Score = 2 Responses in this range demonstrate marginal skill in responding to the writing task.Elements are sometimes controlled but provide weak support for the writer’s purpose, audience,and form.• The response provides a little explanation of the subject.• A balance between broad assertions and general and specific examples may not be evident. Ifdetails and examples are present, they are brief, general, or inadequately developed, and they maynot be clearly relevant to the explanation. There may be minimal evidence of relevant approachesto the development of ideas.• Some ideas may not be clearly focused on the topic. The response shows an attempt to organizethoughts by grouping ideas, and there may be minimal evidence of approaches to organization.However, relationships among ideas are often illogical or unclear.• Sentence structure is sometimes correct, but there is little, if any, sentence variety. Word choice israrely specific and does little to support the clarity of the explanation. Voice and tone show littleunderstanding of what is appropriate for the writer’s purpose and audience.• Grammar, usage, and mechanics are usually correct but with many distracting errors that impedeunderstanding.Score = 1 Responses in this range demonstrate little or no skill in responding to the writing task.Elements are seldom controlled and provide almost no support for the writer’s purpose, audience,and form.• The response may provide little or no explanation of the subject.• If any details or examples are present, they are brief, general, undeveloped, or not relevant to theexplanation.• The response shows an attempt to organize thoughts by grouping ideas, but groupings areillogical and there is little or no evidence of relevant approaches to organization. Relationshipsamong ideas are mostly unclear.• Sentence structure is often incorrect; word choice is often unclear and inappropriate; and there islittle or no control of appropriate voice and tone.• Grammar, usage, and mechanics are sometimes correct but with frequent distracting errors thatoften impede understanding.• The response may be too brief to support a sound judgment about the development of ideas,organization, or language facility and conventions.Score = 0 Unscorable: Response is too brief to score; not written in English; off topic; orillegible.
6+1 Traits® Condensed 5-Point 3-12 Writer’s Rubric aka One PagerIdeas: The main message of the piece, thetheme, with supporting details that enrich anddevelop that theme. This paper is clear and focused. It holds thereader's attention. Relevant anecdotes and detailsenrich the central theme.A. The topic is narrow and manageableB. Relevant, telling, quality details go beyond theobviousC. Ideas are crystal clear and supported with detailsD. <strong>Writing</strong> from knowledge or experience; ideas arefresh and originalE. Reader's questions are anticipated and answered.F. Insightful topic The writer is beginning to define the topic, eventhough development is still basic or general.A. The topic is broadB. Support is attemptedC. Ideas are reasonably clearD. Writer has difficulty going from generalobservations about topic to specificsE. The reader is left with questionsF. The writer generally stays on topic The paper has no clear sense of purpose orcentral theme. The reader must make inferencesbased on sketchy or missing details.A. The writer is still in search of a topicB. Information is limited or unclear or the length is notadequate for developmentC. The idea is a simple restatement or a simpleanswer to the questionD. The writer has not begun to define the topicE. Everything seems as important as everything elseF. The topic may be repetitious, disconnected, andcontains too many random thoughtsKey Question: Did the writer stay focused and shareoriginal and fresh information or perspective about thetopic?Organization: The internal structure, thread ofcentral meaning, logical and sometimes intriguingpattern or sequence of the ideas. The organizational structure of this paperenhances and showcases the central idea or themeof the paper; includes a catchy introduction and asatisfying conclusion.A. An inviting introduction draws the reader in; asatisfying conclusion leaves the reader with asense of closure and resolution.B. Thoughtful transitions connect ideas.C. Sequencing is logical and effective.D. Pacing is well controlled.E. The title, if desired, is original.F. Organizational structure is appropriate for purposeand audience; paragraphing is effective. The organizational structure is strong enough tomove the reader through the text without too muchconfusion.A. The paper has a recognizable introduction andconclusion.B. Transitions sometimes work.C. Sequencing shows some logic, yet structure takesattention away from the content.D. Pacing is fairly well controlled.E. A title, if desired, is present.F. Organizational structure sometimes supports themain point or story line, with an attempt atparagraphing. The writing lacks a clear sense of direction.A. No real lead or conclusion present.B. Connections between ideas, if present, areconfusing.C. Sequencing needs work.D. Pacing feels awkward.E. No title is present (if requested).F. Problems with organizational structure make it hardfor the reader to get a grip on the main point orstory line. Little or no evidence of paragraphingpresent.Key Question: Does the organizational structureenhance the ideas and make it easier to understand?Voice: The unique perspective of the writer evidentin the piece through the use of compelling ideas,engaging language, and revealing details. The writer of this paper speaks directly to thereader in a manner that is individual, compelling,engaging, and shows respect for the audience.A. Uses topic, details, and language to strongly connectwith the audience.B. Purpose is reflected by content and arrangement ofideas.C. The writer takes a risk with revealing details.D. Expository or persuasive reflects understanding andcommitment to topic.E. Narrative writing is honest, personal, and engaging. The writer seems sincere, but not fully engaged orinvolved. The result is pleasant or even personable,but not compelling.A. Attempt to connect with audience is earnest butimpersonal.B. Attempts to include content and arrangement of ideasto reflect purpose.C. Occasionally reveals personal details, but avoids risk.D. Expository or persuasive writing lacks consistentengagement with the topic.E. Narrative writing reflects limited individualperspective. The writer seems uninvolved with the topic and theaudience.A. Fails to connect with the audience.B. Purpose is unclear.C. <strong>Writing</strong> is risk free, with no sense of the writer.D. Expository or persuasive writing is mechanical,showing no engagement with the topic.E. Narrative writing lacks development of a point ofview.Key Question: Would you keep reading this piece if itwere longer?© 2010, Education Northwest Page 1