan UpdateTransPlanRegional Transportation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 150 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 150 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid, STP- 420 $ 400$ 400State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 225 $ 25 $ 100 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Other (LTD) 420 $ 50$ 50SEDA 429 $ 200$ 200Unspecified $ 850$ 850Total $ 1,725 $ 25 $ 1,600 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 97

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationBridge Preservation and Rehabilitation Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: This project will address known deficiencies to City owned bridges discovered through required semiannualODOT Bridge Inspections. These inspections have identified $50k of needed repairs to preserve function and structuralintegrity of six City bridges.Justification: There are six bridges maintained by the City that are currently inspected by ODOT in correlation to the Statewide transportation system. Repair activities include bank scour beneath the bridge, rebuilding or replacement of a concretenosing, grouting, secure embankment erosion, replacing split spacer block, replacing a wing wall and patching concretespalding. Steps need to be taken to address the financing of these projects before they reach a critical stage.Project Driver: ODOT Bridge Inspection reports that are provided on a semi-annual basis - these reports identifyrepairs and deficiencies with each bridge. PW Maintenance performs 6 month inspections to identifynew issues and monitor existing ones.Project Trigger: Due to reduction in street funding there will be little or no operating funds to absorb a bridge repairproject if necessary. Aging facilities and regulatory requirements.Project Status: MonitoringSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council GoalsEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 60 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Other $ -Total $ 60 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 6 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ 30 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Total $ 36 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ 50 $ 10$ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Unspecified $ 10$ 10Total $ 60 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ -Page 982012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850151System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationGateway/Beltline Intersection Improvement SDC Eligibility: 49%Map ID-TP18Project Description: Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, includingconstruction of a couplet and purchase of right-of-way. CIP project funding contributes to overall project estimate of $30million. Phase 1 is under constructionwith a cost esitamte of $10 million.Justification: Needed to improve level of service at the intersection and maintaining proper function of the intersectionin relationship to the I-5/Beltline Interchange.Project Driver: Community growth and agreements with Federal Highways and ODOT to construct intersectionimprovements as part of the larger I-5/Beltline interchange upgrade project.Project Trigger: Project Phase 1 is mid-way through constrcution with completion anticipated late summer 2011.Project Phase 2 trigger is set by traffic operations agreement with ODOT.Project Status: Phase 1 construction underway.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:I-5/Beltline Environmental AssessmentTransPlanRegional Transportation PlanGateway Refinement PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 250$ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 5050Engineering $ 750$ 305445Land/Right of Way $ 5,6505650Construction $ 6,6266626Other $ 7,244 $ 1,530 $ 1,297 $ 1,480 $ 1,368 $ 1,199 $ 370Total $ 20,520 $ 1,530 $ 1,297 $ 1,530 $ 1,418 $ 1,249 $ 725 $ 12,771OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 10$ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2Personnel Costs $ 25$ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Total $ 35 $ - $ - $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 2,685 $ 750 $ 225 $ 355 $ 605 $ 395 $ 355SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 17,825 $ 780 $ 1,062 $ 1,175 $ 813 $ 854 $ 370 $ 12,771Other 420 $ -Total $ 20,510 $ 1,530 $ 1,287 $ 1,530 $ 1,418 $ 1,249 $ 725 $ 12,7712012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 99

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850006System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationUniform Traffic Control Devices Compliance Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Replace and revise signs, markings, traffic signals, beacons and other work to conform to theManual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as suplemented by Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR).Justification: Federal Highways Administration and Oregon Department of Transportation periodically update the Manual.The City is required to conform to the revisions in the new Manual over specified time frames. Failure to comply violatesstate law and jeopardizes federal highway funds.Project Driver: Regulatory mandate and traffic safety.Project Trigger: MUTCD Update OAR adoption by the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC).Project Status: OTC adoption expected mid-2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Manual of Uniform Traffic Control DevicesTransPlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 60$ 10 $ 10 $ 10 10 $ 10 $ 10Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 450$ 75 $ 75 $ 75 75 $ 75 $ 75Other $ -Total $ 510 $ - $ 85 $ 85 $ 85 $ 85 $ 85 $ 85OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ 120$ 40 $ 40 $ 40Unspecified $ 390$ 85 $ 45 $ 45 45 $ 85 $ 85Total $ 510 $ - $ 85 $ 85 $ 85 $ 85 $ 85 $ 85Page 1002012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialConstruction and PreservationStreet Lights - NESC Compliance Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Repair and modify street light and traffic signal communication facilities on Springfield Utility Board(SUB) poles in compliance with National Electric Service Code.Justification: The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) requires Springfield Utility Board (SUB) to comply with the NationalElectric Service Code (NESC). SUB periodically reviews all SUB poles. SUB notifies City of City facilities that are out ofcompliance and requests City action to remediate NESC violations. Comcast and Qwest also have facilities that are inviolation. SUB+A13 conducts the work to conform City, SUB, Comcast and Qwest facilities to NESC compliance. This projectwill provide for payments to SUB for City share of this work. SUB plans to assess NESC compliance on a nine year schedule.Since code changes occur periodically it is expected that new compliance issues will be revealed in the future.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Compliance with PUC order and NESC requirementsRegulatory requirements and SUB compliance programPending funding approvalSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 27 $ 12 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Other $ -Total $ 27 $ 12 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ 15$ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Unspecified $ 12 $ 12Total $ 27 $ 12 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 101

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #: 850178System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationMaple Island Improvements Improvement SDC Eligibility: 80%Map ID-TP21Project Description: This project will upgrade the roundabout at Maple Island Road and International Way. It will alsoextend the Maple Island Loop Road to the north along the Maple Island Slough.Justification: The City of Springfield desires to promote growth and development in the Gateway Area which will increasethe need for more access and connectivity to alleviate traffic congestion. Private developer has constructed a portion of thenorth extension of Maple Island Rd., which the City can acquire at cost before 2017.Project Driver: Council Goals and development within the Gateway AreaProject Trigger: Sufficient funding to acquire north extension and/or intersection improvementsProject Status: Deferred pending funding and future development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council GoalsTransPlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 100$ 100Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ 415$ 415Construction $ 246$ 246Other $ 720$ 550$ 170Total $ 1,481 $ - $ 550 $ 100 $ 831 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ 30 $ 30SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 1,681 $ 200 $ 550 $ 100 $ 831Total $ 1,711 $ 230 $ 550 $ 100 $ 831 $ - $ - $ -Page 1022012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationOakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-TP22Project Description: This project will design and implement bicycle lanes along the Oakdale and Pheasant routes to improve theconnectivity to local destinations. The project will offer bicycle commuters a route choice that is less congested with vehiculartraffic. A portion of the project is on County owned jurisdiction and will require County participation.Justification: There are currently no direct routes from the I-5 pedestrian bridge to the Peacehealth facility at Riverbend. Thisroute is one piece of that direct route connection, with the remaining piece of the route currently under county jurisdiction.Project Driver: Safety/Hazard conditionT1-3 T2-3Total Project Constructed Cost:Project Trigger:Project Status: Deferred Pending Funding AllotmentSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 30$ 30Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 300$ 300Other $ -Total $ 330 $ - $ - $ 330 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 330$ 330Total $ 330 $ - $ - $ 330 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 103

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #: 850066Street Light Infill & LPS LightReplacementImprovement SDC Eligibility:0%Project Description: Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by thepublic through the CIP process and throughout the year. Replace 2,720 low pressure sodium (LPS) lights.Justification: Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. LPS lights have higher life cycle costs thanalternatives. Replacement will reduce operations cost and improve visibility.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget.Implement Council Policy; Citizen Service RequestsProject Status: Ongoing ProgramSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council GoalsTransPlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 190$ 28 $ 28 $ 28 $ 28 $ 28 $ 50Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2,260$ 252 $ 252 $ 252 $ 252 $ 252 $ 1,000Other $ -Total $ 2,450 $ - $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 1,050OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (44)$ (2) $ (4) $ (6) $ (8) $ (10) $ (14)Personnel Costs $ -Total $ (44) $ - $ (2) $ (4) $ (6) $ (8) $ (10) $ (14)FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 2,450$ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 1,050Total $ 2,450 $ - $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 280 $ 1,050Page 1042012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsSystem Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #: 850008Local/Residential Street Slurry Seal Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort by slurry and crack sealing ofLocal/Residential Street System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's local street systemapproximately 5 to 8 miles should be crack sealed and slurry sealed annually. Following is a partial list indicatingthe highest priority sealing locations:Gateway 4 segmt (3,726 ft., $19,100)49th St. 11 segmt (5,160 ft., $26,500)Kelly Butte 15 segmt (7,411 ft., $38,000)65th Pl Main 3 segmt (1,110 ft., $5,200)G-F St 21st-28th 8 segmt (3,122 ft., ($16,000)Daisy 42nd-Bob Strb 21 segmt (8,236 ft., $42,200)Lindale/Pheasant (2,042 ft., $10,500)Camellia Loop area 19 segmt (7,575 ft., $38,800)A St. 62nd-69th 16 segmt (5,045 ft., $26,000)S 48th-Daisy 8 segmt (2,295 ft., $11,800)S 54th (665 ft., $3,400)Total Ft. = 46,387 Total = $267,000Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long termpreventative maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street lifeand delays more costly repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond thepoint that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance andimprovements to the City's capital infrastructure.Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed. Aging facilities andprogrammed preventive maintenance.Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council GoalsInfrastructure Management SystemEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 280 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 4040Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,820 $ 260 $ 260 $ 260 $ 260 $ 260 $ 260260Other $ -Total $ 2,100 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 2,100 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300Total $ 2,100 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 3002012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 105

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #:System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationStreet Light Pole Test, Treat &ReplacementImprovement SDC Eligibility:0%Project Description: Test and treat light poles at 10 year intervals and replace rotting poles and broken conduits in theCity owned street light system.Justification: Pole testing reveals condition of all City owned poles. Treating poles reduces rate of deterioration. Theproposed project replaces poles identified as at the end of useful life. The City's light poles were last tested in 1999.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget.Testing and treating is recommended at 10 year intervalsProject Status: Ongoing ProgramSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council goal to maintain infrastructureEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 22 $ - $ 7 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Land/Right of Way $ -$ -Construction $ 98 $ - $ 73 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Other $ -Total $ 120 $ - $ 80 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 12080 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8Total $ 120 $ - $ 80 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8Page 1062012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #: 850008System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationArterial/Collector Street Reconstruction Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 24 miles of streets classified as acollector or arterial have deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to thereduction of available funding for preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approxiamtely 6 miles per yearover the last two year. The approximate cost to eliminate the current backlog is $10.8 million in 2010 dollars. Following isa partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects:21st St. (1,586 ft., $1,475,000) Q St. (925 ft., $500,000 )G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $900,000) B St. (486 ft., $250,000)Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed arterial and collector street segments as identified within theInfrastrucure Managment System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annualmaintenance perservation activities are no longer effective or economical.Project Driver: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance andimprovements to the City's capital infrastructure.Project Trigger: Structural street failuresProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Infrastructure Management System2010 Street Conditions ReportEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 720$ 120 $ 120 $ 120 $ 120 $ 120120Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 5,280$ 880 $ 880 $ 880 $ 880 $ 880880Other $ -Total $ 6,000 $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ - -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 6,000$ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Total $ 6,000 $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,0002012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 107

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #:System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationArterial/Collector Street Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Scheduled Life Cycle MaintenaceProject Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort to complete necessary annual life cycleprojects on the arterial and collector system. This includes routine overlay and street seal projects.Justification: This funding is set aside to complete required life cycle maintenace and repairs on the arterial andcollector street system throughout the City. Projects are identified within the Infrastrucure Managment System. Thisactivity is critical to limiting the number of street segments that require major reconstruction or overlays.Project Driver:Street structure has failed and current maintenance procedures no longer provide satisfactory results.Project Trigger:Street section has failedProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Infrastructure Management System2010 Street Conditions ReportEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 600$ 100 $ 100 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2,400$ 400 $ 400 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400Other $ -Total $ 3,000 $ - $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 3,000$ 500 $ 500 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500Total $ 3,000 $ - $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500Page 1082012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #: 850008System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationLocal/Residential Street Reconstruction Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 68 miles of local/ residential streetshas deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of availablefunding for preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approxiamtely 6 miles per year over the last twoyear. The approximate cost to eliminate the current backlog is $5.5 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list withthe highest priority reconstruction projects:F St. (306 ft., $23,000) C St. (332 ft., $28,500)3rd Pl. (583 ft., $43,500) Kelly Blvd. (361 ft., $25,500)Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed Local and Residential street segments as identified within theInfrastrucure Managment System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annualmaintenance perservation activities are no longer effective or economical.Project Driver: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance andimprovements to the City's capital infrastructure.Project Trigger: Structural street failuresProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Infrastructure Management System2010 Street Conditions ReportEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 210$ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 3535Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,590$ 265 $ 265 $ 265 $ 265 $ 265265Other $ -Total $ 1,800 $ - $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ - -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 1,800$ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300Total $ 1,800 $ - $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 3002012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 109

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #:System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationLocal/Residential Street Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Scheduled Life Cycle MaintenaceProject Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort to complete necessary annual life cycleprojects on the local and residential system. This includes routine overlay and street seal projects.Justification: This funding is set aside to complete required life cycle maintenace and repairs on the arterial andcollector street system throughout the City. Projects are identified within the Infrastrucure Managment System. Thisactivity is critical to limiting the number of street segments that require major reconstruction or overlays.Project Driver:Street structure has failed and current maintenance procedures no longer provide satisfactory results.Project Trigger:Street section has failedProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Infrastructure Management System2010 Street Conditions ReportEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 450$ 75 $ 75 75 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 3,150$ 525 $ 525 525 $ 525 $ 525 $ 525Other $ -Total $ 3,600 $ - $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 3,600$ 600 $ 600 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600Total $ 3,600 $ - $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600Page 1102012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #: 860013System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and PreservationWayfinding For Low Vision Users Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%And Pedestrian SafetyProject Description: Installation of pedestrian wayfinding devices and other safety devices based on user requests. Thefirst project area of interest is the Lane Transit District downtown station and connection within the downtown area.Accessible pedestrian signal retrofits is a possible part of this project.Justification: Low vision pedestrians need tactile or audible queues to assist in traveling in high risk routes or areas ofoverwhelming sensory input such as high volume streets and intersections, circuitous routes, and rail crossings. Thisproject was developed in response to citizen service requests from the low-vision communityProject Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Customer Service Requests from the low vision pedestrian community. T1-1, T2-3, T4-3Citizen RequestsOngoing need, deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:TransPlan PoliciesAmericans With Disabilities ActEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 60 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 240 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40Other $ -Total $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -Street Fund 434 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 447 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 446 $ -Unspecified $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50Total $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 111

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationFranklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project Improvement SDC Eligibility: 20%Map ID-TP31Project Description: The Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project will construct modern urban standards improvements on the oldHwy 99 alignment in Glenwood called Franklin Boulevard between the Glenwood/Franklin intersection and the Franklin/McVayintersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional safety and mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and autos.Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes,property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and is integrated with the urbanrenewal plan for Glenwood. Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work.Project Driver:Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area.Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to successful Glenwood arearedevelopment. City, in partnership with the Lane Transit District, ODOT and Eugene continues to seekproject funding through various federal initiatives, including a federal transportation bill reauthorization fundingrequest through the Oregon Congressional Delegation.Project Trigger:Project Status:City priority to redevelop Glenwood riverfront areaPending potential funding inclusion in the reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Bill and/or the 2012Federal annual appropriations bill. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation phase currentlypartially funded - see Franklin Boulevard Planning project (#870007).Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council PriorityFranklin Blvd. StudyGlenwood Urban Renewal PlanGlenwood Refinement PlanTransPlanRegional Transportation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 2,000$ 2,000Land/Right of Way $ 15,000$ 10,000 $ 5,000Construction $ 28,000$ 13,000 $ 8,000 $ 7,000Other $ -Total $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 13,000 $ 7,000 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund #Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 45,000$ 25,000 $ 13,000 $ 7,000Total $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 13,000 $ 7,000 $ - $ -Page 1122012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationIntelligent Lighting Controls Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: An Intelligent lighting system will monitor street light performance. The light monitoring system will monitorenergy consumption, fixture output, light outages, generate work orders and, most importantly, alarm per set conditions. Thealarm feature would be used as a wire theft prevention with the idea of alerting the Police Department when a series of lights on acircuit suddenly goes dark. This would be a primary method of protecting the public infrastructure and cost of replacing stolenwire.Justification: In the past two years the City has lost approximately $150,000 in the repair and replacement of stolen conductorsfor street light systems. Also, current loss prevention has resulted in extra expense for our own repair of the systems that do getdamaged. Street light outages are currently reported by citizens and by City personnel conducting physical surveys of the existingsystem to search for outages and problems. With the implementation of this system there would be a reduction in labor expensefor monitoring the system, wire loss prevention and reduced time of light outages all improving customer service and satisfaction.Finally, the system has a dimming control feature that will allow for substantial energy savings by allowing the City to DIM lightoutput during non peak hours. The system will also include a data base of the lighting assets allowing much better management ofthe asset.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Wire theft and street light managementOpportunity to reduce operational costsDeferred Pending Funding Allotment: this project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover onlyareas of high risk of wire theft.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 500$ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100Total $ 500 $ - $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ (56)$ (3) $ (6) $ (8) $ (11) $ (14) $ (14)Total $ (56) $ - $ (3) $ (6) $ (8) $ (11) $ (14) $ (14)FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 500$ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100Total $ 500 $ - $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 113

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationMain Street Lighting Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: The project will add lighting to Main Street from 20th to 69th by placing lights on existing poles whereavailable and installing new poles where necessary. The project could be incremental and done in phases or sections.Justification: Main Street is a major arterial and has been identified as a top safety site by ODOT. A safety study for the corridoridentified street lighting as a major component toward improving pedestrian safety. There have been mutilple deaths andpedestrian crashes in addition to a high number of vehicle crashes. The improved lighting offers a significant safety benefit.Improved lighting also has the potential for positive public perception of the corridor.Project Driver: Safety/Hazard conditionT1-2 T2-3Total Project Constructed Cost: Estimated at $700KProject Trigger:Project Status:Deferred Pending Funding Allotment: This project is scalable and could be completed in phases.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Main Street Safety Study, Oregon Highway Plan, Trans Plan and CityRefinement plansEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 300$ 150 $ 150Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 300$ 100 $ 100 $ 100Other $ -Total $ 600 $ - $ 150 $ 150 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 36$ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6Personnel Costs $ 18$ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Total $ 54 $ - $ 9 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 654$ 159 $ 159 $ 109 $ 109 $ 109 $ 9Total $ 654 $ - $ 159 $ 159 $ 109 $ 109 $ 109 $ 9Page 1142012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationWire Theft Remediation Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: In the past several years, the City has suffered theft of wire and damage to it's street lighting systems on alarge scale. As the losses suffered have increased, it has become an unmanageable burden for normal maintenance budgets torepair/replace the infrastructure. This project would identify areas of theft or vandalism, develop plans to replace/repair the lightingsystem and have the work completed.Justification: Replacement and repair of City lighting systems that were rendered inoperable due to theft, vandalism, accident orcrash.Project Driver: Safety and Citizen RequestsT1-2 T2-1 T3-1Total Project Constructed Cost:Project Trigger: Response to inoperable lighting systemsProject Status:Deferred Pending Funding Allotment: This project is scalable.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City As-Built PlansEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 10$ 5 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 175$ 125 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Other $ -Total $ 185 $ - $ 130 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 185$ 130 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11Total $ 185 $ - $ 130 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 112012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 115

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationRRFB Installations Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Currently three crossings have been identified that would receive a safety benefit from the installation of aRRFB (Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon). Those locations are: 1) Thurston Rd. 2) S32nd St. 3) S42nd St. The project wouldconsist of full crossing improvements including ramps, medians and poles.Justification: The City has and continues to receive numerous requests for improved safety at crossings. These projects wouldincrease pedestrian safety and respond to public requests.Project Driver: Safety/Hazard ConditionT1-3 T2-3Total Project Constructed Cost:Project Trigger: Identified needProject Status:Deferred Pending Funding Allotment: This project is scalable.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 40$ 15 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 160$ 60 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20Other $ -Total $ 200 $ - $ 75 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 6$ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 6 $ - $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 206$ 76 $ 26 $ 26 $ 26 $ 26 $ 26Total $ 206 $ - $ 76 $ 26 $ 26 $ 26 $ 26 $ 26Page 1162012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationUGB Expansion Area Facility Plans - Transportation Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Project Description: Amend the Transportation System Plan to include areas selected by the City Council for expansion ofSpringfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).Justification: As part of the proposed 2030 Refinement Plan Project, the City is evaluating several areas for potential UGBExpansion to address identified deficiencies in the Commercial and Industrial Buildable Lands Inventory (CIBL). Urban facilityplanning will need to occur once the Council determines which area(s) are appropriate for UGB expansion.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Council approval of UGB Expansion Area(s)2030 Refinement Plan acknowledgement by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation andDevelopmentPending City Council approval of UGB Expansion Areas and 2030 Refinement Plan and fundingidentification.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Metro PlanTransPlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 7575Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 75 $ - $ - $ 75 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 7575Total $ 75 $ - $ - $ 75 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 117

Transportation and StreetsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationFYA Prot/Perm Left Turns Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: The project will evaluate traffic volumes and determine locations where the implementation ofProtective/Permissive turn movements will benefit safety and operations.Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Project will result in less delay and therefore fuelconsumption.Project Driver: Operational FunctionalityT1-2 T2-2 T4-3Total Project Constructed Cost:Project Trigger:Project Status:Deferred Pending Funding Allotment: This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover onlyceratin approaches.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 25$ 10 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 40$ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10Other $ -Total $ 65 $ - $ 20 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 65$ 20 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15Total $ 65 $ - $ 20 $ 15 $ 15 $ 15 $ - $ -Page 1182012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Transportation and Street Capital ProjectsFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationCherokee Dr. Overlay Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description:Justification:Project Driver:Rehabilitate the street pavement on Cherokee Drive, from S. 34th Place to S. 38th Street, to restorethe street pavement following the Cherokee Drive Sewer Local Improvement District (LID).The Cherokee Drive Sewer LID is complete. During construction, staff found that the existingpavement structure was about 2 inches of asphalt over about 6 inches of base. This structure issignificantly less than current standards for a local street, and the street is exhibiting significantcracking following the LID project.Citizen inquiries following LID construction which likely accelerated pavement failureProject Trigger:Pavement failuresProject Status: Pending FundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and FacilitiesEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 1010Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 5050Other $ -Total $ 60 $ - $ - $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Street Fund 434 $ -SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -Other $ -Unspecified $ 6060Total $ 60 $ - $ - $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 119

This page left intentionally blankPage 1202012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WASTEWATEROverviewWastewater projects fall into several categories:Preservation and Maintenance – These projects typically involve upgrading the current wastewatersystem. Projects may include the rehabilitation of existing sanitary sewer lines, laterals and connectionsto reduce infiltration and inflow of groundwater into the system.New Facilities – These projects typically involve the construction of new wastewater facilities as a result,or in anticipation of new development. Projects may include sanitary sewer lines built as part of a newsubdivision and extension of sanitary sewer trunk lines.PROJECT MAPSWW1 Cherokee Drive SewerWW2 Jasper Trunk Line ExtensionWW3 Sanitary Basin #22 RehabilitationWW4 10th and “N” Street UpgradeWW5 58th Street Flow Control FacilityWW6 7th/8th Street Wastewater PipeReplacementWW7 Hayden Lo Pump StationWW8 River Glen Pump StationWW13 Franklin Boulevard System ExpansionWW14 ”A” Street Improvements Unit 1WW15 “A” Street Improvements Unit 2WW16 ”A” Street Improvements Unit 3WW17 Main Street Improvements Unit 1WW18 Nugget Way Pump StationWW19 Peacehealth/Riverbend Pump StationWW20 Main Street Improvements Unit 2WW21 McKenzie Highway Expansion2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 121

This page left intentionally blankPage 1222012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 123

Page 1242012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalCherokee Drive Sewer $ 350Constructed- - - - - 350Capital Fund (409) $ 50- - - - - 50Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Special Assmt. (419) $ 300- - - - - 300In ProcessJasper Trunk Line Extension $ 1,950- 9,300 - - - 11,250Capital Fund (409) $ 200- - - - - 200Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ 1,750- - - - - 1,750Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- 9,300 - - - 9,300Sanitary Basin 22 Rehabilitation $ 5,550- - - - - 5,550Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ 5,550- - - - - 5,55010th and "N" Street Upgrade $ 3,935- - - - - 3,935Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ 3,935- - - - - 3,93558th Street Flow Control Facility $ 2,195- - - - - 2,195Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ 2,195- - - - - -7th/8th Street Replacement $ 476- - - - - 476Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ 476- - - - - 476Funding ProgrammedSewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement $ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000Capital Fund (409) $ 1,000 1,000 433 577 452 493 3,955Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - 548 507 1,055Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- 567 423 - - 990Misc. Wastewater System Repair $ 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,200Capital Fund (409) $ -- 212 - 587 600 1,399Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ 200 200 200 475 413 50 1,538Revenue Bonds (409) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ - 800 588 525 - 350 2,263Hayden Lo Pump Station $ -- - 1,050 - - 1,050Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - 1,050 - - 1,050Revenue Bonds (409) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- - - - - -River Glen Pump Station $ -- - - 1,225 - 1,225Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - 400 - 400Revenue Bonds (409) $ -- - - 825 - 825Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- - - - - -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 125

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total"A" Street Improvements 2 $ -- - 285 - - 285Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - 85 - - 85Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- - 200 - - 200"A" Street Improvements 3 $ -- - 180 - - 180Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - 72 - - 72Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- - 108 - - 108Local Sewer Extensions $ -- - 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000Capital Fund (409) $ -- - - - - -Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (409) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ -- - 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000Annual Totals $ 15,656 2,085 23,960 5,135 4,225 3,000 38,405Capital Fund (409) $ 1,250 1,043 645 577 1,039 1,093 4,397Improvement SDCs (443) $ - 42 614 373 - - 1,029Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ 200 200 200 1,525 1,361 557 3,843Revenue Bonds (409) $ 13,906- - - 825 - 825Special Assmt. (419) $ 300- - - - - -Unspecified Wastewater Funds $ - 800 22,501 2,660 1,000 1,350 28,3112012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 127

This page left intentionally blankPage 1282012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 129

WastewaterConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 850215Cherokee Drive Sewer Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-WW1Project Description: Construct the public wastewater main and laterals into a portion of the Douglas Garden neighborhood that iscurrently not served by the public system.Justification: This project was initiated by City Council after being presented with a petition for a Local Improvement District (LID)from a majority of property owners in the neighborhood requesting the project. This project will provide public wastewater access to44 homes along Cherokee Drive and S. 38th Street that are annexed and within Springfield City limits, but do not have publicwastewater service available. These properties are currently on septic systems, and at least one has failed, with others likelyneeding replacement or repair. This project will allow properties to decommission septic systems and connect to a publicwastewater system. This project will provide for the public wastewater line to be installed at one time and allow the cost to bespread over the benefitting property owners instead of each home having to extend and connect to the public system individually asseptic failures occur.Project Driver:Total Project Constructed Cost: $325,000Project Trigger: Citizen driven - 50% or more of residents signed petition to form LID, council initiates project after receivingnecessary signatures.Project Status:Council action from citizen request. A private citizen in the Douglas Garden neighborhood circulated apetition to form a local improvement district for the purpose of installing public sewer lines to benefit thearea.Constructed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Conforms to City Ordinance regarding formation and operation of an LID. Initiated by Council Resolution.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 17 $ 1 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Personnel Costs $ 17 $ 1 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Total $ 34 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6 $ 6FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. 419 $ 300 $ 300Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ 50 $ 50Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1302012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 131

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 850105Jasper Trunk Line Extension Improvement SDC Eligibility: 81%Map ID-WW2Project Description: Installation of 18,000 feet of 10 to 27 inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from 42nd Street toNatron and the Urban Growth Boundary. The City is planning on borrowing the total of the project cost and collecting thedeveloper share through agreements and reimbursements upon connection to the system. Wastewater trunk lines aretypically cleaned annually and video inspected by maintenance every five years. The additional impact on the operationsand maintenance budget are shown below.Justification: The Jasper sewer extension project will provide sewer service to the Jasper/Natron urban growth area thatis currently not serviced. The Jasper Road Extension project from 57th and Main Street to Brand S Road and proposalsfor residential and industrial development in this area will stimulate the need for sewers. 100% of project costs areproposed to be funded with City funds, with an estimated 50% to be reimbursed to the City by grants, developercontributions, or assessments. Decommissioning of three existing pump stations is included in this project. Givencompletion of the Bob Straub Parkway, it is a priority to extend service to this area to meet anticipated development. Theproject is currently planned for construction in 2013. However, the Lucerne Meadows Pump Station, which will bedecommissioned during construction of this trunk sewer, is at the end of its useful life and needs significant upgrades tocontinue to function. These upgrades are currently estimated to cost up to $80,000. Staff is evaluating the alternative forkeeping this pump station operational until the trunk sewer is constructed.Project Driver:Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for construction by2010.Project Trigger:Project Status:Development in the Jasper/Natron Area and the need to decommission 3 pump stations and avoidcostly system upgrades and maintenance activities.Design is underway, construction is deferred until 2013 pending funding.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Direction2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 200 $ 200Engineering $ 750 $ 350$ 400Land/Right of Way $ 500 $ 500Construction $ 9,800 $ 900$ 8,900Other $ -Total $ 11,250 $ 1,950 $ - $ 9,300 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 47 $ 6 $ 6 $ 7 $ 7 $ 77 $ 7Personnel Costs $ 151 $ 20 $ 20 $ 21 $ 21 $ 23 $ 23 $ 23Total $ 198 $ 26 $ 26 $ 28 $ 28 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ 1,750 $ 1,750User Fees 409 $ 200 $ 200Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 9,300$ 9,300Total $ 11,250 $ 1,950 $ - $ 9,300 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1322012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #Sanitary Basin #22 Rehabilitation Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-WW3Project Description: The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan identified Sanitary Basin #22 as a primary source of Infiltration andInflow (I/I), and thus a priority for rehabilitation and this basin has been identified as a high risk for sanitary sewer overflows.This project requires approximately 20,000 linear feet of pipe to be rehabilitated. Nearly a third of the total will be completedin a FY 2011 construction contract with the remainder to be completed in FY 2012.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This isnecessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary seweroverflows. Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as schedule, thus there is a minimal net impact on theoperations and maintenance budget.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring publichealth and safety. This program is a response to the need to both reduce the peak flows to the regionalwastewater plant, as well as address all other requirements. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized thisproject for completion by 2010, it was deferred as the EPA order put an emphasis on other basins.Project Trigger:Regulatory requirements and aged facilities.Project Status: Phase I - Under Construction Phase II - Planning and DesignSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50 $ 50Engineering $ 400 $ 200200Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $4,750 $ 1,200 3550Other $350 350Total $ 5,550 $ 1,450 $ 4,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ 5,550 $ 5,550User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 5,550 $ 5,550 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 133

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #10th and "N" Street Upgrade Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-WW4Project Description: Construct approximately 6,500 linear feet of 24 inch wastewater pipe parallel to the existing 24 inchwastewater pipe. This project will require the line to be bored under Highway 126. Wastewater trunk lines are typicallycleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City'smaintenance work load and need.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the wastewater collection system and treatment facilities.This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitarysewer overflows.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2010.Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory requirements.Deferral of the Jasper Trunk construction allows this project to be shifted to 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 1,396 $ 250 1000 $ 146Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2,5392000 $ 539Other $ -Total $ 3,935 $ 250 $ 3,000 $ 685 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 34 $ 6 $ 6 $ 7 $ 7 $ 8Personnel Costs $ 34 $ 6 $ 6 $ 7 $ 7 $ 8Total $ 68 $ 12 $ 12 $ 14 $ 14 $ 16 $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ 3,935 $ 3,935User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Other $ -Total $ 3,935 $ 3,935 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1342012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #58th Street Flow Control Facility Improvement SDC Eligibility: 12%Map ID-WW5Project Description: Construct approximately 4,900 linear feet of 15 inch wastewater pipe as a wet weather flow controlfacility. This project will cross the Bob Straub Parkway near Main Street and then turn north at 58th Street eventually tyinginto the Thurston Road wastewater trunk line. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspectedevery five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the wastewater collection system and treatment facilitiesduring wet weather and peak flow conditions. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federaland state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2011.Project Trigger:Regulatory requirements.Project Status: Deferral of the Jasper Trunk construction allows this project to be shifted from to 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanCompliance with Environmental Protection Agency enforcement orderEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 200 $ 50 150Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,5001500Other $ 495495Total $ 2,195 $ 50 $ 2,145 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 12 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3Personnel Costs $ 40 $ 6 $ 8 $ 8 $ 9 $ 9Total $ 52 $ 8 $ 10 $ 10 $ 12 $ 12 $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ 2,195 $ 2,195User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Other $ -Total $ 2,195 $ 2,195 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 135

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #7th/8th Street Wastewater Pipe Replacement Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-WW6Project Description: This Project begins at the intersection of Centennial Boulevard between 7th and 8th Street andreplaces approximately 800 linear feet of 12 inch wastewater pipe to the north with a 21 inch wastewater pipe to eliminateoverflow conditions. The work described to be completed with this project has been included in the Basin 22Rehabilitation Project.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the wastewater collection system and treatment facilitiesduring wet weather and peak flow conditions. This project is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance withfederal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSO).Project Driver:Project Trigger:Springfield has an obligation under the Evironmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2011.Regulatory requirements.Project Status: Deferral of the Jasper Trunk construction allows this project to be shifted from to 2011.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 169 $ 169Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 307 $ 307Other $ -Total $ 476 $ 476 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ 476 $ 476User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Other $ -Total $ 476 $ 476 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1362012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #Hayden Lo Pump Station Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-WW7Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential forsanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station beupgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 494 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additionalflow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding isneeded in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This isnecessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO.Project Driver:Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. Thisproject is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements toeliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completionby 2014.Project Trigger:Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan, Protection of Public health and safetyProject Status: Programmed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50$ 50Engineering $ 150$ 150Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 600$ 600Other $ 250$ 250Total $ 1,050 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,050 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 2$ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ 4$ 2 $ 2Total $ 6 $ - $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ 1,050$ 1,050Unspecified $ -Total $ 1,050 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,050 $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 137

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #River Glen Pump Station Improvement SDC Eligibility: 21%Map ID-WW8Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential forsanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station beupgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 664 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additionalflow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding isneeded in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This isnecessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This isproject necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitarysewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2015.Project Trigger:Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master PlanProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50$ 50Engineering $ 200$ 200Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 700$ 700Other $ 275$ 275Total $ 1,225 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,225 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 2$ 1 $ 1Personnel Costs $ 4$ 2 $ 2Total $ 6 $ - $ - $ - $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ 825$ 825User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ 400$ 400Unspecified -Total $ 1,225 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,225 $ - $ -Page 1382012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterFunding Programmed: YesConstruction and PreservationWastewater Master Plan Update Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Project Description:Justification:Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Review June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and update as necessary.Review and revise the June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and technical model as necessary toaccommodate changes related to new growth, additional flow monitoring data, implementation of theDowntown Plan, proposed changes in Glenwood and updating the 1991 North Springfield SewerStudy .Council Direction to update Project List and Master Plan on 5-yr cycleTo meet 5-yr target set by Council (2013 Adoption)Master Plan will commence upon funding approval.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Wastewater Master Plan, June 2008City Council ObjectiveEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 8585Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 85 $ - $ 85 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ 4343Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ 4242SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 85 $ - $ 85 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 139

This page left intentionally blankPage 1402012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 830010Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: The City of Springfield's obligations in the 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP)were completed by January 2010; however it is necessary for this program to continue as a new WWFMP report will becompleted by the end of 2010, and it is expected that a new project list will be generated which will need to be completedover the next decade.Justification: This program deals with capacity problems in the wastewater system and treatment facilities in the mostcost-effective manner identified by the plan. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal andstate regulations requiring elimination of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) . Normal maintenance and inspections willcontinue as schedule thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. This program is a response to the need to both reduce the peak flows to theregional wastewater plant, as well as address all other requirements.Project Trigger: Regulatory requirements.Project Status: Accumulating funds for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Direction2008 Wastewater Master Plan2001 Wet Weather Flow Management PlanRegulatory RequirementsEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 1,500 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 4,500 $ 750 $ 750 $ 750 $ 750 $ 750 $ 750Other $ -Total $ 6,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ 3,955 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 433 $ 577 $ 452 $ 493Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ 1,055$ 548 $ 507Unspecified $ 990$ 567 $ 423Total $ 6,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 141

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 850007Miscellaneous Wastewater System Repair Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers that require eitheremergency rehabilitation as a result of Sanitary Sewer Overflows or the prospect of impending system failures. The PWMaintenance Division addresses an average of four (4) emergency repairs of this nature annually.Justification: The project will repair and/or replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life or is otherwisecausing problems within the collection system. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federaland state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). Normal maintenance and inspections will continue asscheduled, thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. This program provides funding for maintenance and engineering to respondto any system failures or issues quickly and efficiently as they arise or are identified.Project Trigger: Regulatory requirements.Project Status: Accumulating funds for projects as developed.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Direction2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 770 $ 20 $ 150 $ 150 $ 150 $ 150 $ 150Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 4,430 $ 180 $ 850 $ 850 $ 850 $ 850 $ 850Other $ -Total $ 5,200 $ 200 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ 1,824$ 212 $ 425 $ 587 $ 600500Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ 1,538 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 475 $ 413 $ 50500Unspecified $ 1,838$ 800 $ 588 $ 100$ 350Total $ 5,200 $ 200 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Page 1422012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterFunding Programmed: PartialConstruction and PreservationUGB Expansion Area Facility Plans - Wastewater Improvement SDC Eligibility: 50%Project Description:Justification:Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Develop a Wastewater Facility Master Plan for each of the areas selected by the City Council forexpansion of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).As part of the proposed 2030 Refinement Plan Project, the City is evaluating several areas forpotential UGB Expansion to address identified deficiencies in the Commercial and Industrial BuildableCouncil approval of UGB Expansion Area(s)2030 Refinement Plan acknowledgement by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation andDevelopmentPending City Council approval of UGB Expansion Areas and 2030 Refinement Plan and fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Metro Plan2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 100100Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 100 $ - $ - $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 100100Total $ 100 $ - $ - $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 143

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #Franklin Boulevard System Expansion Improvement SDC Eligibility: 100%Map ID-WW13Project Description: This Project expands the Glenwood wastewater system from the exiting 30 inch trunk line inFranklin Boulevard south with approximately 3,900 feet of 15 inch pipe and 2,400 feet of 8 inch pipe. Wastewater trunklines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by maintenance every five years.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the Glenwood area.Project Driver:Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2009.Additionally, should the City receive federal stimulus dollars for the Franklin Boulevard Project, this willbecome a priority as much of the new pipe will be under the reconstructed roadway.Project Trigger:Project Status:Development activity in the Glenwood area.Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Direction2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 75$ 75Engineering $ 300$ 300Land/Right of Way $ 250$ 250Construction $ 2,373$ 2,373Other $ -$ -Total $ 2,998 - - 2,998 - - - -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 21 $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ 5 $ 5Personnel Costs $ 41 $ 7 $ 8 $ 8 $ 9 $ 9Total $ 62 $ 10 $ 12 $ 12 $ 14 $ 14 $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ 614$ 614SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 2,384$ 2,384Total $ 2,998 $ - $ - $ 2,998 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1442012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #"A" Street Improvements Unit 1 Improvement SDC Eligibility: 35%Map ID-WW14Project Description: This project replaces approximately 1,000 feet of an exiting 12 inch wastewater pipe with a 15 inchpipe from 66 th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the east Springfield area.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013.Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues.Deferred pending funding and development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 200$ 200Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 420$ 420Other $ -Total $ 620 $ - $ - $ - $ 620 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ 216$ 216SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 404$ 404Total $ 620 $ - $ - $ - $ 620 $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 145

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #"A" Street Improvements Unit 2 Improvement SDC Eligibility: 30%Map ID-WW15Project Description: This project replaces approximately 529 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inchpipe from 69 th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the east Springfield area.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013.Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues.Deferred pending funding and development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 90$ 90Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 195$ 195Other $ -Total $ 285 $ - $ - $ - $ 285 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ 85$ 85SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 200$ 200Total $ 285 $ - $ - $ - $ 285 $ - $ - $ -Page 1462012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #"A" Street Improvements Unit 3 Improvement SDC Eligibility: 40%Map ID-WW16Project Description: This project replaces approximately 325 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inchpipe from 70 th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the east Springfield area.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013.Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues.Deferred pending funding and development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 65$ 65Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 115$ 115Other $ -Total $ 180 $ - $ - $ - $ 180 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ 72$ 72SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 108$ 108Total $ 180 $ - $ - $ - $ 180 $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 147

This page left intentionally blankPage 1482012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Main Street Improvements Unit 1 Improvement SDC Eligibility: 20%Map ID-WW17Project Description: This Project begins at 59th Street and replaces approximately 3600 linear feet of 15 and 18 inchwastewater pipe to the east with a 24 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth. To avoid capacityissues, the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan identifies a need to upgrade to 21 inch pipe for existing land use; however a 24inch pipe is recommended to provide for future growth. The Wastewater Master Plan recommends additional flowmonitoring prior to preliminary design.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the east Springfield area.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. Also, Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the UrbanGrowth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Planprioritized this project for completion by 2011.Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory requirements and development activity in the east Springfield area.Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Direction2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 25$ 25Engineering $ 721$ 721Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,356$ 1,356Other $ -Total $ 2,102 $ - $ - $ 2,102 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 2,102$ 2,102Total $ 2,102 $ - $ - $ 2,102 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 149

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Nugget Way Pump Station Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Map ID-WW18Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential forsanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station beupgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 911 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additionalflow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding isneeded in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur. Also, completion of theFranklin Expansion will most likely allow for decommissioning of this pump station as well as reducing the futuremaintenance burden.Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This isnecessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO.Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain thewastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuringpublic health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2009.Currently the pump station is not experiencing problems, and flow monitoring will be done to determineif and when future upgrades will be needed.Project Trigger:Project Status:Regulatory Requirements and Facilities Master PlanDeferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50$ 50Engineering $ 300$ 300Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,043$ 1,043Other $ 50$ 50Total $ 1,443 $ - $ - $ 1,443 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 18 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Total $ 18 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 1,443$ 1,443Total $ 1,443 $ - $ - $ 1,443 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1502012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Peacehealth/Riverbend Pump Station Improvement SDC Eligibility: 100%Map ID-WW19Project Description: This project is for the engineering and construction of a pump station in the RiverBend area. Theneed for the pump station will be driven by development within the RiverBend campus area and as defined in the SanitarySewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the RiverBend area.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012.Project construction will occur with development.Development within the RiverBend Area - capacity issues; and/or construction of the NE link betweenRiverBend Drive and International Way.Project Status:Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanSanitary Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision (2005)EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 956$ 956Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2,233$ 2,233Other $ -$ -Total $ 3,189 $ - $ - $ 3,189 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 66 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 66 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ 11 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 3,189$ 3,189Total $ 3,189 $ - $ - $ 3,189 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 151

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Main Street Improvements Unit 2 Improvement SDC Eligibility: 25%Map ID-WW22Project Description: This Project begins at 69th Street and replaces approximately 2,300 linear feet of 12 inchwastewater pipe to the east with a 18 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the east Springfield area.Project Driver: Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012.Project Trigger:Project Status:Development activity in the east Springfield area.Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 406$ 406Land/Right of Way $ -$ -Construction $ 739$ 739Other $ -$ -Total $ 1,145 $ - $ - $ 1,145 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 1,145$ 1,145Total $ 1,145 $ - $ - $ 1,145 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1522012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #McKenzie Highway Expansion Improvement SDC Eligibility: 100%Map ID-WW21Project Description: This project extends the wastewater system from the existing 21 inch trunk line east along theMcKenzie Highway with approximately 2,000 feet of 10 inch pipe and 2,000 feet of 12 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk linesare typically cleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increasethe City's maintenance work load and need.Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing landuse designations in the east Springfield area.Project Driver: Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012.Project Trigger:Project Status:Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues.Deferred pending funding and development activitySpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 600$ 600Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,083$ 1,083Other $ -Total $ 1,683 $ - $ - $ 1,683 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 16$ 4 $ 4 4 $ 4Personnel Costs $ 16$ 4 $ 4 4 $ 4Total $ 32 $ - $ - $ - $ 8 $ 8 $ 8 $ 8FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 1,683$ 1,683Total $ 1,683 $ - $ - $ 1,683 $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 153

WastewaterSystem Expansion, Upgrades, and RehabilitationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Local Sewer Extensions Improvement SDC Eligibility: 0%Project Description: Within the City of Springfield's city limits and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are several areas existthat are fully developed, but lack wastewater service. The project would fund extending wastewater pipes to these areasupon request of affected property owners or annexation, with some or all of the cost possibly reimbursable throughassessments. Increased infrastructure will increase the need for more maintenance personnel which impacts thewastewater operations budget. The estimated increase in the wastewater operations cost is $1,600 per 1,000 feet of newpipe.Justification: The City will need to provide wastewater service to all development existing and future within the city andthe UGB.Project Driver: Environmental issues, or failing septic tanks within the City and un-annexed areas within the UGB.Project Trigger: Council decision - Annexation of developed areas within the UGB and/or petitions for LocalImprovement DistrictsProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Goal to provide for development.2008 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 200$ 50 $ 50 $ 5050Engineering $ 600$ 150 $ 150 $ 150150Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 3,200$ 800 $ 800 $ 800800Other $ -Total $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 10$ 1 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4Personnel Costs $ 10$ 1 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4Total $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ 2 $ 4 $ 6 $ 8FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 409 $ -User Fees 409 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ -SDCs, Reimb. 442 $ -Unspecified $ 3,000$ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Total $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Page 1542012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

BUILDINGS AND PROPERTYOverviewThe Buildings and Property section covers a variety of projects that include; construction of newfacilities; maintenance, repair or renovation of existing facilities; and the demolition of unnecessary orun‐maintainable facilities. As the City of Springfield grows, so does the need for municipal publicservices. These services come with an associated infrastructure that requires continual monitoring,maintenance, replacement and/or additions. In order to catch up and stay current, Buildings andProperty projects will continue to be a priority.Numerous other projects are included in the Building Preservation sheet. This project addressesongoing maintenance issues as well as maintenance to begin alleviating the backlog of deferredpreviously unfunded maintenance projects. There are projects at all City‐owned buildings, including CityHall, Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Depot, and Public Works Maintenance Division Facilities.Another project is for the removal of the building constructed over the Mill Race west of the spillwaydam. This project is in conjunction with an Army Corp of Engineers Millrace bank restorationproject. Timing of the removal and related work is related to Army Corp scheduling.Project MapsBP1BP2BP3BP4BP5BP6BP7BP9City Hall Lighting UpgradesBooth Kelly Building RemovalBuilding PreservationFuel FacilityCity Hall Emergency GeneratorBooth Kelly Internal StructuralImprovementsBooth Kelly Roof Replacement/RepairFiring Range DecommissioningBP10BP11BP12BP13BP14BP16BP17Fire Station #14 Relocation/ReplacementFire Station #4 Relocation/ReplacementMunicipal Parking LotCity Storage FacilityCity Hall Storage FacilityRenovation of City HallFire Station #3 Parking Improvements2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 155

This page left intentionally blankPage 1562012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 157

Page 1582012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Building and PropertyMaintenance Capital ProjectsEECBG-City Hall Lighting Upgrades -Federal Aid (420) -Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalConstructed$ - - - - - -$ - - - - - -Booth Kelly Building Removal $ 30- - - - - 30Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -In ProcessBuilding Preservation $ 400 $ 400 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 4,800Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Booth Kelly (618) $ -- - - - - -Revenue Bonds (xxx) $ -- - - - - -Buliding Preservation Fund (420) $ 400 400 400 400 400 400 2,400Unspecified $ -- 600 600 600 600 2,400Fuel Facility $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 60Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Old SDCs (420) $ 30.0- - - - - 30.0Springfield Sch. Dist (420) $ 24.0- - - - - 24.0Willamalane P&R (420) $ 4.8- - - - - 4.8Rainbow Water Dist. (420) $ 1.2- - - - - 1.2Buliding Preservation Fund (420) $ -- - - - - -Funding ProgrammedBooth Kelly Internal Structural Imp. $ 50- - - - 100 150Booth Kelly (618) $ 50- - - - 100 150Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair 200 - - - - 200 400Booth Kelly (618) $ 200- - - - 200 400Unspecified $ -- - - - - -City Building Maintenance $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 240Old SDCs (420) $ 40 40 40 40 40 40 240Unspecified $ -- - - - - -Funding Not ProgrammedFiring Range Decommissioning - 100 - - - - 100Booth Kelly (618) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 100 - - - - 100Fire Station 14 $ 420- 4,400 850 - - 5,670Unspecified $ 420- 4,400 850 - - 5,670Unspecified Grant Funds (420) $ -- - - - - -Fire Station 4 $ -- 1,150 4,800 - - 5,950Unspecified $ -- 1,150 4,800 - - 5,950Unspecified Grant Funds (420) $ -- - - - - -Municipal Parking Lot $ -- 665 - - - 665Revenue Bonds (420) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -665 - - - 665City Storage Facility $ -1 2 3 254 5 265Revenue Bonds (420) $ -1 2 3 4 5 15Unspecified $ -- - - 250 - 250City Hall Storage $ -- 80 - - - 80Revenue Bonds (420) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified 80 - - - 802012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 159

Building and Property Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Maintenance Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalLibrary $ -- - - 25,300 - 25,300Unspecified $ -- - - 25,300 - 25,300City Hall Renovation $ - - - - - 3,000 3,000Booth Kelly (618) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ -- - - 3,000 3,000City Hall Generator $ 100 - - - - - 100Booth Kelly (618) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ 100- - - - - 100FS3 Parking $ - $ 29 $ - $ - $ - $ - 29Unspecified $ - 29 - - - - 29Electric Vehicle Projects $ - $ 850 $ 850 $ - $ - $ - 1,700Unspecified $ - 850 850 - - - 1,700Solar Improvements $ - $ 150 $ - $ - $ - $ - 150Unspecified $ - 150 - 150Annual Total $ 1,200 1,529 8,145 6,650 26,550 4,300 48,374Booth Kelly (618) $ 250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300 550Revenue Bonds (xxx) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ --Springfield Sch. Dist (420) $ 24 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 24Willamalane P&R (420) $ 5 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -5Rainbow Water Dist. (420) $ 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -1Other (420) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ --Unspecified $ 520 $ 1,129 $ 7,745 $ 6,250 $ 26,150 $ 3,600 45,394Federal Aid (420) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ --Unspecified Grant Funds (420) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ --Buliding Preservation Fund (420) $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 2,400Page 1602012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 161

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 650118City Hall Lighting UpgradesMap ID-BP1Project Description: The City of Springfield applied for and received a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for EnergyEfficiency and Conservation Projects. The City received $539,400 from the Recovery Act Stimulus package and with directionfrom City Council divided the grant between City projects and projects at Willamalane Park and Recreation District andSpringfield Public Schools. This project in particular is for the replacement of the outdated lighting system under City Hall witha more efficient system in both energy efficiency and lighting quality and distribution.Justification: This is Federal stimulus money used to provide funding for projects that will create new jobs and reduce energyconsumption. There was no matching funding required for this grant and the grant dollars will be leveraged by energy rebatesfrom the Springfield Utility Board. Between the grant and rebates Team Springfield will be able to make a significant differencein several locations by increasing lighting quality and conserving energy and reducing future energy costs.Project Driver: A mixture of lighting types illuminates the under-side of City Hall. One type is not allowed by current energycodes. This will bring the City into compliance with code and provide better for building safety & energy efficiency.Project Trigger:Project Status:Energy Conservation and aged facilitiesCompletedSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Energy Conservation strategiesEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 97 $ 97Other $ -Total $ 97 $ 97 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (30) $ (6) $ (6) $ (6) $ (6) $ (6)Personnel Costs $ (3) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1) $ (1)Total $ (33) $ (7) $ (7) $ (7) $ (7) $ (7) $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Other $ -EECB Grant $ 97 $ 97SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Energy rebate 420 $ -Total $ 97 $ 97 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1622012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 810043Booth Kelly Building RemovalMap ID-BP2Project Description: Removal of building, wood pilings and Mill Race bank restoration.Justification: In conjunction with the Army Corp of Engineers Mill Race project, the City is responsible for the removal of thebuilding constructed over the Mill Race west of the spillway dam.Project Driver: The Mill Race Restoration ProjectProject Trigger: Construction of the Mill Race Restoration ProjectProject Status: Completed as part of the Mill Race Restoration Phase 2Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:The Mill Race Restoration ProjectCouncil GoalsEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (150)$ (30) $ (30) $ (30) $ (30) $ (30)Personnel Costs $ -Total $ (150) $ - $ - $ (30) $ (30) $ (30) $ (30) $ (30)FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bond 425 $ 30 $ 30Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Booth Kelly 618 $ -Unspecified $ -Total $ 30 $ 30 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 163

This page left intentionally blankPage 1642012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 165

Buildings and PropertyBuilding Rehabilitation and PreservationFunding Programmed: PartialAccount # 810050Building PreservationMap ID-BP3Project Description: Perform preservation, capital maintenance and repair projects on City-owned buildings, including CityHall, 5 Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Jail, Depot, Carter Building and Maintenance Facilities. Projects can include therepair, renovation or replacement of structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Other projects can includesystems preservation such as, painting, roofing, lighting, alarm and elevator projects as well as repair and/or upgrades toaesthetic and architectural elements.Justification: These projects are necessary to maintain and preserve City-owned buildings. Project needs, costing, andprioritization are identified in the Public Works Building Maintenance Work Plan and by City Staff. Deferred capital maintenance(backlog) and annual ongoing capital maintenance needs are identified. Extending beyond the 5-yr CIP, funding needs willcontinue and will likely increase as facilities age and costs increase.Project Driver: Council decision to increase useful life of City building/facility assetsProject Trigger:Aged facilities, regulatory requirements (ADA), implementation of Council 5-year Workplan and 5-yearBuilding Facility Strategic PlanProject Status: Ongoing capital maintenance programSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure andFacilities. Building Condition Report.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 4,800 $ 400 $ 400 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Total $ 4,800 $ 400 $ 400 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Capital maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 480 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80Total $ 480 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Building Preservation 420 $ 2,800 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400400Unspecified $ 3,000$ 600 $ 600 $ 600 $ 600600Total $ 5,800 $ 400 $ 400 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000Page 1662012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 870009Fuel FacilityMap ID-BP4Project Description: The Regional Fuel Facility was commissioned in 1990 in partnership with the Springfield School District,Willamalane Park and Recreation, Rainbow Water District and the City of Springfield. Approximately three (3) million gallons offuel are dispensed annually from the facility. Minimal on-going maintenance has been performed over the years and is now timecritical to be proactive to remain in compliance with Federal, State and Local regulatory mandates and codes. Now more majorsystem upgrades are necessary to remain in compliance. The project is being proposed in two phases: Phase 1 will includeinstalling leak containment under each pump, replacement of aged dispenser equipment, replacement of the current sump andleak containment chamber, and install spill containment at the tank fill location. Phase 2 includes replacement of the fuel cardreaders, tank monitoring and leak detection systems.Justification: To meet all applicable Federal, State and Local regulatory mandates, to replace aged equipment and systems, toaddress operating efficiency and facilities for all fuel facility partners.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:The need for routine improvements and upgrades of inadequate aging facilitiesAged facilities and environmental requirementsTo be completed FY11Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Project costs will be shared by all partners based on historic annual average usage.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 60 $ 60Other $ -Total $ 60 $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs (old) 420 $ 30 $ 30Springfield Sch. Dist 420 $ 24 $ 24Willamalane P&R 420 $ 4.8 $ 4.8Rainbow Water Dist 420 $ 1.2 $ 1.2SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 447 $ -Building Preservation $ -Total $ 60.0 $ 60 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 167

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #City Hall Emergency GeneratorMap ID-BP5Project Description: Springfield City Hall is a 93,000 square foot structure that houses several hundred people at any giventime including staff, citizens and patrons. In order to assure that everyone can safely exit the building in the event of anemergency, the City is required to have an emergency generator to provide adequate lighting of emergency egress pathways.The current generator is old and in need of replacement. This project will replace the old generator with a new, more efficientgenerator that not only satisfies these egress requirements but is also up-sized to account for additional emergency loadsimplemented after the original generator was sized and installed.Justification: The existing generator is old and is experiencing regular breakdowns. The City is repairing it, but soon repair willnot be possible or will prove to be uneconomical. This project will replace the existing generator with an new larger generator thatis sized to serve two critical functions. First is the need to assure that code required emergency Fire and Life Safety issues aremaintained. Second is to increase generator capacity to include emergency power for the City's Information Technology (IT)infrastructure. In the last year, the City has had at least two incidents where the IT server room lost power, causing or potentiallycausing interruptions to computer, phone and radio services to multiple City facilities. This is potentially a very serious issue. Ifessential City services lose computers and/or communications, people and property would be put at risk. To a lesser degree,when IT is out of service, worker productivity will be dramatically reduced and patrons would be inconvenienced.Project Driver: Fire and Life Safety and increased demand or uninterrupted municipal services, especially essential servicessuch as Police, Fire and Public WorksProject Trigger:Project Status:Aged FacilitiesDeferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Goals #4 - Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities and # 5 - Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and EnvironmentalQuality.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 10 10Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 90 90Other $ -Total $ 100 $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 100 $ 100Total $ 100 $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1682012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationBooth Kelly Internal Structural ImprovementsMap ID-BP6Project Description: Structural repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center.Funding Programmed: YesAccount 810043Justification: This project will complete the internal structural rehabilitation of certain areas of the facility that wereconsidered nonessential when the initial repairs were completed in the early 1990s. Certain structural and/or lease spacemodifications are also anticipated due to tenant vacancies. This project also includes new roof covering for the southeastportion of the facility and waterline replacement in the east-west alleyway.Project Driver: Internal and structural improvements. This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center.Project Trigger:Project Status:Structural repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly CenterProgrammedSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Booth Kelly Development PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 150 $ 50$ 100Other $ -Total $ 150 $ 50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Booth Kelly 618 $ 150 $ 50$ 100Total $ 150 $ 50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 169

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: YesAccount #Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/RepairMap ID-BP7Project Description: Complete roof replacement or epoxy over coating of the existing metal roof decking of the "Saw-tooth"building, commonly referred to as Building G at the Booth-Kelly Center.Justification: The existing roof material of the "Saw-tooth" building is over 50 years old and no longer provides adequate weatherprotection for the building users or interior equipment.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Internal and structural improvementsThe replacement or over coating of the roof decking will significantly reduce/eliminate the ongoingmaintenance demands of the roof for a period of approximately 20 years.ProgrammedSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 400 $ 200$ 200Other $ -Total $ 400 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Booth Kelly 618 $ 400 $ 200$ 200Unspecified $ -Total $ 400 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200 $ -Page 1702012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyBuilding Rehabilitation and PreservationFunding Programmed: YesAccount # 810002City Building MaintenanceProject Description: Perform major maintenance and contracted activities to address unanticipated emergency facilityequipment and systems replacement.Justification: Each year we budget for preservation maintenance and ongoing repair and preventive maintenance ofequipment and systems. However, unanticipated breakdowns occur. This project covers unanticipated repairs or replacementsof equipment and or systems.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Council decision to increase useful life of City building/facility assetsAged facility equipment and systems failures, regulatory requirements (ADA), implementation ofCouncil 5-year Workplan and 5-year Building Facility Strategic PlanProject Status: Ongoing capital maintenance programSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure andFacilities. Building Condition Report.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 240 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40Total $ 240 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Capital maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ 480 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80Total $ 480 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Old SDCs 420 $ 240 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40Unspecified $ -Total $ 240 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 171

This page left intentionally blankPage 1722012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyFunding Programmed: NoAccount 810043Construction and PreservationFiring Range DecommissioningMap ID-BP9Project Description: This project involves the clean-up of the outdoor firing range formerly used by the Police Department,including lead mining, removal of miscellaeous materials, and overall environmental assessment of the site.Justification: The Police department has stopped using the the outdoor firing range nad is coordinating firearms trainingwith other law enforcement agencies. The site is located above the Booth Kelly Mill Pond, which will be rehabilitated forwetlands and water quality purposes. The outdoor range site must be cleaned up in association with these plans.Project Driver: Completion of Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for waterentering the Mill Pond. This project was originally prioritized for 2001.Project Trigger:Project Status:Completion of the Mill Race Restoration ProjectPlannedSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Mill Race Restoration ProjectEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 10$ 10Engineering $ 20$ 20Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 70$ 70Other $ -Total $ 100 $ - $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Booth Kelly 618 $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 100$ 100Total $ 100 $ - $ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 173

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Fire Station #14 Relocation/ReplacementMap ID-BP10Project Description: The Project will be constructed in east Springfield, utilizing the site at 725 S. 57th Street. The design ofthe new facility will need to reflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield.The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to provideproper Fire and Life Safety services to the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to theJasper/Natron area. Funding for this project has not been identified.Justification: Fire Station #14 located at 4765 Main Street, was originally constructed in 1961 and then remodeled in 1999. In2007, the Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by EmergencyServices Consulting Inc. The following evaluation of the station was observed; "while minimally functional, this station is not apositive environment for the staff. Storage and living space are at a critical point. The station does not meet today's standards.The building is not fully ADA compliant; and appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of thestation was established in 1961. Since that time the addition of other fire stations to provide fire and emergency service for theexpanding city has caused a significant overlap of coverage. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south tocover the Jasper Natron area will not negatively impact current coverage and will accommodate future annexations anddevelopment. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility, the fire department will be unable to deliver this keyurban service to these future developments.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:Development and Annexation in Jasper Natron requires relocation of fire station to provide urban levelof serviceStandards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Jasper/NatronDeferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007SFLS Strategic Plan.Natural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 15 $ 15Engineering $ 550$ 200 $ 350Land/Right of Way $ 405 $ 405Construction $ 3,950$ 3,950Other $ 750$ 250 $ 500Total $ 5,670 $ 420 $ - $ 4,400 $ 850 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 30$ 10 $ 10 $ 10Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 30 $ - $ - $ - $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 5,670 $ 420$ 4,400 $ 850Total $ 5,670 $ 420 $ - $ 4,400 $ 850 $ - $ - $ -Page 1742012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Fire Station #4 Relocation/ReplacementMap ID-BP11Project Description: The Project will be constructed in downtown Springfield. The design of the new facility will need toreflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield. The City intends thecompleted project will meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to implement proper Fire and LifeSafety services to the downtown area of the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to theGlenwood area. Funding for this project has not been identified.Justification: Fire Station #4, located at 1475 5th Street, was originally constructed in 1973. In 2007, the Department of Fireand Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc. Thefollowing evaluation of the station was observed; "Age and construction type has led to increasing maintenance costs. Theentire structure shows signs of excessive usage and wear. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is notfully ADA compliant; and appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes. " The location of the station wasestablished in 1973. Since that time the acceptance of Glenwood into the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) from the Cityof Eugene has created a gap in the Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety's ability provide this key urban level ofservice to portions of Glenwood. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south will provide improved coverage tothe downtown area and accommodate future annexations and developments in Glenwood with the appropriate response time.Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility the Fire Department will be unable to deliver urban service levels tofuture annexations and developments in some areas of Glenwood.Project Driver:Development and Annexation in Glenwood requires relocation of Fire Station #4 to provide urban levelof serviceProject Trigger:Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of GlenwoodProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007SFLS Strategic PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 200$ 200Engineering $ 550$ 200 $ 350Land/Right of Way $ 400$ 400Construction $ 3,950$ 3,950Other $ 850$ 350 $ 500Total $ 5,950 $ - $ - $ 1,150 $ 4,800 $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 20$ 10 $ 10Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10 $ 10 $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 5,950$ 1,150 4800Total $ 5,950 $ - $ - $ 1,150 $ 4,800 $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 175

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Municipal Parking LotMap ID-BP12Project Description: This project is for the purchase of land and construction of a 150 car asphalt parking lot with concretecurbs and gutters for City of Springfield employees and fleet vehicles. This will replace the former lot at 4th and B Streets thatwas incorporated into the Springfield Justice Center as well as provide adequate parking for City Hall fleet vehicles.Justification: Construction of the Justice Center required removal of 84 spaces previously reserved for City staff parking. Thisloss has caused staff to park curbside in the adjacent business district, residential neighborhood, and/or in dedicated publicparking around City Hall. Staff have received complaints from businesses and property owners and from the patrons visitingCity facilities. By relocating staff and fleet vehicles away from City Hall, additional parking will be made available for customerspatronizing downtown businesses and Municipal facilities.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Downtown redevelopment, citizen concerns and business accessibilityCapacity Issues, citizen concerns and business accessibilityProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Community and Economic Development and Revitalization, Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ 475475Construction $ 190190Other $ -Total $ 665 $ - $ - $ 665 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 21 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3Personnel Costs $ -Total $ 21 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 665665Total $ 665 $ - $ - $ 665 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1762012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #City Storage FacilityMap ID-BP13Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility to provide long term storage for City Departments. Thefacility construction is proposed to be a pre-engineered metal building with a concrete floor and include multiple compartmentsto accommodate the varying storage needs of Departments. The building would be weather-tight and climate controlled toassure proper storage of materials and equipment.Justification: The City owns land at the Public Works-Maintenance Shops at South 18th street that could be used to constructthis facility. Every Department has growing storage needs which include; long term file retention, historical items, materials,equipment and supplies. Limited storage space at City facilities have caused several Departments to rent storage in the privatesector. This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Limited spaceCapacity IssuesProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure andFacilities.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 25$ 25Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 250$ 250Other $ -Total $ 275 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ (32)$ (16) $ (16)Personnel Costs $ 2$ 1 $ 1Total $ (30) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (15) $ (15) $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 250$ 250Total $ 250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250 $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 177

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #City Hall Storage FacilityMap ID-BP14Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility under City Hall to provide long term file storage for CityDepartments. The facility is proposed to be weather-tight, split-face concrete block building with a concrete floor, it will beclimate controlled and fire protected to assure proper storage of materials and files.Justification: There is unutilized space under City Hall between the fleet vehicle parking and the public sidewalk where thisstorage facility can be constructed. Every Department has growing storage needs, particularly for long term file retention andsupplies. Limited storage space in City Hall has caused several Departments to rent storage off-site or crowd files into workareas. This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces and create additional useable space for staff.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Limited spaceCapacity IssuesProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure andFacilities.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 5$ 5Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 75$ 75Other $ -Total $ 80 $ - $ - $ 80 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 80$ 80Total $ 80 $ - $ - $ 80 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1782012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #:Library BuildingProject Description: Construct an approximately 60k sq. ft. Library facility adequate to serve the needs of Springfield citizensfor the next 20-30 years based on currently adopted population estimates. The projected cost of the new library will be$25,300,000 including design, site preparation, construction, FF&E and landscaping. Estimated facility size and cost werederived from: Standards for Oregon Public Libraries, 2008 by the Public Library Division of the Oregon Library Association; PublicLibrary Space Needs: A Planning Outline, 2009, Anders C. Dahlgren, President of Library Planning Associates, Inc., WisconsinDept. of Public Instruction; Robertson/Sherwood Architects, Eugene, Oregon, Randy Nishimura - Architect.Justification: The Library is currently below Oregon Library Standards for both facilities and open hours for communities oursize. It is at "threshold" (minimum) standards for size of collection. Recently, the Library has experienced double digit increasesin both circulation (13%) and program attendance (20%). It cannot expand it's collections in any meaningful way due to spacelimitations. The Library cannot keep up with public demand for programming and for community meeting space and is hamperedin effectively deploying new technology due, in part, to the age and infrastructure of the building. Population estimates projectSpringfield's population to grow to over 80,000 people in the next 20 years increasing the difficulty in providing services in a substandardfacility. In addition, a new Library building can help in the City's efforts at revitalizing the downtown core by attractingtens of thousands of people to the area through its services and programs and by serving as a community gathering place.Project Driver: Growing demand for Library services; current facility cannot sustain current usage level nor can it addressprojected population growth into the future; ability for new Library to act as a positive factor in revitalizing downtown core.Project Trigger: Ability to provide library service from current facility declines to the point that both quality and quantity ofservice are impacted. Citizen feedback and staff reporting support Council action.Project Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Goals #4 - Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities and # 5 - Preserve Hometown Feel,Livability and Environmental Quality.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 5,0002500 $ 2,500Land/Right of Way $ 4,0002000 $ 2,000Construction $ 33,60016800 $ 16,800Other $ 8,0004000 $ 4,000Total $ 50,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,300 $ 25,300 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ 18$ 6 $ 66Personnel Costs $ 240$ 80 $ 8080Total $ 258 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 86 $ 86 $ 86FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 25,30025300Total $ 25,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,300 $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 179

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Renovation of City HallMap ID-BP16Project Description: Once the Library moves out of City Hall into a building of its own, City Hall will be left with about 25,000square feet of empty space that will need to be reallocated to meet departmental space needs. This project is for the renovationof City Hall to improve building safety, energy efficiency and space allocation. This project includes additional seismic bracing,upgraded HVAC system and ductwork, better insulation and interior redesign to better utilize space.Justification: City Hall holds the majority of City Employees and many essential municipal functions are based out of this aging,retrofitted building. The building is not designed to current seismic codes and as such is vulnerable to earthquakes. Also whilerenovations have improved some energy efficiency from the original construction, additional improvements would increase usercomfort and increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption. Finally with the space created by the Library moving toits own building, City Hall can be reconfigured into a more efficient space for staff and users with room for growth as the Citygrows.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Providing a safe, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staffApproval of funding for a new Municipal LibraryProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and EnvironmentalQuality.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ 300$ 300Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2,700$ 2,700Other $ -Total $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 3,000$ 3,000Total $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000 $ -Page 1802012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyConstruction and PreservationFunding Programmed: NoAccount #Fire Station #3 Parking ImprovementsMap ID-BP17Project Description: This project will expand and improve parking areas at Springfield Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28thStreet. The project involves addition of ten (10) parking spaces for staff and relocation of the existing fence and gate to thesouth. The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of staff, equipment, and materials related to the operationof the fire station. Funding for this project has not been identified.Justification: Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street, was originally constructed in 1971. In 2008, the building wasremodeled to provide upgraded kitchen facilities and individual sleeping rooms for 24/7 staff. This one-story addition to theexisting 8,579 square foot facility eliminated approximately ten (10) secured parking spaces for Fire Department staff andequipment. This project will replace the lost parking areas and relocate the fence that secures the parking area to the South.Current parking availability requires some personal and staff vehicles to be parked in an unsecure area, susceptible tovandalism.Project Driver: Inadequate facilitiesProject Trigger:Capacity Issues and safety concernsProject Status: Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007SFLS Strategic PlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 22Engineering $ 22Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 2525Other $ -Total $ 29 $ - $ 29 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 29$ 29Total $ 29 $ - $ 29 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 181

Buildings and PropertyFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationElectric Vehicle ProjectsProject Description: The City of Springfield and our TEAM Springfield partners desire to reduce reliance on fossil fuels andbegin to transition agency fleets from fossil fuel based vehicles to electric or hybrid fueled vehicles. The project objective is toseek clean energy opportunities through moving our fleet to alternative fuels that promote the use of renewable and cleanenergy sources. Priority first phase projects initiatives include development and installation of approximately 10 electric vehicle(EV) charging stations at the Regional Fuel Facility and other strategic locations within Springfield.Justification: All TEAM Springfield agencies have interests to reduce GHG emissions and a responsibility to work towardmore energy independence and environmental sustainability. By changing some of our fleet vehicles and rolling stock toequipment that can operate on electricity or alternative fuels we can help to meet these independence and sustainability goals.The City and TEAM Springfield agencies have concluded that it is vital to reduce the use of fossil based fuels by replacingvehicles with those that are fueled by electricity, and to begin the process of providing solar based electricity for those vehicles,so that ultimately there will be no GHG impact from the fleet. The partners are now seeking supplemental grant funding tosupport existing vehicle replacement reserves and replace 30 administrative vehicles over the next three years.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:In 2007 the Legislative Assembly set ambitious targets for the reduction of greenhouse gases(“GHG”) from activity in Oregon. House Bill 3543 calls for a target reduction of 10 percent below 1990levels by 2020 and 75 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.Grant funding opportunities and agency fleet replacement funds support project implementationProject dependent on Federal/State Aid or Grant Assistance FundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability andEnvironmental QualityEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 15075 75Engineering $ 15075 75Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 200100 100Other $ 1,200600 600Total $ 1,700 $ - $ 850 $ 850 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 1,700850 850Total $ 1,700 $ - $ 850 $ 850 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1822012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Buildings and PropertyFunding Programmed: NoConstruction and PreservationSolar ImprovementsProject Description: This project is to install photovoltaic (PV) generation panels on City and Team Springfield facilities. Firstphase construction will focus on installations at the Regional Fuel Facility (RFF) and other agency buildings to provide supportfor electric vehicle charging stations (see Electric Vehicle Project). In subsequent phases PV panel installation could beexpanded to include installations at public buildings (City Hall, fire stations, justice center/jail, pools and parks, schools, utilitydistricts), to provide alternative power for public facilities to reduce reliance on Springfield Utility Board’s (SUB) electric grid.Justification: The City is working with Team Springfield partners to implement an initiative that will engage all of theagencies by pursuing innovative and sustainable solutions that reduce demand for electricity while at the same time reducinggreenhouse gases (GHG). As a large energy consumer in the area we also generate a significant carbon foot print andcontribute to greenhouse gas emissions. There are currently regional goals that mandate or recommend reductions inmunicipal carbon footprints and greenhouse gas emissions; and as such Springfield has determined that we need to look atalternatives to the status quo.Project Driver:Energy costs and SavingsProject Trigger:Project Status:Deferred pending fundingSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability andEnvironmental QualityEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 150150Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ -Total $ 150 $ - $ 150 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -AFG Grant 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ -Unspecified $ 150150Total $ 150 $ - $ 150 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 183

This page left intentionally blankPage 1842012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

MISCELLANEOUSOverviewThe Miscellaneous section covers debt collection and tracking of public facilities and infrastructure. Asthe City of Springfield grows, so does the need for municipal public services. These services come withan associated infrastructure cost that at times requires the City to acquire debt.Current debt includes the Springfield Justice Center Facility bond which included the construction of ajail facility to house misdemeanor offenders.In 2009, the City issued $22.8 million in sewer revenue bonds to pay for various capital wastewaterrehabilitation and improvement projects to the City’s sanitary sewer system for the health and safety ofcitizens as well as to meet regulatory requirements.In 2010, the City issued an additional $10 million in sewer revenue bonds to pay for various capitalstormwater rehabilitation and improvement projects to the City’s stormwater system.Miscellaneous projects address ongoing facility and infrastructure upgrades, working to sustain physicalassets found in the field and electronic assets found in databases. Projects include storm, sewer, andtransportation facilities. These projects encompass a variety of areas, like the City’s participation inpublic improvements of private developments; for example, the McKenzie/Gateway CorporatePark. Other projects include citywide base mapping projects, such as the Topographic RemappingProject, and database projects like the Geographic Information System (GIS)/Facilities Management(FM) System Migration Project. Because of budget reductions neither the GIS/FM System MigrationProject nor the Topographic Remapping Project are currently funded.Projects:GIS/FM System Migration Project – This project addresses failing systems that manage electronicinventories and provide reliable and well‐integrated information for asset management and mappingfunctions. Functions serve activities such as planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, reporting,accounting, forecasting and operating City facilities, i.e., managing the City’s billion dollars worth ofpublic facilities. The project is needed to mitigate current and future risk associated with outdated andfailing systems (which failed twice in Fall of 2010), continue to support comprehensive facilities andasset management needs, and sustain support for a broad range of Public Works functions.Topographic Remapping Project – This project addresses out‐of‐date topographic maps (base maps) forthe entire City. Current base maps are woefully out‐of‐date and as a result do not reflect significantdevelopment that has occurred over the last 10 years, such as the PeaceHealth RiverBend MedicalCenter and MountainGate, and other development activity such as smaller capital improvementprojects, private developments, and natural resource changes that have occurred since the previousupdate. Work addresses development‐induced changes that have occurred across the City and includesupdating full topography (e.g., elevation, structures, surface facilities, vegetation and surfacewaterways) on all City base maps used to support key City functions by all Departments including abroad range of Public Works functions.2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 185

This page left intentionally blankPage 1862012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Micellaneous Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total TotalDebt - SLI $ 82 83 84 85 86 5 425Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ 30 30 30 30 30 - 152Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ 39 39 39 39 39 - 196Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 12 12 12 12 12 - 62Debt - Interceptor $ 606 457 312 315 244 - 1,934Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) $ - 20 - - - - 20Wastewater Capital (409) $ 606 437 312 315 244 - 1,914City Participation $ 250 250 250 250 250 250 1,500Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - -Drainage Capital (425) $ 50 50 50 50 50 50 300Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ 33 33 33 33 33 33 198Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) $ 34 34 34 34 34 34 204Wastewater Capital (409) $ 33 33 33 33 33 33 198Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 50 50 50 50 50 50 300Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) $ 50 50 50 50 50 50 300Unspecified $ -- - - - - -Topographic Remapping Project $ 410- 120 - 145 - 675Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ 13- - - - - 13Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ 21- - - - - 21Drainage Capital (425) $ 21- - - - - 21Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ 21- - - - - 21Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) $ 51- - - - - 51Wastewater Capital (409) $ 21- - - - - 21Street Fund (434) $ 21- - - - - 21Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 21- - - - - 21Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) $ 28- - - - - 28Unspecified $ 195- 120 - 145 - 460GIS-FM Migration Project $ - 100 200 - - - 300Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ -- - - - - -Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ -- - - - - -Drainage Capital (425) $ -- - - - - -Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ -- - - - - -Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) $ -- - - - - -Wastewater Capital (409) $ -- - - - - -Street Fund (434) $ -- - - - - -Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ -- - - - - -Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) $ -- - - - - -Unspecified $ - 100 200 - - - 300Annual Totals $ 1,348 890 966 650 725 255 4,834Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) $ 43 30 30 30 30 - 165Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) $ 21- - - - - 21Drainage Capital (425) $ 71 51 52 53 54 55 336Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) $ 93 72 72 72 72 33 415Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) $ 85 54 34 34 34 34 275Wastewater Capital (409) $ 660 470 345 348 277 33 2,133Street Fund (434) $ 21- - - - - 21Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) $ 83 62 62 62 62 50 382Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) $ 78 50 50 50 50 50 328Unspecified $ 195 100 320 - 145 - 7602012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 187

MiscellaneousDebt Service, City Participation, and OthersFunding Programmed: YesAccount #Debt - SLI Improvement SDC Eligibility: 37%Project Description: Oregon Special Public Works payment on a loan for a portion of the public improvements in theMcKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park. The total loan amount is $952,309 and is to be paid over a 20 year period. The lastpayment will be in FY 2015.Justification: The loan and repayment of the loan was approved by Council in 1994.Project Driver: Development and growthProject Trigger: Loan securedProject Status: Projects completed. This represents the debt service paymentsSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Wastewater Master PlanCouncil DirectionEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 410 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82Total $ 410 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ 196 $ 39 $ 39 $ 39 $ 39 $ 39Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ 152 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30 $ 30SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ 62 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12UnspecifiedTotal $ 410 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ 82 $ - $ -Page 1882012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

MiscellaneousWastewater System Expansion and UpgradesFunding Programmed: YesAccount # NASanitary Sewer Interceptor - Debt Service Improvement SDC Eligibility: 8.3%Project Description: Annual payment of 20 year revenue bonds and State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan to fund the SouthSpringfield Interceptor.Justification: A portion of the South Springfield Interceptor sewer was funded with loans and bonds amortized over a 20year period. The SRF loan of $1,075,000 for Phase 1 resulted in an annual payment of $75,000. In Phase II, the $3.3million revenue bond sold in 1995 resulted in an annual payment of $285,000. The payment on the $2,900,000 DEQRevolving Loan for Phase III in FY 1998 equals $300,000 per year.Project Driver: Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promotefuture urban development.Project Trigger: Bond SaleProject Status: In repaymentSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Council Direction1980 Wastewater Master PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other (Debt Pymt) $ 1,934 $ 606 $ 457 $ 312 $ 315 $ 244Total $ 1,934 $ 606 $ 457 $ 312 $ 315 $ 244 $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -Revenue Bonds 420 $ -User Fees 409 $ 1,914 $ 606 $ 437 $ 312 $ 315 $ 244Federal Aid 420 $ -State Aid 420 $ -SDCs, Imp. 443 $ 20$ 20SDCs, Reimb. 442UnspecifiedTotal $ 1,934 $ 606 $ 457 $ 312 $ 315 $ 244 $ - $ -2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 189

MiscellaneousDebt Service, City Participation, and OthersFunding Programmed: YesAccount #860002,870004,880001City ParticipationImprovement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City'sConstruction Permit process. To respond to known and potential private development projects, it is necessary to budget$100,000 each fiscal year in each infrastructure program area, i.e. Transportation, Local Wastewater and Stormwater Theprogrammed funds for FY11 are only those necessary to meet this estimated need. Currently other programmed funds are notyet tied to specific projects.Justification: In many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage and/or streets beyonda size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid bythe City under Council adopted participation policies.Project Driver: Development and growth. City requirement of developer to oversize infrastructure.Project Trigger: Private development projectsProject Status: On-going sinking fundSpecific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ 1,800 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300Other $ -Total $ 1,800 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Wastewater Capital 409 $ 198 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33SDCs. Imp. (WW) 443 $ 204 $ 34 $ 34 $ 34 $ 34 $ 34 $ 34SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ 198 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33Storm Capital 425 $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -SDCs. Reimb (Storm) 441SDCs. Imp (Str.) 447 $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 $ 300 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50Street Capital 434Total $ 1,500 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ -Page 1902012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

MiscellaneousData ImprovementsFunding Programmed: PartialAccount #Topographic Remapping ProjectImprovement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: Replace out-of-date topographic maps (base maps) for the entire City that were last developed in 2000. Newmaps will address development induced changes that have occurred across the City and will include updating full topography (e.g.,elevation, structures, surface facilities, vegetation and surface waterways) on all City base maps used to support key City functions byall Departments. Proposing full remapping in 2010 and then incremental remapping every 2 years to assure that from 2011 forward,base maps for all areas of the City are current to within 3 years - all areas are remapped every three years.Justification: Current base maps are woefully out-of-date. Base maps do not reflect significant development that has occurred overthe last 10 years such as PeaceHealth and MountainGate and do not reflect other development activity such as smaller capitalimprovement projects, private developments, natural resource changes, etc. that have occurred since that last update. Many Cityfunctions such as facilities planning, design, construction and maintenance, current and long range land use planning, and publicsafety incident response (fire, police and ambulance) depend on current and complete base maps. In order to serve the broad array ofcitywide needs for current and complete base map information, this topographic remapping project is required. Errors and omissionson the topographic maps have already begun to impact functions citywide.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:City wide needs for current and complete base map information are not being met because topographicdata is 10 years old.Topographic data have reached the end of their useful life and are now obsoletePending funding. (Funding estimates an approximately 53/47 split where 53% comes from various PublicWorks user rate and SDC funds and the remaining 47% comes from other funds managed by otherdepartments. )Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Most other CIP ProjectsEngineering Map Books (Sewer Maps)Mill Race ProjectPolice Map BooksHB 3337 Planning (UGB, Comp Plan, BLI Inventories)Fire and Life Safety Map BooksGlenwood Refinement PlanWater Rescue Maps2010 FEMA Remapping Project Wastewater and Stormwater Master PlansLocal Wetland Inventory (LWI)TransPlanStandard and Special Purpose MapsNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ -Engineering $ -Land/Right of Way $ -Construction $ -Other $ 830 $ 410$ 120$ 145$ 155Total $ 830 $ 410 $ - $ 120 $ - $ 145 $ - $ 155OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -WW User Rate 409 $ 20.5 $ 20.5STM Drainage User Rate 425 $ 20.5 $ 20.5Street User Rate 434 $ 20.5 $ 20.5SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ 13.0 $ 13.0SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ 20.5 $ 20.5SDCs. Imp. (WW) 443 $ 51.3 $ 51.3SDC Reimb. (Street) 446 $ 20.5 $ 20.5SDC Reimb. (Storm) 441 $ 20.5 $ 20.5SDCs, Imp. (Str.) 447 $ 28.2 $ 28.2Unspecified $ 615 $ 195$ 120$ 145$ 155Total $ 830 $ 410 $ - $ 120 $ - $ 145 $ - $ 1552012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 191

MiscellaneousSystem ImprovementsFunding Programmed: NoAccount #GIS/Facilitates Management (FM) System MigrationImprovement SDC Eligibility:VariesProject Description: Replace failing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Facilities Management (FM) systems that manageelectronic inventories of City infrastructure and provide reliable and well integrated information for asset management and mappingfunctions. Functions serve activities such as planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, reporting, accounting, forecasting andoperating City facilities, i.e., managing City facilities valued at approximately one billion dollars. Proposing a phased approach with 1)system planning and design for $100,000 beginning in 2012; 2) full migration for $200,000 in 2013; and then ongoing maintenance for$50,000 per year plus adjustments for inflation beyond. Note maintenance cost are not included in CIP.Justification: The City faces current challenges and future risk. Servers running the City’s GIS/FM system are old and failing. TheFM Server is over 7 years and the GIS server is over 5 years old. Since November, 2010 the City has had to recover from two systemfailures. The first required a half day to repair and the second required 5 days to repair. As a result the system was approximately90% restored. Subsequent work included moving systems to another aged server, contracting to audit the system and entering a sixmonth on-call contract to assure prompt response to anticipated future failures. System software is approximately 10 years old and nolonger supported by vendors; accept as funded under contract with the City. Recovery from system failure averages between $5,000and $10,000 per event. Migration is required to mitigate risk, contain future costs, manage City assets, and sustain facilitymanagement functions described above.Project Driver:Project Trigger:Project Status:The City must migrate to new systems to continue to support comprehensive facilities and assetmanagement needs and sustain support for vital Public Works functions.Systems have exceeded their useful life and are now failing.Pending funding.Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Most CIP Projects and PW OperationsMill Race ProjectHB 3337 Planning (UGB, Comp Plan, BLI Inventories)Glenwood Refinement PlanFlood MitigationLocal Wetland Inventory (LWI)Standard and Special Purpose MapsEngineering Map Books (Sewer Maps)Wastewater and Stormwater Master PlansTransPlanNatural Hazard Mitigation PlanFacilities ManagementAssets managementSupervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Planning $ 50$ 50Design $ 50$ 50Construction (Migration) $ 200$ 200Maintenance $ -Total $ 300 $ - $ 100 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ -OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Maintenance Costs $ -Personnel Costs $ -Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Beyond 2016Special Assmt. $ -WW User Rate 409 $ -STM Drainage User Rate 425 $ -Street User Rate 434 $ -SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 $ -SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 $ -SDCs. Imp. (WW) 443 $ -SDC Reimb. (Street) 446 $ -SDC Reimb. (Storm) 441 $ -SDCs, Imp. (Str.) 447 $ -Unspecified $ 300 $ - $ 100 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ -Total $ 300 $ - $ 100 $ 200 $ - $ - $ - $ -Page 1922012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

FY 2012‐2016 Stormwater PlanPrioritiesDrivers 1 2 3SW1 Safety/Hazard/Risk/LiabilityNeeded to address deficiencieswhich may contribute todocumented instances of injury,property damage, or failure tocomply with regulatoryrequirements which may impactpublic health and welfareNeeded to maintain basic health,safety, environmental and propertyprotection conditionsAddresses developing publichealth or safety, liabilityconcerns, or concerns aboutability to meet regulatoryrequirements or responds topublic requests or complaintsSW2 Operational FunctionalityNeeded to address accessibility,maintain minimum systemfunctionality and meetstormwater system managementpoliciesImproves identified substandardoperational conditionsResponds to public requestsor complaintsSW3Stormwater asset preservationand rehabilitationFailed system or structurePoor condition requiringreconstruction, or just‐in‐timepreservation to avoid imminent failureand more costly repair; and/or grantfunds availableScheduled life cycleimprovements/extensionsSW4Community Development,Neighborhood revitalization,and Environmental RestorationSystem/capacity expansion orsystem restoration to meetidentified Council priority forcommunity growth; high priorityurban renewal projectIdentified in long‐range plans as neededgenerally to support community growthand restoration/water qualityimprovement enhancements ; and/orrequested to support specificdevelopment areaResponds to public requests,complaints, or communityproposalsSW5 Operational cost/EfficiencyRapid payback (savings) oninvestment, or other efficiencyimprovements for which externalsources of revenue are availableModerate payback and SystemImprovementIdentified efficiencies andoperational cost savings2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 193

FY 2012‐2016 TransportationPrioritiesDrivers 1 2 3T1 Safety/Hazard/Risk/LiabilityNeeded to address deficiencieswhich may contribute todocumented instances of injury,property damage, or failure tocomply with regulatoryrequirements which may impactpublic health and welfareNeeded to maintain basichealth and safety conditionsAddresses developing safety orliability concern or responds topublic requests or complaintsT2 Operational FunctionalityNeeded to address accessibility,maintain minimum systemfunctionality and meettransportation system policiesImproves identifiedsubstandard operationalconditionsResponds to public requests orcomplaintsT3Street asset preservation andrehabilitationFailed system or structurePoor condition requiringreconstruction, or just‐in‐timepreservation to avoidimminent failure and morecostly repair; and/or grantfunds availableScheduled life cycleimprovements/extensionsT4Community Development andNeighborhood revitalizationSystem/capacity expansion orsystem restoration to meetidentified Council priority forcommunity growth; high priorityurban renewal projectIdentified in long‐range plansas needed generally tosupport community growth;and/or requested to supportspecific development areaResponds to public requests,complaints, or communityproposalsT5 Operational cost/EfficiencyRapid payback (savings) oninvestment, or other efficiencyimprovements for which externalsources of revenue are availableModerate payback andSystem ImprovementIdentified efficiencies andoperational cost savingsPage 1942012-2016 Capital Improvement Program

FY 2012‐2016 Wastewater PlanPrioritiesDrivers 1 2 3WW1 Safety/Hazard/Risk/LiabilityNeeded to address deficiencieswhich may contribute todocumented instances of injury,property damage, or failure tocomply with regulatoryrequirements which may impactpublic health and welfareNeeded to maintain basichealth, safety andenvironmental qualityconditionsAddresses developing publichealth or safety, liabilityconcerns, or concerns aboutability to meet regulatoryrequirements or responds topublic requests or complaintsWW2OperationalFunctionality/MaintainabilityNeeded to address accessibility,worker safety, maintain minimumsystem functionality, and meetsystem operational policiesImproves identifiedsubstandard operationalconditionsResponds to public requests orcomplaintsWW3Wastewater asset preservation andrehabilitationFailed system or structurePoor condition requiringreconstruction, or just‐in‐timepreservation to avoidimminent failure and morecostly repair; and/or grantfunds availableScheduled life cycleimprovements/extensionsWW4Community Development andNeighborhood revitalizationSystem/capacity expansion orsystem restoration to meetidentified Council priority forcommunity growth; high priorityurban renewal projectIdentified in long‐range plansas needed generally tosupport community growth;and/or requested to supportspecific development areaResponds to public requests,complaints, or communityproposalsWW5 Operational cost/EfficiencyRapid payback (savings) oninvestment, or other efficiencyimprovements for which externalsources of revenue are availableModerate payback andSystem ImprovementIdentified efficiencies andoperational cost savings2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program Page 195

FY 2012‐2016 Buildings and PropertiesPrioritiesDrivers 1 2 3BP1 Safety/Hazard Conditions Code ComplianceKnown Safety or HazardConditionDeveloping Safety ConcernBP2Building and SystemsIntegrityEminent Structural orSystems FailureProtection of BuildingEnvelopePreventive Maintenance and/or PreservationBP3 Energy Cost/UsageGenerates Revenue; RapidPayback; GrantsModerate payback andSystem ImprovementIdentified Savings PotentialBP4 Systems Reliability Just‐in‐time/Eminent FailureScheduled Life CycleImprovements/ExtensionModernization or Correctionof Declining ConditionsBP5 Operational FunctionalityAccessibility; Min.Functionality; HygieneStandardsImprove Conditions for Staffand PublicAestheticsPage 1962012-2016 Capital Improvement Program